Whats the general thoughts on the 110 gr jacketed hollow points.I have a couple hundred.

I went through a short phase of using them in the late 70s/early 80s, back when it was thought that speed kills. Not too keen on them any more. They seem to shoot a little low for fixed sight guns. I like more weight in my .38/.357 bullets and use the light weight slugs in 9mm and .380. Only my view.

They could make reasonable practice ammunition though.

I bought a batch of 500 IMI 110gr .357 JHP's several years ago, still have 2 or 3 hundred left. Never found a really good accurate load with them for the .38 spl and kind of gave up on them. Much rather load 125gr JHP's.

I'm not a big fan of light for caliber bullets. I'm not much a fan of even the 125gr bullet in the .357 Magnum even though it's a proven man stopper. I like 140gr bullet and heavier in the .357 Magnum.

For the .38 Special I'm pretty much on the same lines. I usually don't shoot anything lighter than the 135gr Speer Gold Dot ammo. I'm a big fan of the FBI Load in the .38 Special.

Just my opinions....

__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437

I bought a bunch of the Win jhp ones at one time because they were cheap (they have a deep concave base, like a Minie ball) and shot them for quite a while. I really liked them at the range. I loaded them up with 6.4 gr Unique in 38 Special +p brass, which seems hot compared to a some loading manuals but that was listed as the 'accuracy' load in the Sierra manual (can't remember the edition, around 1995-6). They really were very accurate, and low recoiling. Better yet, they gave a serious report and flash that made them seem much bigger than they were, especially from a snub. They will shoot really low unless you crank the sights way up, but they were great in my 2.5" 686 and are still one of my favorite loads in my 2" Model 15. I never chrono'd them, but I imagine they would work well as a close quarters defensive load.

__________________
" I said, good DAY! "

WOW 6.4 gr of Unique seems WAY WAY hot for a .38. Hell I'm using 4.9 gr. in a .38 case with 148-158 grainers and I get flack for that being hot.

But hey if it works

Have fun and be safe.
Nightshade2x

Thats right at Alliants max of 6.3 grs Unique for the 110 bullet.+P load.

The 135 Speer GDHP uses 5.2 grs Unique for a +P round

Heavier bullets usually less powder. I know, doesn't seem logical but it's physics and velocity stuff..

__________________
Still Running Against the Wind

Try this intuitive approach and see if it helps:
Smokeless powder generates ZERO pressure if burned without containment (in the open).
Smokeless powder generates maximum pressure when completely contained in a sealed chamber with no outlet.

There you have the two limits of pressure that the powder can produce, and complete containment usually means a blown gun.

Therefore, a heavier bullet provides MORE containment and the same amount of powder would generate MORE pressure.
To keep from blowing up the gun, the allowable max powder charge is REDUCED when going to a heavier bullet.

__________________
Science plus Art

Good explanation and better stated than mine. I understand it and was more for nightshade. By containment you are saying the heavier bullet is longer and taking up more space in the the case? Or requiring more energy or force to move the bullet out of the case due to it's weight?
How does bullet composition enter into it? Lead vs copper and neck tension of the same weight bullet. Lead usually being less powder as there is less resistance to get it moving?

__________________
Still Running Against the Wind

I have tried a Lee 105 SWC that casts out at 110 grains in my Tuarus .38 Spl with 5.0 grains of Bullseye..it was remarkably accurate and a lot of fun to shoot. Great can plinker, which was what I wanted it for. Lead is now expensive and going to a lighter bullet to plink to me makes a lot of sense. MV was just over 1,100 FPS in a 6" barrel. Also shot very well in my Marlin 1894C Carbine. I sized them big at .359".

The 1978 Sierra manual shows quite a bit more Unique than 6.4 grains. I'll leave it to someone to sleuth out the maximum listed load for Unique and a 110 grain bullet in that manual. It has a number of eyebrow-raising maximum listed loads in it. Some are along the lines of the Speer No. 8 and SR 4756.

Some 30 years ago I worked up to Sierra's maximum listed load for Unique in the .38 Special with their 110 grain JHP, chronographing it from a 4-inch Model 10 and from an 8 3/8-inch Model 14 to obtain the following:

MV 1295 fps: 4-inch barrel
MV 1434 fps: 8 3/8-inch barrel

The Sierra 1978 maximum Unique load doesn't hold a candle to their maximum listed .38 Special load using Blue Dot with their 110 grain JHP:

1388 fps: 4-inch barrel
1573 fps: 8 3/8-inch barrel

My notes indicated that I thought the Blue Dot load to be fairly accurate. I don't now recall what that meant.

The maximum listed Unique load for Sierra's 158 grain JHP was 6.4 grains in their 1978 manual. I never attempted to work up to that.

All of the above factors affect total resistance to expansion, which is the containment.

__________________
Science plus Art

I didn't really need an explanation of that, I understand the concept but thanks for your effort.

Have fun and be safe.
Nightshade2x

My bad then. You seemed shocked at the amount of powder for a light bullet compared to a heavier bullet so I thought a little explanation might help.

No offense meant.

__________________
Still Running Against the Wind

Ok, no problem.

Have fun and be safe.
Nightshade2x

A few years back a gunwriter named John Wooters out of Texas wrote that he used the 125 grain bullets in his .357s exclusively. He said he tried the 110 grain bullets but found the expansion no better than the 125s on game up to the size of Texas whitetails.

He wrote interesting stuff by the way and an excellent book on hunting trophy deer.

__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.

Interesting that he would try the 110 JHPs on larger game. I think penetration would be poor but they would likely be better in a handgun than a carbine. Out of a carbine like a Marlin 1894 I get spectacular velocity with them (let's just say a good bit over 2300fps). I'm not sure much would be left to penetrate following impact since they are designed to open at lower handgun velocities. But if you had a flat point one with a tough enough jacket it sure could be interesting!

I know the 125gr JHPs are often used on deer out of a 357 Mag handgun. In fact, my cousin-in-law the late gunwriter Bob Shimek favored a 125 JHP in his Model 27 for many years and had good success with it. He kept ranges under 50 yards though and only took broadside heart/lung shots. He later went to 140gr bullets.

__________________
" I said, good DAY! "

VAdoublegunner,

I distinctly remember reading an article by Bob Shimek about his 8 3/8 M27 and how he shot so many 125 grain top end loads out of it the revolver finally "shot loose" if I remember his description. It was a great article.

I suspect John Wooters tried the 110 grainers on lesser game than deer. He was knowledgeable enough to perhaps not try that.

I tried the 110 grainers and even the old Remington 95 grainers. The problem I had was they would not take a full house charge of H110, W296, or 2400 so that I could get truly max velocities. The cases would not accomodate full loads of powder.

__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.

I fooled around with 110 JHP's in .357 many years back. I tried them out on some fish carcasses and found they would expand vigorously but lacked penetration, which I think is pretty standard for this particular style of bullet in .357 diameter. Recoil, even when loaded to max, is pretty tame. Like most everyone else, I prefer standard weight bullets in .357/.38 Special but they will do fine for practice. As someone mentioned, expect them to shoot quite low compared to 158 grain bullets; that gets to be a headache in a fixed sight gun.

Greetings
I would not use a 110 on anything bigger than a coyotee. Out of a rifle maybe out to 100 yds. A revolver I would not go to past 50yds. The 110´s are explosive on groundhogs.

I never liked the 110's, and for a while I was using 125's but now I am a full fledged 158 grainer again. I prescribe to the heavier bullet is better theory, and never cared for the fact that the lighter bullets do not shoot to p.o.a. in my fixed sight guns.


chief38

cjw3 said, "I fooled around with 110 JHP's in .357 many years back. I tried them out on some fish carcasses...."

Now THAT would make a great handgun article in a shooting magazine. I don't think even Skeeter Skelton or Mike Venturino could top that.

I can see Massad Ayoob now, "Back in the day when fish carcasses were running the streets we had to resort to .357s loaded with Super Vel 110 grain loads to get reliable one-shot stops."

Or how about an article entitled...."The .357 Versus the 9mm, Which Is Really Better For Fish Carcasses?"

Or maybe...."Bagging Trophy Fish Carcasses With The .357."

Of course enough of that kind of writing and we will see the growth of an organization entitled "People Against The Shooting of Fish Carcasses."

__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.

ArchAngel +1

I was under the impression that they were exclusively for short barrel revolvers like the various j frames. They would offer short barrel velocity and expansion that in a longer barrel you could get with a heavier bullet. Other than "Just because I can" I don't see the use in using them in anything short of smaller j frame or equivalents. Having lower recoil they would also offer up faster recovery time even if they sacrificed deeper penetration. That would be why I keep them in my 637 that hides in my nightstand.

Should make a great bullet for groundhogs. In a long barrel velocity should be WAY up there.

Got some when I bought a bunch of misc. bullets form a friend.
Found they were fun to play around with in various high velocity loadings.
The big fun was loading them over a max charge of H-110 in a 357 Maximum. Crono'd around 2100 fps out of a 7 1/2" barrel. Loaded the balance of them as 38 SPL +P and 357 Mag. just for something to do with them. I normally like 158's in these guns.