Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2011, 06:58 AM
frankenstien frankenstien is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: fairbanks, alaska
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns

recentlyish bought a model 29-2 6 1/2'' barel, recently went and put about 75 rounds through it, shot some heavy buffalo bore ammo through it, and it sems to jar the cylinder with the heavier loads, from what ive herd, its a common problem with the gun, but is there a fix for it?

thanks
mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2011, 07:10 AM
srgvaz's Avatar
srgvaz srgvaz is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 862
Likes: 10
Liked 26 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Your gun may need the endurance package. IIRC only the factory does that work, at a reasonable price. Call S&W!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2011, 07:15 AM
NFrameFred's Avatar
NFrameFred NFrameFred is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 503
Liked 4,428 Times in 1,023 Posts
Default

Well, I know you don't want to hear it, but not shooting loads it wasn't designed for would be a start.

The gun wasn't designed for 300 grain heavy loads.

Most of the "problems" with the "fragile" older 29's are the result of folks hot rodding the ammo. The endurance package that was implemented in the later models addressed this somewhat, but most shooters who want to shoot the ultra heavy duty stuff usually go to a heavier gun like the Ruger.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2011, 06:24 PM
frankenstien frankenstien is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: fairbanks, alaska
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

hmmmm, if you pull the trigger again after the misfire it does spin and fire the next round, i dont shoot the heavy loads alot, just getting a feel for them as i carry it on my snowmachine in case of angry moose.....again lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2011, 07:23 PM
mod29's Avatar
mod29 mod29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 612
Likes: 1,979
Liked 705 Times in 292 Posts
Default

My 29-2's are limited to factory 240-gr ammo. That's as far as I'll push 'em.

-Jim
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2011, 07:35 PM
wheelman44's Avatar
wheelman44 wheelman44 is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 238
Likes: 324
Liked 135 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Agreed 240 gr is the limit for a 29, 300 gr use a ruger
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2011, 08:18 PM
lebomm lebomm is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 38
Liked 821 Times in 490 Posts
Default

So the 250gr Keith over 22gr 2400 is too much for the 29?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-11-2011, 08:52 PM
frankenstien frankenstien is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: fairbanks, alaska
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

i talked to buffalo bore about what ammo they say is safe to shoot in my gun, they said up to their 305 gr bullets, nothing above that for those the say the redhawks or marlin lever actions, the gun is strong enough to take the pressures from the ammo, im not worried about the gun blowing up, cause in fact it is a very strong gun, not a redhawk by any means, but its not a tauras either
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-11-2011, 09:13 PM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,900
Likes: 14,032
Liked 13,740 Times in 4,979 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lebomm View Post
So the 250gr Keith over 22gr 2400 is too much for the 29?
Since purchasing my first 29-2's in the early 70's and those that came after have been fed a constant diet of cast 250 gr. swc's pushed by 20 grs/2400. They are no worse for wear now than back then. They will outlast me.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2011, 10:27 PM
sw282's Avatar
sw282 sw282 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CSRA
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 869
Liked 1,629 Times in 779 Posts
Default

si--------

Last edited by sw282; 07-02-2011 at 06:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-11-2011, 10:36 PM
NFrameFred's Avatar
NFrameFred NFrameFred is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 503
Liked 4,428 Times in 1,023 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lebomm View Post
So the 250gr Keith over 22gr 2400 is too much for the 29?
Nope. But the pressures on the barrel, etc. probably don't exceed factory jacketed loads with those hard cast and an extra 10 grains is just past "negligible". Like most "accidents" whether it be with driving, aircraft, electricity or firearms, it usually isn't "one" thing that does you in, but an unfortunate confluence of two, three, or more factors/events that cause a 'failure'. Repeated stress; the intangible "limit" (that WILL vary from gun to gun depending on several factors) of additional stress you can subject it to; dumb luck good or bad . . . . even old Elmer blew up a few guns.

This debate will continue forever. I've known and shot with all kinds and there is no convincing some that their pet load that they've "shot safely for years" is unsafe or doing damage to their gun. They've "studied it" and "talked to the guys at the factory" and can recite figures from this and that article and yadda, yadda, yadda, . . . .

To each his own. I don't baby my 29's in the ammo department and have been known to shoot quite a few magnum loads - part of the charm, impetus, reason for owning a 44 magnum. But I've also seen some scary/ugly stuff from those who "know better" and I leave them to theirselves on the range.

It's your gun and you'll shoot what you want to in it. Life is a gamble. To each his own.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2011, 12:24 AM
frankenstien frankenstien is offline
Member
Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns Model 29-2 ?'s and concerns  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: fairbanks, alaska
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

very well said
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
44 magnum, endurance, model 29, ruger


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smith and Wesson Model 29 Concerns lucasfilmfan S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 40 08-04-2017 08:31 AM
lil gun concerns hammer 1 Reloading 15 02-05-2017 04:45 PM
Accuracy Concerns on a S&W Model 19 G-Mann S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 19 08-22-2015 12:18 PM
Model 41 round velocity concerns hijakk Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 9 04-15-2011 09:12 AM
64-8 concerns Texas1941 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 9 06-19-2009 02:53 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)