Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2013, 11:01 AM
forestswin's Avatar
forestswin forestswin is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 959
Likes: 652
Liked 549 Times in 293 Posts
Default Chronograph suggestions

I am quite surprised at all the negative reviews for just about all the chronographs other than the Oehler - but I just can't justify spending $350 for a chrono

I'm asking for some advice here - previous posts here are several years old - are there new chronos out there?

suggestions????

how about replacement parts for when I shoot it?
my sons fly RC helicopters - they can get any part they break on a crash at the local hobby shop at reasonable prices - is that so with any chrono??
__________________
I'd like to agree with you BUT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2013, 11:15 AM
Waywatcher's Avatar
Waywatcher Waywatcher is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1,457
Liked 1,489 Times in 570 Posts
Default

I have had perfect results using this one.

I have had it for about 18 months. I use it a few times a month and it's still on its first battery. It always records a velocity, seems to be very accurate and consistent, and without error messages. I have used it from .38 puff loads up to 5.56 loads and it always has worked for me. I have nothing bad to say about it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 06-09-2013, 11:20 AM
AveragEd AveragEd is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,579 Times in 1,125 Posts
Default

About the only time you should need parts for a chronograph is if you shoot it - but then, you'll need more than just "parts."

I've used numerous brands of "better" chronographs but like you, prefer not to invest a lot of money in something for a hobby. I have two ProChrono units, one newer digital with the bench-mounted remote control and an older analog unit I keep for a backup (but have never needed). For $110, you can't beat them.

The "better" chronographs seem to be much more sensitive to the angle of the natural light they are used under. I bought a Pact that would not work at all and a Competitive Edge Dynamics M2 that gave inconsistent readings unless the sun was directly overhead or obscured by cloud cover. My ProChronos always work.

Pact told me to turn the chronograph so the sun was shining into the photocells. When I told them that since our range faces west, that would mean turning the unit across the range and tilting it. They said, "you gotta do what works." I did - I returned the unit.

CED told me that their photocells are of higher quality, thus the sensitivity, but they yield more accurate results under perfect lighting conditions. That doesn't exist very often and then only at a given time each day, so it went back, too.

I never owned an Oehler but I hear they are good. For the price, I would expect nothing less.

I think a ProChrono or Shooting Chrony would satisfy all your needs.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2013, 12:06 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
Default

$139.99 and still ticking...................

Got this one with the long cord, so I can use it at the rifle range and also nice that the "Brain unit" is at your table if
corrections or adjustments are needed during the testing.

Stores 6 test that you can look at when you get home which is nice but I log all data in a log book, while shooting, just
to be on the safe side.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 06-09-2013, 12:14 PM
TAROMAN's Avatar
TAROMAN TAROMAN is offline
US Veteran
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 8,789
Liked 7,778 Times in 2,375 Posts
Default

What Nevada Ed said.
Get one with a remote.
First one I bought didn't have that feature.
Thankfully, a friend's son center punched it with a .357 and I ordered a Chrony from Buds.
Got the red one. Does everything I need.
You will be surprised how far off many published loads are when fired in your guns.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 06-09-2013, 01:14 PM
S&WIowegan S&WIowegan is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 14,444
Liked 3,763 Times in 1,784 Posts
Smile

All chronos are sensitive to varying degrees to sunlight and the angle the sun's coming from. Here in Iowa we have almost constant wind which can affect results by wiggling your set-up....or blow the whole mess over.

The only answer to reliable repeatable chrono results is to build a light box if you chrono outdoors. That's what Chronoman uses at all the USPSA National championship matches. He must deliver consistent, correct results all day long and he does!!

The other solution which I chose is to chrono indoors. The light source must be incandescent bulbs.....fluorescent drives a chrono crazy!!
__________________
Bob.
SWCA 1821
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2013, 01:33 PM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,833
Likes: 13,927
Liked 13,636 Times in 4,936 Posts
Default

I realize that there are those that don't want to spend alot of money on a cronograph. For me its the Oehler 35P. Had mine for over 20 years and its still going strong.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2013, 03:32 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,063
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,463 Times in 6,787 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waywatcher View Post
I have had perfect results using this one.

I have had it for about 18 months. I use it a few times a month and it's still on its first battery. It always records a velocity, seems to be very accurate and consistent, and without error messages. I have used it from .38 puff loads up to 5.56 loads and it always has worked for me. I have nothing bad to say about it.
I get real tired of fighting with the folding Chronys (had 2) and got the same one. Never misses a shot never had a error in the Blazing Florida Sun and reflection off the sandy soil. The CED is a great unit. No I do not worry about shooting it. I can shoot between the uprights at 10 ft. I never use a target when testing, just a pistol rest and concentrate on the shot.

Competition Electronics ProChrono Digital Chronograph


Forest,
read the reviews 4.6 out of 5, 133 review. It goes on sale regular for $100.00


Scroll to the bottom of this thread there are several chronograph threads.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2013, 04:13 PM
Nick B Nick B is offline
US Veteran
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: S.W. Fl.
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 676
Liked 1,156 Times in 447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3 View Post
I get real tired of fighting with the folding Chronys (had 2) and got the same one. Never misses a shot never had a error in the Blazing Florida Sun and reflection off the sandy soil. The CED is a great unit. No I do not worry about shooting it. I can shoot between the uprights at 10 ft. I never use a target when testing, just a pistol rest and concentrate on the shot.

Competition Electronics ProChrono Digital Chronograph


Forest,
read the reviews 4.6 out of 5, 133 review. It goes on sale regular for $100.00


Scroll to the bottom of this thread there are several chronograph threads.
^^ This one is all you need .
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2013, 06:25 PM
stavman11's Avatar
stavman11 stavman11 is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The DESERT of Arizona
Posts: 983
Likes: 408
Liked 445 Times in 297 Posts
Default

I have had this chrono for a year Now....

F1 chrono

For $99 , and as often as i use it, which is about every 10th range trip, It works great for me

You can mod it to have a Corded extension... But Ive had no issues seeing the readout 15' away

just my opinion... either way... they are a Funny tool for a fun Hobby.. get one... youll love it
__________________
--Stav--
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2013, 07:58 PM
125JHP's Avatar
125JHP 125JHP is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: bluesky
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 237
Liked 279 Times in 148 Posts
Default

no, no... get this one...

CED Millennium 2 Chronograph System
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-09-2013, 08:15 PM
stavman11's Avatar
stavman11 stavman11 is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The DESERT of Arizona
Posts: 983
Likes: 408
Liked 445 Times in 297 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 125JHP View Post
no, no... get this one...

CED Millennium 2 Chronograph System

now THAT is bitchin....

I want one
__________________
--Stav--
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-09-2013, 08:32 PM
sourdough44's Avatar
sourdough44 sourdough44 is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 602
Likes: 16
Liked 112 Times in 66 Posts
Default

I have the one linked to in post #2, near or just over $100 & has worked fine. I use a cheaper camera tripod from Wal-Mart. I'm usually on private property so I just walk up to it for a reading.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-09-2013, 09:00 PM
forestswin's Avatar
forestswin forestswin is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 959
Likes: 652
Liked 549 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 125JHP View Post
no, no... get this one...

CED Millennium 2 Chronograph System
that's the one I thought was 2nd to the Oehler 35P, its been recommended here in other threads

but have you read the reviews? - there are more negatives (1's) than (5's)
that really throws up a red flag I was kind of surprised

normally I'd take reviews like these (equal very good and very bad) as quality control - but in this case - seems to me to be functional design issues.
__________________
I'd like to agree with you BUT
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-09-2013, 09:33 PM
Jboutfishn Jboutfishn is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: State Of Jefferson, Ca
Posts: 471
Likes: 93
Liked 153 Times in 93 Posts
Default

I have had an F1 Chrony for over 10 years. Plain wrap, has never failed, and I have no problem reading it at 15 feet. I paid $75 for it. Money well spent.

I use it for load development only, as I suspect all are used. No need for the big $$$$$.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-09-2013, 10:01 PM
AveragEd AveragEd is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,579 Times in 1,125 Posts
Default

There is a good reason why the CED M2 gets bad reviews: they don't work consistently as they are VERY light sensitive.

I bought one thinking I should have a "better" chronograph than my old ProChrono and really liked the looks of the whole M2 package, so I bought everything, carrying case and all. On cloudy, overcast days, it worked; on sunny days, it wouldn't. When the sun was overhead during midday hours, it worked; when the sun was at an angle to it in the morning, when I prefer to test loads, it wouldn't. Results varied from no readings, error codes for the "start" or "stop" photocells to impossibly low or high readings.

I spoke with an oriental lady at CED, which is located just a few hours from me here in Pennsylvania. She tried helping me but finally said she would have Charles, their chief engineer, contact me. A week or so later, Charles spent a lot of time with me, possibly because I am an outdoor writer, and did exchange every component except the display unit over several months to no avail. I had purchased it directly from CED and Charles initially refused to accept it as a return and refund my purchase price but finally and very reluctantly did. That took some time as he apparently forgot to tell the oriental lady about our agreement before he left for a trip to Asia, but I did eventually see the refund on my bank statement.

The M2's spotty operation was a real nuisance as I would waste my handloaded test rounds trying to get it working. One day when the CED M2 wouldn't work, I set my older ProChrono up right behind the M2 and shot over them while speaking with Charles on the phone. The ProChrono worked while the M2 just gave me error messages. I then set up a 10' canopy over the chronographs and the M2 started working, much to Charles' surprise - he told me it needed light to work but as I said earlier, it only worked on overcast days.

The M2 sure is an attractive setup but as I told Charles when he insisted that the M2 was more accurate than my ProChronos, reasonably accurate readings are better than no readings. I subsequently bought one of the newer ProChrono digital models with their remote bench control unit and it has never failed to work, regardless of the light conditions or time of day. It even has the extras benefit of just one cable running back from the unit while the M2 has one from each photocell.

Ed
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 06-09-2013, 10:14 PM
forestswin's Avatar
forestswin forestswin is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 959
Likes: 652
Liked 549 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AveragEd View Post
There is a good reason why the CED M2 gets bad reviews....


Ed
thanks Ed for such a thorough and informational response
__________________
I'd like to agree with you BUT
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-09-2013, 10:18 PM
AveragEd AveragEd is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,579 Times in 1,125 Posts
Default

You're very welcome. I've been at the shooting and handloading games for over 40 years and like to share what has and has not worked for me with others. In fact, that's the basis for my column and articles in Shotgun Sports Magazine.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-10-2013, 12:13 AM
arizona98tj's Avatar
arizona98tj arizona98tj is offline
US Veteran
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 733
Likes: 62
Liked 265 Times in 146 Posts
Default

My experience with the CED M2 is quite different. I've had mine now for about a year and it works very well. I use it on loads from .223 Rem to .45ACP. We don't have that many cloudy days here in central AZ so I have to say most of my range time has been nothing but sunny days. I typically hit the range about an hour after sunrise, regardless of the month. So I shoot with the sun lower to the horizon (winter) and higher in the sky (summer). I stick it 10' from the muzzle and it just works....just like it should.

Here is a photo I dug out of my online review. I was working up loads for my .308 FNAR that day. You can see how the sun is shining from the chrono's shadow. That would have been taken during the winter months. Given the length of the shadow, the sun was far from being anywhere near directly overhead.

__________________
Stu

Last edited by arizona98tj; 06-10-2013 at 12:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-10-2013, 07:12 AM
Nick B Nick B is offline
US Veteran
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: S.W. Fl.
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 676
Liked 1,156 Times in 447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 125JHP View Post
no, no... get this one...

CED Millennium 2 Chronograph System
A lot of bad reviews on that one .
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-10-2013, 09:51 AM
125JHP's Avatar
125JHP 125JHP is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: bluesky
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 237
Liked 279 Times in 148 Posts
Default

I don't know about their experiences but I have had mine for 1 1/2 years and use it weekly under clear sunny Arizona conditions without problems. There was one instance where I had some screwy results but I attribute that to just before sunset when the light was coming very low from behind. (It also could have been the powder charges I was comparing-but I eventually got it resolved)

Normally I shoot with the sun to my right at an elevated angle between 45 and 90 degrees and a position angle from 1pm to 4 pm - sometimes it gets late and the sun drops to 5pm (relative position) without problems. Lower than that and it can miss a shot but the 90% it does get are in line with the normal. When the sun gets real low, and the light is fading fast is when it becomes unreliable.

I have begun using a new shooting spot on a ranch that extends my backstop to 325 yd.
That location is oriented 90 degree to my normal shooting spot above, so that the sun is typically in front of me now, moving from 10am thru an arc to 2pm. I was concerned that the light coming in low from the front would put a lot of glint on the sensors but so far it hasn't given me any false readings.

I shot some 7.62x39 the other day and compared the readings of OEM ammo to their published velocities (they correlated fine) and I also compared loads of 3 powders to what the book said I should expect for the given charge and again my results were as expected with one being 2 fps from the book figure.

There have also been plenty of cloudy days in the winter and during monsoon season that I know mine works in all conditions.

I used a PACT for over 20 years and when I decided to get new tech, I did a comparative test with my PACT and the M2, arranging the screens overlapping so I could shoot thru both and record a single shot on both. Since the overlapped screens were only 3" difference between centers I was able to calculate the velocity difference between the two units was about 8fps - close enough for me.

Like I said, I don't know what problems the other users have had but I have had a good experience with it and would buy another one. Both of the above scenarios I mentioned are posted on here somewhere if you search on my UN.

... ok I read the reviews and it seems like with so many chinese products these days, you either get one that works as expected or you don't. It also seems that some of the users might be a bit tech challenged.

Like many, I usually rely on user reviews for purchase decisions. Of the 32 ratings,not counting the average (3*) 13 (40%) were 1 or 2 stars and 17 (53%) were 4 or 5 stars. I hope they have sold more units than that. I probably wouldn't have bought the M2 either based on the splits in the Midway reviews.

Last edited by 125JHP; 06-10-2013 at 10:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-10-2013, 06:51 PM
AveragEd AveragEd is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,579 Times in 1,125 Posts
Default

I think the CED M2 has the POTENTIAL to be a great bang-for-the-buck chronograph as the package is very attractive and well thought out. But their operational record leaves a lot to be desired and I like to think they still have to get some bugs ironed out. However, Charles did not agree with that, insisting that he shoots over them quite frequently and has the design about perfected. If that really is the case, buying one would be a crapshoot, so perhaps JHP125's analogy is very accurate.

I will add that the rifle range I use most faces west, so morning usage is popular among club members as our targets are well lit and afternoon sessions can have the sun in your eyes. Accordingly, the sun is behind the firing line during the morning hours; perhaps my M2 would have worked if could have oriented it so the sun was beside it as 98tj's is pictured above.

Regardless, mine didn't function reliably even with every component except the display unit, which can only display what is sent to it, replaced. That suggests there are problems...

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-10-2013, 07:46 PM
824tsv's Avatar
824tsv 824tsv is offline
Member
Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions Chronograph suggestions  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 3,749
Liked 3,780 Times in 1,388 Posts
Default

F1 Shooting Chrony,
I have had it for several years without issue. If you are going to use this unit indoors, don't buy the expensive "indoor lighting kit" for this unit. You can get 2 LED lights from the Source and velcro them to the underside of the diffusers and the unit works perfectly indoors. Unit with LED lights for about $120. No need to spend a lot of money.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CED M2 chronograph SOLD LOCALLY Boogsawaste Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 1 03-13-2017 10:27 AM
Chronograph? Mikeinkaty Reloading 14 11-12-2016 08:43 AM
Chronograph RodSS Reloading 14 01-30-2015 07:14 AM
Chronograph suggestions dma1 Reloading 23 06-03-2013 11:49 PM
How do you like your CED M2 Chronograph? BruceM Reloading 9 09-18-2011 06:44 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)