|
|
04-19-2015, 11:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Picked up "Sporterized" rifle. Need help with identification.
I picked up this sweet rifle at a garage sale. Now looking for a little history and identification help. Thanks!
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:38 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
More pictures
A few more pictures.
Last edited by moabman; 04-19-2015 at 11:40 AM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: stamping ground,ky
Posts: 591
Likes: 839
Liked 550 Times in 182 Posts
|
|
its a 1903 springfield,very well done too.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:43 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 8,086
Likes: 13,058
Liked 13,534 Times in 5,115 Posts
|
|
Looks like It’s a Springfield 03 (WW1 and 2 battle rifle) People that know much more about this gun than I do will chime in
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
|
04-19-2015, 11:45 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Shores, WA, USA
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 201
Liked 5,067 Times in 1,770 Posts
|
|
Looks like a Springfield M1903 of some ilk. That serial is higher than the listed range for the 1903 and lower then the range for the 1903A3.
It also looks like something the engraver replaced when doing the receiver engraving....
Nice looking sporter....
__________________
Dean
SWCA #680 SWHF #446
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 01:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,027
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
At the risk of telling you something you already know, it "should be" chambered for the .30-06 cartridge, unless the chambering/barrel was also modified. If you don't know how to verify this, have a gunsmith help you out.
The magazine cut off is used to enable or disable the magazine. That is, set it to "OFF" to make the rifle a single shot. This was considered a proper feature for a military rifle back in the late 1800s / early 1900s. Kind of a way to put it in "anti-spray and pray" mode.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 02:06 PM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,914 Times in 3,554 Posts
|
|
Regardless of SN it is a 1903-A3 Springfield. Note the dovetail base for the rear sight on the receiver bridge! 4th picture on 1st post by O.P.
Too bad they didn't use a milled magazine/floorplate instead of the WWII period stamped version! That's all that detracts from a nice rifle.
Last edited by Alk8944; 04-19-2015 at 02:09 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 02:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 6,833
Liked 8,936 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
That appears to be a wonderful 03-a3 Springfield Sporter. I've never seen anything like that at a yard sale.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 04:30 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 3,223
Likes: 4,040
Liked 3,710 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
|
That is one fine looking rifle. Is it a Remington or a Smith Corona?
|
04-19-2015, 04:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Too bad they didn't use a milled magazine/floorplate instead of the WWII period stamped version! That's all that detracts from a nice rifle.
|
Really? To me sporterizing it detracted most valuable. The rifle is still fine shooting but value wise .....
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 05:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Not sure of the manufacturer. I would also like to know who did the engraving if at all possible. I don't see any stamps or signatures. I am hoping someone here can point me in the right direction. I would like to know the value also, its obvious someone put alot of work into it. My local gunsmith wasn't much help. Thanks!
Last edited by moabman; 04-19-2015 at 07:54 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 06:04 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
That stamped trigger guard on what is obviously a Springfield action was the immediate giveaway.
|
04-19-2015, 07:19 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,431 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
I'm going to guess this was a "local" gunsmith project sometimes in the 50's. It appears to be pretty well done, with nice features. It is a "custom" rifle, and therefore a one of a kind made to individual specifications. Check out the caliber, it is often stamped in the barrel on the left side just forward of the action. If it is not marked, take it to a gunsmith and have him determine the caliber, he may have to make up a mold in the chamber and measure that. Most custom gunsmith's would sign their work, some may have put their markings on the bottom of the action/barrel so that you might have to remove the barreled action from the stock to see it. With no markings at all I tend to believe it was a serious hobbyist.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Last edited by H Richard; 04-19-2015 at 07:21 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 07:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: nebraska
Posts: 987
Likes: 1,406
Liked 936 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Regardless of SN it is a 1903-A3 Springfield. Note the dovetail base for the rear sight on the receiver bridge! 4th picture on 1st post by O.P.
Too bad they didn't use a milled magazine/floorplate instead of the WWII period stamped version! That's all that detracts from a nice rifle.
|
Yep, that and the receiver bridge is flat next to the bolt handle. A 1903 has a machined half moon in that area. Serial number is total fantasy. Springfield armory numbers only went to 1.53 million, Remington started at 3000009, Smith Corona at 3.6 million. That said, it is still a nice rifle and an excellent example of the post war conversion of surplus rifles.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 08:11 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BELTON, SC, USA
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 425
Liked 605 Times in 340 Posts
|
|
Have seen several similar and a couple of Mausers that were done in primarily Germany shortly after WWII during occupation. Many craftsmen were out of work and quality work was very inexpensive.
__________________
TOMBECK
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 08:12 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,977
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,370 Times in 5,476 Posts
|
|
My father bought a numbers matching Model 1903 and K-98 German Mauser through the NRA in the 1950s for $50.00 each. He sporterized the both at home and had a gunsmith do the bolt and the bluing on the Springfield. I think the safety is different on the 1903 versus the 1903-A3 as well. Here are some pictures to show the differences.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 10:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Nice thanks! Any idea what its worth?
|
04-19-2015, 11:03 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 8,743
Liked 1,813 Times in 797 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moabman
Nice thanks! Any idea what its worth?
|
Value would vary from region to region. Basically whatever someone in your area is willing to pay for it, If it was customized by Griffin & Howe, or a nationally known gunsmith, it is worth a lot more than if it was done by a local smith.
__________________
Can my S&W Mdl 10 shoot +P
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,749
Likes: 1,642
Liked 9,152 Times in 3,380 Posts
|
|
Looks like the gunsmith/engraver removed the markings and ser# on the original rifle during the sporterizing process.
The current ser# looks like a later hand stamped addition. It doesn't fit the sequence of either the S/C or R/A 03-A3 production.
Maybe the gun was a gunsmithing trade school project and the re-addition of a serial number was at the stern suggestion of the course instructor.
No idea on a value. It does have that late 60's style to it with the inlays, stock styling, jeweling, ect.
The rear sight looks way over to the right,,but that may just be the pic. If it is and that's where it needs to be to hit center,,check the front sight to see if it's off kilter,,or a bent bbl or really bad stock forend bedding pressure.
Check the caliber & the headspace. Clean the bore, shine up the silver inlayed deer head, take it out and have fun with it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 5,932
Liked 5,259 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
|
I saw that type of rebuilding of 03-A3s many years ago fairly often. They were almost always the work of German gunsmiths or Japanese Gunsmiths. All were 'bring backs' by American Servicemen. This one could very well be the result of having been rebarreled and stocked in Germany and then years later being engraved in Japan for a wandering Serviceman. The stockwork just 'looks' German to me; while the engraving looks Japanese to me.
Pull the metal work out of the stock and look very carefully for identification, proof marks, gunsmith signature, etc. You might learn just a little more about the rifle. It wouldn't hurt to get a chamber cast done to positively identify the caliber. The barrel stamping could be one thing while the actual caliber could be something else. .............
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-20-2015, 09:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northeast Alabama
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 2,812
Liked 1,926 Times in 710 Posts
|
|
Nice rifle. I agree it looks like something sporterized back in the 1950 or 1960. Due to the original floor plate, I would think it was not done by a big name "smith" but by a local "smith" somewhere. the engraving looks nice from the photos, but without being signed by a "famous" engraver, I would not think it adds a great deal to the price. In this day and age of the rifle nuts only thinking about "Black plastic AR" rifles, its value is greatly decreased from what it would have been worth 25-30 years ago. Great rifle that is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. You paid what you did so its worth a least that much.
Chamber checking? are you a reloader? Years ago, when benchrest shooting, which are all "tight necked" cases, I purchased something similar at a gun show. I drove 4 hours one way to my gunsmith to have him check the chamber and neck thickness. He was in the shop, on the lathe when I arrived. We were great friends and he had this sheepish grin on his face on my request for a chamber cast. This is classic - he takes an empty case, puts in a primer, put a very small amount of power in the case (which he did not even measure and said "follow me". He steps outside, points rifle up at sky, places case in gun and pulls the trigger. Goes back in side and takes dial calipers and says, "yep, that's a 6PPC with a 262 neck, no charge today". That was a long 4 hour drive back home, but a lesson I have never forgot. If you want to pay someone $ 100 to confirm you have a 30-06, if a empty case will chamber, then bring me the gun and a crisp hundred dollar bill and I will confirm if it truly is a 30-06 chamber.
|
04-20-2015, 12:06 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: REPUBLIC OF WEST FLORIDA
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 3,020
Liked 3,451 Times in 1,625 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Regardless of SN it is a 1903-A3 Springfield. Note the dovetail base for the rear sight on the receiver bridge! 4th picture on 1st post by O.P.
Too bad they didn't use a milled magazine/floorplate instead of the WWII period stamped version! That's all that detracts from a nice rifle.
|
With what appears to be a "stamped" vs. "machined" trigger guard is another clue it's probably a 1903-A3.
__________________
NULLI SECUNDUS
|
04-22-2015, 11:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the info!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|