|
|
07-06-2010, 08:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: MO
Posts: 25
Likes: 10
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
shooting high
A recently purchased 66-1 is shooting 4" plus high at 25yds. with the rear sight at it's lowest setting. I've tried 158g SWC over 5g Universal and various factory loads like Fed. 158 SJHP and 38+p 125s. All shoot high. The only other time I've run into this is with my 686+ Mtn. Gun and the Fed. 180 Cast Core load. Heavier bullets usually shoot higher than lighter ones due to longer bore contact so that problem was solved my not using that load anymore in that gun. I really like the feel and handling of this 66 and want to solve this. Any ideas? Thanks.
Bob
|
07-06-2010, 08:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NW of San Antonio
Posts: 334
Likes: 70
Liked 30 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Change the rear sight blade?
|
07-06-2010, 08:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: MO
Posts: 25
Likes: 10
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Cubguy. Thanks. I'll call S&W tomorrow. Guess I was trying to make it too complicated.
Bob
|
07-06-2010, 08:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Great Lakes Area
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
i dont know that powder but i see +p and some factory loads. just for giggles if you want to stay with 38 sp. try slowing them down a bit, maybe some greendot and 148 gr FWC, just to see what happens. then if that brings the POA down you have a theory to work with. if they go wild or stay high then start searching other remedies. now if this is for carry and not target i dont have an opine on that. good luck and let us know what happens.
|
07-06-2010, 09:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida,South,hell.
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 143
Liked 2,499 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
" Shooting High" Don't do it!
It can be worse than posting while drinking. Someone could get
seriously hurt.
Regards , Allen Frame
__________________
NRA cert.instructor&R.S.O.
|
07-06-2010, 09:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida,South,hell.
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 143
Liked 2,499 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Seriously ,, if the front sight blade is pinned ,how about
a taller front sight blade?
Good luck ,,Al
__________________
NRA cert.instructor&R.S.O.
|
07-06-2010, 09:45 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NW of San Antonio
Posts: 334
Likes: 70
Liked 30 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
that's what I thought too, when I saw the thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen-frame
" Shooting High" Don't do it!
It can be worse than posting while drinking. Someone could get
seriously hurt.
Regards , Allen Frame
|
|
07-06-2010, 10:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 445
Likes: 12
Liked 47 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefever
Heavier bullets usually shoot higher than lighter ones due to longer bore contact...
Bob
|
I always wondered why heavier bullets shoot higher. It should be the opposite - heavy bullets weigh more (duh!) and should drop faster. But this month I read that heavy bullets produce more recoil at the muzzle - which is true - and therefore produce more muzzle rise - also true and it seems logical.
BTW - I use a lot of Universal in .40 S&W, and it's a great powder. The burn rate in nearly identical to Unique, but burns cleaner.
Also, try shooting your revolver from a good rest, and have someone else shoot it to make sure the problem is with the gun.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member
|
07-07-2010, 06:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Great Lakes Area
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefever
A recently purchased 66-1 is shooting 4" plus high at 25yds. with the rear sight at it's lowest setting. I've tried 158g SWC over 5g Universal and various factory loads like Fed. 158 SJHP and 38+p 125s. All shoot high. The only other time I've run into this is with my 686+ Mtn. Gun and the Fed. 180 Cast Core load. Heavier bullets usually shoot higher than lighter ones due to longer bore contact so that problem was solved my not using that load anymore in that gun. I really like the feel and handling of this 66 and want to solve this. Any ideas? Thanks.
Bob
|
I just looked at some old (1998) paper targets and saw that I lost about 3 inches at 15 yards with a load of 4.6 gr of W-231 over a 148 gr HBFWC. This was out of a Security Six and a pre-Mod- 14. If mem serves that was at a fairly low vol. About 1.5 to 2.0 in groups. Standing W/2 hand hold.
|
07-07-2010, 07:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,113
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,318 Times in 4,239 Posts
|
|
Simple solution:
use same type case and powder charge but try a lighter bullet.
Start with 150gr, then 145gr, then 125gr.
a heavier bullet will POA higher then a lighter one.
Heavier bullet will have more bore time than a lighter one thus POA higher.
Jimmy
|
07-07-2010, 08:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Arizona wilderness
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
As I remember....(and I'm getting old)...
S&W has at least three (3) heights of rear sight blades for K-frames.
A shorter blade (or whatever you call it) will lower your Point of Impact (POI) versus Point of Aim (POA).
I recently found a Model 66 (no dash) and it shoots high at 25 yards with my favorite target load (high meaning that it will not sight in so that POA and POI are the same at 25 yards).
Then I remembered that when these guns were made, folks were shooting Bullseye competition with them and S&W recommended a "6-O'Clock" hold in the original owner's manual and the illustration showed an NRA 25-yard Bullseye target.
So I tried the "ol time pumpkin on the post" sight picture with an official NRA 25-yard target and found it has ample adjustment to center your POI when holding on the bottom edge of the 25 yard target at 25 yards. I need to try this with an old-time 50 yard Slow fire target at 50 yards -- but I bet it will also work.
While my Model 66 appears to have the tall rear sight, I happened to also have an "extra" rear sight assembly with a short rear sight blade in my spare S&W parts collection. Installation of that low rear sight blade assembly allows me to adjust the gun for "Center of cottontail rabbit head" at 25 yards if needed.
Just my humble opinion.
Last edited by Snobal; 07-07-2010 at 08:06 PM.
|
07-07-2010, 09:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 619
Likes: 8
Liked 286 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Rear sight blade
See if the factory can provide you with a lower rear sight blade. Measure your blade height first if you have a micrometer or vernier caliper. They're not difficult to replace, but a tool you can probably get from Brownell's will make it far easier. I did one years ago on one of my guns, and, since I have elephant fingers and succeeded, it must have been relatively simple, and, since I am somewhat of a miser, the tool must have been inexpensive. The tool looks like a little fork that engages corresponding slots in the windage nut. A lower rear blade will cause you to lower the muzzle to line up the top of the front blade with the top of the rear. It worked for me, although in my case I had the opposite problem: shooting too low. I got the next higher blade. May you succeed.
|
07-07-2010, 10:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,209 Times in 2,174 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen-frame
Seriously ,, if the front sight blade is pinned ,how about
a taller front sight blade?
Good luck ,,Al
|
Yes, or one of these FO fronts:
Super Sights
|
07-07-2010, 11:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: MO
Posts: 25
Likes: 10
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the replies. Called S&W today and ordered a taller rear sight blade. Will check with Brownells tomorrow about the installation tool that was mentioned. I know 125's would print lower but I have a lot of 158g LSWC's and want a load for general carry around the farm for dispatching coons, skunks, possums, etc. and just for plinking. Have used 22's, 44's and 45's for this but decided to work with 38 and 357 for a while since I have a new to me 66-1 and haven't shot my others in that category much lately. Looking forward to it. Thanks again.
Bob
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|