|
|
05-15-2010, 04:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 16
Liked 255 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
3" Mod 66-1 Photos Added
Are these rare? Anyone have any info or pictures of one? I am looking at one with a 69K SN and the barrel is quite different from a 66-2, it has a pinned on blued front sight base and uses a 2 1/2" length ejector rod.
m.
Last edited by Mack; 05-16-2010 at 12:42 AM.
|
05-15-2010, 04:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 310
Liked 405 Times in 105 Posts
|
|
That gun sounds suspicious.
|
05-15-2010, 04:38 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,784
Likes: 938
Liked 18,878 Times in 9,241 Posts
|
|
The first factory 3" 66 was the -2. If the one you see has a 2 1/2" barrel with a short ejector rod shroud, that was specific for the short barrel; the 3" has a standard-length shroud. Hard to imagine someone shortening a 4 or 6" barrel and the shroud to make a 3" with the short ejector rod...a photo would help here.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
05-15-2010, 05:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 16
Liked 255 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
The first factory 3" 66 was the -2. If the one you see has a 2 1/2" barrel with a short ejector rod shroud, that was specific for the short barrel; the 3" has a standard-length shroud. Hard to imagine someone shortening a 4 or 6" barrel and the shroud to make a 3" with the short ejector rod...a photo would help here.
|
My camera is out of town at the moment, as soon as it gets home I will post some photos. I am looking at a 2 1/2" 66-1, a 3" 66-2, a 4" 66-2, a 3 1/4" 66-5 and the mystery 3" 66-1. The two 3" barrels are the same length and the markings are centered the same, both start about 1/2" back from the muzzle, the 4" markings would be at the muzzle and I don't see how you could shorten the ejector rod shroud on the -2 to fit a short rod. This looks like a dept. gun and is stamped on the left side under the cylinder S.M.CO. 8x. The front sight base does not extend all the way to the rear sight and the rear sight does not extend all the way to the front of the frame. The rear sight stops about 1/4" from the front of the frame and that 1/4" of the frame and 3/4" of the barrel between the front and rear sight is grooved. Also the frame kind of dips down in front of the rear sight like on the 66-5 but not quite the same. If someone put this thing together they went to a lot of trouble doing so.
m.
Last edited by Mack; 05-16-2010 at 12:28 AM.
|
05-16-2010, 12:38 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 739
Liked 3,271 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
I doubt it is factory. It may be a stretch, but one could arrive at that by removing 1/2" off of each end of a 4" barrel. That would account for both the short ejector rod and the centered roll marks. The gun, if originally a 4 inch, would have originally had a square butt frame. What do the grooves on the front and rear grip straps look like under the grips?
It could have been done because the 4" barrel had a damaged forcing cone, or the original owner just wanted a 3" gun really really badly.
Whatever the origin, it looks nicely done.
Last edited by BUFF; 05-16-2010 at 12:41 AM.
|
05-16-2010, 12:51 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,784
Likes: 938
Liked 18,878 Times in 9,241 Posts
|
|
I agree with Buff, most likely someone took 1/2" off both ends of a 4" barrel, installed a new front sight base and ramp, shortened and then recut new threads on the forcing cone/barrel shank...a lot of time and effort went into this.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
05-16-2010, 01:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 16
Liked 255 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFF
I doubt it is factory. It may be a stretch, but one could arrive at that by removing 1/2" off of each end of a 4" barrel. That would account for both the short ejector rod and the centered roll marks. The gun, if originally a 4 inch, would have originally had a square butt frame. What do the grooves on the front and rear grip straps look like under the grips?
It could have been done because the 4" barrel had a damaged forcing cone, or the original owner just wanted a 3" gun really really badly.
Whatever the origin, it looks nicely done.
|
Buff,
I think you got it, no grooves on the grip straps both front and rear are smooth. Whoever must have taken 1/2" off both ends of a 4" barrel, it does look like a nice job, I will have to see how she shoots.
Next question is who is S.M.CO.
m.
Last edited by Mack; 05-16-2010 at 01:15 AM.
|
05-16-2010, 09:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: yonder
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 4,149
Liked 3,533 Times in 947 Posts
|
|
according to a factory letter, the first 3" 66s had the serial prefix AER
|
05-16-2010, 10:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Liked 143 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Here is a couple, 3 - AHA's and 1 ANA.
|
05-16-2010, 11:40 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Looks cool, though!
|
05-16-2010, 12:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eich
Here is a couple, 3 - AHA's and 1 ANA.
|
Where on Earth did you find FOUR of them?? It took me ten years to find ONE!!
|
05-16-2010, 12:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: yonder
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 4,149
Liked 3,533 Times in 947 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
Next question is who is S.M.CO.
...
|
Smith Modifying Company????
|
05-16-2010, 01:09 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,182 Times in 2,860 Posts
|
|
That looks like the 3" 66-5 barrel.
There were a bunch of those type 3" barrels made up for the 3" 66-5's made by S&W for Walther. Walther sold them as the R99 La Chasse.
Nice 66 in any case. Congrats! Regards 18DAI.
|
05-17-2010, 05:49 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 209
Likes: 27
Liked 34 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
I think the key is in the "S.M. CO." It may have been part of a batch ordered in that configuration for a particular agency.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|