Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2010, 01:35 PM
ncbengal ncbengal is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nawth Carolinah
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Hard cast vs swaged bullets

I have used different brands of "hard cast" 158 gr .357 swc bullets in my s&w 686 and Mod 19, both w/6" bbl and in good condition. These ought to produce decent groups from sand bag, which for sake of argument I'll call 2" at 25 yd. Powders range from Tite Group, 231, Universal, Auto Comp, up and down the scale. Never able to achieve better than 5-6" consistently. A change to copper plated or jacketed bullets brought my groups down to an acceptable level. Then I "accidentally" bought a 500 box of softer swaged bullets by Magnus. A phone call confimed these are 9-11 hardness whereas hard cast are 18-19. Another source had suggested Solo 1000 for lead and target use. Having very little published about Solo 1000 in .38 spl cases, I made a horseback guess at 3.0 gr of Solo and made a few. (Found another source that said min of 3.1 gr with 158 gr lead - good guess!.)

Bottom line: These loads will drive nails! Impact is centered with even .357 loads; recoil is lighter than store bought .38's; 5 shot groups 1-2" from sand bag is no problem.

Someone(s) have already said to check the barrel and cylinder bore diameter on my guns, as maybe hard cast bullets are leaking gas; but I figure S&W has had more experience in making gun barrels than I have in measuring, so I'll forego that. Barrel leading seems not to be an issue so far, but we'll watch out and just keep on lobbing those soft bullets into the 10-ring.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2010, 03:29 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Lightbulb Fit is the issue 95% of the time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncbengal View Post
I have used different brands of "hard cast" 158 gr .357 swc bullets in my s&w 686 and Mod 19, both w/6" bbl and in good condition. These ought to produce decent groups from sand bag, which for sake of argument I'll call 2" at 25 yd. Powders range from Tite Group, 231, Universal, Auto Comp, up and down the scale. Never able to achieve better than 5-6" consistently. A change to copper plated or jacketed bullets brought my groups down to an acceptable level. Then I "accidentally" bought a 500 box of softer swaged bullets by Magnus. A phone call confimed these are 9-11 hardness whereas hard cast are 18-19. Another source had suggested Solo 1000 for lead and target use. Having very little published about Solo 1000 in .38 spl cases, I made a horseback guess at 3.0 gr of Solo and made a few. (Found another source that said min of 3.1 gr with 158 gr lead - good guess!.)

Bottom line: These loads will drive nails! Impact is centered with even .357 loads; recoil is lighter than store bought .38's; 5 shot groups 1-2" from sand bag is no problem.

Someone(s) have already said to check the barrel and cylinder bore diameter on my guns, as maybe hard cast bullets are leaking gas; but I figure S&W has had more experience in making gun barrels than I have in measuring, so I'll forego that. Barrel leading seems not to be an issue so far, but we'll watch out and just keep on lobbing those soft bullets into the 10-ring.
Measuring the throats in your revolver would be where I would start, not ignore. It has been my experience that accuracy is a function of fit and so is leading. Most commercial casters don't have a clue about what gun you might be shooting their bullets in so, they make them hard so as not to have problems with soft ones being driven too hard causing leading.

There are a bunch of commercial casters that will work with you to tailor a bullet for you gun/load combination.

Here is the problem that I see with your situation. You don't cast so you have to rely on someone else that has never shot your gun to give you bullets that fit it perfectly! How is that going to happen? It can't.

That dear friend, is why I cast my own. I can make them big enough and soft enough or small enough and hard enough for whatever my guns and loads require.

I have yet to shoot the first swaged bullet and doubt I ever will. My target loads run straight wheel weights from 700fps to 800fps. With just a tad bit of tin or Linotype, I can run them all the way to 2000fps in a pistol caliber carbine (44Mag 210gr LRNFP) with no leading and accuracy is acceptable.

Oh, the two biggest things about casting though: I have what I want when I want, no shortages affect me; The cost of equipment has long ago been paid back and my bullets now cost me hundredths of cents to make. Imagine a 1000 158gr LSWC for $2!

I think I will cast my own, thanks.

p.s. Glad you found a solution to your problems though, that is what matters most. Keep shooting and be safe!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 09-27-2010, 08:36 PM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

There is nothing wrong with swaged bullets as long as you don't try to attain magnum velocities with them. In fact, at low velocities in the 700-900 fps range, I have found them to be just like you describe.

Winchester used to sell swaged bullets as components. I don't think they do any longer and that is a shame. I bought a bunch of 158 SWCs and 148 HBWCs and they shoot really well out of all my guns and do not lead at all.

But for heavier loads, I usually stick with my own cast bullets. There are some good vendors out there but there are a lot who sell one-size-fits-all junk.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2010, 08:53 PM
NKJ nut's Avatar
NKJ nut NKJ nut is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 83
Liked 80 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smith crazy View Post
Imagine a 1000 158gr LSWC for $2!
Skip that sounds good to me. I'll take a hundred thousand a month
__________________
too TOO young!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-27-2010, 08:56 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Talking My time is free though!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NKJ nut View Post
Skip that sounds good to me. I'll take a hundred thousand a month
Jes,
Since I don't have to support my family doing so, I don't have to have my time paid for, that is taken care of on another job!

If it was my livelihood, the price MIGHT go up a bit!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2010, 09:04 PM
NKJ nut's Avatar
NKJ nut NKJ nut is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 83
Liked 80 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Skip you can keep your day job and cast me a hundred thousand bullets a month, just working at night.

Even if you only worked at it three nights a week you wouldn't have to cast and size but just a wee bit over 8,000 bullets a night
__________________
too TOO young!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2010, 09:05 PM
HEAD0001 HEAD0001 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RIVESVILLE, WV
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I really enjoy casting bullets. Personally I have found that leading is more a function of a properly sized bullet, rather than the hardness of the bullet. A good properly sized and lubed bullet does not lead the barrel. So as Smith Crazy says you should measure your revolver and cast your own, or have a custom caster size them for you. a good reputable caster will do that for you. Try casting, just be careful, it is very very very addictive. You will soon have a mess like me. Tom.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2010, 10:34 PM
Paul5388's Avatar
Paul5388 Paul5388 is offline
US Veteran
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rusk Co. Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 31 Posts
Default

I'd almost be willing to say Tennessee Valley Bullets could make the size bullets you need in an alloy that would work in your guns. Check Jessie out and see if that isn't the case. TVB - Bullets
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-27-2010, 10:41 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Wink Go ahead and call!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NKJ nut View Post
Skip you can keep your day job and cast me a hundred thousand bullets a month, just working at night.

Even if you only worked at it three nights a week you wouldn't have to cast and size but just a wee bit over 8,000 bullets a night
Jes,
You have my phone number, go ahead and ask the missus if she will go for that!

'Course if she does, I suppose I can move in with my daughter and son in law! (JK!)

OK, 100,000 a month and let's take the price to 5 cents each, that would include shipping, would bring us to $60,000 p/yr. I will need that in advance, please!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 09-27-2010, 11:28 PM
NKJ nut's Avatar
NKJ nut NKJ nut is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 83
Liked 80 Times in 43 Posts
Default

The check is in the mail
__________________
too TOO young!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-27-2010, 11:33 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Talking OKEY DOKEY!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NKJ nut View Post
The check is in the mail
Jes,

I get started as soon as it clears the bank!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:09 PM
sgt2004 sgt2004 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

okay this is the first time hearing of swaged bullets can anyone tell me what the deal with the bullets is are they consistant.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:31 PM
Paul5388's Avatar
Paul5388 Paul5388 is offline
US Veteran
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rusk Co. Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Swaged bullets are formed under pressure from lead wire. The wire doesn't have to be pure lead and can contain 3% or so antimony. In the 1970s, Speer offered cast bullets and had them with loads in their manuals. But that changed in the middle 1970s to swaged bullets which made the data drop to 1000 fps or less to allow for the softer bullet and keep leading to a minimum.

Home swaging used to be practiced, with C&H making many dies for bullets using an O frame press CH4D :: 101 Bullet Swaging Dies. Corbin also makes swaging equipment. Corbin Home Page Most home swaged bullets are half jacket at the minimum, but many are made with fully jacketed designs.

Casting is cheaper in the long run and doesn't depend on wire or jacket material from outside sources.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-08-2011, 10:06 PM
cptdco cptdco is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 630
Likes: 7
Liked 107 Times in 39 Posts
Default

I put a lot of swaged SWCs downrange. My favorite these days is the Zero 158 grain SWC hollow point. I load it over 3.5 grains of bullseye in .38 cases and over 4.0 grains in .357 cases. It is very accurate in my guns and no lead problems. And the Zeros are very competitively priced. I also buy their 148 grain HBWC. If you're not familiar with Zero bullets, they are available through a company called Roze Distributers. Fast shipping also, and while I'm at it, I'll mention that I also like their jacketed bullets; they shoot well and are cheaper then many others. Just be aware that Roze is sometimes out of a particular bullet type when you want it so you need to check back frequently.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-08-2011, 10:44 PM
TheTinMan TheTinMan is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sorta Downeast
Posts: 933
Likes: 2,866
Liked 1,735 Times in 417 Posts
Default

Hornady specifically recommends that their swaged bullets be kept around 800 fps, but also specifies their 148gr HBWC at 800 fps as their most accurate .38 Special load.

I've worked up a decent .38 Special load with Hornady's swaged HBWC and am close to a good .357 Magnum target load (IOW under 900 fps) with their 158gr swaged LSWC.

However, some hard cast bullets from Penn are on their way. I'll report here on which is most accurate in my revolvers.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-09-2011, 02:44 PM
trulyapostolic's Avatar
trulyapostolic trulyapostolic is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Central, Indiana
Posts: 254
Likes: 43
Liked 53 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncbengal View Post
I have used different brands of "hard cast" 158 gr .357 swc bullets in my s&w 686 and Mod 19, both w/6" bbl and in good condition. These ought to produce decent groups from sand bag, which for sake of argument I'll call 2" at 25 yd. Powders range from Tite Group, 231, Universal, Auto Comp, up and down the scale. Never able to achieve better than 5-6" consistently. A change to copper plated or jacketed bullets brought my groups down to an acceptable level. Then I "accidentally" bought a 500 box of softer swaged bullets by Magnus. A phone call confimed these are 9-11 hardness whereas hard cast are 18-19. Another source had suggested Solo 1000 for lead and target use. Having very little published about Solo 1000 in .38 spl cases, I made a horseback guess at 3.0 gr of Solo and made a few. (Found another source that said min of 3.1 gr with 158 gr lead - good guess!.)

Bottom line: These loads will drive nails! Impact is centered with even .357 loads; recoil is lighter than store bought .38's; 5 shot groups 1-2" from sand bag is no problem.

Someone(s) have already said to check the barrel and cylinder bore diameter on my guns, as maybe hard cast bullets are leaking gas; but I figure S&W has had more experience in making gun barrels than I have in measuring, so I'll forego that. Barrel leading seems not to be an issue so far, but we'll watch out and just keep on lobbing those soft bullets into the 10-ring.
I use Magnus or Zero bullets exclusively on my bullseye competition guns because of what you've also experienced. If I was able to cast my own bullets I would certainly do it, but don't have the time (or understanding enough wife) to allow that. Shooting the 158 SWC bullet, for Distinguished Revolver competition, either manufacturers bullet performs wonderfully. My stock 14-4 will put 10 shots inside 3" at 50 yards. I've been shooting 3.1 gr. bullseye but have also recently been playing with 3.8 gr. 231. Both loads are running 750-775 fps average.
I've also purchased several brands of cast 45 185gr. SWC bullets to compare to their swaged counterparts and experienced the same thing. The cast bullets couldn't hold a candle to the swaged ones. I saw group increases of 1-2" at 50 yards. I'm certain some folks who cast their own, and even some manufacturers, can produce bullets that perform equally to the swaged but I haven't found them yet.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-09-2011, 07:47 PM
Maximumbob54's Avatar
Maximumbob54 Maximumbob54 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

With risking sounding like I'm attacking the OP (and I'm NOT!!!)...

This is the kind of thread that screams why so many people are moving away from lead bullets!!! Too few take the time to figure out what they are doing either right or wrong and just move to jacketed bullets. Worse, S&W seems to be fully pandering to this crowd with the use of the new rifling they are putting in the revolvers. But the few that figure out how to slug the bore, measure the throats in each chamber, and can match alloy, lube, and pressure find that LEAD STILL KICKS BUTT!!!

AND YOU CAN MAKE THEM YOURSELF!!!

Sorry for the all caps rant. A nerve just got tweaked there. It still burns me that 158 gr LSWCHP's lead the heck out of my 637...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-23-2011, 12:58 PM
hawgleg's Avatar
hawgleg hawgleg is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: arkansas
Posts: 236
Likes: 4
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Default

I like the Hornady swage 158 lswchp . They cost more than cast but are cheaper than the jacketed. For an indoor range the smoke is about half of the cast bullets. To me cast is fine outdoors but not for indoor ranges.

If you've never used a swage bullet I'd highly recommend try some of the Hornady swage bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-27-2017, 12:52 AM
OldFart61 OldFart61 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm always amazed at people who talk about group size at 25 yards and less. I have trouble finding a bullet that won't group at 25 yards or less. Maybe you ought to work on your shooting skills before you worry about what is most accurate.
If your talking about 50 yard groups out of your pistol now you should be concerned with group size. I worked for 7 years as a full time range instructor for a police academy and I only know of a few men/women that can shoot up to the accuracy of their guns. If you have a handgun that won't shoot a one inch group at 25 yards with any ammo then throw the gun away or learn to shoot. I only consider myself a "good" shooter and I can take any piece of **** handgun and benches it for a one inch group.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-27-2017, 09:18 AM
forestswin's Avatar
forestswin forestswin is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 959
Likes: 652
Liked 549 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Well, that's kind of an oddball first post, in a 6 year old thread.

What does it have to do with reloading?
Most posts here deal with helping people with reloading issues.

It kind of reminds me of Fess Parker as Daniel Boone walking into a pub and toasting the king of England, so he can find some allies among those who just threw him out.
__________________
I'd like to agree with you BUT

Last edited by forestswin; 02-27-2017 at 11:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 02-27-2017, 10:50 AM
mtgianni mtgianni is online now
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 10,392
Liked 5,970 Times in 2,940 Posts
Default

Having seen bullets keyhole at 25 yards I would guess it is much more than a learn to shoot situation.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 02-27-2017, 11:03 AM
elpac3's Avatar
elpac3 elpac3 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mpls, Minnesota
Posts: 867
Likes: 87
Liked 967 Times in 398 Posts
Default

I shoot both hard cast and swagged 148 grain HBWC in my 14-3 PPC revolver and the hard cast 170 grain Keith in my model 19 4". I have found the best accuracy with the hard cast comes they are pushed hard. Best accuracy so far has been with 13 grains of 2400 ( about 1160 FPS) and a good roll crimp. Will group under 2" all day at 25 yards. The 14 will shoot the 148 HBWC 2" all day at 50 yards.

Lots of factors could be coming into play with your results including cylinder throats, cast bullet size etc. Had some issues with the 170's when I tried shooting them slow, groups were nothing to write home about but dramatically improved as the velocity (pressure) was increased .
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-27-2017, 02:19 PM
Fishslayer Fishslayer is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, PRK
Posts: 9,238
Likes: 11,531
Liked 11,249 Times in 3,916 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Sackett View Post
Imagine a 1000 158gr LSWC for $2!

I think I will cast my own, thanks.
My friend & I recently started casting our own partly due the political climate in Kalifornistan.

Free lead isn't really available here but even at $1.00/lb we can cast a 230gr .452" boolit for 3-ish cents a pop. We also powdercoat so hardness isn't really all that important. If we need harder alloy a local club sells reclaimed bird shot from their trap range for fairly cheap.

Most importantly in this state we are free from worry about any per bullet "public safety tax" that they have actually discussed in the past.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-27-2017, 03:33 PM
Wise_A Wise_A is offline
Banned
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 2,661
Liked 4,324 Times in 1,793 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forestswin View Post
Well, that's kind of an oddball first post, in a 6 year old thread.
If that post was any more full of Bravo Sierra, the text would be brown.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #25  
Old 02-27-2017, 05:06 PM
Qc Pistolero Qc Pistolero is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: May 2016
Location: 30min SE Montreal
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 150
Liked 1,540 Times in 841 Posts
Default

I both cast and swage my own.My swaged and cast bullets for target work are aprox 5 to 6BHN.Up to 900 to 1000fps,no leading problem with the swagwd.My cast run aprox 11 to 14 BHN.I can shoot full magnum with them(some with and some without GC) and in all exept one(a recently acquired mod 629 .44Mag at 1250fps)no leading.The first thing I'll be doing is measure the throats and I'm 90% sure that's where I'll find the problem and then apply the cure to the 629.
I actually find that people shoot too hard lead in their guns.The softer lead bumps up to fit the throats of the cylinder and obturates the rushing gas to where they belong;behind the bullet.
Sometimes,too hard a bullet will only contribute to leading by not bumping the diameter up,letting the gases pass between the bullet and bore.Result:lots of fun at home if scrubbing a bore is your definition of having a good time;not my cup of tea!
Qc.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #26  
Old 02-27-2017, 05:38 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,063
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,464 Times in 6,787 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldFart61 View Post
I'm always amazed at people who talk about group size at 25 yards and less. I have trouble finding a bullet that won't group at 25 yards or less. Maybe you ought to work on your shooting skills before you worry about what is most accurate.
If your talking about 50 yard groups out of your pistol now you should be concerned with group size. I worked for 7 years as a full time range instructor for a police academy and I only know of a few men/women that can shoot up to the accuracy of their guns. If you have a handgun that won't shoot a one inch group at 25 yards with any ammo then throw the gun away or learn to shoot. I only consider myself a "good" shooter and I can take any piece of **** handgun and benches it for a one inch group.
Well, most of the "OldFarts" at our range can not get 1" groups at 10 yards. So we all must suk or have bad guns.

Wilson Combat "warranties" 1" at 25 yards with a $5,000 1911. Must be in a ransom rest.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #27  
Old 02-27-2017, 06:26 PM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,906
Likes: 41,494
Liked 29,147 Times in 13,778 Posts
Default The swaged HBWC..

The swaged HBWC is about as accurate as any bullet out there. A slow, heavy bullet is pretty much the norm for accuracy.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 02-27-2017, 10:49 PM
SMSgt's Avatar
SMSgt SMSgt is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 3,343
Liked 9,152 Times in 3,432 Posts
Default

It is my understanding that sizing bullets to fit chamber throats is about accuracy, not leading. Sizing to fit the throat keeps the bullet from getting crooked when it enters the forcing cone.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-03-2017, 10:11 PM
Qc Pistolero Qc Pistolero is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: May 2016
Location: 30min SE Montreal
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 150
Liked 1,540 Times in 841 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMSgt View Post
It is my understanding that sizing bullets to fit chamber throats is about accuracy, not leading. Sizing to fit the throat keeps the bullet from getting crooked when it enters the forcing cone.
Right!But leading is counterproductive to accuracy.I agree with you that it is not the sole factor but I stick to the fact that is is one of utmost importance.
Qc
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #30  
Old 03-05-2017, 01:14 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
Default

That is some really great powder for lead and I also liked
Nitro 100 for my 12 Ga. trap loads.

Only problem the bottles got less powder over the years and the price keep getting higher.

I finally moved on to another brand of powder.

It also sounds like your weapon might like .358 dia. lead bullets.
My M19 liked the soft Speer 158gr in RN or swc styles.

Good shooting.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-13-2017, 07:32 PM
jtcarm's Avatar
jtcarm jtcarm is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 1,552
Liked 4,271 Times in 1,805 Posts
Default

Hard cast is ****. The bullet has to fit your chamber throats. Otherwise softer is better because it'll expand & fill the throats.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-16-2017, 11:31 PM
mtgianni mtgianni is online now
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 10,392
Liked 5,970 Times in 2,940 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtcarm View Post
Hard cast is ****. The bullet has to fit your chamber throats. Otherwise softer is better because it'll expand & fill the throats.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Elmer loved Hardcast, the only thing is he considered it to be 1 in 10 tin to lead or 1 in 12 instead of his usual 1 in 16 or 1 in 20. It is all terms but if it doesn't fit the throat you may just as well use a slingshot.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #33  
Old 07-17-2017, 02:09 AM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,906
Likes: 41,494
Liked 29,147 Times in 13,778 Posts
Default The main two things about swaged.....

Don't push them over about 950 fps or they will lead.

Soft swaged very easily conforms to the diameter of a barrel so it is very easy to obtain accurate loads. I think for soft swaged about .002 over barrel dia. is ideal, but it doesn't hurt to try anything

BTW The swaged HBWCs are inherently about the most accurate bullet in most any gun without a lot of fine tuning in that the skirt of the bullet expands to fit any barrel. Slick, huh?

When I decide that I want accuracy over muzzle energy, velocity and recoil I shoot Speer or Hornady (and others) swaged HBWCs. A soft, heavy bullet lofted at slow velocity is a pretty good formula for accuracy. In semis, the swaged SWC with a light load is often tops.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"

Last edited by rwsmith; 07-17-2017 at 02:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-20-2017, 12:28 PM
jtcarm's Avatar
jtcarm jtcarm is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 1,552
Liked 4,271 Times in 1,805 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtgianni View Post
Elmer loved Hardcast, the only thing is he considered it to be 1 in 10 tin to lead or 1 in 12 instead of his usual 1 in 16 or 1 in 20. It is all terms but if it doesn't fit the throat you may just as well use a slingshot.

Exactly.

"Hard" had a different meaning when people were alloying tin to pure lead with no antimony.

A softer bullet can get away with being slightly undersized if the load develops enough pressure to expand the base to fit the throats.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-20-2017, 01:04 PM
41 fan 41 fan is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Loganville, Ga.
Posts: 354
Likes: 171
Liked 133 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Many commercial casters will size bullets to your request. Dean
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-21-2017, 03:18 PM
mikld's Avatar
mikld mikld is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. Orygun
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 1,962
Liked 1,827 Times in 987 Posts
Default

I don't remember the term "hard cast" when I started shooting cast bullets about 35 years ago. Seems to be a recent buzzword mostly used by newer users of cast bullets. I don't believe there is a standard designation of "hard" (is that 16 BHN? or 18 BHN? or mebbe 20 BHN?) or "soft (8 BHN? or 10 BHN, or 12 BHN?). From my reading Keith did not use "hard cast" as many of his alloys were designated by lead to tin ratio (20-1, 16-1). The term is jst used to designate cast bullets from swaged bullets that has gotten to be "the" term for cast bullets.

From the OPs first post, I'd say he was shooting undersized bullets to get the reported 6" @ 25 accuracy. Yes S&W does know more about making barrels than most reloaders, but knowing exactly what your gun measures is essential ( sizing to cylinder throat is 99% for clean shooting, not alignment or "accuracy").
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-21-2017, 06:46 PM
38SPL HV's Avatar
38SPL HV 38SPL HV is offline
Member
Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets Hard cast vs swaged bullets  
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 957
Liked 949 Times in 419 Posts
Default

I like Speer 158 gr LSWC in my 38 Spl +P loadings - they pretty much duplicate the velocities (confirmed through chronograph) of factory Rem/Win/Fed +P 158 gr LHP loadings. Speer do not lead like the factory stuff and are extremely accurate; more accurate than cast bullets at similar velocities.

My 38-44 loads used 150 gr to 158 gr cast bullets (approx. 1,100 fps from 6 inch).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
357 magnum, 637, 686, bullseye, carbine, commercial, hornady, universal

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hard cast bullets for the 500 S&W leadtag Ammo 1 07-07-2016 10:55 PM
Hard Cast Bullets gvrogers1 Reloading 16 11-09-2013 01:14 PM
Purchasing Hard Cast Bullets,Need Help pistolairo Reloading 23 03-17-2013 08:58 PM
329 PD and hard cast bullets ?? J-FRAME S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 04-17-2012 11:30 PM
.357 hard cast bullets chud333 Reloading 20 03-19-2012 04:14 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)