Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:14 PM
tkosiba tkosiba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 8 Posts
Default .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia?

There was a time when the K Frames were well known for their light turning ability when moving their cylinder. The inertia of the trigger pull required was smooth and light due to the cylinder's small weight and size.

Jump to N frames. Almost the opposite here. However, I think I found why I have a bigger liking with the .45 Colt. It seems lighter and moves more easily, as compared to a thicker (heavier) .44 mag cylinder. Remember, I'm not talking about a slicker action at this point, only physics, and grams and/or ounces can make a big difference when pulling.

I bring this up, because I don't hear enough on this subject when calibers are compared, only overall gun weight. It's a subtle difference, but for the serious shooter, significant. Any comments appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2012, 08:25 PM
dfariswheel dfariswheel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Liked 947 Times in 413 Posts
Default

Many double action shooters preferred the big "N" frame guns due to the heavy cylinder's inertia causing the cylinder to rotate to full lock on the next chamber once it was started turning.

This caused a slightly heavier trigger pull at the very start, but once the heavy cylinder rotated over to full lock on the next chamber, you were left with a light, smooth trigger pull.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2012, 08:38 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is online now
Member
.45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia? .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia? .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia? .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia? .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia?  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,784
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,321 Times in 2,920 Posts
Default

Wouldnt that lighter empty .45 cylinder actually either be close to the same or heavier when loaded ?

Last edited by Engine49guy; 05-24-2012 at 08:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2012, 12:04 AM
Dale53 Dale53 is offline
Member
.45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia? .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia?  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southwestern Ohio
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 209
Liked 1,195 Times in 457 Posts
Default

Getting proficient with double action revolvers requires LOTS of trigger time. In addition to the actual practice provided, conditioning of the hand can be likened to weight training.

There is a tremendous difference between and unconditioned hand and a conditioned hand regarding actual performance at the target.

Dale53
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2012, 04:02 PM
David Sinko David Sinko is offline
Member
.45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia? .45 Colt Mountain Gun, Better Cylinder Inertia?  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Liked 384 Times in 221 Posts
Default

It sounds to me like you're talking about staging the trigger, which is not speed shooting. When speed shooting, there are other considerations that are more important than cylinder mass, such as the strength of the rebound spring and how you position your finger on the trigger to apply leverage. But generally speaking, I think the elite shooters like McGivern and Miculek always shot the K Frames quicker. If you remove the shooter from the equation, I believe the K Frame has the shorter trigger travel and that should be the mechanical advantage.

Dave Sinko
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
625 Mountain gun cylinder question pesty3782 S&W-Smithing 3 04-23-2014 02:48 PM
inertia hammer growr Reloading 11 03-29-2013 07:49 PM
629 Mountain Gun Cylinder will not open after firing .357Magnus S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 14 08-25-2011 07:39 PM
Any Primer Damage From Inertia Bullet Pullers? NiklasP Reloading 19 07-21-2009 01:20 AM
625-9 Mountain gun cylinder length please? Neal S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 10-27-2008 07:02 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)