Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2011, 05:59 PM
LOBONCA LOBONCA is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?

Any comments on the advantages/disadvantages of the Dillon Presses RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2011, 06:18 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
Default

You mean aside from the auto-index and 5 stations on the 650 as opposed to manual advance and 4 stations on the 550?
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2011, 07:06 PM
growr growr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 5,162
Likes: 3,432
Liked 6,245 Times in 2,061 Posts
Default

Also ease of primer conversion (small to large etc) on the 550B....the 650 is a bit more labor intensive.
You simply cannot go wrong with either one!!
Randy
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2011, 11:00 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

It comes down to need. If you need more than 500rds a week, then a 650 w/ case feeder is probably the way to go. If you load for multiple calibers, a few 100 at a time, then a 550B is more economical & easier to use. The 4stn thing, not important for rifle rounds & not that big a deal for pistol rounds. You just don't get a powder check die for handgun. There is NO speed advantage to auto indexing, the speed comes from using a case feeder on the 650. Yes, I load on both & the 650 is a great piece of gear, but 90% of shooters just don't need that much machine, including me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2011, 11:40 PM
tlen's Avatar
tlen tlen is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 214
Likes: 3
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Another weekly queston. Just read comments on Brian Enos' web site.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2011, 11:42 PM
andyo5's Avatar
andyo5 andyo5 is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 497
Liked 943 Times in 518 Posts
Default

I have owned a 550 for the past 15 years. I like the fact that it does not index automatically, because there are times that I just don't want that feature. For example, when setting up and adjusting dies or when adjusting the powder die to deliver a specific weight. I just don't need the extra speed that the automatic indexing of the 650 would provide.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2011, 03:29 AM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andyo5 View Post
I have owned a 550 for the past 15 years. I like the fact that it does not index automatically, because there are times that I just don't want that feature. For example, when setting up and adjusting dies or when adjusting the powder die to deliver a specific weight. I just don't need the extra speed that the automatic indexing of the 650 would provide.
Again Andy, there is no real "speed" advantage to auto indexing. You have to place the bullet, either before manual indexing or when the case comes to rest after you watch it move. So while it's more convenient, not really any faster. The case feeder & never having to move your right hand off the handle is where the speed comes in. If you do not use a case feeder on the 650, you have to fill the case feed tube every 20rds or so, that negates any small speed advantage IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2011, 06:37 AM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Default

It all depends on you dexterity as to how much auto-indexing helps increase production. It isn't a one size fits all thing............some folks are different.

As for the machines, Fred brings up the point of need. None of us need to have a Dillon. We have them because we want them and have the expendable income to do so. If money isn't an issue, you may want to look into the XL650 BECAUSE of two things:#1: auto indexing; #2: 5th station for a powder check die. The fact that it can be used with a case feeder is a moot point now that they also make one for the RL550.

If it was me, and this is a big change for me, for the level I shoot now, the RL550 with a case feeder would be all I NEED. (Read previous comment on NEED to understand) That said, I really like my 2 XL650s. I don't have an RL550, I have an RL450B that is partially converted. It has the primer and powder measure upgrades, not the frame one.

Works like a charm too. Honestly, since folks are different, let me ask you a question about YOU: How is your attention to detail? Are you easily distracted? Do you consistently follow procedures on everything you do now?

If you answer in the negative to the above questions, then get the XL650. If you advance the RL550B without dropping powder and don't check the case for powder OR if you were to use a powder like Titegroup(which will never be in any of my loads) and happen to charge a case twice because you can easier with an RL550B, then get the XL650.

Since we all are different, there can be no blanket statements about which is better for you or which is better for me. Make an honest assessment of your abilities and shooting needs. Then make your choice. The XL650 is quite a machine and true, not needed unless you need lots of ammo in a hurry. It is nice to have that just waiting to be used though!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-07-2011, 08:43 AM
sunday bill sunday bill is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 303
Likes: 21
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Default

That ol saw about "Druther have it and not need it than to need it and not have it" plays in on my call. After trying both, I keep one 650 set up for small primers and one for large. Both are equipped with case feeders.

Wife and I taught school for a livin, so basically had to acquire'em the same way Johnny Cash built his Cadillac.

Priorities.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-07-2011, 09:52 AM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Default

One piece at a time..............It's a 60, 61, 62, 63.........


Too funny! On a teacher's salary, Bill, I would have thought that you would be buying "Lexus" or "Rolls" rather than a mere "Cadillac"!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-10-2011, 12:35 AM
lmcgust lmcgust is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 124
Likes: 32
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I have both and love them both. I use the 550 mainly for 9mm to avoid the powder spillage while indexing. I know the is a workaround for this but I have not done it yet. I use the 650 for heavy 38 special production being in the PPC circle.

Having said that, the 650 has a superior priming system than the 550, which require frequent cleaning and is not as assertive as the 650.

I don't care much for the extra station the 650 provides. I don't use it. The powder measure on the dillons is so wonderful and constant, I fully trust it. Also, when I reload, I'm focused and don't see the need to buy a powder checker die for now anyways.

If you get the 650, the case feeder is a must. Before, I was a 550 guy, but now that I bought a 650, I kind of prefer it....except for the 9 mm (or other small cases where the powder fills most of the case) . For these, the 550 shines and prevents spillages.

Regards,
Guy -
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-13-2011, 02:42 AM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lmcgust View Post
I have both and love them both. I use the 550 mainly for 9mm to avoid the powder spillage while indexing. I know the is a workaround for this but I have not done it yet. I use the 650 for heavy 38 special production being in the PPC circle.

Having said that, the 650 has a superior priming system than the 550, which require frequent cleaning and is not as assertive as the 650.

I don't care much for the extra station the 650 provides. I don't use it. The powder measure on the dillons is so wonderful and constant, I fully trust it. Also, when I reload, I'm focused and don't see the need to buy a powder checker die for now anyways.

If you get the 650, the case feeder is a must. Before, I was a 550 guy, but now that I bought a 650, I kind of prefer it....except for the 9 mm (or other small cases where the powder fills most of the case) . For these, the 550 shines and prevents spillages.

Regards,
Guy -
The "fix" on the 650 is quite simple. Remove the shell plate, clip about 1/3 of a coil off the ball detent spring. It slows the shell plate index just enough to not spill powder. I just don;t like the many parts change over for small to large, so keep my 650 for 45acp & 45colt. Everyhting else is loaded on the 550B or my ss press. That is about 22 calibers now.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-14-2012, 01:53 AM
derek45auto's Avatar
derek45auto derek45auto is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 100
Liked 806 Times in 210 Posts
Default

I have both.

I use the 650 for bulk 5.56, 40IPSC, 45ACP, etc.

I use the 550B for smaller batches, like 100 rounds of 44 mag for deer season, or working up 6.8mmSPC, etc.

both presses are wonderful

the 650 is faster
the 500 caliber conversion is faster
__________________
NRA Life
USPSA/IPSC
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:25 PM
wildcatter wildcatter is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I own the 550B and have for over 20 years now, it is my must have loading press! all I will say is steer clear of the square deal!! special dies and finger pinchin s____ I think you get my drift.

I used em all, even a 1050 before buying mine. I would have bought the 650 if I had room for both or I didn't need small and large priming and so many different calibers to load for. I think one would be hard pressed to load 1000 45 acp's and changeover and run 1000 38 spcl. and be finished using a 650 over me using my 550, it would be close at best.

As far as dexterity, when I first got it like anything new, I had to build a repetitive sequence, once I stayed with pickup bullet turn & set bullet, while letting go of handle & pick & put in brass, cycle press, I don't worry about missed charges I just think you need to run with intent before you start trying to run for speed, like anything else speed comes with repetition!

The 650 may be a little faster in the scenario above, but if you are going to load pistol, rifle, small primer, large, and use one press, its hands down the 550. If large bulk runs or dedicated one caliber or primer size, get a 650. As one said here already, if you change a lot, the auto indexing can be very aggravating when your trying to setup new dies, or just switch bullets in a same cartridge but must adjust seating depth, tool heads once setup and kept, make that much easier with either press, but die adjustment and seating depth adjustment, is a pain when the handle moves constantly and you can't stop the rotation of the shell plate.

Regardless of your needs, these should be the only two progressives you ever need or consider, I won't mention the unmatched dedication to customer support or the true meaning of an NO B.S. WARRANTY!!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-17-2012, 01:03 AM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcatter View Post
The 650 may be a little faster in the scenario above, but if you are going to load pistol, rifle, small primer, large, and use one press, its hands down the 550. If large bulk runs or dedicated one caliber or primer size, get a 650. As one said here already, if you change a lot, the auto indexing can be very aggravating when your trying to setup new dies, or just switch bullets in a same cartridge but must adjust seating depth, tool heads once setup and kept, make that much easier with either press, but die adjustment and seating depth adjustment, is a pain when the handle moves constantly and you can't stop the rotation of the shell plate.

Regardless of your needs, these should be the only two progressives you ever need or consider, I won't mention the unmatched dedication to customer support or the true meaning of an NO B.S. WARRANTY!!
Running both, I can tell you the 650 is more than a little bit faster, but at a cost & complexity. It's why I leave it setup for 45acp & just run it that way. I can easily do 700rds/hr sustained. The best you are getting out of a 550B w/o case feeder is maybe 450rds/hr. The case feeder makes it that much faster. Adding one to a 550B, if you can keep it running right, will get you upto "close". For the guy that only loads 1000rds & wants to change over, the 550B is hard to beat. For the guy that wants to load 5K rds a month of one or two calibers, 650, no contest.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:19 AM
roundgunner's Avatar
roundgunner roundgunner is offline
US Veteran
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
Default

I had a 550, got a 650 to go along with it. I ended up liking the 650 so much I sold the 550 to help pay for another 650. I now run one for large primers and one for small.


__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:56 PM
beach elvis beach elvis is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Joplin, MO.
Posts: 646
Likes: 133
Liked 417 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Roundgunner, now THAT's a cave, sir. You have my utmost respect and envy.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-21-2012, 01:25 AM
moonshine44 moonshine44 is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 111
Likes: 29
Liked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Yeah, that place is almost bigger than my whole house!
__________________
Gotta love N-frames...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-30-2012, 02:52 PM
wildcatter wildcatter is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
Running both, I can tell you the 650 is more than a little bit faster, but at a cost & complexity. It's why I leave it setup for 45acp & just run it that way. I can easily do 700rds/hr sustained. The best you are getting out of a 550B w/o case feeder is maybe 450rds/hr. The case feeder makes it that much faster. Adding one to a 550B, if you can keep it running right, will get you upto "close". For the guy that only loads 1000rds & wants to change over, the 550B is hard to beat. For the guy that wants to load 5K rds a month of one or two calibers, 650, no contest.
what I said, if you want one for a specific caliber and don't want to change back and forth, the 650, if you want ONE PRESS TO LOAD EVERYTHING (large and small batches) I agree with you the 550 hands down is better, If you want a dedicated press and run large volumes the 650, but if that is the case, and you can aford it, get a 1050 and you have real volume loading!!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-30-2012, 07:10 PM
sambodie sambodie is offline
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 23
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default I got the XL 650

Because:

1. I like auto indexing.
2. Five stations - extra check for powder besides my old eyes.
3. I could, so I did.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-30-2012, 08:44 PM
trulyapostolic's Avatar
trulyapostolic trulyapostolic is online now
Member
RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ? RL 550B vs. XL 650 ?  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Central, Indiana
Posts: 254
Likes: 43
Liked 53 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roundgunner View Post
I had a 550, got a 650 to go along with it. I ended up liking the 650 so much I sold the 550 to help pay for another 650. I now run one for large primers and one for small.


Love the room! Especially the recliner.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
45acp, 650, cartridge, detent, ppc, primer, wildcat

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with 550b Scuba2do Reloading 7 06-03-2014 12:25 AM
Dillon RL 450 vs RL 550b RCF Reloading 27 02-14-2014 04:34 AM
WTB/WTT Dillon 550b Lago86 WANTED to Buy 0 01-26-2014 10:41 PM
Dillon 550B Old Seabee WANTED to Buy 1 02-11-2013 08:22 PM
Dillon 550B 44magsam Reloading 12 03-31-2012 05:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)