Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2012, 03:50 PM
Trooperdan Trooperdan is offline
Member
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wellington FL Aberdeen NC
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 4,159
Liked 1,469 Times in 511 Posts
Default Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF

I've just acquired a 4" barrel, blue, cal .32 WCF model 1905, 4th change, serial number 84534. Last patent date on the barrel is DEC 28, 1914.
There is the S&W trademark in the grips but no S&W markings on the sideplate nor the left side, is this usual?

It came with an old basket weave holster and the revolver has six notches cut into the left grip and the face of the cylinder has W689411 electro-pen'ed between two cylinders, which I took to possible be a police evidence ID, interesting!
__________________
Old paratrooper in NC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2012, 04:02 PM
Trooperdan Trooperdan is offline
Member
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wellington FL Aberdeen NC
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 4,159
Liked 1,469 Times in 511 Posts
Default A ****** pic

Here is a poor cell phone pic of both.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg S&W, Holster.jpg (16.3 KB, 49 views)
__________________
Old paratrooper in NC

Last edited by Trooperdan; 08-02-2012 at 04:03 PM. Reason: attach picture
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2012, 06:06 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
Default

That serial number points to a probable (but not certain) ship date in 1919. At that time S&W was not marking their revolvers because they were reestablishing normal production in the aftermath of WWI. During the War, while the company was operating under government control, the S&W logo was removed from regular production. The logo was added back in 1920, I believe, and the famous MADE IN U.S.A. rollmark was introduced in 1922. So it is perfectly correct for your gun, and any gun made in that time frame, to have no frame markings associated with the company.

Those .32-20 revolvers are great fun to shoot. Avoid the old rounds marked "for rifle use," because they are loaded too hot for handguns. But other .32-20 ammo is safe to shoot.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2012, 06:34 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
Absent Comrade
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

Note: Older .32-20 ammo marked "For Rifle Use Only" as mentioned by David Wilson as not safe to shoot, can be shot in S&W revolvers. The ammo. is the same as other .32-20 ammo. and the reason for the "For Rifle Use Only" is because many countries, mostly in South & Central America, placed a tax on handgun ammo. but not on rifle ammo., so ammo. companies stamped their ammo. boxes as "For rifle Use Only" to avoid the taxes. Ed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2012, 07:18 PM
Trooperdan Trooperdan is offline
Member
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wellington FL Aberdeen NC
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 4,159
Liked 1,469 Times in 511 Posts
Default

Further question, upon closer examination, the trigger is also marked W689411CA and it came from California via a GA ad. Is this some type of California registration number in stead of a police evidence ID as I first thought?

Thanks for the info guys, I plan to reload .32 Long-level "fun" ammo for this old-timer. Just imagine, around 92 years old, what history might it have seen?
__________________
Old paratrooper in NC

Last edited by Trooperdan; 08-02-2012 at 09:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2012, 07:39 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,007
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opoefc View Post
Note: Older .32-20 ammo marked "For Rifle Use Only" as mentioned by David Wilson as not safe to shoot, can be shot in S&W revolvers. The ammo. is the same as other .32-20 ammo. and the reason for the "For Rifle Use Only" is because many countries, mostly in South & Central America, placed a tax on handgun ammo. but not on rifle ammo., so ammo. companies stamped their ammo. boxes as "For rifle Use Only" to avoid the taxes. Ed.
Ed, in all these years I have never heard that. Is there then no significant pressure difference between the "rifle" and "pistol/general" .32 WCF loadings?

Live and learn. (Though I am not doing that much living today, I am definitely learning.)
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-02-2012, 08:25 PM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF Question on 1905, 4th Change .32 WCF  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,547
Likes: 89,899
Liked 24,943 Times in 8,538 Posts
Default

Watch out for the factory loaded .32-20 cartridges that have a 80 gr hollow point jacketed bullets. These rounds are truly "strong rifles only". Not only should they NOT be fired in handguns, they shouldn't be fired in rifles such as the Winchester 1873.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on my 1905 4th change 32 wcf S&W19506070 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 16 07-16-2014 08:41 PM
M&P of 1905 4th Change Question Straightshooter2 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 12-31-2013 01:40 PM
1905 4th change question karen77 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 12-22-2012 09:07 PM
1905 4th change question.... 10-shooter S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 04-28-2012 10:13 PM
M&P 1905 1st change question.. digi-shots S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 12-06-2007 12:30 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)