Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2010, 08:12 PM
Rafter-S Rafter-S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Telephone, Texas
Posts: 111
Likes: 14
Liked 46 Times in 19 Posts
Default A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???

Gentlemen,

An interesting thing happened handloading for a new Remington 700 in 30-06 caliber. Using 150 grain Sierra spitzer bullets, the rifle prefers IMR-3031 powder over IMR-4064. In the past, when I worked up loads for 30-06 rifles, they preferred 4064 over most other powders, especially 3031.

The rifle is a standard BDL model and is as it came from the factory. And I am getting 1” groups with rounds not assembled all that carefully. So now I will break out the neck sizing and in-line seating dies and see just how much that 1” group can be shrunk.

Has anyone else had favorable results using 3031 for 30-06?

Rafter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2010, 08:30 PM
FlYFiShErMaN's Avatar
FlYFiShErMaN FlYFiShErMaN is offline
US Veteran
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: OLDEST CITY, FLORIDA
Posts: 421
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I have a pre-64 M70 that acts the same way!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2010, 09:08 PM
Snapping Twig's Avatar
Snapping Twig Snapping Twig is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 527
Liked 3,814 Times in 1,243 Posts
Default

Try 4350.

I've found 30-06 bolt rifles like it - a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2010, 09:12 PM
BruceM's Avatar
BruceM BruceM is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 7
Liked 657 Times in 369 Posts
Default

IMO, 3031 is way too fast for the .30-06.

If your looking for hunting ammo, try the Sierra 165 grain SPBT over 56 - 57 grains of IMR-4350 for deer size critters. If you're looking for less velocity but excellent accuracy, try IMR4895 with the 150 grain Sierra.



Bruce

Last edited by BruceM; 04-17-2010 at 05:29 PM. Reason: load data charge weight error
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2010, 09:24 PM
Rafter-S Rafter-S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Telephone, Texas
Posts: 111
Likes: 14
Liked 46 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceM View Post
IMO, 3031 is way too fast for the .30-06.

If your looking for hunting ammo, try the Sierra 165 grain SPBT over 46 - 47 grains of IMR-4350 for deer size critters. If you're looking for less velocity but excellent accuracy, try IMR4895 with the 150 grain Sierra.



Bruce
Bruce,

I am glad you mentioned IMR-4895. I have used it in the past with reasonable success in other bolt action 30-06's, especially with a custom Springfield 03 model. But this particular Remington 700 "rebells" with 4895 and the Sierra 150 gr. bullet for some reason. I get a 4-5" group.

Rafter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2010, 09:40 PM
epj's Avatar
epj epj is offline
US Veteran
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 228
Liked 2,397 Times in 1,081 Posts
Default

Used to use 3031 in a 30-06 loaded with 172 gr. cast bullets. This combo was deadly accurate out of a sporterized 03A3 with scope. Well under 1 MOA at 100 yds.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2010, 10:02 PM
Dragon88 Dragon88 is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Hey, go with what works in your rifle. 3031 is a good powder.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2010, 11:25 PM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,447
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

The .30-06 is a wonder cartridge despite the fact that some consider it boring. It will work really well with a number of different bullets and powders. It is not surprising at all that you are having great results with IMR 3031 powder and the 150 grain bullet.

I've found that IMR 3031 works about as well as IMR 4064 or IMR 4895 with both 125 grain and 150 grain bullets in several different .30-06 rifles kept around here. One can duplicate 150 grain factory velocities using 3031. A powder like IMR 4759 or IMR 4198 would be way too fast. IMR 3031 isn't too fast.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2010, 12:30 AM
NE450No2 NE450No2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 7
Liked 469 Times in 278 Posts
Default

I use IMR 3031 in the wifes 12x12x30/06 drilling.

The loads are slightly less than full power factory loads.

They are easier on the gun and we just do not need full power 30/06 to shoot deer and pigs where we hunt.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-17-2010, 07:58 AM
Dan Cash Dan Cash is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western North Dakota
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Powder like 3031 and Reloader 7 work ok in 06 with lighter bullets but beware; there is little margin between OK and way too hot. No forgiveness.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-17-2010, 10:06 AM
LoboGunLeather's Avatar
LoboGunLeather LoboGunLeather is offline
US Veteran
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 7,520
Likes: 19,278
Liked 32,371 Times in 5,476 Posts
Default

In my experience, IMR 3031 does very well in .30-06 with bullets up to 150 grains. Heavier bullets generally benefit from slower burning powders.

I used Speer 130 grain HotCor bullets in .30-06 for antelope hunting very successfully. Antelope are light and thin-skinned game, usually hunted in open country. Our other game animals here in Colorado include mule deer and elk, usually hunted in brush and timber, for which I prefer heavier bullets.
__________________
Life of the party until 8:00PM
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-17-2010, 10:19 AM
Jim in Wisconsin Jim in Wisconsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pardeeville WI
Posts: 220
Likes: 6
Liked 27 Times in 11 Posts
Default

What BruceM said; at one point in time I played with 130 gr. and lighter bullets in .30-06. 3031 worked very well. For 150 4895 gr. (47 grs. IIRC) was very accurate (real <1").
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-17-2010, 10:51 AM
bnewc75 bnewc75 is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default my 700 30-06 likes

imr4831 behind 180g nosler AB
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-17-2010, 11:00 AM
Alk8944's Avatar
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,727
Likes: 1,578
Liked 8,852 Times in 3,531 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceM View Post
IMO, 3031 is way too fast for the .30-06.

If your looking for hunting ammo, try the Sierra 165 grain SPBT over 46 - 47 grains of IMR-4350 for deer size critters. If you're looking for less velocity but excellent accuracy, try IMR4895 with the 150 grain Sierra.



Bruce
I hope you meant 56-57 gr.? Your load wold be in the .30-30 velocity range.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-17-2010, 02:36 PM
scorvers's Avatar
scorvers scorvers is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Cash View Post
Powder like 3031 and Reloader 7 work ok in 06 with lighter bullets but beware; there is little margin between OK and way too hot. No forgiveness.
yup. I use 3031 to load for my 742 Carbine with 18 1/2" bbl. The 4350 and 4831 produce some serious muzzle flash and noise. The 3031 tamed that. I use a Remington 165 CoreLok. Can't recall the powder charge off the top of my head right now.
Like Dan said, there isn't a whole lot of wiggle room. Weigh each charge.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-17-2010, 04:39 PM
TSQUARED TSQUARED is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 2
Liked 115 Times in 85 Posts
Default

I have used a lot of IMR-3031 in 30-06 with 125 an d 150 gr. bullets. Always has provided excellent accuracy in a number of bolt action rifles.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-17-2010, 05:28 PM
BruceM's Avatar
BruceM BruceM is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 7
Liked 657 Times in 369 Posts
Default

You can get a variety of propellants to work in the .30-06 but that does not make all of them the best choices. Things can get a little interesting when trying to get max performance with it in the 06 when bullets weigh more than 125 grains. Sort of like max. charges of Bullseye in the .44 Magnum. 3031 is a good choice for cast bullet loads. 3031 shines the brightest in .30-30 & .35 Rem class cartridges.

I did mean 56-57 grains and will edit that entry.

You can usually get max. velocity with accuracy with IMR 4350 and it seems to shoot very well in any rifle I tried it in. Many .30-06 rifles will give less than max. accuracy with 150 grain bullets at max. (3000 fps) velocity. The 165 grain and heavier bullets seem to shoot better. If you back off the gas some with the 150's, that's a different story and IMR4895 usually give excellent accuracy when doing so. It's also the propellant of choice for duplicating military ball ammo loads for the M1. Once again, these are not maximum velocity loads.

If you are having severe accuracy issues with 4895, I would try a different 150 grain bullet.

Bruce

Last edited by BruceM; 04-17-2010 at 05:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-18-2010, 03:33 PM
Homie Homie is offline
US Veteran
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 583
Liked 274 Times in 182 Posts
Cool

Rafter,

It seems a lot have people are unaware that IMR 3031 was developed for .30-'06 class cartridges, and it has been doing fine for 76 years.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

My concern would be why a rifle would shoot 1" with only one load and 5" with a similar load. Sounds like a bedding issue (hopefully), or a barrel problem (hope not).

Good shooting.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 04-18-2010, 08:32 PM
running iron running iron is offline
US Veteran
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: N.Az
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

52.5 grs. of 4350 with a 190gr. Hornady spbt in my B.A.R. Safari Mark 2 with iron sights. It doesn't get any better for me. Great set up for high country Elk. I agree that 3031 is way to fast for the 06 and 4350 is best for the heavy bullets. I don't know about the lighter ones cause I don't use them.
__________________
AM-Tracks 66-69

Last edited by running iron; 04-18-2010 at 08:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-19-2010, 02:59 PM
BruceM's Avatar
BruceM BruceM is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 7
Liked 657 Times in 369 Posts
Default

"It seems a lot have people are unaware that IMR 3031 was developed for .30-'06 class cartridges"

This still does not make it the best or even the "better" choice.

Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-19-2010, 04:16 PM
44forever 44forever is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default Slight thread drift -

For years my "go to" load for the .270 Winchester has been 56 grains of 3031 and a 130 grain Sierra Gameking. I have yet to find a .270 that won't group that load. I realise it is a smaller bore but it is the same case.

As others have mentioned, maybe not the best choice for heavier bullets.
__________________
Big bang, much smash'em.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-19-2010, 10:21 PM
canoe on the yukon canoe on the yukon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 10 Posts
Default

With the old adage "If it ain't broke,don't fix it" in mind......If the load in question is accurate,safe w/reasonable pressure and effective for whatever use it's being put to,there's no reason to change.

A great many powders will "work" in 30/06 class cartridges but as others have said,3031 would not usually be considered optimum.I've always had the best results with 4350 with the 30/06.There are other powders which do quite well with it but most of them are actually not far apart from 4350 in terms of bulk/burning rate.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-21-2010, 11:11 AM
Rafter-S Rafter-S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Telephone, Texas
Posts: 111
Likes: 14
Liked 46 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44forever View Post
For years my "go to" load for the .270 Winchester has been 56 grains of 3031 and a 130 grain Sierra Gameking.
44forever,

Did you mean 46 grains of 3031 instead of 56? The Lyman Reloading Handbook shows 47 grains to be the Max. Load with 53,200 C.U.P.

Rafter
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-21-2010, 11:53 AM
DGNY DGNY is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Garden Spot, Upstate NY, USA
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 3,385
Liked 748 Times in 445 Posts
Default 30-06 and IMR 3031

Glad you are having success with 3031. It is a fine powder when used judiciously in '06.

When I pursued woodchucks in upstate NY in the 50s and early 60s, my go-to load was 110gr Sierra HPs over a less-than-max load of 3031. Wonderfully accurate in my 1917 '06 Eddystone with Bishop stock. At first with peep sight and then with 10X Weaver. Under 1" @ 100 yards and just 2" @ 200 yards. Eyes were better then to use peep at long range.

Best-ever loads were 165gr Sierra HPs over 4350.

Regards,

Dyson
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-21-2010, 06:56 PM
cjw3 cjw3 is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 858
Likes: 14
Liked 82 Times in 52 Posts
Default

I used 3031 in the .30-06 for several years after I began reloading in the early 70's. I don't remember the exact loading, but it was in the modest range using data from the Lyman Handbook of the time and the Sierra 165 grain HPBT fired from a Remington 760.

Groups at 100 yards were a little under an inch from the trombone rifle, something I have not been able to achieve since with a Ruger 77, but, oh well.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:49 PM
Rafter-S Rafter-S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Telephone, Texas
Posts: 111
Likes: 14
Liked 46 Times in 19 Posts
Default Don't give up on the Ruger 77 too soon

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjw3 View Post
Groups at 100 yards were a little under an inch from the trombone rifle, something I have not been able to achieve since with a Ruger 77, but, oh well.
cjw3,

A little off subject, but a local gunsmith has made several Ruger 77's shoot well simply by putting a shem under the front of the action to lessen the pressure point on the barrel...not make the barrel free floating...but to lessen the pressure "a little." He has made several 77's go from 2" shooters to under 1".

My pal down the road fixed his Ruger 77 himself by putting a piece of a business card under the front of the action as a shem. And sure enough, the group tightened up dramatically. Wish I had known that before I got rid of my old M77.

Rafter
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-22-2010, 05:39 PM
Shuz Shuz is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 383
Likes: 178
Liked 110 Times in 66 Posts
Default

3031 is my favorite powder for use with cast boolits in 2 different .30-06's.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-25-2010, 08:18 AM
dogngun dogngun is offline
US Veteran
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 351
Liked 359 Times in 139 Posts
Default I used to use 3031 for nearly everything - just watch

your cases for over pressure signs. I really like neck sizing, too and I have had several old .30-06 rifles that were WAY more accurate than they wre supposed to be, including an old, beat up '06 Savage bought for $160 that outshot my expensive Ruger .243, after a little cleaning and tightening up.

mark
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:01 AM
Eagles6 Eagles6 is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've used 3031 for years in -06, 46 grs behind a 180 gr JSP. Also works very well for cast, as others have said.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-26-2010, 03:53 PM
oldman10mm oldman10mm is online now
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 3,094
Likes: 49
Liked 4,126 Times in 1,876 Posts
Default

my 700ADL,glass bedded action and floated barrel 'prefers' 3031 for 147FMJBT and 110HP.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-27-2010, 02:34 PM
boatbum101 boatbum101 is offline
Member
A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ??? A 30-06 preferring IMR-3031 ???  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 4,198
Liked 999 Times in 536 Posts
Default

Rifles are like people they'll tell what they like to eat if you'll listen . I must confess that I too would consider 3031 a bit fast for an '06 . Over the years & with numerous rifles I've had better luck with 4895 to 4064 speed powders & 150gr bullets . With 165's usually 4350 , RL19 , W760/H414 works the best . 180's seem to like 4350 to 4831 speed powders . Of course these are generalizations , but they're backed up by years of my experiences . If your rifle likes 3031 use it . I've got a 358Win that loves 3031 w/ Sierra 225 spitzer .
Andy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
44 magnum, bullseye, carbine, cartridge, gunsmith, hornady, military, nosler, remington, ruger, savage, scope, sig arms, springfield, weaver, winchester

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)