|
|
01-14-2013, 07:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 30
Likes: 33
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash
All,
I purchased a 4 inch Model 66 .357 about 6 weeks ago. It is a great shooter and great overall. About 2 weeks ago I purchased a Ruger GP100 4 inch and I must say it is a very nice .357 as well.
The GP100 is very solidly built like a tank. Also, there's no concerns with running a steady diet of .357 through it. Point of the thread is to get opinions as to the pro s and con s of each of these respective pistols. Again, I realize this is a S & W forum but looking for objective opinions.
Thank You
|
01-14-2013, 08:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
I agree with you that the Ruger is more suitable for extensive use with hot loads. I've had both, and prefer the weight and balance of the 66, mine also had a much smoother action at first. A good going over by a fine local gunsmith made the GP-100 the smoother of the two, while still totally reliable. Both are full size holster guns, so to me the weight and bulk of the Ruger are not a bother. I have a K-38 for targets anyway, so I let the 66 go. Both are fine guns, you made good choices! Best, Larrty
|
01-14-2013, 08:36 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11,738
Likes: 17,756
Liked 22,460 Times in 8,391 Posts
|
|
I also own a 66, but think the Ruger should be compared to a 686, I think the match up is more equal.
__________________
Doesn't hasta call me Johnson
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-14-2013, 09:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 1,224
Liked 2,526 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
Owning both is the correct answer.
The 66 is the perfect compromise. The GP is a perfect heavy hauler.
|
01-14-2013, 10:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Paul (smokey!) MN
Posts: 5,335
Likes: 1,443
Liked 6,647 Times in 2,564 Posts
|
|
My GP100 had (before it fell in the lake) a terrible trigger. Gritty, heavy, with stacking/hitches throughout the pull. I don't shoot much full power .357, so a good trigger is much more important to me.
|
01-14-2013, 10:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: kamloops, bc
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 6,526
Liked 3,077 Times in 1,166 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johngalt
My GP100 had (before it fell in the lake) a terrible trigger. Gritty, heavy, with stacking/hitches throughout the pull. I don't shoot much full power .357, so a good trigger is much more important to me.
|
the trigger got better after it fell in the lake? maybe it was just dirty
__________________
the rules? there are no rules
|
01-15-2013, 12:01 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 30
Likes: 33
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by labworm
I also own a 66, but think the Ruger should be compared to a 686, I think the match up is more equal.
|
labworm you make a very good point. I actually went to my LGS
to pick up a 686 . The folks at the LGS told me to check out the GP100 as well. I liked the feel and heft of the Ruger much better than the 686. It was also nearly $200 less.
the 686 does not have the same feel of my 66. Glad I opted for the Ruger !
|
01-15-2013, 12:06 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, PRK
Posts: 9,238
Likes: 11,531
Liked 11,249 Times in 3,916 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by labworm
I also own a 66, but think the Ruger should be compared to a 686, I think the match up is more equal.
|
This. M66 vs GP100 is kinda apples & oranges.
|
01-15-2013, 12:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mid NC
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 4,874
Liked 5,727 Times in 2,130 Posts
|
|
A 66 4" and its little 2.5 " brother hand around this part of the woods. Can't beat them. Ruger is carrying a little more steel. 66 gets my vote.
|
01-15-2013, 12:17 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East St. Louis, Il.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,592
Liked 617 Times in 343 Posts
|
|
66 for carrying, and shooting moderate loads. GP100 for those times when you want to belch fire and brimstone!
And just saying this: S&W model 28=Best of both worlds! Dale
__________________
"Long live the S&W 3rd. Gen.!"
|
01-15-2013, 12:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 254
Likes: 12
Liked 57 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Just like everybody else that has responded, I have both of these revolvers. In my opinion the ruger is absolutely an unstoppable tank, where it lacks is fit and overall finish.....The 66 however is silky smooth and better metal finish, but is better suited for a good diet of 38 special instead of .357 magnum.
|
01-15-2013, 06:54 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,362
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hd28cw
Just like everybody else that has responded, I have both of these revolvers. In my opinion the ruger is absolutely an unstoppable tank, where it lacks is fit and overall finish.....The 66 however is silky smooth and better metal finish, but is better suited for a good diet of 38 special instead of .357 magnum.
|
Actually, my GP-100 is very well fitted and finished. Like all guns, they vary from one to another. Very smooth, even, action, too, once it wore-in, which didn't take too long. I just put a couple of drops of Break-Free down in front of the hammer, cycled the action to distribute the lube, and began using the gun. Some dry-firing helped, but I think live ammo wears-in a gun faster.
I can honestly say that my M-66-3 is no smoother, but it's good, too. When I wore a gun for work, I usually favored the S&W because it is lighter to wear all day or night. But if I practiced much with .357 ammo, the Ruger got the bulk of that duty.
The M-66 conceals better, of course. For many, that is a prime factor.
|
01-15-2013, 09:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Paul (smokey!) MN
Posts: 5,335
Likes: 1,443
Liked 6,647 Times in 2,564 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamloops67
the trigger got better after it fell in the lake? maybe it was just dirty
|
Alas, I will never know!
|
01-15-2013, 12:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Great American Northw
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 197
Liked 453 Times in 167 Posts
|
|
I carry my 66 to protect myself and my family. I carry my GP100 to hammer wire fence staples in the pasture. I used to use the 100 for a small boat anchor, but sold the boat. Both great tools!
__________________
Term limits!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2013, 03:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 30
Likes: 33
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Gents
can you suggest a hip holster that fits the GP100 ? The Gallo for my 66 is too narrow.
Thank You
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
GP100 .22
|
ladder13 |
Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics |
0 |
12-18-2015 01:07 PM |
WTS-WTT Ruger GP100 4in. NIB
|
Peakes |
GUNS - For Sale or Trade |
1 |
07-14-2015 03:29 PM |
GP100 vs 686
|
PurpleMountainOutdoors |
S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present |
184 |
03-29-2015 03:50 PM |
Interested in S&W 686, GP100
|
wine64 |
WANTED to Buy |
3 |
09-13-2012 11:22 PM |
|