Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2012, 09:42 PM
Gman56's Avatar
Gman56 Gman56 is offline
Member
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Behind enemy lines NJ
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default 2400 and 158 xtp

Hi, I'm trying to find a load to use in my 686 and my 28.Both are 6 in.I have been loading light 10.5 grs .Just cant find a good load for tight groups.I dont want to work the 28 hard she is to nice!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2012, 10:12 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Default

Pick a faster powder then. Switch to something in the Unique range on the burn rate chart and go from there.

Loading down a powder has much less satisfaction than loading one towards the top of it's particular data.

Powders seem to work much cleaner, better when they work at the top of their range than at the bottom.

Personally, you can load the hottest load you can load in a 357Mag case and run it through either one of those firearms and not hurt them one bit.

I shoot cast bullets out of my M586 almost exclusively and prefer SR4756 for those loads. Gives me 1300fps from the 6" tube and 1600fps from a Marlin 20" 1894.

Just me but I think 2400 is the wrong powder for what you want. Can you down load it more than some other "magnum" powders? Sure. Why though? There are other powders that work better at those "mild" type loads.


FWIW
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2012, 10:52 PM
semperfi71's Avatar
semperfi71 semperfi71 is offline
US Veteran
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central New Mexico
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,179
Liked 1,116 Times in 409 Posts
Default

Skip Sackett is dead on.

Also, any given powder, loaded within the range it is intended for is capable of excellent accuracy with any given bullet.

Provided your handgun shoots the load accurately.

And any given powder with any given bullet can be grossly inaccurate.

If you want the most accurate load you will have to test a lot of powders, or get lucky on the first, or several first, you choose.

What I am saying is that someone will tell you that HP38 gives them excellent accuracy with "XYZ" bullets. But in your handgun you might get lousy accuracy.

Also, buying several different brands of powder to experiment with is not a waste of money. Even the most inaccurate powder loads cans be used for plinking and casual shooting until the powder is used up.
__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2012, 10:55 PM
Dragon88 Dragon88 is offline
Member
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
Default

W231 should do the trick.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:14 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon88 View Post
W231 should do the trick.
I agree, W231 will be just right for what you're trying to do. At the outside chance you don't like the results you get with W231 give AA#5 or HS-6 a try...
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2012, 01:42 AM
Fishslayer Fishslayer is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, PRK
Posts: 9,237
Likes: 11,531
Liked 11,249 Times in 3,916 Posts
Default

What they said. I've loaded 2400 down to 12.6gr & really wouldn't go any lower than that. W231 sounds like just what you're after.

XTP are kinda pricey for plinkers aren't they? I load my light loads with Bullseye & LSWC. XTP I use for the Big Dogs.

Nosler 158gr SJHP are a bit less expensive & I've gotten some pretty good accuracy with them.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:12 PM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishslayer View Post
Nosler 158gr SJHP are a bit less expensive & I've gotten some pretty good accuracy with them.
I agree, the 250 piece bulk pack from Nosler is fairly inexpensive and they are good bullets too.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:46 PM
Charliee Charliee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I am amused by "not wanting to work the 28 too hard". You aren't. The 28 will take hotter load than most pistols and ask for more. I have a 28 and would not be shy about loading as much as 15 grains of 2400 with a 158 grain bullet in it.However you might want to try 7 grains of Unique for a load and see how that does.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2012, 01:33 PM
Gman56's Avatar
Gman56 Gman56 is offline
Member
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Behind enemy lines NJ
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I will try a hotter load with 2400 .The hornady book I have is the a new edition loads are lighter. It stops at 14.3 grs for 357 with xtp.I bought the book for the 6.8 loads for ar.I will load top load 14.3 and go from there and get another reload manual.Time to update any way to compare various loads.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2012, 12:50 AM
Hook686's Avatar
Hook686 Hook686 is offline
US Veteran
2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp 2400 and 158 xtp  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: California
Posts: 383
Likes: 161
Liked 61 Times in 40 Posts
Default

I load 158 grain XTP for my 627PC, 5" barrel ... 13.3 grains of 2400 gives me about 1180 fps ... 12.5 grains of 2400 give me about 1060 fps ... 13.8 grains of 2400 gives me about 1350 fps in my Desert Eagle and about 100 fps less in the 627PC.
__________________
Hook686
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
627pc, 686, bullseye, hornady, nosler


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WHAT'S UP WITH 2400? TEXVET Reloading 57 04-19-2015 06:50 AM
No 2400? Iron Reloading 27 02-21-2014 12:36 AM
2400 in 38 spl? rustypigeon Reloading 16 01-23-2012 09:34 AM
Does anybody use 2400 in the .45-70? David Sinko Reloading 15 12-24-2011 03:34 PM
Herc 2400 V.S. Alliant 2400 Viss Reloading 84 01-10-2010 09:48 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)