|
|
04-24-2011, 03:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
What are S&W's B/C gap tolerances?
I've heard officially acceptable flash gaps run from 0.004" to 0.014". I'm mostly interested in knowing S&W's maximum.
Gil
|
04-24-2011, 03:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: west coast
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
On good authority, I am told that S&W now considers 0.012" barrel-to-cylinder gap to be acceptable.
0.006" is considered optimum. A little less and the chance of cylinder binding from firing residue is greatly increased.
There was a time not too long ago, that S&W sold new revolvers with b-c gap regulated to 0.005" to 0.008" and held cylinder endshake to less than 0.001". I guess those "good old days" are long gone.
|
04-25-2011, 11:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,820
Likes: 7,852
Liked 25,742 Times in 8,697 Posts
|
|
Years ago (in the late 70's) the Factory Repair Center General Manager told me anything around .005" +/- .002" was in Spec. Now days, it's what ever they can get away with. I would personally be upset with a B/C gap of more than .006". Not that the revolver won't work, but you will start loosing velocity and encounter lead spitting. My revolvers ( which are mostly from 1950 to 1990) are all .006" or under. When I go to look at a used S&W I always bring a feeler gauge of .006" with me to check it before buying.
Chief38
|
04-26-2011, 12:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA Central Coast
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 920
Liked 6,617 Times in 2,199 Posts
|
|
In my S&W revolver armorer class we were told the acceptable B/C gap is .004 - .010.
The ones I've seen myself have tended to run on the smaller end of the range.
__________________
Ret LE Firearms inst & armorer
|
04-26-2011, 01:49 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, TX, US
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 2
Liked 49 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
.012" acceptable??? Holy smokes! That's downright offensive. Time was, that figure would tell us that the frame had been stretched. If that is correct, I really hate to hear it.
|
04-26-2011, 02:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the replies.
I prefer .005" to .007". I don't like less than .005" because that makes it too easy for a little leading to cause cylinder to barrel drag DA plus there's the ocassional unburt powder flake or ball. I've not experienced any negative affects form larger flash gaps but I may not have owned one as large as .010".
What prompted the question is a project. I bought a couple of .38 special cylinders hopping one could be used as a conversion cylinder in my 9mm 940 with no alteration to the collectable 940. Because .38 special headspace is less than the thickness of 9mm moon clips they require a lathe cut to clear the 940's cylinder stop. The best fitting .38 cylinder has great carry up but has a .014" flash gap with its yoke holding it snug against the breach face. It's at my smith for the lathe cut and perhaps a little headspace relief that would close the gap a hair. The smith had to grit his teeth admiting that the B/C gap would be O.K. for firing standard pressure .38 specials. I don't like a sloppy B/C gap either but the alternative is to scrap the project and resell both cylinders. I'm hopefull that the 940 will work out as a convertable because back in the 1980's a machinest friend returned a 57 that he had recently purchased new expecting S&W to warranty repair an .011" flash gap and customer service shipped it back unaltered telling him their maximum tolerance was .014".
Last edited by k22fan; 04-26-2011 at 03:04 PM.
|
04-28-2011, 10:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 7
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
S&W max..014 is ok if you are only going to shoot powder puff loads. Full house loads and you will flame cut the top strap. Fit at .005 you can always open it up if your not happy. Sure hard to put it back ie setback time,maybe thats where you are anyway on this project.
|
04-29-2011, 11:33 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: south central missouri
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 987
Liked 2,270 Times in 654 Posts
|
|
My .357 magnum and my .38 special are both .006 and neither one of them spit lead, nor do they bind up after shooting large amounts of rounds. I like .006.
Peace,
gordon
__________________
better have that checked
|
04-30-2011, 08:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 0
Liked 145 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastbolt
In my S&W revolver armorer class we were told the acceptable B/C gap is .004 - .010.
The ones I've seen myself have tended to run on the smaller end of the range.
|
My armorer manual says the same thing (004-.010 inch).
I don't want to be shooting along side anyone with a air gap over .010 inch. I don't want the side of my face flamed off! Spitting revolvers draw blood sometimes.........
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
|
04-30-2011, 11:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mountain State
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 56
Liked 379 Times in 149 Posts
|
|
I alway set mine to .006 on my guns. The larger gap spit some lead.
|
05-03-2011, 12:18 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Se. Pa.
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 67
Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Almost all new S&Ws are at .006. I have a few that are about .004, and some that are about .008. I like them at .004. Ruger makes all theirs at about .003-.004, and usually have a little endshake , even brand new........Wonder why?
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|