|
|
|
02-08-2014, 03:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 157
Liked 228 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
2400 load for Mod 19 Questions
Hi to all:
I have 1lb of old "Hercules" 2400 and about 400 158gr Lead SWCs that I am considering using for 357 MAG reloads for my 6" Mod 19-3. I am limited to my Pacific Pistol Powder measure and bushing #19 which throws 12.7gr of 2400. All my reloading manuals are as old as the powder and call for 13.5gr to 15.5gr of the same powder. My questions are:
1) Is this load too lite?
2) Any idea of the velocity attained?
3) Do I need Magnum Primers?
I appreciate all opinions on this recipe! I have a bad case of cabin fever and wanted to occupy some of my time reloading. Thanks in advance!
|
02-08-2014, 03:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 4,023
Liked 3,698 Times in 1,466 Posts
|
|
1. Not too light for use but would be a little lighter than a factory load.
2. SWAG of about 1150 fps.
3. Standard small pistol primers will do just fine.
Try it and let us know how you like it.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-08-2014, 03:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 157
Liked 228 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Thank you
Quote:
Originally Posted by OFT II
1. Not too light for use but would be a little lighter than a factory load.
2. SWAG of about 1150 fps.
3. Standard small pistol primers will do just fine.
Try it and let us know how you like it.
|
Thank you so much for that fast reply! All I'm looking to do is create a mild magnum load that is both above +P velocity and will be kind to my fragile Mod 19's forcing cone. Thanks again
|
02-08-2014, 03:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 1,267
Liked 2,021 Times in 760 Posts
|
|
I load 13.5gr. of 2400 with a 158gr LSWC. Nice shooting, accurate round with no signs of leading in my 6" 686. 12.7gr should work fine in your M19. 2400 will get dirty if you load it down enough.
|
02-08-2014, 08:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,553
Likes: 4
Liked 8,885 Times in 4,121 Posts
|
|
I use 12 grains #2400 as a regular .357 load with a 158 LSWC, standard primers, though magnums will work about as well. Chronographs 1,100 fps from 6" barrel and is accurate.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-08-2014, 09:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,918
Likes: 41,503
Liked 29,153 Times in 13,781 Posts
|
|
Yellow gold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collo Rosso
2400 will get dirty if you load it down enough.
|
It gets a yellow-gold powder all over your gun and hands.
|
02-08-2014, 09:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 161
Liked 517 Times in 168 Posts
|
|
I would still use magnum primers because they are typically recommended with 2400. I don't think that is because it is necessarily a heavy load but because the powder is more difficult to ignite uniformly.
__________________
Dick
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-08-2014, 09:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Littleton, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 4,345
Liked 1,054 Times in 506 Posts
|
|
Very close to a .38-44 load. Might burn more cleanly in a. .38 special case. Don't put it in an Aircrew.
__________________
and what his trumpet saith
|
02-08-2014, 10:27 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
|
|
The K frame M19 is plenty sturdy for the 158 lead medium fps loads you are starting with.
I started with 11.4 grs of 2400 with a cci500 standard primer and a 158gr LRN in my 6" and the fps over my chrony was at......
1039 fps and at 25 yards grouped at 1.25".
Have yet to try more powder as yet.....
Good loading.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-08-2014, 10:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 392
Likes: 5
Liked 60 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
My old notes show 12.8 of Herc 2400 giving 1150 fps in a 4 inch Ruger Security Six. with a 160 grain cast SWC.....and it was noted as a "good load". I've gone to 15 grains in testing but settled on 14 grains as all I want to put through my Mod 19 as "full power" loads....mostly I shoot 38 spl in it.
|
02-09-2014, 08:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,607
Likes: 3,693
Liked 7,175 Times in 2,997 Posts
|
|
With lighter charges of 2400 like your 12.7 grs I have found that
consistancy is greatly improved with magnum primers and pressure
should surely still be mild considering that older data went up to
15.5 grs.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2014, 09:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Swamps of WNY
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 94
Liked 840 Times in 428 Posts
|
|
Lyman calls for a magnum small pistol primer. I don't know why you would not use one.
Lyman Manual #47 calls for a starting load of 11.4 /1024 fps
Max load 15.5 /1344 fps.
158 cast round nose.
It could be a good accurate load, who knows? Check for leading.
Enjoy
David
|
02-09-2014, 09:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,553
Likes: 4
Liked 8,885 Times in 4,121 Posts
|
|
Your load needs a good roll crimp. Hard to define the degree of a crimp, but a bit of experimentation will be worth the effort. What some define as a "heavy" crimp may distort the bullet to the point of causing inaccuracy. Too light a crimp and the bullet moves under recoil and powder burning is not efficient; i.e., unburned particles.
|
02-09-2014, 09:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 2
Liked 1,595 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
The classic 2400 loads handed down from Moses were developed with std primers. Full loads of 2400 give lower pressures , and usually better accuracy.
That said , as mentioned a cpl posts above in a magnum case , this is a pretty mild load , and try it both ways with std and mag primers for accuracy and SD .
Also as mentioned above this would be a dandy .38-44 load ( with std primers ) .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2014, 11:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,125 Posts
|
|
Something that always puzzles me is a poster saying he can only use a certain bushing or other measuring device because it is the only one he has. Why can't he buy more bushings? Why can't he buy a powder measure? Has he checked that bushing's drop weight with the powder he has using a scale or is he going strictly by a chart? Certainly anyone who has the financial ability to own a Smith & Wesson revolver and reload for it is able to make those purchases. Or am I missing something?
It troubles me to read about handloaders "settling" on a given recipe because it is the only one they have the tools or components to load. Granted, this OP probably isn't going to make any unsafe ammunition but that isn't always the case.
Just wonderin' - no offense meant.
Ed
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-09-2014, 11:38 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 157
Liked 228 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AveragEd
Something that always puzzles me is a poster saying he can only use a certain bushing or other measuring device because it is the only one he has. Why can't he buy more bushings? Why can't he buy a powder measure? Has he checked that bushing's drop weight with the powder he has using a scale or is he going strictly by a chart? Certainly anyone who has the financial ability to own a Smith & Wesson revolver and reload for it is able to make those purchases. Or am I missing something?
It troubles me to read about handloaders "settling" on a given recipe because it is the only one they have the tools or components to load. Granted, this OP probably isn't going to make any unsafe ammunition but that isn't always the case.
Just wonderin' - no offense meant.
Ed
|
You're missing a couple of facts, Ed. I'm 71, bought the gun new 37 years ago, Pacific no longer makes the bushings and I live on Social Security and a part time job. 37 years ago, I WAS able to afford to make the purchases you speak of. Things change............
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
27 Man, Arisin Wind, bluetopper, dmar, Fishslayer, greenmachine, Kiwi cop, Milton, OFT II, rburg, rwsmith, setxn, Warren Sear |
02-09-2014, 12:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,125 Posts
|
|
Well, I'll be 67 next week and live on Social Security and two part-time jobs, so we have something in common. I meant no offense but on many forums like this, I read about handloaders making do with what they have and not using a scale so often that it makes me worry about who I'm shooting next to at the gun clubs to which I belong. I've never witnessed a rifle or handgun blowing up but I have been around two trap shotguns that were grenaded by careless reloading techniques. It isn't pretty and someone usually gets hurt.
Ed
|
02-09-2014, 02:43 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: nebraska
Posts: 88
Likes: 2
Liked 25 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
P M sent. about bushings
__________________
shoot one gun but shoot it well
|
02-09-2014, 03:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 959
Likes: 652
Liked 549 Times in 293 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noshow
Hi to all:
I have 1lb of old "Hercules" 2400 and about 400 158gr Lead SWCs that I am considering using for 357 MAG reloads for my 6" Mod 19-3. I am limited to my Pacific Pistol Powder measure and bushing #19 which throws 12.7gr of 2400. All my reloading manuals are as old as the powder and call for 13.5gr to 15.5gr of the same powder. My questions are:
1) Is this load too lite?
2) Any idea of the velocity attained?
3) Do I need Magnum Primers?
I appreciate all opinions on this recipe! I have a bad case of cabin fever and wanted to occupy some of my time reloading. Thanks in advance!
|
noshow
I'm not sure of the limits of the K frame, nor how Herco 2400 compares to Alliant 2400, but I've done three different tests (chorograph and targets) with Alliant 2400, using my Model 686, 6 inch.
Almost all with CCI #500 small pistol primers, the few I did with magnum primers were accurate, but the ES and STD were higher than with std SPP - so I'd say from my tests - use SPP
the bullets were 158 gr hardcast truncated cone - very similar to the SWC
at 12.8 gr of 2400, I got the following:
AVG V = 1205 w/1.3" groups
AVG V = 1245 w/1.1" groups
AVG V = 1229 w/1.1" groups
and one test of 12.6 gr
AVG V = 1220 w/1.6" groups
these were shot from a rest at 25 yards.
I don't believe there was any unburnt powder with this load, I did get some with lighter loads
I did 11.5 gr to 14.5 gr. & 10 rounds of each charge three times.
if I had shot all 300 rounds into a single target, pretty much all of them would have fell within the same 2.5" circle - so, in my tests, the powder charge didn't have too much to do with accuracy
good luck on treating your cabin fever and I hope this helps.
here are some links to my tests:
357 & 2400 chrono and target results
Chrono data 357 / 2400 / CCI500 / 158 gr cast w/targets
Chrono data with target groups +
__________________
I'd like to agree with you BUT
Last edited by forestswin; 02-09-2014 at 03:08 PM.
|
02-09-2014, 07:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,065
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,467 Times in 6,788 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noshow
You're missing a couple of facts, Ed. I'm 71, bought the gun new 37 years ago, Pacific no longer makes the bushings and I live on Social Security and a part time job. 37 years ago, I WAS able to afford to make the purchases you speak of. Things change............
|
Once you settle on a load, if you have a good scale you can make a simple dipper from an old brass case. File down the case mouth until it holds the exact amount you want. Wrap a piece of strong wire. or glue or solder it on. Fill it to over flow scrape off the top,(don't tap and shake) and it,s very constant.
Costs nothing and easy to do. I used to reload on a single stage and had all kinds of custom dippers along with the LEE plastic ones. Put them all in a loading block and dip away!
EDIT: 12.7 gr of 2400 is just fine for your load and NO you do not need to use Mag primers.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Last edited by Rule3; 02-10-2014 at 11:48 AM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-10-2014, 06:28 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 157
Liked 228 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Thanks to all!
Noshow is overwhelmed with so many helpful replys! Thanks so much for the great information so willingly offered. This is one of the friendliest corners of the internet!
|
02-10-2014, 07:10 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Swamps of WNY
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 94
Liked 840 Times in 428 Posts
|
|
I am fifty something. I like seeing folks 67 and 71 still reloading and shooting. My future is brighter!
David
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-10-2014, 12:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC Montana
Posts: 853
Likes: 90
Liked 483 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
I recently loaded both some 44 Specials and 357s with some 2400 that was marked 1978. Worked great (as it always did) in both loads.
My 357s were a bit warmer than yours and I DID shoot some in a 19-3, too. I always use mag primers (or WW primers that don't distinguish mag from regular) with 2400 -- just cuz they say to do so.
|
02-10-2014, 12:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Knox, Kentucky
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 5,757
Liked 3,663 Times in 1,012 Posts
|
|
That load should work just fine. I don't recall Model 19 forcing cones being particularly fragile until the late Seventies. Revolvers that easily tolerated stiff loads with 158 LSWCs experienced flame cutting and forcing cone problems after hot 125 grain JHPs became all the rage.
|
02-10-2014, 07:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,918
Likes: 41,503
Liked 29,153 Times in 13,781 Posts
|
|
Lyman says....
Quote:
Originally Posted by David R
Lyman calls for a magnum small pistol primer. I don't know why you would not use one.
Lyman Manual #47 calls for a starting load of 11.4 /1024 fps
Max load 15.5 /1344 fps.
.
Enjoy
David
|
Lyman just puts a note in front of the .357 section that says to use magnum primers on everything and doesn't differentiate. Speer #14 says magnum primers are not needed with 2400 and I've never used them with no problems. With powders like 110/296 they DO recommend magnum primers.
|
02-10-2014, 08:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,553
Likes: 4
Liked 8,885 Times in 4,121 Posts
|
|
The standard primer vs. magnum primers with #2400 powder debate will likely go on forever. I was curious about this several years ago. I loaded 12 grains #2400 with the original .357 Magnum bullet - the Hensley & Gibbs #51 plainbase 158 grain SWC cast from wheelweight alloy. I fired five, five-shot groups at 25 yards from a benchrest using the same load, only switching primers between each 25 rounds. I used a Colt Pythom with a six-inch barrel. Loads were chronographed and all group sizes were measured.
Primers: CCI -standard & magnum, Federal- match & magnum, Remington- standard & magnum, Winchester- standard and magnum.
40 groups of 5 rounds each; 200 rounds total.
Muzzle velocities varied from a low of 1183 (Federal small pistol magnum) to a high of 1261 (Win. small pistol magnum). Exactly the same primers gave best accuracy (1.95" for Fed. magnum) and worst accuracy ( 3.10" for Win. magnum). All other primers provided very similar groups sizes, ranging from 2.25" to 2.75".
With the exception of the two extremes, performance was very close in all respects. There was a very slight accuracy advantage with magnum primers, but not enough to convince me to stop using standard primers. However, long-range handgunning, something few of us do, would probably make me reconsider.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 06:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 157
Liked 228 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Special Thanks!
I wanted to thank "coldmold", a member here, for providing me with the powder bushings I was missing. I now have a complete set, thanks to his kind help. I am very happy to have posted this question on this most friendly forum. Thank you!!!!!!!!
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 08:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 44
Likes: 10
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I also load 158gr LSWC's over 13.5-13.8 grains of 2400 and use standard CCI500 primers with great accuracy and the 'go bang" feel of the magnum we all love!
|
02-16-2014, 08:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,918
Likes: 41,503
Liked 29,153 Times in 13,781 Posts
|
|
I don't do anything unsafe.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by AveragEd
Well, I'll be 67 next week and live on Social Security and two part-time jobs, so we have something in common. I meant no offense but on many forums like this, I read about handloaders making do with what they have and not using a scale so often that it makes me worry about who I'm shooting next to at the gun clubs to which I belong. I've never witnessed a rifle or handgun blowing up but I have been around two trap shotguns that were grenaded by careless reloading techniques. It isn't pretty and someone usually gets hurt.
Ed
|
I don't do anything at all unsafe, just CHEAP!
|
02-16-2014, 09:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 10,960
Liked 10,858 Times in 3,275 Posts
|
|
My general purpose 357 load for many years has been 12.5 grains 2400, 158 gran cast bullet, standard primer in 357 cases. Used in everything from Model 19's to Model 28's with complete satisfaction. If I want more power I switch to a 44 Magnum.
|
05-01-2017, 07:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 49
Likes: 33
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Hi,
For what it is worth.
I have been trying different loads for my 6 inch Smith Model 19-5, 1984. Powders, primers, bullets and so on. I am very meticulous when it comes to clean brass and clean firearms. I use to load 2400 quite a bit years ago. Load data has changed over the years and my old data did seem rather hot by todays standards. To make a long story shorter, I finally found a load that I and my Model 19 likes. Very clean cases, primer pockets and firearm. 14.8grs. 2400 powder, cci primers, 140gr. Sierra JHP at 1.586 OAL. All with medium heavy crimp. One of the cleanest burns over many other powders, great accuracy (30 yds. 6 shots less 1") and no signs of pressure problems. Used both magnum and standard primers. I do suspect the magnum primers created more pressure. I also loaded 14grs. 2400 and accuracy dropped at ninety feet. Any feedback appreciated. Thanks.
|
05-01-2017, 09:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 732
Likes: 1,302
Liked 714 Times in 273 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by David R
I am fifty something. I like seeing folks 67 and 71 still reloading and shooting. My future is brighter!
David
|
I'm going to be 75 this month and I still reload and shoot 5000+ centerfire handgun rounds per year. I started reloading in 1964 with a Lyman 310 hand tool. Calibers include .455 Webley, .32 S&W as well as the usual stuff. I think you've got a very bright future indeed! I hope I do too.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-02-2017, 09:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 185
Liked 3,297 Times in 1,523 Posts
|
|
The " forcing cone " issue was the result of shooting lightweight (125-90gr) jacketed bullets with a compressed load of W296 , it was 21grs and sometimes more . It eroded the forcing cones , weakening them till they cracked .
I routinely shoot 13.5 grs / 2400 in my 19 , 6" with a 158 gr cast bullet . I use std spp's .
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-02-2017, 10:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Lake shore, Ohio
Posts: 144
Likes: 805
Liked 101 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
I am using 13.8 gr of 2400 with 158Gr. Lswc in my 686+ . Its a nice medium load and very accurate.
|
05-02-2017, 10:50 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA.
Posts: 4,435
Likes: 4,490
Liked 4,461 Times in 2,182 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AveragEd
Well, I'll be 67 next week and live on Social Security and two part-time jobs, so we have something in common. I meant no offense but on many forums like this, I read about handloaders making do with what they have and not using a scale so often that it makes me worry about who I'm shooting next to at the gun clubs to which I belong. I've never witnessed a rifle or handgun blowing up but I have been around two trap shotguns that were grenaded by careless reloading techniques. It isn't pretty and someone usually gets hurt.
Ed
|
Double powder charge with a heavy field load like 1 1/4 oz. That really rattles some guns, some even come apart. I don't know what it is about trap shooters, they just load a lot of grenades looking for that magical high velocity load. The very worst of that group is the money shooters. Stay away.
__________________
That's just somebody talkin.
Last edited by LostintheOzone; 05-02-2017 at 10:53 AM.
|
05-02-2017, 11:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA.
Posts: 4,435
Likes: 4,490
Liked 4,461 Times in 2,182 Posts
|
|
Nice thread with lots of useful information.
I normally just shoot 38 spl cowboy loads in my model 19's but I want to start using 357 cases and 2400.
To date I've only used 2400 for my rifle loads. It doesn't care about heavy charges, actually shoots better with faster loads.
I'll probably have to paint the primers so I don't get them mixed up.
I'm saving this thread.
__________________
That's just somebody talkin.
Last edited by LostintheOzone; 05-02-2017 at 11:12 AM.
|
05-02-2017, 11:24 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA.
Posts: 4,435
Likes: 4,490
Liked 4,461 Times in 2,182 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by David R
I am fifty something. I like seeing folks 67 and 71 still reloading and shooting. My future is brighter!
David
|
I'm 67 and reload. You have to do something when you retire except mow the lawn and go to the range. I try to stay away from the warden as she has designs on my time.
__________________
That's just somebody talkin.
|
05-02-2017, 01:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 23
Liked 490 Times in 253 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noshow
Hi to all:
I have 1lb of old "Hercules" 2400 and about 400 158gr Lead SWCs that I am considering using for 357 MAG reloads for my 6" Mod 19-3. I am limited to my Pacific Pistol Powder measure and bushing #19 which throws 12.7gr of 2400. All my reloading manuals are as old as the powder and call for 13.5gr to 15.5gr of the same powder. My questions are:
1) Is this load too lite?
2) Any idea of the velocity attained?
3) Do I need Magnum Primers?
I appreciate all opinions on this recipe! I have a bad case of cabin fever and wanted to occupy some of my time reloading. Thanks in advance!
|
Lyman Cast Bullet Handbook says 12.2-13.5. That is essentially 10% lower than Alliant's current load for jacketed (14.3 max). I'd say you're good to go.
Last edited by at_liberty; 05-02-2017 at 01:57 PM.
|
05-03-2017, 08:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 10,960
Liked 10,858 Times in 3,275 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboy4evr
The " forcing cone " issue was the result of shooting lightweight (125-90gr) jacketed bullets with a compressed load of W296 , it was 21grs and sometimes more . It eroded the forcing cones , weakening them till they cracked .
I routinely shoot 13.5 grs / 2400 in my 19 , 6" with a 158 gr cast bullet . I use std spp's .
|
I cracked one using Blue Dot powder. It's not the powder; it is hot loads with bullets of 125 grains or less.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-03-2017, 11:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 7
Liked 657 Times in 369 Posts
|
|
Quote:
The " forcing cone " issue was the result of shooting lightweight (125-90gr) jacketed bullets with a compressed load of W296 , it was 21grs and sometimes more . It eroded the forcing cones , weakening them till they cracked .
|
I'm sorry but this statement is not factual. Smith & Wesson has NEVER condoned the use of any handloaded ammunition in their firearms and any damage caused when using handloaded ammo was entirely the responsibility of the shooter and not S&W.
The k-frame .357 magnums were designed originally for use in a LE environment where practice would be conducted using .38 Special ammo and the firing of full power 158 grain .357 magnum ammunition would be limited to qualification and duty carry. With the advent of high velocity 110 and 125 grain loadings such as those manufactured by SuperVel, the cracking problems arose. As the popularity of these loadings became more popular, the mainstream ammo companies jumped on the bandwagon and the use of light bullet for the caliber loads became wide spread. Because of this, Smith and Wesson warned against the use of magnum ammunition utilizing bullets lighter than 140 grains in the k-frame magnums. This warning had zero to do with handloads of any type and I don't know where this notion came from or why it continues to be propagated. This goes double for the "W296" enhancer. It is an internet enhanced myth.
Bruce
Last edited by BruceM; 05-04-2017 at 07:59 PM.
|
05-04-2017, 10:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 49
Likes: 33
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
wonder how much carbon build up around forcing cone on the Model 19 contributes to erosion and eventually failure. Carbon ignites around 1292 degrees F. Flat areas great place for deposits to accumulate. Once ignited it can reach 2012 degrees F. until spent. Carbon deposits on automotive valves can burn through the valve.
|
05-04-2017, 10:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 4,223
Liked 3,603 Times in 1,245 Posts
|
|
Lots of myths and opinions out there in internet land. So far as I know Alliant the maker of 2400 ignites 2400 with standard primers. Just now looking at their web site 2400 data, all loads I looked at called for standard primers. I would suppose that the manufacturer might know best.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-04-2017, 12:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 185
Liked 3,297 Times in 1,523 Posts
|
|
I'm sorry Bruce M , but your post is not factual . W296 , H110 over time will erode the forcing cone . Those real light weight jacketed bullets slamming into eroded forcing cone under very high pressure did cause some to crack . This is a known fact . We each have our opinion on this matter , I will stick to mine .
Last edited by cowboy4evr; 05-04-2017 at 12:22 PM.
|
05-04-2017, 11:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 10,960
Liked 10,858 Times in 3,275 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by red1
wonder how much carbon build up around forcing cone on the Model 19 contributes to erosion and eventually failure. Carbon ignites around 1292 degrees F. Flat areas great place for deposits to accumulate. Once ignited it can reach 2012 degrees F. until spent. Carbon deposits on automotive valves can burn through the valve.
|
Mine cracked somewhere around 750 cartridges fired, so erosion or carbon build-up are not factors in my opinion and in my experience.
I am glad no one has mentioned the "steady diet of magnum ammo" line of Bull Squeezein's.
|
05-05-2017, 10:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 185
Liked 3,297 Times in 1,523 Posts
|
|
My favorite load for years in my model 19-5 , 4" was my cast 180 gr RNFP on top of a max load ( current load data) of W296 . It's as tight today as the day I bought it . Model 19/66 was designed for 158 gr , or heavier bullet . That's straight from S&W memo yrs ago . Yrs ago I researched it .
|
05-05-2017, 12:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 157
Likes: 643
Liked 112 Times in 69 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AveragEd
Something that always puzzles me is a poster saying he can only use a certain bushing or other measuring device because it is the only one he has. Why can't he buy more bushings? Or am I missing something?
It troubles me to read about handloaders "settling" on a given recipe because it is the only one they have the tools or components to load.
Just wonderin' - no offense meant. Ed
|
Do tell!
Well...for those of us in similar situation, who have used that pistol measure for more than 30 years with great satisfaction; It was a sad day when they were discontinued! They do speed up charging pistol cases marvelously! I was tired of using my Lee dippers, although I still have a set that I use...not as Herr Lee suggests, but nonetheless useful.
The only competitor that Hornady-Pacific had in them days was the RCBS Little Dandy, which was, and still is, a good measure, but expen$ive!,
When I bought my Pacific, economics raised its ugly head. I think I got the measure, and maybe 4 bushings for a fraction of what the competition would have cost, and as I progressed, I was able to get more bushings. Iirc, then, they were about ~ $3 with shipping. My last one, bought 2 weeks ago, to fill a remaining hole in the lower charges, was ~$15. I probably won't buy another!
Over the years, I am happy to have filled out my collection with a new# 8 to add to my stable of 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22. That will cover all useful loads with Unique, Universal, 2400, and Trail Boss, plus any other replacements for Unique/Universal that I may want to try.
So, if the bushings won't throw to the last 1/1000gr. of my chosen loads, "Close enough is good enough", except for those of us who insist on the last gnat's nut of "consistency", or maybe who like to hang our backsides over the abyss of "Maximum" loads, they are plenty good, especially if we load on the conservative side, and have found what we envision will do the job. I don't presume that a .1 or .2 gr. variation on one side or the other of a "favorite" load will make a real world difference in either pressure, velocity or effectiveness.
But, that's just me.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-06-2017, 11:52 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 49
Likes: 33
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Sear
Mine cracked somewhere around 750 cartridges fired, so erosion or carbon build-up are not factors in my opinion and in my experience.
I am glad no one has mentioned the "steady diet of magnum ammo" line of Bull Squeezein's.
|
Any thoughts on why cracked around 750 rounds. I do believe carbon is very hard on forcing cone. It acts like a metal blasting agent wherever it can escape. Sometimes flame cutting top strap and/or erosion of forcing cone. What powder and grain bullet, if I may ask.
Thanks
|
05-06-2017, 12:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 23
Liked 490 Times in 253 Posts
|
|
My 19-4 had tight throats, so before I fired lead bullets I had the throats reamed to .3575 and the forcing cone recut. First I tried .357 lead, and that didn't work with the standard bore.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-06-2017, 12:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 49
Likes: 33
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Sear
I cracked one using Blue Dot powder. It's not the powder; it is hot loads with bullets of 125 grains or less.
|
I bet Blue Dot contributed. I really dislike powder this powder for any handgun.
Blue DotŪ should NOT be used in the 357 Magnum load using the 125 grain projectile (Blue DotŪ recipes with heavier bullet weights as specified in Alliant Powders Reloading Guide are acceptable for use).
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-06-2017, 10:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 10,960
Liked 10,858 Times in 3,275 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by red1
Any thoughts on why cracked around 750 rounds. I do believe carbon is very hard on forcing cone. It acts like a metal blasting agent wherever it can escape. Sometimes flame cutting top strap and/or erosion of forcing cone. What powder and grain bullet, if I may ask.
Thanks
|
There are as many theories about that as there are about who killed JFK. The bottom line is that high pressure loads with bullets of 125 (or so) grains or less will damage a K frame .357 magnum, sooner or later.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|