Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2012, 11:03 AM
TheTinMan TheTinMan is offline
Member
Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sorta Downeast
Posts: 933
Likes: 2,866
Liked 1,737 Times in 418 Posts
Default Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP

Gun: Colt Officers Model 38 (so shoot me )
Bullet: Rainier plated 158 grain flat point
Cases: UMC factory ammo, third reload
Primer: Federal small pistol
COAL: 1.455"
Powder: Win 231

Rainier says to use lead bullet data but my velocities didn't come close to any lead bullet data I found. I built a ladder from 3.6 grains up to 4.4 grains based on available data. At 3.6 grains, they were barely dribbling out of the barrel and I feared the last one was a squib (chrono showed it at 130 fps). Extreme spread and standard deviation data were a mess, along with the "groups", until I got up to 4.4 grains:

avg 670 fps
hi/lo 62
std dev 25

So accuracy was terrible and my velocities were way below lead data from any source. My Hornady manual shows 4.4 grains as the MAX for a 158 grain lead bullet. It does show 158 grain hollow points over 4.3 grains at 700 fps. That looks a lot closer to my results. For the jacketed bullets, their MAX is 4.9 grains at 900 fps but that load is rated +P. Sierra shows 4.9 at 850 fps as max for jacketed 158 grain bullet.

I don't plan to go all the way up to 4.9 grains, but do you all think working up to 4.7 grains in 0.1 grain steps is responsible?

As a side note, this revolver loves 3.5 grains of W-231 under a swaged 158 grain Hornady HBWC. Avg 834 fps; ES 36; SD 9; and a 5-shot group under an inch at 15 yards off rest. There's nothing wrong with the gun.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2012, 11:15 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
Default

I load Berry 158gr plated by the thousands with HP38/Win231.
You won't get lead velocities because the friction is higher with plated.
The data you are look at is for standard .38 Spl. You can go into +P with plated bullets without problem; I have to go 4.5gr to make reliable minor, which is right at the edge of +P. 4.3 is good enough for ICORE and IDPA (120PF and 115PF). Plated bullets are not suited for magnum loads (like .357 full power).

My experience is that I get all the accuracy I am going to get around 4.3 to 4.5gr. I would not go to the TOP load for jacketed bullets, because the plated seal a bit better. I can get better accuracy out of lead WC, but I don't like the lube smoke for IDPA and ICORE.

By the way, be sure to clean ALL the fouling out of the barrel when switching between lead and plated bullets if you want best accuracy and minimal added fouling.
__________________
Science plus Art

Last edited by OKFC05; 09-03-2012 at 11:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 09-04-2012, 04:17 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

I got a box of Berry's 158gr bullets and I also had to use more powder than with lead bullets to achieve similar velocities but I expected that. I usually charge 4.0gr W231 under a 158gr LSWC and I'm using 4.4gr W231 under the Berry's 158gr bullets.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2012, 10:32 PM
TheTinMan TheTinMan is offline
Member
Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sorta Downeast
Posts: 933
Likes: 2,866
Liked 1,737 Times in 418 Posts
Default

Update: I found the COAL listed above of 1.455" by taking the COAL for this bullet in .357 Magnum from some archived MidwayUSA datat for Rainier and subtracting the difference in case length between a .357 Magnum and a .38 Special.

Then I came across THIS DATA which appears to be directly from Rainier and shows a COAL of 1.430" for this bullet in .38 Special. Tried that with the most accurate load from before of 4.4 grains of W-231. And yes, I know that shorter COAL may increase pressure. There were no pressure signs at all, and based on the velocities I got before I wasn't even close to the maximum.

I wouldn't call it a light target load, but it is nicely accurate out of three different revolvers. I'm going to try a bit more crimp next time. This batch was crimped barely beyond a taper crimp. Some guys report better results with the plated bullets and a bit of a roll crimp.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2012, 12:17 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP Range Report: .38 Special w/ Rainier 158gr FP  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTinMan View Post
Then I came across THIS DATA which appears to be directly from Rainier and shows a COAL of 1.430" for this bullet in .38 Special. Tried that with the most accurate load from before of 4.4 grains of W-231. And yes, I know that shorter COAL may increase pressure. There were no pressure signs at all, and based on the velocities I got before I wasn't even close to the maximum.
The problem with checking for "signs" of pressure in the .38 Special, you will be way over SAAMI limits for the .38 Special before you ever see pressure signs. You can load a .38 Special round to 3X the max .38 Special pressure which are .357 Magnum pressures and see no pressure signs. You would have to exceed .357 Magnum pressures by at least 50% before you would see any signs in a .38 Special.

Not a knock on what you said, just a heads-up...
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rainier ballistics 9mm 158gr Ultimate407 Reloading 6 01-02-2017 05:13 AM
Range Report- 1906 Special US Service wingcollector S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 10-08-2015 04:04 PM
Range report: 1952 Chief's Special Rick_A S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 05-05-2015 07:46 AM
44 special range report beagleye S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 03-14-2012 04:24 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)