|
|
03-27-2011, 04:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
Liked 46 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
K38 Target Masterpiece grips?
Hi forum:
Just picked up a K38, I believe Target Masterpiece, circa 1950 that came with pachmyr rubber grips. I prefer something that looks a bit more correct. I looked on Gun Parts Corp (Numrich) and didn't see anything.
Anyone have any ideas where I can seek out some grips to make this new piece look more 'appropriate'?
Thanks in advance for any info.
Here's a pic. If you need pix of more specific areas, let me know and will do.
Last edited by cmichini; 03-27-2011 at 06:19 PM.
Reason: Add pic
|
03-27-2011, 05:19 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Illinois...via Arizona
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 660
Liked 2,034 Times in 222 Posts
|
|
More than likely had oiled K-Diamond Magna grips. The pictures will help so we can see exactly what you bought.
|
03-27-2011, 06:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
Liked 46 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Pic added to OP. Hope that helps!!
Thanks for the quick look and reply!
|
03-27-2011, 06:27 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 940
Liked 6,468 Times in 1,328 Posts
|
|
The original grips would be either magnas, or target stocks. A letter
might tell you which one, but if you are going to shoot the gun, you
should get whichever style you prefer. Both are available.
Mike Priwer
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-27-2011, 06:47 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,536 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
Your K-38 most likely shipped with Magna stocks like those pictured on the K-38 below that was shipped in January 1950.
Bill
|
03-27-2011, 07:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 10,428
Liked 28,233 Times in 5,273 Posts
|
|
Am I correct in saying that S&W never called the K 38 a "Target" masterpiece? It was simply called the Masterpiece and the shorter barreled version with the Baughman ramped sight was called Combat Masterpiece.
Not trying to be picky here, just taking advantage of an opportunity to get things straight for all of us.
|
03-27-2011, 07:20 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy
Am I correct in saying that S&W never called the K 38 a "Target" masterpiece? It was simply called the Masterpiece and the shorter barreled version with the Baughman ramped sight was called Combat Masterpiece.
Not trying to be picky here, just taking advantage of an opportunity to get things straight for all of us.
|
That's correct. Unfortunately SCSW uses the incorrect "Target Masterpiece" label as a section head. That probably helps keep the error alive.
__________________
David Wilson
|
03-27-2011, 07:24 PM
|
WW II Vet Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 11,807
Liked 8,711 Times in 1,959 Posts
|
|
The end label on my 1955 vintage just says K38 Heavy Masterpiece,
Target Stocks and Target Hammer.
__________________
Mighty 90's,Trying 4 a 100!
|
03-27-2011, 08:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
Liked 46 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Hi folks.
Thanks for correcting me. I heard reference to 'Target' Masterpiece when some referred to the Combat Masterpiece (could've been a youtube video).
I'll make sure to use the correct nomenclature in the future.
I tried to edit the title with cross-out (to retain the original error), but I'll leave it all in the original posts. This points out one of the good things about these forums. You get good info without getting beaten down for likely 'noob' misstatements.
Any idea of where to get the correct grips? The Magna grips look nice. I think I'll look into those.
Doc44 - That is a beautiful revolver. It looks hardly used at all.
|
03-27-2011, 09:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 236
Likes: 2
Liked 111 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
Not sure what the budget is but as soon as I can I'm getting some Keith Brown Ropers for my CM...not my gun, this picture is from Keiths website, but you get the idea... Ropers on a K frame in wraparound black walnut.
|
03-27-2011, 09:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 944
Likes: 140
Liked 382 Times in 139 Posts
|
|
Can I play?
Here's a pic of the stocks from my 1948 K 38 .
They are numbered to the gun.
|
03-28-2011, 11:07 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,804
Likes: 18,554
Liked 22,424 Times in 8,277 Posts
|
|
If the gun dates to 1950-1951, it could have (as option) non-relieved K target diamond grips, or football relieved K Diamond target grips. It was in this time frame when the change occurred. I have just acquired a set of non-relieved which are out to DWFAN for repair and refurb now. I'm still looking for a correct front sight, (mine had been filed into a ramp sight when I acquired it). Talk about something difficult to locate and pricey when found. But, bringing these nice old guns back to original is fun, and hopefully rewarding.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
03-28-2011, 11:10 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
Liked 46 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
It is circa 1950 per the S&W bible. I've looked around (ebay some others) and have seen more target grips than the magna's.
I may go that route as they look more correct than the pachmyr (sp?) grips, which are also a little big for my hands.
Thanks again!
|
03-28-2011, 11:26 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 5
Liked 3,015 Times in 840 Posts
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 11:41 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 940
Liked 6,468 Times in 1,328 Posts
|
|
cmichini
What is the serial number of your K38 ? We need to pin down the
year of the gun, to know which magnas would be right. The contour
of the shoulder changes quite a bit, over the first 3-5 years.
Mike Priwer
|
03-28-2011, 11:54 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 583
Liked 274 Times in 182 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H Richard
If the gun dates to 1950-1951, it could have (as option) non-relieved K target diamond grips, or football relieved K Diamond target grips. It was in this time frame when the change occurred. I have just acquired a set of non-relieved which are out to DWFAN for repair and refurb now. I'm still looking for a correct front sight, (mine had been filed into a ramp sight when I acquired it). Talk about something difficult to locate and pricey when found. But, bringing these nice old guns back to original is fun, and hopefully rewarding.
|
The "relieved" TS were intoduced on the .44 mag, and some say on the Combat Mag as well-late '55-early '56. If yours was shipped with original TS a letter will confirm it. If not, buy a set and enjoy shooting it anyway!
Good shooting!
Last edited by Homie; 03-28-2011 at 12:05 PM.
|
03-29-2011, 12:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
Liked 46 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
S/N is K 9319X.
HTH
|
03-29-2011, 01:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCWilson
Unfortunately SCSW uses the incorrect "Target Masterpiece" label as a section head. That probably helps keep the error alive.
|
Supica and Nahas do the same thing. On page 144 of the 3d Edition, it says, "The K-38 Target Masterpiece - "Pre-Model 14"
I wonder if this is a carry-over from the M&P Model of 1905 for which there was a Target version available. Speculating . . .
JP
Oooops! Just noticed what I did. You were citing "SCSW" aka Supica and Nahas. Oh well. Thank goodness for the 'edit' button.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|