|
|
02-12-2012, 01:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 11,064
Liked 12,074 Times in 1,920 Posts
|
|
Loads for 38/44 Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman
I understand the 38/44s were designed for heavier loads than the 38 special. Some of the guns apparently have been modified to take 357. Has anyone worked up modern equivalent of the old 38/44 loads? None of my manual show it. I now load both 38 and 357 and wonder if the 38/44 load was somewhat comparable to the current 38+P. Thanks for any info.
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
|
02-12-2012, 02:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 10,417
Liked 28,226 Times in 5,272 Posts
|
|
Last edited by Iggy; 02-12-2012 at 02:25 PM.
|
02-12-2012, 03:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 858
Likes: 14
Liked 82 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
12.0 grains of 2400 + 158 grain LSWC gets me 1120 in my 5" postwar HD.
There is still leeway to go up in this particular gun, but that's close enough to the original ballistics for me.
|
02-12-2012, 04:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,615
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,602 Times in 3,450 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinn
I understand the 38/44s were designed for heavier loads than the 38 special. Some of the guns apparently have been modified to take 357. Has anyone worked up modern equivalent of the old 38/44 loads? None of my manual show it. I now load both 38 and 357 and wonder if the 38/44 load was somewhat comparable to the current 38+P. Thanks for any info.
|
The old Lyman #43 manual showed .38 Special loads "For heavy frame guns" that ran in the 25,000 PSI range.
.38-44 IS .38 Special, just loaded to higher pressure. Current +P limit is 20,000 PSI, .38-44 loads were significantly above this limit and even higher than the pressure level indicated by the old Lyman book.
The best bullets to use to replicate the .38-44 loads are Lyman 358156GC, 357446, or RCBS .38-158 SWCGC. Load them as follows:
6.5 gr. Unique w/standard primer
11.0 gr. 2400 w/Fed 200
Note; Alliant specifies a Magnum primer with 2400!
7.1 gr. 4756 w/standard primer
Any of the above will get you in the 1150 FPS range with a 6 1/2" barrel and 1115+/- with a 5". If you have a chronograph, and you are just spitting in the wind if you do not, start with these loads and adjust as needed to get to ca. 1115 FPS with a 5" barrel and you will be very close to what was once published for .38-44 factory ammunition.
The .38-44 was never loaded with jacketed bullets by the factories. There was a metal-capped bullet. If you try loading jacketed bullets you need to settle for about 100-150 FPS less that with cast to stay in the appropriate pressure range.
If you are not already aware, velocities can vary drastically from one gun to another. A good example is 11.8/2400.158 SWCGC. I have chronographed this and had velocity range from 1086 in one 5" revolver to 1236 in another 6", far greater than the usually referenced 25 FPS per unch of barrel. It is also common for factory ammunition to chronograph significantly slower than published velocities, often by as much as 150-200 FPS!
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
Last edited by Alk8944; 02-12-2012 at 04:43 PM.
|
02-12-2012, 04:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 10,349
Liked 6,901 Times in 2,335 Posts
|
|
I've just gotten back into reloading for the .38 due to a recent love affair with my '55 38-44.
I read up on all the information and tried 12.0gn of 2400 in both 158gn LSWC and 140gn JHP, I am so stoked with the accuracy potential of this pistol that it has become my all time favorite to shoot, I still like the little K-22...but am planning on carrying the 38-44 afield with me and have loaded up some speer shot shells for snakes using heavier 7.5 shot with 5.5gn of Unique, makes a head shattering pattern at 10ft.
I find no need to exceed the 12gn loading as it delivers all the accuracy I could ask for with the terrific knockdown of a well delivered bullet.
|
02-12-2012, 05:36 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 4,023
Liked 3,698 Times in 1,466 Posts
|
|
11.5 grains of 2400 for me in my 1954 HD. This also makes a good intermediate load for use in 357s. Easy on the ears and accurate in every thing I shoot it in.
|
02-12-2012, 07:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: bluesky
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 237
Liked 279 Times in 148 Posts
|
|
I just looked at my Lyman-ideal # 40 manual from 1955 and like ALK8944 indicates they have a listing for heavy frame guns. Using the 158gr #358156GC bullet they show the following MAXIMUM loading... 13.5 gr of 2400 # 1220fps
When they list the 160gr Keith Hollow base-HP they drop to a max load of 12 grains of 2400.
I like looking at the old load book data, but in reality they were flying by the seat of their pants. The fact that the guns didn't blow up with some of these loads is a miracle. When the load book OEM's started using psi measuring devices in the late 90s they found out several of the loads deemed safe under the CUP standard, were way over SAMMI pressure standards - that's why (IMO) a lot of the load data was "watered down".
Last edited by 125JHP; 02-12-2012 at 08:01 PM.
|
02-12-2012, 09:04 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 11,064
Liked 12,074 Times in 1,920 Posts
|
|
Wow! A lot of great information. Thanks all. I have 158 gr SWC bullets on hand but no 2400. I've been using 231 for my 38 special loads. I'll have to pick up some 2400 at the next GS. Years ago I used 2400 almost exclusively in antique black powder single shot rifles loading such cartridges as 44-77 Sharpes BN and 43 Danish. Haven't had any in years, though. I think this will be fun. I have newly acquired post war 38-44 Heavy Duty in 4" and Outdoorsman in 6.5"
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
|
05-17-2012, 06:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Land of Lincoln
Posts: 202
Likes: 63
Liked 29 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Anybody care to try one of these in a 640?
|
05-18-2012, 12:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 10
Liked 78 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Check out Handloader #243, Oct 2006, for Brian Pearce's excellent article on 38-44S&W loads using more recent powders. Good info on the history of the cartridge as well.
I have been just recently experimenting with one load in a first year Ruger SP101 chambered in 38 Special. Most of the loads run to 25kpsi level, but some are higher. They can approach low end 357 loads. Since the SP101 was found capable of handling 125gr 357s (it was subsequently lengthened in frame window and cylinder to handle full on 357s) with a simple rechambering, I thought it was a suitable candidate for some performance improvement. I particularly liked Power Pistol and the 125gr JHP loads.
__________________
" I said, good DAY! "
|
05-19-2012, 08:48 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 84
Liked 1,441 Times in 526 Posts
|
|
Where's that pesky Speer #8 manual with the 158 grain LSWC loads using SR4756?
|
05-20-2012, 02:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 140
Likes: 22
Liked 55 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckS1
Where's that pesky Speer #8 manual with the 158 grain LSWC loads using SR4756?
|
I can't help you with #8, but I have Speer #6 and Lyman #38 & #44 as pdf's
Some intertesting 38 Special data there, with the Lyman developed in a K-frame Model 14, and the Speer data labeled "38 Special K-38."
|
05-20-2012, 04:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 667
Liked 6,771 Times in 1,312 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinn
I understand the 38/44s were designed for heavier loads than the 38 special. Some of the guns apparently have been modified to take 357. Has anyone worked up modern equivalent of the old 38/44 loads? None of my manual show it. I now load both 38 and 357 and wonder if the 38/44 load was somewhat comparable to the current 38+P. Thanks for any info.
|
If you need it or would like it, I can email you the October 2006 Handloader article by Brian Pearce on the .38-44, it's been pretty much the basis for all of my loads.
__________________
Vaya con Dios
|
05-20-2012, 06:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Bank/Algiers, LA
Posts: 457
Likes: 193
Liked 116 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
Id be interested in that article, pm with my email incoming...
|
05-21-2012, 05:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Panhandle of FL
Posts: 575
Likes: 23
Liked 273 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckS1
Where's that pesky Speer #8 manual with the 158 grain LSWC loads using SR4756?
|
That load is extensively used in my .357 guns. It's a darn good load.
|
05-21-2012, 09:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 702
Likes: 1,360
Liked 122 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Taffin posted an article in Amer Handgunner last year, try online seach.
__________________
Tommy
|
05-21-2012, 09:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 667
Liked 6,771 Times in 1,312 Posts
|
|
__________________
Vaya con Dios
|
|
Tags
|
243, 640, cartridge, chronograph, k-22, outdoorsman, postwar, rcbs, ruger, smith-wessonforum.com, sp101 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|