Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Rifles and Shotguns > Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 Dedicated to the Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:45 PM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default legality

Since I'm getting into a new venue with my recently purchased 15-22 MOE rifle and 15-22P guns, I need to know if I would take my MOE lower and put the 22p upper on it, would I be creating an illegal platform? SBR or AOW problems? The combo looks in my mind like it might feel good but not good enough to sit in a federal court.

Regards,
Hobie

Last edited by Hobie1; 12-10-2010 at 10:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2010, 09:07 PM
CrazyFingers's Avatar
CrazyFingers CrazyFingers is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 575
Likes: 127
Liked 468 Times in 209 Posts
Default

As long as it is not illegal in your state, registered with the ATF, and you have the tax stamp for a SBR, you're fine.
Missing any of those three and you're looking at a serious problem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_barreled_rifle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...inal_penalties
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2010, 09:37 PM
bradystrib bradystrib is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i read somewhere owning both could be considered "content" to sbr...not sure on that though....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2010, 10:14 PM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default

Holy ****.

Sorry, but if by owning these two guns, legally purchased from a long time local dealer(Gil Hebard Guns, Knoxville Il.)can be construed to be commiting a federal crime, I would of sure liked to know.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

I'm going to look a little more into this but I'm hoping that as long as I don't ever exchange the components, I isnt goin to prizen.

Hobie..........out for now
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2010, 10:20 PM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyFingers View Post
As long as it is not illegal in your state, registered with the ATF, and you have the tax stamp for a SBR, you're fine.
Missing any of those three and you're looking at a serious problem.

Short barreled rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
National Firearms Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I got a chance to sit down and read those references..........Okay, no SBR for me. If I go to a new range I'll leave one or the other at home.

Ready on the right
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2010, 10:25 PM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default

Isn't it a sad state of affairs that a piece of plastic could send you to a world of hurt?

Hobie
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2010, 10:33 PM
Dragon88 Dragon88 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobie1 View Post
The combo looks and feels good...
You mean, it would probably feel good if you put them together, but you haven't, right?

Don't flirt with this idea or post about it on internet forums until you research the NFA and class 3 laws.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2010, 10:38 PM
Tram's Avatar
Tram Tram is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florence, Al
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobie1 View Post
I got a chance to sit down and read those references..........Okay, no SBR for me. If I go to a new range I'll leave one or the other at home.

Ready on the right
I think you'd be fine carrying both to the range, but you might want to look into it more..

Having them both in your house at the same time, if it's wrong to take them to the range at the same time, is just as wrong..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2010, 10:49 PM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default Roger that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon88 View Post
You mean, it would probably feel good if you put them together, but you haven't, right?

Don't flirt with this idea or post about it on internet forums until you research the NFA and class 3 laws.
Thank you as I just felt that might be okay but that's why i asked. They will be kept intact, no other action.

Thanks folks,

I'm learning.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2010, 11:50 PM
Rustpot Rustpot is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

The word bradystrib was looking for was "intent", as in you have the parts and although they are not illegally assembled it's very likely you intend to make an illegal configuration.

I think if you had a 10" barreled complete upper without a registered pistol lower you could be guilty of intent, but not by simply owning the 2 guns.

Same as it's not illegal to own a full-auto sear by itself, owning the gun the sear can be installed in without having paperwork on file is considered intent to construct a full-auto weapon.

This is also why barrels under 16" need permanently affixed muzzle devices to get them to 16" unless you have SBR paperwork/tax stamp. Otherwise you've got a rifle that can readily be made under a controlled length and guilty of intent to do so.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-11-2010, 12:41 AM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blowncole View Post
I was hoping to see a picture. Photochop anyone?
Just think about the little pistol upper on the rifle lower. Not going to happen in my life.

Hobie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-11-2010, 12:43 AM
Dragon88 Dragon88 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blowncole View Post
I was hoping to see a picture. Photochop anyone?
Here you go:

National Firearms Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seriously don't joke about this stuff. You think the BATFE doesn't monitor forums like this? Discussing how to get a tax stamp for a class III item is one thing, but talking about just slapping a pistol upper on a rifle lower is asking for trouble, not only for you but for this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-11-2010, 01:46 AM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon88 View Post
Here you go:

National Firearms Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seriously don't joke about this stuff. You think the BATFE doesn't monitor forums like this? Discussing how to get a tax stamp for a class III item is one thing, but talking about just slapping a pistol upper on a rifle lower is asking for trouble, not only for you but for this forum.
There was no humor intended. I am finding quickly that I'm into a different area that I never dealt with before. All I'v ever owned are a couple match grade pistols and a couple rifles. My question was truly a new guy question. The subject will never come from me again. No kidding.
Thanks for your guidance.
I am going to research as much BATF material as I can because obviously i can't safely ask a simple question here without causing damage to this forum.
As a matter of fact, no great loss here, I'm out of here.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-11-2010, 03:39 AM
VooDuuChild's Avatar
VooDuuChild VooDuuChild is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Just a thought. But since SBR laws are so rigid, I'm sure S&W took measures in order to keep the pieces from fitting. You'd think so anyhow.

I wanna see a photochop too!!!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-11-2010, 03:52 AM
VooDuuChild's Avatar
VooDuuChild VooDuuChild is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Ok, here's my attempt...no photoshop, just good old microsoft paint. Here's a S&W M&P 15-22P MOE

Can someone make one with the butt extended? I can't find a suitable pic (well, I have only been lookin for MOE's).

Aieet, I think I got it. The second one has a shorter barrel, I wasn't really payin attention; just whippin these out. I like the first one better, haha.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22P MOE Edition.jpg (37.5 KB, 88 views)
File Type: jpg 150877_1.jpg (12.5 KB, 69 views)

Last edited by VooDuuChild; 12-11-2010 at 04:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-11-2010, 03:58 AM
grimreaper21 grimreaper21 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustpot View Post
The word bradystrib was looking for was "intent", as in you have the parts and although they are not illegally assembled it's very likely you intend to make an illegal configuration.

I think if you had a 10" barreled complete upper without a registered pistol lower you could be guilty of intent, but not by simply owning the 2 guns.

Same as it's not illegal to own a full-auto sear by itself, owning the gun the sear can be installed in without having paperwork on file is considered intent to construct a full-auto weapon.

This is also why barrels under 16" need permanently affixed muzzle devices to get them to 16" unless you have SBR paperwork/tax stamp. Otherwise you've got a rifle that can readily be made under a controlled length and guilty of intent to do so.
i think proving that they are both fully independent purchases/weapons would be a logical defense to "not intent". but who says law is logical.

it's sad we have to make stupid laws like this because along the lines some idiots somewhere screwed it up for everybody else.
really makes no sense to me that the 15-22 pistol is legal but switching the receivers makes it illegal. it does not make the weapon any more 'dangerous'. is it basically because it now has a extendable stock? the weapon is just as deadly as if it didn't have the stock. Thats the whole "big jail time sentence"? hardly logical. but, thats how it is i guess.

Last edited by grimreaper21; 12-11-2010 at 04:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-11-2010, 12:53 PM
Hobie1's Avatar
Hobie1 Hobie1 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 477
Liked 325 Times in 148 Posts
Default

I'm learning all the time. Just like when I bought my 15-22p I thought a VFG would be really cool. WRONG!!! I fortunately asked about it's legality and discovered I'd be breaking the law big time. So, no VFG for it ever.

I'm going to the range in a bit and run some rounds through these little jewels.

Regards,

Hobie
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-11-2010, 07:55 PM
infamous209's Avatar
infamous209 infamous209 is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The valley of Cali
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

whats scary is just cause you honestly dont know doesnt mean they wont throw the book at you
__________________
Gun control means two hands
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-11-2010, 08:34 PM
Smithhound's Avatar
Smithhound Smithhound is offline
US Veteran
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Liked 308 Times in 108 Posts
Default

As one of the earlier posters pointed out, having both a rifle and pistol model at the same time, whether at the range or at home is not illegal, but having a rifle and an unattached pistol upper is cause for suspicion. The logical question anyone would ask is "Why do you have that?".
Definately do not put yourself into a situation that can, at the very least, cost you thousand of dollars to get out of.
Realistically tho, if the authorities are rooting around your house or person you've probably already got big time problems, that's just icing on the cake for them.
The process of obtaining an SBR, provided they are legal in your area, is easy. It just requires some leg work on your part, some spare cash and a bit of patience. If you want one go ahead with the process.
SBR's and Suppressed weapons are the hottest areas in firearms right now, people seem to have realized that full auto weapons have been pushed out of the price range for the average Joe/Jane and with the cost of feeding the same are just not feasable.
But anyone who is capable and has the initiative and funds can go thru the process and have something just as cool, but with a much smaller appetite.
I have a 10.5" AR (5.56) that i really like, does everything I want except make a loud, sustained blast. Really gets the attention at the range and is surprisingly accurate. I also have paperwork in for a YHM suppressor for my SIG 226 TAC, very much looking forward to gettiig that.
Enjoy the hobby but do be aware of the laws and consequences.
RD
__________________
Got a Phd from Hard Knocks U
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-11-2010, 08:51 PM
Brett248Vista Brett248Vista is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Greensburg , PA
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 60
Liked 503 Times in 239 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustpot View Post

Same as it's not illegal to own a full-auto sear by itself, owning the gun the sear can be installed in without having paperwork on file is considered intent to construct a full-auto weapon.

Owning an Auto-Sear most certainly *is* illegal unless you own a pre ban Machine Gun and have the valid tax stamp to own it.

"Regardless of the date of manufacture of a drop in auto sear, possession of such a sear and certain M-16 fire control parts is possession of a machinegun as defined by the NFA. Specifically, these parts are listed as “(a) combination(s) of parts” designed “Solely and exclusively” for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun and are a machinegun as defined in the NFA."

National Firearms Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-11-2010, 08:54 PM
kenjen kenjen is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: pa.
Posts: 677
Likes: 225
Liked 611 Times in 226 Posts
Default

well i guess that the 1000's of thompson contender owners are in the same boat too. if you put a barrel under 16" on a rifle stock-recever you are breaking the law if you do not have the proper paper work......
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-11-2010, 09:07 PM
BELT_FED's Avatar
BELT_FED BELT_FED is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 3
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smithhound View Post
As one of the earlier posters pointed out, having both a rifle and pistol model at the same time, whether at the range or at home is not illegal, but having a rifle and an unattached pistol upper is cause for suspicion. The logical question anyone would ask is "Why do you have that?".
Definately do not put yourself into a situation that can, at the very least, cost you thousand of dollars to get out of.
Realistically tho, if the authorities are rooting around your house or person you've probably already got big time problems, that's just icing on the cake for them.
The process of obtaining an SBR, provided they are legal in your area, is easy. It just requires some leg work on your part, some spare cash and a bit of patience. If you want one go ahead with the process.
SBR's and Suppressed weapons are the hottest areas in firearms right now, people seem to have realized that full auto weapons have been pushed out of the price range for the average Joe/Jane and with the cost of feeding the same are just not feasable.
But anyone who is capable and has the initiative and funds can go thru the process and have something just as cool, but with a much smaller appetite.
I have a 10.5" AR (5.56) that i really like, does everything I want except make a loud, sustained blast. Really gets the attention at the range and is surprisingly accurate. I also have paperwork in for a YHM suppressor for my SIG 226 TAC, very much looking forward to gettiig that.
Enjoy the hobby but do be aware of the laws and consequences.
RD
This is exactly correct if you own a pistol ar 15 and a rifle ar15 its perfectly legal as far as the feds r concerned where the problem would lie is having a pistol barrel annd a only a rifle lower.. but you r perfectly legal just don't swap them around...

And check with yhm but I don't think you are supposed to put that can on a 10.5 barrel
__________________
07/SOT2
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-11-2010, 09:25 PM
BELT_FED's Avatar
BELT_FED BELT_FED is offline
Member
legality legality legality legality legality  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 3
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenjen View Post
well i guess that the 1000's of thompson contender owners are in the same boat too. if you put a barrel under 16" on a rifle stock-recever you are breaking the law if you do not have the proper paper work......
This is correct and it says so right on the barrel but you can put the pistol grip on it and its legal... you get alittle more snuggle room with a single shot rifle than an "evil gun"
__________________
07/SOT2
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
model 16, sbr, sig arms, suppressor, thompson


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
legality of Gendel P 30 in Massachusetts nyeguy Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 2 12-28-2015 04:44 PM
Legality of blackjacks guitar1580 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 35 02-12-2012 12:50 PM
Frangible ammo legality kimberst245 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 4 09-01-2011 07:10 PM
Legality question on an antique S&W Smithhound S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 08-17-2009 12:36 PM
Heads up on Knife legality klondike 2nd Amendment Forum 6 06-09-2009 08:53 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)