|
|
06-17-2012, 09:20 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,497
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,604 Times in 3,231 Posts
|
|
S&W HD or HP?
I had the hot's for a HD, but all I found that were at best were "OK" maybe were way too high in price.
So, I got a HP at a reasonable price again & didn't make it into another calaber like I did the first two(.45Colt & 38-40/38WCF).
Good choice? Well, anything a HD can do a HP can do more as far as a shooter I think.
Any thoughts?
Last edited by STCM(SW); 06-18-2012 at 12:35 AM.
Reason: correction
|
06-17-2012, 09:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 31,497
Liked 22,512 Times in 4,626 Posts
|
|
Agreed. I still have the "wants" for a nice HD but i'll be patient and look for a spectacular deal on one. I prefer having the versatility of shooting .357 and .38 in a gun so right now thats what i've been collecting. Older P&R revolvers with 4" or shorter barrels in .357
The HP fits the bill perfectly. As does the pre-27 and 27-2
Chuck
__________________
They hold no Quarter
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-17-2012, 09:28 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,545
Likes: 89,882
Liked 24,937 Times in 8,536 Posts
|
|
I personally have no use for a big, heavy .38 special with fixed sights. I'd much rather have a 4" Highway Patrolman.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-18-2012, 12:20 AM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muley Gil
I personally have no use for a big, heavy .38 special with fixed sights. I'd much rather have a 4" Highway Patrolman.
|
what he said.
Charlie
|
06-18-2012, 12:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 1,956
Liked 3,499 Times in 1,287 Posts
|
|
I say get' em both!
I have a 5" Heavy Duty from 1952. That is a fantastic revolver. I even used it to re-qualify for my carry permit. Instructor was impressed. Bought a Lobo IWB holster for it and have carried it some. It balances better than any N-Frame I own, and I shoot it very well. Plus it's just COOL.
I also have two 4" Highway Patrolman revolvers, both in 4" and a 4" M27-2. These are very nice Magnums, and I really like them, but there's just somethin' special about the Heavy Duty. (And for that matter, The Outdoorsman too. I've got of them also).
Jim
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-18-2012, 11:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: SE Iowa
Posts: 45
Likes: 25
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
I have been looking at an Outdoorsman that really needs a thorough cleaning, but I think underneath the grime is a 98% gun. The guy has not put a price on it yet, but I believe it can be had for quite a ways south of a grand. I don't think I can pass that up even if it is a .38!
Ed
|
06-18-2012, 11:49 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
I don't think you will think you have gone wrong with the HP once you start shooting it as they are great.
|
06-18-2012, 11:52 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,719
Likes: 29,596
Liked 23,021 Times in 5,791 Posts
|
|
As an owner/shooter, not a collector, I believe that the M-28 is a much more practical option that the 38/44 H.D; as much as I would love to have a nice one.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-18-2012, 02:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: SE Iowa
Posts: 45
Likes: 25
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by old bear
As an owner/shooter, not a collector, I believe that the M-28 is a much more practical option that the 38/44 H.D; as much as I would love to have a nice one.
|
I agree that is the more practical, but I already have a nice pre-28..........I don't have a 38/44.
|
06-18-2012, 11:58 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
There is nothing like a 4" Pre War HD in your hands!
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-19-2012, 02:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
I must say that when I opened this thread I thought someone was choosing between a Heavy Duty and a High Power!
I'd like to get a HD someday, just to complete all production frame sizes in .38 Special, if nothing else.
(Yes, I have a .38 Special 586. )
Shooting magnums doesn't interest me so I'd opt for the HD anyway as a shooter.
Now HiPowers, like the M&P, are things one can't have too many of.........
Good thing too, as I believe they reproduce prolifically in the dark confines of a safe.
Regards,
Pat
|
06-19-2012, 09:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: BC, & soon, Mexico again!
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 186
Liked 2,082 Times in 606 Posts
|
|
I don't even have the option as the Model 28 in standard form is VERBOTTEN here. Still, I have seen Model 28's that have been reworked and appear to the eye in every way to be a Model 20...except that the longer case will still fit into the cylinder of course. And they are still adjustable sighted.
In the meantime, I have a 1955 manufactured Heavy Duty and it hit exactly where I would have adjusted it to hit if it came with adjustable sights. So I am most happy with it.
Still, if one of those Model 28's that have been magically turned into a Model 20 ever comes my way I will not say "no" either. Both are just so cool.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|