|
|
|
10-04-2015, 02:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
What is the advantage to the 357 Sig??
Rather than mess up the ongoing thread, I had a question on this.
Yes, I know the claim of 357Mag in a semi auto and I love Sigs
Is the 357 Sig more accurate than a +P 9MM or better for defense than a 40 SW? Less recoil than a 40 SW??
I looked up velocities of shooting a lighter 40 SW at max loads and it seems as good or better than the 357 Sig?
Guess I never saw the reason to buy a conversion barrel for my 40 SW's?
Never shot a 357 Sig so what am I missing?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
10-04-2015, 03:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Lighter recoil than the 40 IMO. Better bullet performance vs lighter 135-155gr 40s. The slightly lighter recoil would be the only measurable reason to switch really. With fmj, better barrier penetration.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 03:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
I figured if it was that much better, more LEO and Military would use it but they don't. I supose some special units do.
The 40 seems to be the major caliber. Heck some of switching back to the 9mm.
Sure any necked down case will jump up the velocity. Like the old Tokarev round.
I do not worry to much about barrier penetration unless I am shooting at heavier cardboard.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 03:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,890
Likes: 4,778
Liked 6,940 Times in 3,309 Posts
|
|
Never played with it, but I do play with its ugly big brother, 400 corbon.
With the higher velocities offered by these bottlenecks, things start to get a little interesting on target.
If you enjoy visions of water filled plastic jugs and bottles being reduced to clouds of spray, You'll likely enjoy the 357 sig over either 9MM or 40 S&W. If you find such things repulsive ... then ... why are you spending money on this?
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 03:31 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
Rather than mess up the ongoing thread, I had a question on this.
Yes, I know the claim of 357Mag in a semi auto and I love Sigs
Is the 357 Sig more accurate than a +P 9MM or better for defense than a 40 SW? Less recoil than a 40 SW??
I looked up velocities of shooting a lighter 40 SW at max loads and it seems as good or better than the 357 Sig?
Guess I never saw the reason to buy a conversion barrel for my 40 SW's?
Never shot a 357 Sig so what am I missing?
|
Where in Florida are you? South Florida?
I will let you experience the 357SIG in any thing from a pocket pistol, to a duty sidearm, to a target gun, to a SMG that you would like
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 03:41 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
I figured if it was that much better, more LEO and Military would use it but they don't. I supose some special units do.
The 40 seems to be the major caliber. Heck some of switching back to the 9mm.
|
As I am sure you are aware, there is no single firearm that fills the need of all Law Enforcement.
The needs of the Highway Patrol are different than the needs of a City Police force which are different than the needs of Correctional Officers which are different than the needs of Probation Officers, etc.
Also many Law Enforcement equipment choices have nothing to do with what is best.
Some choices are based on what the Vendor has offered the Agency for FREE. Occasionally choices are based on what the Vendor has offered the particular contract Administrator.
The one example I will point out is FHPs switch from 9MM to 40S&W was made because Beretta offered a 96D and three mags for each 92 traded in. This was at a cost of $0 to the State. Beretta did this to be able to claim a major Agency had adopted the 96D in 40S&W
40S&W is a terrible choice for Highway Patrol work, the 357SIG is far better
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 05:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,885
Likes: 3,797
Liked 11,740 Times in 3,664 Posts
|
|
I bought a Glock 31 to shoot at 2 liter Sprite bottles at 100 yards. The .357 Sig shoots flatter than a 9 mm Parabellum; it has the energy at 100 yards that the 9 mm has at the muzzle.
|
10-04-2015, 05:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
40S&W is a terrible choice for Highway Patrol work, the 357SIG is far better
|
I agree with your post (the parts I deleted in this quote, just to narrow it down to this)
Why is the 357 Sig better for the FHP over the 40 SW?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
10-04-2015, 05:46 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
I agree with your post (the parts I deleted in this quote, just to narrow it down to this)
Why is the 357 Sig better for the FHP over the 40 SW?
|
Perhaps "TERRIBLE" was a poor word choice.
The 357 Sig is not better for the FHP specifically, it is better for the needs of Highway Patrol work anywhere
The Highway Patrolman often sees a car door or window between himself and the other party. Traditionally, defensive 9MM ammunition is terrible against windshields, 40 S&W defensive ammunition is only slightly better.
The 125 grain 357 Magnum and 357SIG with their higher velocity and greater sectional density perform considerably better.
Last edited by colt_saa; 10-04-2015 at 05:47 PM.
|
10-04-2015, 05:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,885
Likes: 3,797
Liked 11,740 Times in 3,664 Posts
|
|
Providing I can find them cheap enough, I will get a .357 Sig barrel and magazine for my Sig P239.
Last edited by ColbyBruce; 10-04-2015 at 07:58 PM.
|
10-04-2015, 05:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Providing I can find them cheap enough, I will get a ,357 Sig barrel and magazine for my Sig P239.
|
Your 40 S&W magazine works just fine with 357SIG.
40 S&W in the 357SIG magazine will not work
|
10-04-2015, 07:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
Perhaps "TERRIBLE" was a poor word choice.
The 357 Sig is not better for the FHP specifically, it is better for the needs of Highway Patrol work anywhere
The Highway Patrolman often sees a car door or window between himself and the other party. Traditionally, defensive 9MM ammunition is terrible against windshields, 40 S&W defensive ammunition is only slightly better.
The 125 grain 357 Magnum and 357SIG with their higher velocity and greater sectional density perform considerably better.
|
That is what I figured. The FHP use to carry SW 357 Mag Revolvers. Now what do they have Glock 37 in 45 GAP??
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
10-04-2015, 07:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
As I am sure you are aware, there is no single firearm that fills the need of all Law Enforcement.
The needs of the Highway Patrol are different than the needs of a City Police force which are different than the needs of Correctional Officers which are different than the needs of Probation Officers, etc.
Also many Law Enforcement equipment choices have nothing to do with what is best.
Some choices are based on what the Vendor has offered the Agency for FREE. Occasionally choices are based on what the Vendor has offered the particular contract Administrator.
The one example I will point out is FHPs switch from 9MM to 40S&W was made because Beretta offered a 96D and three mags for each 92 traded in. This was at a cost of $0 to the State. Beretta did this to be able to claim a major Agency had adopted the 96D in 40S&W
40S&W is a terrible choice for Highway Patrol work, the 357SIG is far better
|
The 96D might be a terrible choice but plenty of agencies issue 40s. Good barrier penetration, high cap, manageable recoil in full size guns. I do wish I could get a 357sig bbl for my 1st gen 4006 though.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
10-04-2015, 07:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
Providing I can find them cheap enough, I will get a ,357 Sig barrel and magazine for my Sig P239.
|
I have P239 in 357sig, best shooting small gun I own.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 09:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,890
Likes: 4,778
Liked 6,940 Times in 3,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell
sectional densities:
.357 @ 125 gr = .140
.40 @ 155 gr = .138
.40 @ 165 gr = .147
etc., etc.
I'm not seeing why the .357 is considerably better from the standpoint of sectional density
|
the 357 sig 125g is moving on along at about 1400 FPS and some folks pushing this up into the 1500+ range
the 40's 155g makes right around 1150.
Velocity means something when your interested in seeing things pulverized
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|
10-04-2015, 11:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 604
Likes: 21
Liked 660 Times in 284 Posts
|
|
I bought a .357 Sig barrel for my Glock 22. It's an impressive and hot little round. However, I don't think it serves a purpose that isn't filled by some other more common caliber. There are anecdotes out there that claim it is the ballistic equivalent of the venerable .357 Magnum 125 Gr. hollow point, but I don't think there are any statistics to confirm that.
|
10-04-2015, 11:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 667
Likes: 268
Liked 1,135 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Everybody forgets one of the best features of the 357 Sig. When it is feeding from the magazine into the chamber, you have a 9mm bullet going into a 10mm hole. It is like a funnel. Very reliable function.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-04-2015, 11:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,890
Likes: 4,778
Liked 6,940 Times in 3,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gen3guy
I bought a .357 Sig barrel for my Glock 22. It's an impressive and hot little round. However, I don't think it serves a purpose that isn't filled by some other more common caliber. There are anecdotes out there that claim it is the ballistic equivalent of the venerable .357 Magnum 125 Gr. hollow point, but I don't think there are any statistics to confirm that.
|
alliant has the Sig pushing a 124g at 1435FPS
Hodgdon has the magnum pushing a 125g at 1966FPS
Nope ... the Sig won't actually duplicate the magnum.
It does, however, start offering some magnum territory to the service auto pistol.
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|
10-05-2015, 12:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 355
Likes: 140
Liked 221 Times in 94 Posts
|
|
My 226 sig shoots much tighter groups with the 357 barrel. Usually half the size at 25 yards.
I am able to better times with the reduced recoil but that is me.
|
10-05-2015, 12:10 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell
sectional densities:
.357 @ 125 gr = .140
.40 @ 155 gr = .138
.40 @ 165 gr = .147
etc., etc.
I'm not seeing why the .357 is considerably better from the standpoint of sectional density
|
Part of the flaw when trying to keep answers short is sometimes leaving out words.
The 125 grain 357 Magnum and 357SIG with their higher velocity and greater sectional density for similar weight projectiles, perform considerably better.
|
10-05-2015, 12:15 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by venomballistics
alliant has the Sig pushing a 124g at 1435FPS
Hodgdon has the magnum pushing a 125g at 1966FPS
Nope ... the Sig won't actually duplicate the magnum.
It does, however, start offering some magnum territory to the service auto pistol.
|
That is VERY unfair, since Hodgdon uses a 10" test barrel for velocity, not a 4" model 19 like in the real world
|
10-05-2015, 12:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,890
Likes: 4,778
Liked 6,940 Times in 3,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
That is VERY unfair, since Hodgdon uses a 10" test barrel for velocity, not a 4" model 19 like in the real world
|
Might be skewed, probably is. but it takes more than barrel length differences to make a 500 fps spread.
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|
10-05-2015, 12:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by venomballistics
alliant has the Sig pushing a 124g at 1435FPS
Hodgdon has the magnum pushing a 125g at 1966FPS
Nope ... the Sig won't actually duplicate the magnum.
It does, however, start offering some magnum territory to the service auto pistol.
|
The 327 Fed Mag is suppose to come close to 357 Mag also. I can crank a 115 gr bullet at very high velocities out of 2" sbub but it is not a 357 Mag, I consider it more of a 9 MM +P+.
It's all a small fast, big slow space time continuum thing!
How about a 135 gr JHP in a 40 SW!
Looking at Hodgdon and Speer, Hornady data one can crank a 40 SW at the same velocity as a 357 Sig give or take. I do not see much difference. If indeed the Sig has less recoil that would be a benefit for sure. Guess that is why I never messed with it and have to deal with yet another caliber.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
10-05-2015, 12:45 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,000
Likes: 41,665
Liked 29,250 Times in 13,830 Posts
|
|
It's weird but.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
Sure any necked down case will jump up the velocity. Like the old Tokarev round.
|
I feel in my bones that a necked down pistol round won't be very popular. It seems "foreign" or something. I may be wrong but I'm just feeling the pulse of society.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
10-05-2015, 12:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,000
Likes: 41,665
Liked 29,250 Times in 13,830 Posts
|
|
I haven't had so much fun...
Quote:
Originally Posted by venomballistics
If you enjoy visions of water filled plastic jugs and bottles being reduced to clouds of spray, You'll likely enjoy the 357 sig over either 9MM or 40 S&W. If you find such things repulsive ... then ... why are you spending money on this?
|
I haven't had so much fun popping water bottles since I was a kid with cherry bombs. That's my idea of a 'reactive target'.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
10-05-2015, 12:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,890
Likes: 4,778
Liked 6,940 Times in 3,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwsmith
I feel in my bones that a necked down pistol round won't be very popular. It seems "foreign" or something. I may be wrong but I'm just feeling the pulse of society.
|
Yeah ... The first argument is loss of round count over a 9mm.
Yet nobody pitches a fit over a 308 rifle saying that it's a loss over 30 carbine
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 02:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Paul (smokey!) MN
Posts: 5,357
Likes: 1,459
Liked 6,727 Times in 2,579 Posts
|
|
I've read that it is a challenge to reload. I think the issue is the neck area is very short, and it is difficult to get enough neck tension to securely hold the bullet.
__________________
Common sense isn't so common.
|
10-05-2015, 09:30 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell
Which .357SIG load has a projectile weight similar to a .40SW projectile?
|
Almost all of them
|
10-05-2015, 09:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oxford, MS
Posts: 265
Likes: 90
Liked 261 Times in 106 Posts
|
|
A few years ago, when it was hard to find pistol ammo, you could get all of the 357SIG you wanted. Thats the way it was around hear anyway. I love my GLOCK 33. That is a hot little gun!
|
10-05-2015, 09:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 13,611
Likes: 491
Liked 1,883 Times in 987 Posts
|
|
A 40 S&W vs 357 Sig. debate? Hmmmm
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 10:19 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by novalty
A 40 S&W vs 357 Sig. debate? Hmmmm
|
Nice colors
But how is the 357 Sig for Bears???
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
10-05-2015, 10:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 13,611
Likes: 491
Liked 1,883 Times in 987 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
Nice colors
But how is the 357 Sig for Bears???
|
Sorry there was not a green color choice
If you can't tell, I don't like either the 40S&W or 357 Sig. So from my stand point having to choose between the two, I would say the 40S&W would be the least disliked.
1. Not necked down
2. Less costly if you are buying factory
3. Brass is more widely available for the 40 (aka free range pickings)
4. I expect the .357 Sig to disappear from mass production in chamberings like the .327 Federal Magnum and 40 Action Express.
Last edited by novalty; 10-05-2015 at 10:50 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 11:13 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell
"Almost all" 357SIG ammo has a 124-125gr bullet.
|
Exactly
And they have a higher sectional density than all similar weight 40 caliber projectiles
The proof of that is in post #15
|
10-05-2015, 11:27 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell
"Again, which .357SIG load has bullet weight with a "greater sectional density" that makes it "considerably better"
than a 40?
|
We know you LOVE your 40 S&W
You need to re-read my posts.
I NEVER made the blanket statement that the 357SIG is considerably better than the 40 S&W
You sound like you missed the phrase "for Highway Patrol work, the 357SIG is far better" in my earlier post
No single cartridge is KING. Each cartridge has different characteristics that make it better suited for different specific roles
For Example:
Is 44 Magnum a better cartridge than 22 LR?
Yes if you are hunting wild Boar.
No if you are getting rid of the Possum tearing apart your garbage
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 01:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,175
Likes: 6,402
Liked 7,086 Times in 3,003 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
Is 44 Magnum a better cartridge than 22 LR?
Yes if you are hunting wild Boar.
No if you are getting rid of the Possum tearing apart your garbage
|
I don't know about dat..Ol Pogo..he can take a lotta lead. LOL.
I had a 40..gone now thankfully. Also had a 357 Sig. Reminded me of a 30 Mauser or 30 Luger. In other words...almost useless in MY opinion. The 357 Sig is not even close to what the 357 Mag has always been. For Po-Leece work it just gives more round count for the officer. As does the 9mm and the 40. Better cartridges?? Again in MY opinion. nuh uh! Not even close! But I guess they are adequate with the newer bullets available...but they have newer better bullets for the 357 and 45 auto too. I am also of the old school on the 30-06/308/45 auto class of cartridges for military use over the 223/9mm. Bigger is definitely better for the intended use.
|
10-05-2015, 02:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeet 028
I don't know about dat..Ol Pogo..he can take a lotta lead. LOL.
I had a 40..gone now thankfully. Also had a 357 Sig. Reminded me of a 30 Mauser or 30 Luger. In other words...almost useless in MY opinion. The 357 Sig is not even close to what the 357 Mag has always been. For Po-Leece work it just gives more round count for the officer. As does the 9mm and the 40. Better cartridges?? Again in MY opinion. nuh uh! Not even close! But I guess they are adequate with the newer bullets available...but they have newer better bullets for the 357 and 45 auto too. I am also of the old school on the 30-06/308/45 auto class of cartridges for military use over the 223/9mm. Bigger is definitely better for the intended use.
|
POgo?? Does someone besides me remember Pogo??
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 02:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,175
Likes: 6,402
Liked 7,086 Times in 3,003 Posts
|
|
Of course I does dis-remember Pogo. But I doubt too many do. I was just talking to a friend from Md last night who asked me about some odd droppings he had found on his place. He described 'em and I asked if he still had some persimmon trees on his place. When he told me yep and they were full of persimmons I reminded him of dem pogo's that just love persimmons. I like 'em too..after a frost of two hits 'em. I even used to trap 'em when I was a kid. Usually got better prices than mus -rats. Them and coons really liked sardines...hold the mustard
|
10-05-2015, 03:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 3,071
Liked 4,295 Times in 1,611 Posts
|
|
Beyond what has already been mentioned here, I see two positive aspects to the 357 sig.
First, It has (so far) kept me from spending a butt-ton of money experimenting with the 38 super. The sig only required a barrel change in my .40S&W guns where the 38 super would have required a couple of new guns to properly experiment :-)
Second, (and I know this is going in the opposite direction of the design goal)
the 357 sig handloads down nicely to 9mm performance levels. This (again) allows for getting more out of one gun with just a simple barrel change.
That's my reasoning and I'm sticking to it!
__________________
Dave
|
10-05-2015, 04:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,292
Likes: 8,818
Liked 7,785 Times in 2,377 Posts
|
|
And it makes one helluva fireball when loaded with Blue Dot!
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
Last edited by TAROMAN; 10-05-2015 at 04:33 PM.
|
10-05-2015, 06:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 141
Likes: 6
Liked 47 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
I agree with Wee Hooker. We get to shoot 2 different calibers out of the same gun with a simple barrel change. And our reloading skills have improved. I have an M&P357 and a SigP226 and love all 4.
|
10-05-2015, 06:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 247
Likes: 34
Liked 82 Times in 62 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by venomballistics
but it takes more than barrel length differences to make a 500 fps spread.
|
No it doesn't. Factory American Eagle .357 Mag from a 4" GP100 vs 16" Rossi. 1318 fps vs 1799 fps. ~480 fps change just due to barrel length. Also that's a heavier 158gr bullet (and a practice/plinking commercial load). A 125gr would do even better with longer barrels due to the extra powder.
That said, in a longer barrel, no doubt the .357 Mag will outperform the SIG in terms of energy. It has more case capacity. And it can push heavier bullets. But if you are using a 125gr bullet, and a pistol as short as most SIG's, you'd be hard pressed to push the bullet much faster.
Keep in mind a 4" SIG has 4" of chamber and barrel. A 4" .357 revolver has 4" of barrel, and about 1.75-2" of cylinder. It is a substantially longer gun than a semi-auto 4" chambered in the SIG round. You'd need something more like a sunb-nose to get similar size (in length, obviously the semi will be thinner no matter what). And you become less likely to match the 1400-1500 fps the .357 SIG was designed around.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 07:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Guys, I did not start this thread to create a what is better or a war or debate on what is better.
Just curious as to the advantages or disadvantages of the Sig load.(velocity, recoil, energy, etc)
Everyone has a favorite for whatever reason so lets not get hung up on sectional densities and other minutia.
Less recoil was kinda what I was looking for as I do not care for the "snap" of the 40 SW. I rather shoot a 45 ACP in that respect.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 07:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,088
Likes: 10,799
Liked 15,515 Times in 6,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by novalty
Sorry there was not a green color choice
If you can't tell, I don't like either the 40S&W or 357 Sig. So from my stand point having to choose between the two, I would say the 40S&W would be the least disliked.
1. Not necked down
2. Less costly if you are buying factory
3. Brass is more widely available for the 40 (aka free range pickings)
4. I expect the .357 Sig to disappear from mass production in chamberings like the .327 Federal Magnum and 40 Action Express.
|
The 40 SW is not my favorite either although I have several and I will carry it when ever I can wear a jacket.
I do like my 327 Fed Mag. 6 shots in a snub that outperform any 38 special and not the blast and flash of a 357 Mag. No IL either
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-05-2015, 07:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell
"The 125 grain 357 Magnum and 357SIG with their higher velocity and greater sectional density for similar weight projectiles, perform considerably better."
...suggesting there are 357SIG and 40SW loads with similar weight projectiles.
|
You are once again correct
There are 357SIG and 40S&W loads with similar weight projectiles
|
10-05-2015, 07:46 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
Less recoil was kinda what I was looking for as I do not care for the "snap" of the 40 SW. I rather shoot a 45 ACP in that respect.
|
If measured, the actual recoil of the two cartridges are very close. Too close to make a difference
Perceived recoil is another matter. How that recoil is spread over time makes the two cartridges feel different to the shooter.
Many shooters describe the 357SIG a bit sharper while the 40S&W is often said to be snappier when comparing similar weight loadings in the same firearm
|
10-05-2015, 07:50 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 540
Likes: 497
Liked 203 Times in 115 Posts
|
|
For me the 357 sig is just plain fun to shoot. I take mine out often.
|
10-05-2015, 10:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,890
Likes: 4,778
Liked 6,940 Times in 3,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aurora40
No it doesn't. Factory American Eagle .357 Mag from a 4" GP100 vs 16" Rossi. 1318 fps vs 1799 fps. ~480 fps change just due to barrel length. Also that's a heavier 158gr bullet (and a practice/plinking commercial load). A 125gr would do even better with longer barrels due to the extra powder.
That said, in a longer barrel, no doubt the .357 Mag will outperform the SIG in terms of energy. It has more case capacity. And it can push heavier bullets. But if you are using a 125gr bullet, and a pistol as short as most SIG's, you'd be hard pressed to push the bullet much faster.
Keep in mind a 4" SIG has 4" of chamber and barrel. A 4" .357 revolver has 4" of barrel, and about 1.75-2" of cylinder. It is a substantially longer gun than a semi-auto 4" chambered in the SIG round. You'd need something more like a sunb-nose to get similar size (in length, obviously the semi will be thinner no matter what). And you become less likely to match the 1400-1500 fps the .357 SIG was designed around.
|
does this figure into the 6" differential of the misquoted comparison?
Nope ....
bottom line is the 357 sig is still not a 357 magnum.
the Sig cartridge does however offer velocities that are largely unavailable in service auto pistols without getting exotic like the 460 rowland.
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|
10-05-2015, 11:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
I bought a Glock 31 to shoot at 2 liter Sprite bottles at 100 yards. The .357 Sig shoots flatter than a 9 mm Parabellum; it has the energy at 100 yards that the 9 mm has at the muzzle.
|
Yeah not so much. The diff between 125gr at 1200 & 1450fps is a whopping 2" @ 100, sighted in to be on at 50. Just not enough to be concerned about. The 357sig gives one 357mag perf with the 125gr bullet in a smaller gun with more rds. What's not to like?
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Last edited by fredj338; 10-05-2015 at 11:58 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-06-2015, 09:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: S.E. Wisconsin and MSP
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 713
Liked 1,574 Times in 578 Posts
|
|
This has been a great discussion. It’s always interesting to learn ammo details and how one compares to another.
For me there are two major considerations in caliber choice.
1. Is it effective?
2. Do I shoot it well?
I’ve been shooting 357 Sig since it first became available, and in the only gun chambered for it at the time, the Sig 229.
The 229 barrel was a nominal 3.8 inches and delivered a 125-gr bullet at 1250 fps at the muzzle. I remember tests that showed higher fps in the field, even 1300. Published results of police use showed it to be effective within a percent or two of the best .45ACP.
It shot flatter than any 9mm available at the time, especially at distance, and hit harder. The gun carried more ammo than anything in .45ACP.
That satisfies Number 1.
I was shooting issued Sig 228/9mm, Beretta 92/9mm, a Browning Hi-Power and Sig 226/9mm. Also various .40S&W guns, including Glocks and all sorts of .45ACP guns.
First time out of the box I shot it as well as the 228 and qualified with equal scores.
I shot it better than any .40S&W.
With all the age-related foibles I have I still shoot it at about the same comparisons.
I have a Sig X5/.40S&W, a gun that is, no argument, very accurate. Except when I shoot it. I’m STILL better with the 229/357 Sig.
That satisfied Number 2.
I think modern 9mm +P and +P+ ammo has pretty well caught up, but ONLY if you’re still talking the 229 with 3.8” barrel.
My S&W M&P, 4.25” barrel, boots them out at around 1350fps, and a 4.5 to 5” barrel in anything throws them at over 1400fps.
THAT is .357 Magnum territory!
Others in this discussion have brought up other advantages:
1. The fireball. If you don’t hit them at close range you’ll burn them to death.
The muzzle blast, if you’re in front of it, will crack teeth.
2. Feed reliability. That 9mm bullet into a 10mm hole. I have never had one fail to feed even when making attempts to cause it.
3. Penetration. I like to put small targets (bottle caps, grapes) on top of 2X4s and, ahem, occasionally a bullet disobeys me and hits the board. The 357Sig penetrates better than any 9mm, .40S&W or .45ACP.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|