Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2011, 09:02 PM
4306 4306 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 5 Posts
Default N-Frame Classics question

While I love the "Classic" N frame lineup, one thing has me scratching my head. Why do the 44 specials have magnum length cylinders. I have never had an issue using "long" lead round nose or Keith type SWCs in older Model 24s with regular length cylinders. On the other hand, Model 27 cylinders will not accept some lead round nose and SWC bullets in their original (and current) sized cylinders. It seems that if a revolver could have benefited from a longer cylinder it would be the Model 27, not the 24.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2011, 09:41 PM
Dragon88 Dragon88 is offline
Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Possibly to reduce production costs. Instead of making two different length cylinders, they can make one for use on multiple models.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2011, 11:40 PM
4306 4306 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I had thought that might be the case when the Model 21-4 "Thunder Ranch"" 44 Spl. came out with the long cylinder. But the Model 22 "Thunder Ranch" and Model of 1917, along with the Model 27 show S&W's capability to supply the correct cylinder size.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2011, 12:36 AM
Nightowl's Avatar
Nightowl Nightowl is offline
SWCA Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrensburg, MO USA
Posts: 5,404
Likes: 2,842
Liked 3,296 Times in 1,688 Posts
Default

It has always been a mystery to me why they did not make a longer cylinder for the Model 27, especially after the Model 19 arrived with the longer cylinder.
__________________
Richard Gillespie
FBINA 102
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2011, 01:28 AM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,838
Likes: 13,934
Liked 13,643 Times in 4,939 Posts
Default

COST..............The new N .44's are really magnums with .44 spl. cylinder chambers.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2011, 09:49 PM
Alk8944's Avatar
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,619 Times in 3,453 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightowl View Post
It has always been a mystery to me why they did not make a longer cylinder for the Model 27, especially after the Model 19 arrived with the longer cylinder.
Because the cylinder is long enough for SAAMI specification ammunition. S&W builds revolvers principally to shoot standard, factory ammunition, not to cater to handloaders whims.

There is a theory the longer cylinder in the 19/Combat Magnum was intended to provide a little safety margin against the gun locking up if there was some bullet pull under recoil. This is much less likely with the heavier Model 27.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2011, 11:03 PM
boblink boblink is offline
Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 15
Likes: 2
Liked 9 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike, SC Hunter View Post
COST..............The new N .44's are really magnums with .44 spl. cylinder chambers.
I assume one would be free then to make some home rolled loads for the 24 that are above and beyond normal pressure, like Elmer K used to experiment with; since you have the strength of the magnum frame (If not the cylinder).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2011, 11:27 PM
CAJUNLAWYER's Avatar
CAJUNLAWYER CAJUNLAWYER is online now
Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,411
Likes: 18,442
Liked 58,604 Times in 9,624 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon88 View Post
Possibly to reduce production costs. Instead of making two different length cylinders, they can make one for use on multiple models.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike, SC Hunter View Post
COST..............The new N .44's are really magnums with .44 spl. cylinder chambers.
I'm going with costs. Gone forever are the days of the 1950's and back. Sorry. But at least we have stainless
__________________
Forum consigliere
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2011, 12:59 PM
tdan tdan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 18
Liked 111 Times in 59 Posts
Default

<COST..............The new N .44's are really magnums with .44 spl. cylinder chambers.>

I also wondered why those new 44Special classics had a 44Mag length cylinder, unlike the 24/624 from the mid 80's. Seems like I read awhile back that one could chamber a 44Mag cartridge in the cylinder of these "new classics" in 44 Special. Can an owner of this latest rendition confirm this? If so.........Smith has simply released a tapered barrel version of the 29 that has 44Special marked on the barrel. I'm a bit curious about this one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2011, 03:24 PM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question N-Frame Classics question  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,838
Likes: 13,934
Liked 13,643 Times in 4,939 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boblink View Post
I assume one would be free then to make some home rolled loads for the 24 that are above and beyond normal pressure, like Elmer K used to experiment with; since you have the strength of the magnum frame (If not the cylinder).
What I meant to inply was that Smith used magnum length frames and cylinders for the new .44 special classics. I just checked my 21 & 24 with a .44 magnum cartridge(250 gr cast swc/heavy crimp) and it went in both cylinders and stopped about a rim's thickness from seating flush.
Would I shoot mags in my specials if they fit? NO...........I have 29's/629's for that.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
44 magnum, 624, 629, cartridge, classics, crimp, model 19, model 21, model 27, n-frame

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone have one of the new 586 Classics? sarge1967 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 24 04-18-2016 09:06 PM
Help with some classics please! PurpleMountainOutdoors S&W Antiques 13 04-14-2014 07:28 PM
Picked up a couple of classics. Got a question. CajunBass The Lounge 25 05-23-2013 08:31 PM
N frame classics Workmate S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 10-27-2012 08:21 PM
My Two Classics David the Gnome S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 5 09-26-2009 09:47 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)