Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2012, 06:23 AM
tappedandtagged tappedandtagged is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 397
Likes: 147
Liked 110 Times in 67 Posts
Default Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast

Is it ok to use data for Jacketed Bullets with Hard Cast Bullets?

I've been told by the local reloading shop guy that if I use data for a Jacketed Bullet and load it under a Cast, that I will actually get lower pressures and a bit more FPS out of the load. He said that when loading cast bullets with jacketed data, the only concern is not to push it so fast that the barrel begins to lead.

I want some nice magnum loads for my .357 and a 158 grain LSWC (18 brinell). Preferably with the pound of Unique that I have on hand. Alliant's website says not to go over 6 grains for cast, but says I can use 7.7 grains for the same weight jacketed. Moreover, my Lyman 49 ed. says I can use 8.3 grains for a jacketed 158 grain bullet and has no data for Unique with any of their casts bullets. So far, I've only shot some 12 brinell 158 grain bullets with a max of 5.9 grains of Unique with no leading whatsoever. The loads just don't have much bang and feel like 38 spl.

So, can I up the powder charge up to close to 8 grains as long as I work it up slow and watch for leading? Or should I just stick to data published strictly for cast if I'm loading cast??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2012, 06:33 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
Default

After being at this for awhile, I'm reluctant to handload using general rules or estimates.

If you look at the Lyman loading manual, which has lots of cast bullets, you can see that even similar weight bulets have quite different loading data because of bearing surface, sealing properties, seating depth, etc. Therefore, tested loading data with the actual bullet you intend to use is the intelligent safest way to go about it.

I've had some friends who loaded "by guess and by golly" for years and derided us cautious types, until they blew up a gun.

Loading manuals are cheaper to buy than new guns.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 04-29-2012, 08:02 AM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 37
Liked 5,413 Times in 1,756 Posts
Default

For once, it seems a gunshop guy has given something like factual advice! While it is always prudent to work up a new load any time any component is changed, data for jacketed bullets can be used for lead bullets of the same weight with the result, as he said, that pressure will be lower and velocity likely a bit faster.

Just do not assume, as some I have known have done, that the opposite is true. Generally, the same manual will show a slightly higher charge weight for a cast bullet versus a jacketed bullet of the same weight, and it is NOT safe to assume you can jack up the jacketed load to meet the lead load.
__________________
Pisgah
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2012, 09:08 AM
Alk8944's Avatar
Alk8944 Alk8944 is online now
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,616
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,603 Times in 3,451 Posts
Default

There are too many variables to make such a generalization, and these can cause pressures to vary widely when using the same charge with both lead and jacketed bullets.

Depending on the hardness/strength of the cast bullet being used the pressure can be similar or significantly higher when using jacketed data with cast bullets. Often you may never know the difference because you have no way of measuring pressure!

If shooting standard cartridges this is a generally safe practice as there is insufficient impetus from the charge to cause the lead bullet to bump up in the lead of the revolver and cause damage, but when loading high-intensity cartridges such as the Magnums it is safer to use the data specific to the bullet type.

Your source is correct in saying you will get higher velocity with the cast bullet, but when it comes to pressure developed it usually will be just as high, often higher, but rarely significantly less.

When it comes to leading, velocity is not a factor as most believe it to be. Leading is a function of bullet alloy, lubricant and bullet fit. A proper cast bullet can be driven to higher velocity than a jacketed bullet without causing leading, as long as the three noted factors are correct. The reason most see significant leading with cast bullets is they are using commercially cast bullets which usually have insufficient Tin, worthless lubricants that are intended to ship well, and they are often undersized. An undersized bullet allows gasses to blow by the bullet and, very literally, melt the surface of the bullet causing leading.

DO NOT even think about using 8 gr. Unique with a cast bullet. Alliant, and previously Hercules, has never listed more than 6.8 gr. Unique for a pressure of nearly 34,000 PSI. To increase the load to 8.0 gr. will increase pressure by ca. 35%, and that is for single-base powders. Double-base powders, as are all Alliant pistol/shotgun powders, is a completely different matter. If you want/need higher velocity then use 2400, it is the propellant used for initial cartridge development of the .357 Magnum in the early 1930s, and still cannot be improved upon for full power loads for this cartridge.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961

Last edited by Alk8944; 04-29-2012 at 09:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 04-29-2012, 09:13 AM
arjay's Avatar
arjay arjay is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 15,082
Likes: 91,551
Liked 26,243 Times in 8,376 Posts
Default

When I was new to reloading I assumed using jacketed data would be safe with lead bullets and it was until I split several cases! Start low and work your way up.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2012, 09:31 AM
Alk8944's Avatar
Alk8944 Alk8944 is online now
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,616
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,603 Times in 3,451 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay View Post
When I was new to reloading I assumed using jacketed data would be safe with lead bullets and it was until I split several cases! Start low and work your way up.
arjay,

Cases splitting has everything to do with case ductility which is diminished with use. Brass, and all copper based alloys, work hardens and becomes brittle. Pressure is not a factor.

If you have used any polishing product containing ammonia on your brass this will also result in embrittlement and splitting.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2012, 02:10 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,605
Likes: 3,691
Liked 7,169 Times in 2,996 Posts
Default

Posted by Alk8944.
"DO NOT even think about using 8 gr. Unique with a cast bullet. Alliant, and previously Hercules, has never listed more than 6.8 gr. Unique for a pressure of nearly 34,000 PSI. To increase the load to 8.0 gr. will increase pressure by ca. 35%, and that is for single-base powders. Double-base powders, as are all Alliant pistol/shotgun powders, is a completely different matter. If you want/need higher velocity then use 2400, it is the propellant used for initial cartridge development of the .357 Magnum in the early 1930s, and still cannot be improved upon for full power loads for this cartridge."
Well now my old Lyman cast bullet manual shows a max load of
Unique of 8.0 grs with a 158 gr gas check cast bullet at 35,500 cup.
My old Hercules manual 1-84, shows a max load of Unique of 8.5 grs
with a 158 gr lead bullet at 36,500 cup. Never is a long time and I
think calculating pressure increases based on powder characteristics
like single base or double base might prove dificult. I agree 100%
on the idea of switching to 2400 for full power loads. The money
already spent on the can of Unique is gone, don't worry about it.
Just buy a can of 2400 and load away.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2012, 02:21 AM
tappedandtagged tappedandtagged is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 397
Likes: 147
Liked 110 Times in 67 Posts
Default

I loaded up some 6.5 grain Unique loads that I intend to test in the morning. I will be getting some 2400 or Accurate No. 9 for more magnum loads. I am leaning toward No. 9 seeing as that company has a lot more data available online for their powders. I've found Alliant's online data to be lacking greatly.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-30-2012, 04:15 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,605
Likes: 3,691
Liked 7,169 Times in 2,996 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tappedandtagged View Post
I loaded up some 6.5 grain Unique loads that I intend to test in the morning. I will be getting some 2400 or Accurate No. 9 for more magnum loads. I am leaning toward No. 9 seeing as that company has a lot more data available online for their powders. I've found Alliant's online data to be lacking greatly.
If you're basically interested in one load, a good full power
load with a 158 gr cast bullet, you don't need lots and lots
of information. Around 14.0 grs with magnum primers, my
choice, or up to 15.0 grs with standard primers will suffice
and be within today's pressure standards. I think Alliant has
been taken over by Speer and so the quantity and quality
of their data has declined.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-30-2012, 10:55 AM
sixshot sixshot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Soda Springs, Idaho
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Just because 2 bullets weigh the same doesn't mean you can interchange load data. Seating depth can make a big difference with no other changes, including jacketed vs cast.
8 grs of Unique is an extremely hot load in a 357 maggie!

Dick
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-30-2012, 02:00 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is online now
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,063
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,464 Times in 6,787 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tappedandtagged View Post
I loaded up some 6.5 grain Unique loads that I intend to test in the morning. I will be getting some 2400 or Accurate No. 9 for more magnum loads. I am leaning toward No. 9 seeing as that company has a lot more data available online for their powders. I've found Alliant's online data to be lacking greatly.
Perhaps buy Lymans cast Bullet Manual
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:46 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

I disagree with the premise of lower pressures. No, all data sources will tell you to NOT use jakceted data for equiv lead bullets. Basic rules of powder ingition; all things being equal, pressure = vel. So reducing pressure will reduce vel, NOT increase it. Check loading data for jacketed & identical moly coated jacketed. It requires MORE powder to achieve higher vel not less. Why is that? It's because less friction means less pressure means less vel.
My theory is a lead bullet has higher friction, at least the metals table says so, & larger dia & seals the bore more completely from leaking gases. So it developes a bit more pressure than equiv jacketed, if you can actually find an equiv jacketd bullet shape to compare. The 230gr RN 45 is about the best comparison. Same charge wts, I get about 40fps LESS vel with jacketed. That is telling me slightly higher pressure w/ lead than jacketed to get me higher vel.
As noted, vel & leading rarely have anything to do with one another. No, it's more bullet fit & alloy hardness related to pressures used. Lots of guys out there shooting cast lead bullets @ low rifle vel (1500fps+) w/ little to no leading.

Last edited by fredj338; 04-30-2012 at 11:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-01-2012, 06:16 PM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is online now
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,838
Likes: 7,390
Liked 8,046 Times in 3,652 Posts
Default

The late Skeeter Skelton wrote about this load being one of his favorites in 357 mag. and one I liked to shoot in my old model Ruger Blackhawk. The Lyman # 358156 , 156gr. cast SWC with gas check ( gas check eliminates leading but try unchecked bullets if that's what you got ) over 7.5 grs. Unique.

For top end magnum loads go with 2400 , this powder can't be beat in this application.

Don't use bevel base cast bullets in magnum loads, the don't do well at all.

Last edited by gwpercle; 05-01-2012 at 06:19 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-01-2012, 07:34 PM
Dashriprock's Avatar
Dashriprock Dashriprock is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 765
Likes: 417
Liked 1,136 Times in 310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944 View Post
DO NOT even think about using 8 gr. Unique with a cast bullet. Alliant, and previously Hercules, has never listed more than 6.8 gr. Unique for a pressure of nearly 34,000 PSI.
Reckon that depends on the cartridge being loaded. Speer #11 lists a 250-gr cast semi-wadcutter .45 Colt load for Blackhawks and Contenders with 10.5 grs. Unique.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-01-2012, 10:09 PM
BoDog BoDog is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: central Kalifornia
Posts: 176
Likes: 71
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

pressure curves on powders varry with seating depth, bullet hardness, primer. I have been loading for 40 years, last year I wanted to use a standard power with a 225gr, 44 cal load but the powder wasn't listed, so I called them. The bullistian on their end said well you can start with 20g. and max was 21g. that was with Barnes Copper.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-02-2012, 12:25 AM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is online now
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,063
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,464 Times in 6,787 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dashriprock View Post
Reckon that depends on the cartridge being loaded. Speer #11 lists a 250-gr cast semi-wadcutter .45 Colt load for Blackhawks and Contenders with 10.5 grs. Unique.
It helps to read the original post as the OP was taking about 357 Mag and 158 gr bullets.

Even though there is "old" data that was published that pushed the use of Unique higher than what is now listed, the advice given is a safer bet for all.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:27 AM
Steve C Steve C is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Lead will shoot faster than a jacketed bullet with the same charge weights. Lead has less barrel resistance and slips through easier and therefore is quicker.

The problems with lead can be in leading both if the pressure is too low or too high and if you like to spend hours scrubbing out bores then go ahead an push them as hard as you dare. Careful workup is the best way to avoid all problems though it may take some effort and more time.

If you have absolutely no data for lead a good place to start is a 20% reduction less than the max load for jacketed of the same weight. A 10% reduction from that maximum will usually give your the same as maximum load velocity of the jacketed bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-02-2012, 03:53 AM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C View Post
Lead will shoot faster than a jacketed bullet with the same charge weights. Lead has less barrel resistance and slips through easier and therefore is quicker.
.
I still don't buy that. Less resistance or friction means lower pressures/velocity w/ the same charge wts. Yes, lead is more maleable, but that doesn't account for the higher pressures/velocity IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-02-2012, 10:27 AM
Dashriprock's Avatar
Dashriprock Dashriprock is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 765
Likes: 417
Liked 1,136 Times in 310 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Rule3]It helps to read the original post as the OP was taking about 357 Mag and 158 gr bullets.[QUOTE]

Thanks, I noticed that. I also noticed that the response to which I responded said "a" cast bullet. No caliber designation nor weight of projectile. Once generalization begins, we all lose.

But I'm not splitting hairs! Agreed on the safety point you make.

But I wonder: Unique has been around for a mighty long time. While we do know that manufacturers periodically tweak powder makeup, how much can Unique have been changed that would all of a sudden make a 10 gr charge unsafe in a stong action?

I suspect we see these changes in manuals with the progression of time because of the litigious society in which we currently live.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-02-2012, 11:57 AM
Sal1950 Sal1950 is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Central FL
Posts: 97
Likes: 12
Liked 61 Times in 36 Posts
Default

For various reasons times have changed in relation to recommended max loads over the years.
I have a Lyman 45th edition handbook here, copyright 1970, It lists,

158g Cast bullet /w gas check
Starting load of Unique 4.0g = 680fps
Max Load of Unique 8.0g = 1250fps

You should start at 10% below Max (7.2g) and work your way up watching for pressure signs. Use Caution.
Sal

Last edited by Sal1950; 05-02-2012 at 12:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-02-2012, 12:49 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is online now
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,063
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,464 Times in 6,787 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Dashriprock;136494239][QUOTE=Rule3]It helps to read the original post as the OP was taking about 357 Mag and 158 gr bullets.
Quote:

Thanks, I noticed that. I also noticed that the response to which I responded said "a" cast bullet. No caliber designation nor weight of projectile. Once generalization begins, we all lose.

But I'm not splitting hairs! Agreed on the safety point you make.

But I wonder: Unique has been around for a mighty long time. While we do know that manufacturers periodically tweak powder makeup, how much can Unique have been changed that would all of a sudden make a 10 gr charge unsafe in a stong action?

I suspect we see these changes in manuals with the progression of time because of the litigious society in which we currently live.
But the discussion was 357 Mag 158 grain and continued to say so in the rest of Alks post, Regardless as mentioned I have data for a higher charge of Unique but am not going to post it. I do not agree with the all of the posted info either.
So it's just a short hair.

"DO NOT even think about using 8 gr. Unique with a cast bullet. Alliant, and previously Hercules, has never listed more than 6.8 gr. Unique for a pressure of nearly 34,000 PSI. To increase the load to 8.0 gr. will increase pressure by ca. 35%, and that is for single-base powders. Double-base powders, as are all Alliant pistol/shotgun powders, is a completely different matter. If you want/need higher velocity then use 2400, it is the propellant used for initial cartridge development of the .357 Magnum in the early 1930s, and still cannot be improved upon for full power loads for this cartridge. "
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-02-2012, 01:43 PM
Sal1950 Sal1950 is offline
Member
Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast Loads with Jacketed vs. Cast  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Central FL
Posts: 97
Likes: 12
Liked 61 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3 View Post
"DO NOT even think about using 8 gr. Unique with a cast bullet. Alliant, and previously Hercules, has never listed more than 6.8 gr. Unique for a pressure of nearly 34,000 PSI. To increase the load to 8.0 gr. will increase pressure by ca. 35%, and that is for single-base powders. Double-base powders, as are all Alliant pistol/shotgun powders, is a completely different matter. If you want/need higher velocity then use 2400, it is the propellant used for initial cartridge development of the .357 Magnum in the early 1930s, and still cannot be improved upon for full power loads for this cartridge. "
Think I have to agree with that no matter what the Lyman 45th says.
Just looked at Hodgdon Universal numbers, which is as close to Unique as you can get and they show a,
Max 6.2 = 1247fps = 33,400 CUP
Unique is a great power for low to upper midrange loads but if you really want to explore the limits of a 357 spend the $20 and buy a pound of 2400
Sal
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
230gr, 357 magnum, cartridge, colt, primer, ruger, skeeter, skelton, universal, wadcutter

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MV of cast vs. Jacketed bullets DWalt Reloading 30 05-10-2015 01:15 AM
jacketed vs cast samemills Reloading 10 02-17-2015 11:36 PM
Pressure in Cast vs Jacketed Bullet Loads GyMac Reloading 22 04-10-2014 07:18 AM
.38 S&W, cast or jacketed? finstr Reloading 13 03-09-2013 10:07 PM
jacketed vs cast johngalt Reloading 3 03-12-2010 07:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)