Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2013, 07:38 PM
spartan59 spartan59 is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 30
Likes: 33
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default GP100 vs. 66 No Dash

All,

I purchased a 4 inch Model 66 .357 about 6 weeks ago. It is a great shooter and great overall. About 2 weeks ago I purchased a Ruger GP100 4 inch and I must say it is a very nice .357 as well.

The GP100 is very solidly built like a tank. Also, there's no concerns with running a steady diet of .357 through it. Point of the thread is to get opinions as to the pro s and con s of each of these respective pistols. Again, I realize this is a S & W forum but looking for objective opinions.

Thank You
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2013, 08:30 PM
41RF 41RF is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Default

I agree with you that the Ruger is more suitable for extensive use with hot loads. I've had both, and prefer the weight and balance of the 66, mine also had a much smoother action at first. A good going over by a fine local gunsmith made the GP-100 the smoother of the two, while still totally reliable. Both are full size holster guns, so to me the weight and bulk of the Ruger are not a bother. I have a K-38 for targets anyway, so I let the 66 go. Both are fine guns, you made good choices! Best, Larrty
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2013, 08:36 PM
labworm's Avatar
labworm labworm is offline
US Veteran
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 9,807
Likes: 13,108
Liked 16,427 Times in 6,534 Posts
Default

I also own a 66, but think the Ruger should be compared to a 686, I think the match up is more equal.
__________________
Doesn't hasta call me Johnson
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-14-2013, 09:54 PM
Bat Guano Bat Guano is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,920
Likes: 982
Liked 1,936 Times in 795 Posts
Default

Owning both is the correct answer.

The 66 is the perfect compromise. The GP is a perfect heavy hauler.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2013, 10:00 PM
johngalt johngalt is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 135
Liked 1,449 Times in 666 Posts
Default

My GP100 had (before it fell in the lake) a terrible trigger. Gritty, heavy, with stacking/hitches throughout the pull. I don't shoot much full power .357, so a good trigger is much more important to me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-14-2013, 10:06 PM
kamloops67's Avatar
kamloops67 kamloops67 is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: kamloops, bc
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 4,016
Liked 1,921 Times in 737 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johngalt View Post
My GP100 had (before it fell in the lake) a terrible trigger. Gritty, heavy, with stacking/hitches throughout the pull. I don't shoot much full power .357, so a good trigger is much more important to me.
the trigger got better after it fell in the lake? maybe it was just dirty
__________________
the rules? there are no rules
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:01 AM
spartan59 spartan59 is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 30
Likes: 33
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by labworm View Post
I also own a 66, but think the Ruger should be compared to a 686, I think the match up is more equal.
labworm you make a very good point. I actually went to my LGS
to pick up a 686 . The folks at the LGS told me to check out the GP100 as well. I liked the feel and heft of the Ruger much better than the 686. It was also nearly $200 less.

the 686 does not have the same feel of my 66. Glad I opted for the Ruger !
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:06 AM
Fishslayer's Avatar
Fishslayer Fishslayer is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, PRK
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6,024
Liked 6,957 Times in 2,418 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by labworm View Post
I also own a 66, but think the Ruger should be compared to a 686, I think the match up is more equal.
This. M66 vs GP100 is kinda apples & oranges.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:13 AM
billwill's Avatar
billwill billwill is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mid NC
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1,475
Liked 1,100 Times in 503 Posts
Default

A 66 4" and its little 2.5 " brother hand around this part of the woods. Can't beat them. Ruger is carrying a little more steel. 66 gets my vote.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:17 AM
Badkarma 1's Avatar
Badkarma 1 Badkarma 1 is offline
US Veteran
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East St. Louis, Il.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,529
Liked 582 Times in 333 Posts
Default

66 for carrying, and shooting moderate loads. GP100 for those times when you want to belch fire and brimstone!
And just saying this: S&W model 28=Best of both worlds! Dale
__________________
"Long live the S&W 3rd. Gen.!"
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:30 AM
hd28cw hd28cw is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 249
Likes: 12
Liked 52 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Just like everybody else that has responded, I have both of these revolvers. In my opinion the ruger is absolutely an unstoppable tank, where it lacks is fit and overall finish.....The 66 however is silky smooth and better metal finish, but is better suited for a good diet of 38 special instead of .357 magnum.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-15-2013, 06:54 AM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,659
Likes: 10,906
Liked 6,273 Times in 3,178 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hd28cw View Post
Just like everybody else that has responded, I have both of these revolvers. In my opinion the ruger is absolutely an unstoppable tank, where it lacks is fit and overall finish.....The 66 however is silky smooth and better metal finish, but is better suited for a good diet of 38 special instead of .357 magnum.
Actually, my GP-100 is very well fitted and finished. Like all guns, they vary from one to another. Very smooth, even, action, too, once it wore-in, which didn't take too long. I just put a couple of drops of Break-Free down in front of the hammer, cycled the action to distribute the lube, and began using the gun. Some dry-firing helped, but I think live ammo wears-in a gun faster.

I can honestly say that my M-66-3 is no smoother, but it's good, too. When I wore a gun for work, I usually favored the S&W because it is lighter to wear all day or night. But if I practiced much with .357 ammo, the Ruger got the bulk of that duty.

The M-66 conceals better, of course. For many, that is a prime factor.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:41 AM
johngalt johngalt is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 135
Liked 1,449 Times in 666 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kamloops67 View Post
the trigger got better after it fell in the lake? maybe it was just dirty
Alas, I will never know!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:09 PM
OLDFED's Avatar
OLDFED OLDFED is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Great American Northw
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 165
Liked 442 Times in 162 Posts
Default

I carry my 66 to protect myself and my family. I carry my GP100 to hammer wire fence staples in the pasture. I used to use the 100 for a small boat anchor, but sold the boat. Both great tools!
__________________
Term limits!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 01-16-2013, 03:55 PM
spartan59 spartan59 is offline
Member
GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash GP100 vs. 66 No Dash  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 30
Likes: 33
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Gents

can you suggest a hip holster that fits the GP100 ? The Gallo for my 66 is too narrow.

Thank You
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interested in S&W 686, GP100 wine64 WANTED to Buy 3 09-13-2012 11:22 PM
Ruger GP100 .357 corpulent Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 33 01-21-2011 01:32 PM
GP100 Question CAJUNLAWYER The Lounge 1 08-02-2010 01:04 PM
GP100 3inch (AL) M&P Maniac WANTED to Buy 1 12-28-2009 06:06 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)