|
|
08-13-2022, 07:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 3,434
Liked 3,064 Times in 1,301 Posts
|
|
Alec Baldwin, FBI
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 07:40 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hamilton, Ohio
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 61,827
Liked 189,936 Times in 36,629 Posts
|
|
I had been doing a good job of keeping his name out of my head.
Until now.
__________________
Music/Sports/Beer fan
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
BB57, Beemerguy53, bruce5781, Golphin, Greyman50, Harrison, JH1951, JohnRippert, LoboGunLeather, Nedroe, rubiranch |
08-13-2022, 07:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 4,755
Likes: 3,555
Liked 12,671 Times in 3,375 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeke
|
<sarcasm on>
The gun could not be fired without pulling the trigger in the quarter cock, half cock or full cock positions? I’m just shocked by that finding! Guns go off all by themselves all the time.
<sarcasm off>
It’s still gross negligence. Reed, as the person in charge of the firearms on the production and on set, should have personally verified it was unloaded before handing it to Baldwin. Baldwin as the actor who would be pointing it at another actor, as well as potentially at cameramen and crew, should have personally confirmed it was unloaded as well.
That’s just basic firearm safety.
|
The Following 15 Users Like Post:
|
Beemerguy53, desi2358, F4phantom, Golphin, Greyman50, Harrison, hobby-gunsmith, Igiveup, LoboGunLeather, netcats, Protocall_Design, rock doc, Rudi, Shark Bait, Tex1001 |
08-13-2022, 09:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minden, Nevada
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 2,014
Liked 5,296 Times in 1,736 Posts
|
|
Is anyone surprised?
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 09:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Northeastern PA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 3,850
Liked 9,018 Times in 2,700 Posts
|
|
Good actor.
Terrible human being.
__________________
BTDT, Got The T-Shirt
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 09:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 2,217
Liked 5,451 Times in 1,966 Posts
|
|
He’s obviously trying hard to prove it’s not his fault. But now he’s caught in a lie. Yes he pulled the trigger. He would have been better off playing stupid which he is, and just said they handed me a loaded gun. I’m an actor how should I know it’s loader……… I’m not saying that’s a good excuse but honesty trumps lies in court.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 09:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,749
Likes: 1,642
Liked 9,152 Times in 3,380 Posts
|
|
'..... With the hammer in the quarter- and half-cock positions, the gun "could not be made to fire without a pull of the trigger," the report stated.....'
Did they mis-speak or word that badly when they said that?
It seems to imply that WITH a pull on the trigger, the revolver WOULD fire from either 1/4 or 1/2 cock.
Or am I only reading it wrong?
That would also mean that the 1/4 & 1/2 cock notches were damaged or out of spec allowing it to fire.
That the notches are fragile and can break is well known. But if in good order and nothing wrong or out of spec, a pull on the trigger should not drop the hammer from either 1/4 or 1/2 cock.
At 1/4cock,,the cylinder is locked in position with a chamber (cartridge) under the hammer. If the 1/4cock fails, it is possible for the hammer to have enough force to fire the cartridge that is in line with it.
At 1/2 cock the cylinder is free wheeling. At the 1/2cock point of the hammer rotation, no cartridge is directly under the hammer/firing pin. But the free wheeling aspect of the mechanism/cylinder can easily bring one into allaignment with the handling of the revolver.
A hammer drop from a 1/2cock position that fails would fire a cartridge
in most circumstances if it was allaigned with the hammer/firingpin.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 10:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 2,864
Liked 9,123 Times in 3,217 Posts
|
|
In movie making as I understand it,
use of firearms ultimately lies with
the armorer(s)/asst. director(s) and
this not only includes the main
actors but all the extras who may
be handling firearms.
In this tragedy, Baldwin does not
bear final responsibility for the
firearm.
__________________
Ubi Est Mea
|
08-13-2022, 10:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 2,217
Liked 5,451 Times in 1,966 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq
'..... With the hammer in the quarter- and half-cock positions, the gun "could not be made to fire without a pull of the trigger," the report stated.....'
Did they mis-speak or word that badly when they said that?
It seems to imply that WITH a pull on the trigger, the revolver WOULD fire from either 1/4 or 1/2 cock.
Or am I only reading it wrong?
That would also mean that the 1/4 & 1/2 cock notches were damaged or out of spec allowing it to fire.
That the notches are fragile and can break is well known. But if in good order and nothing wrong or out of spec, a pull on the trigger should not drop the hammer from either 1/4 or 1/2 cock.
At 1/4cock,,the cylinder is locked in position with a chamber (cartridge) under the hammer. If the 1/4cock fails, it is possible for the hammer to have enough force to fire the cartridge that is in line with it.
At 1/2 cock the cylinder is free wheeling. At the 1/2cock point of the hammer rotation, no cartridge is directly under the hammer/firing pin. But the free wheeling aspect of the mechanism/cylinder can easily bring one into allaignment with the handling of the revolver.
A hammer drop from a 1/2cock position that fails would fire a cartridge
in most circumstances if it was allaigned with the hammer/firingpin.
|
I thought the same thing. Maybe we both read it wrong
|
08-13-2022, 10:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 3,434
Liked 3,064 Times in 1,301 Posts
|
|
|
08-13-2022, 10:30 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 7,540
Liked 5,590 Times in 2,562 Posts
|
|
It seems to be pretty well agreed that he wasn't cleaning the gun. Maybe he should get some witnesses that he was just starting to turn his life around.
__________________
Formerly Model520Fan
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 10:40 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 715
Likes: 43
Liked 843 Times in 332 Posts
|
|
I think it was poorly worded but have think the implication is that the safety and 1/2 cock notches were working as designed to include stopping the hammer if released prior to the hammer's full engagement with the sear.
On a SAA clone used in movies, I would be highly suspect of the condition of these notches. "Fanning" the hammer is common in westerns and tends to be very hard on the hammer notches.
|
08-13-2022, 11:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Liberty Township, WI
Posts: 112
Likes: 36
Liked 153 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
What day is the FBI raiding his mansion??
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2022, 11:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oregon & Japan
Posts: 14,187
Likes: 46,111
Liked 33,277 Times in 9,092 Posts
|
|
I don't understand what the import of this latest report is supposed to be.
I think Baldwin was clearly careless, from a gun guy's point of view, but I sincerely doubt he was trying to murder his director.
I guess the import is supposed to be that he said, "I never pulled the trigger." Maybe he did. Maybe he is lying about it. Or, maybe he did, and just doesn't remember pulling the trigger. Or, maybe, he pulled the hammer back to full cock, with the trigger depressed, and the hammer slipped.
But, in any of the above scenarios, what difference does it make?
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-14-2022, 07:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 3,434
Liked 3,064 Times in 1,301 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onomea
I don't understand what the import of this latest report is supposed to be.
I think Baldwin was clearly careless, from a gun guy's point of view, but I sincerely doubt he was trying to murder his director.
I guess the import is supposed to be that he said, "I never pulled the trigger." Maybe he did. Maybe he is lying about it. Or, maybe he did, and just doesn't remember pulling the trigger. Or, maybe, he pulled the hammer back to full cock, with the trigger depressed, and the hammer slipped.
But, in any of the above scenarios, what difference does it make?
|
Perhaps the import is the FBI directly contradicting all those saying the gun could have fired without pulling the trigger. Like all those alec tv performances and especially the da reportedly responsible for bringing any charges.
"An informal experiment conducted by the top prosecutor now weighing possible criminal charges in the deadly Rust shooting reportedly found that Alec Baldwin’s claim he didn’t pull the trigger isn’t as far-fetched as it might sound."
Talk about trying to influence a future jury pool for how long now?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-14-2022, 07:36 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 29,955
Likes: 12,835
Liked 34,133 Times in 8,022 Posts
|
|
The previous Baldwin shooting threads were locked for a reason.
He’s simply not worth our time…
__________________
"I also cook."
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
The Baldwin shooting
|
rays44 |
Concealed Carry & Self Defense |
10 |
12-01-2021 07:02 PM |
|