|
|
12-25-2016, 01:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
Likes: 71
Liked 52 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Build a Nyclad
With all the coated offerings available today, how would you build a modern version of the old Nyclad? I still have (most of) a box in the ammo room that was loaded in a late 80s model 37 my wife carried for a while. Seems like they were very soft lead, fully coated in nylon and boasted good penetration/expansion in non +p velocities. I know they had a +p version as well. Build that one too while you're at it.
In your opinion, was the Nyclad (or your recipe for a modern version) superior to the old FBI load? How about better than the cartridge with one of the best track records ever--Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
12-25-2016, 01:10 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Cast a soft lead HP, powder coat it, you have basically a Nyclad. Pick any caliber, 800fps up to say 1200fps.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Last edited by fredj338; 12-27-2016 at 04:09 PM.
|
12-25-2016, 01:55 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 3,191
Liked 12,777 Times in 5,693 Posts
|
|
A 130GR HP COATED WITH SOFT LEAD ONLY NEEDS 830 FPS.
Just waiting for a company to see the light.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-25-2016, 03:02 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,004
Likes: 41,670
Liked 29,251 Times in 13,831 Posts
|
|
Coated HPSWC
The Nyclad is really a soft HPSWC coated with polymer, which today can be applied by the user or the manufacturer. What I don't know is the exact hardness of the lead. I have a few Nyclads around still. Maybe I can compare to other bullets that I have.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
12-25-2016, 04:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Harlem, Ohio
Posts: 14,455
Likes: 23,502
Liked 26,378 Times in 9,144 Posts
|
|
I have been thinking about making some powder coated bullets. I already have a 30 year old Lee mold for a 146 HP/SWC. So I'll cast some in pure lead. Harbor freight has all the equipment I don't have and powder coating in Black, White, Red, and Yellow.
Dose Granger sell coatings? Maybe a nice bright Blue?
I know that Nyclad's could be had in a full wadcutter version also and assumed they were about 650 fps but never read the actual velocity.
Once I start I have to find a 225 grain HP/SWC mold for 45 cal. And that will be a whole new can of worms.
Ivan
|
12-26-2016, 04:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
Likes: 71
Liked 52 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Somewhat strange that the Federal Nyclad was known to be "soft" lead and expanded reasonably well from snubbies whereas their iteration of the FBI load was thought to come in 2nd behind the Remington product. Mas Ayoob (and others) always recommended the Remington as it had a better track record--probably due to the composition of the lead.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
12-27-2016, 07:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 180
Liked 1,661 Times in 691 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan the Butcher
I have been thinking about making some powder coated bullets. I already have a 30 year old Lee mold for a 146 HP/SWC. So I'll cast some in pure lead. Harbor freight has all the equipment I don't have and powder coating in Black, White, Red, and Yellow.
Dose Granger sell coatings? Maybe a nice bright Blue?
I know that Nyclad's could be had in a full wadcutter version also and assumed they were about 650 fps but never read the actual velocity.
Once I start I have to find a 225 grain HP/SWC mold for 45 cal. And that will be a whole new can of worms.
Ivan
|
I've been using Smokes powder over on castboolits.com for several years now. A lot better than the cheap harbor freight powder, it's finer and sticks better than the larger clumper hf powders. I also never used a pc gun, always used the free/cheap #5 containers and the black airsoft bb's.
The dry powder coat powder is a polyester
The wet/paint coatings are a polyurethane
Hi quality Powder for DT or Spraying bullets
41 pages of reading and how to contact smoke.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-27-2016, 10:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 2,512
Likes: 3,437
Liked 3,064 Times in 1,301 Posts
|
|
Fill that deep hp with silicone. Expands, then the expanded portion sheers off allowing a slug with large/flat meplat to continue on.
|
12-27-2016, 10:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
Likes: 71
Liked 52 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
What coated bullet manufacturer offers a soft SWCHP that would reliably expand at standard snub velocities?
Loaded to +p may somewhat lessen the need for the softest lead. Or as others have mentioned--forget expansion and load SWC without HP.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
12-27-2016, 04:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwsmith
The Nyclad is really a soft HPSWC coated with polymer, which today can be applied by the user or the manufacturer. What I don't know is the exact hardness of the lead. I have a few Nyclads around still. Maybe I can compare to other bullets that I have.
|
It was actually Nylon, quite a bit thicker than the PC many of us use today. I have PC some LHP, just haven't tested them yet, but I expect they perform quite well at the vel levels tested, like any LHP, just without the smoke & mess.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
12-27-2016, 04:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,089
Likes: 10,801
Liked 15,516 Times in 6,802 Posts
|
|
There are no "magic" bullets. For a short snub use the Speer short Barrel bullets if you can find them.
Shot placement is everything.
Of course you could dip the bullet in molten pure silver and then you may have something.
JMO but I think the Hi Tek Coating polymer would be the closest product available today.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-27-2016, 07:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
Likes: 71
Liked 52 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
There are no "magic" bullets. For a short snub use the Speer short Barrel bullets if you can find them.
Shot placement is everything.
Of course you could dip the bullet in molten pure silver and then you may have something.
JMO but I think the Hi Tek Coating polymer would be the closest product available today.
|
Agreed about the Gold Dots--I always keep factory Speer 135 grain +p in my snubs used for SD. I do, however, like tinkering with different loads and the snub SD stuff has been on my mind lately.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-28-2016, 03:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
There are no "magic" bullets. For a short snub use the Speer short Barrel bullets if you can find them.
Shot placement is everything.
Of course you could dip the bullet in molten pure silver and then you may have something.
JMO but I think the Hi Tek Coating polymer would be the closest product available today.
|
Hi-Tek, even powder coating is far thinner than the Nyclad. It was actually a nylon jacket with core swaged into it. You could do several coatings with PC but not sure it is a real benefit to be thicker than say 0.002".
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
12-28-2016, 04:20 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 3,191
Liked 12,777 Times in 5,693 Posts
|
|
There was the lighter 125gr Nyclad that was made for the lighter recoil in the J frame short barrels. It worked in most
cases, enough to stop the threat or at least get away.
I was just thinking that a 130gr might penetrate a little more
and still be in the ball park for a light 38 full loads with out
getting into the +P area, of heavy recoil.
Just looking for a light recoil load that will do the job.
|
12-30-2016, 11:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Tonto Rim
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 13,546
Liked 2,512 Times in 932 Posts
|
|
Well you guys have peaked my interest. I have a box of the old Nyclad .38 Special around here somewhere that I may have to dig out and chronograph in different barrel lengths. IIRC, they are standard pressure 125 grain.
__________________
NRA Life, COTEP 640
|
12-31-2016, 02:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,431 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
I loaded many thousand nyclad bullets back in the early 80's. The 158 SWC HP was my favorite accuracy bullet.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
01-01-2017, 03:35 AM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
|
|
I have a dew boxes Nyclad .38 Special ammo but I can't find it in me to use it. I tested in in 4 Snub nose revolvers and it was was accurate in all of them.
I carryover FBI load in my Chief's Special and Speer 135gr GDHP ammo in my M442 because both work well and those are most accurate in my revolvers.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|
01-01-2017, 04:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,004
Likes: 41,670
Liked 29,251 Times in 13,831 Posts
|
|
Soft lead HPs will expand....
A soft lead SWC hollow point will expand at lower velocities so load the velocity that is best for you. As long as it doesn't bounce off.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
01-09-2017, 10:17 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Tonto Rim
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 13,546
Liked 2,512 Times in 932 Posts
|
|
I don't know how the old Nyclads compare to other defensive 38 Spcl. ammo, but to satisfy my own curiosity went out and chronographed Nyclads in a snub nosed revolver today.
I used a S&W 642 revolver with ~2" barrel to test the Federal 125 grain standard pressure Nyclads and Federal 129 grain +P Hydra-shoks.
The 125 grain Nyclads averaged 765 FPS, the +P 129 grain Hydra-Shoks averaged 763 FPS. I've not done any gel testing, but suspect the soft lead Nyclads might actually expand at these low velocities.
Just for the heck of it I tested some 9MM 124 grain +P HST ammo in my S&W 940 revolver with ~2" barrel. The 9MM +P 124 HST was the round most similar to the .38 Spcl. +P 129 Hydra-Shok that I happened to have on hand. The 9MM 124 +P HST averaged 1195 FPS.
I would personally be comfortable carrying the old Nyclads in a little 5-shot .38 revolver. None of the 38 ammo I've tested seems like Thunder and Lightning when fired in these little short-barreled guns. Ballistically, the 9MM HST in the little 940 revolver was far superior to even the +P .38 Spcl. I knew the 9 would be superior to the 38, but admit I was surprised by how much. I would think that factory Nyclad velocities could easily be duplicated in hand loads....
__________________
NRA Life, COTEP 640
Last edited by Rock185; 01-09-2017 at 10:21 PM.
|
01-11-2017, 01:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
Likes: 71
Liked 52 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock185
I don't know how the old Nyclads compare to other defensive 38 Spcl. ammo, but to satisfy my own curiosity went out and chronographed Nyclads in a snub nosed revolver today.
I used a S&W 642 revolver with ~2" barrel to test the Federal 125 grain standard pressure Nyclads and Federal 129 grain +P Hydra-shoks.
The 125 grain Nyclads averaged 765 FPS, the +P 129 grain Hydra-Shoks averaged 763 FPS. I've not done any gel testing, but suspect the soft lead Nyclads might actually expand at these low velocities.
Just for the heck of it I tested some 9MM 124 grain +P HST ammo in my S&W 940 revolver with ~2" barrel. The 9MM +P 124 HST was the round most similar to the .38 Spcl. +P 129 Hydra-Shok that I happened to have on hand. The 9MM 124 +P HST averaged 1195 FPS.
I would personally be comfortable carrying the old Nyclads in a little 5-shot .38 revolver. None of the 38 ammo I've tested seems like Thunder and Lightning when fired in these little short-barreled guns. Ballistically, the 9MM HST in the little 940 revolver was far superior to even the +P .38 Spcl. I knew the 9 would be superior to the 38, but admit I was surprised by how much. I would think that factory Nyclad velocities could easily be duplicated in hand loads....
|
Interesting numbers you clocked there. Somewhat surprised that the Nyclads were faster than the (supposed)+p Hydro shocks. Agreed that the 9mm is simply a superior round.
The only box of Nyclads left on my shelves is 158 grain RN. Bought back in the early 90s, but not sure why RN--probably all the LGS had at the time. They were for M37 of the same vintage--not rated +p. Still would be interested in working some up to real +p levels using coated, soft 158 HPs. It would be a good round for my family of snubs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
01-11-2017, 06:20 AM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock185
I don't know how the old Nyclads compare to other defensive 38 Spcl. ammo, but to satisfy my own curiosity went out and chronographed Nyclads in a snub nosed revolver today.
I used a S&W 642 revolver with ~2" barrel to test the Federal 125 grain standard pressure Nyclads and Federal 129 grain +P Hydra-shoks.
The 125 grain Nyclads averaged 765 FPS, the +P 129 grain Hydra-Shoks averaged 763 FPS. I've not done any gel testing, but suspect the soft lead Nyclads might actually expand at these low velocities.
Just for the heck of it I tested some 9MM 124 grain +P HST ammo in my S&W 940 revolver with ~2" barrel. The 9MM +P 124 HST was the round most similar to the .38 Spcl. +P 129 Hydra-Shok that I happened to have on hand. The 9MM 124 +P HST averaged 1195 FPS.
I would personally be comfortable carrying the old Nyclads in a little 5-shot .38 revolver. None of the 38 ammo I've tested seems like Thunder and Lightning when fired in these little short-barreled guns. Ballistically, the 9MM HST in the little 940 revolver was far superior to even the +P .38 Spcl. I knew the 9 would be superior to the 38, but admit I was surprised by how much. I would think that factory Nyclad velocities could easily be duplicated in hand loads....
|
You are not testing similar cartridges. The 9mm has close to double the pressure limits as the .38 Special +P. If you want to do a fair comparison compare the 9mm and .357 Magnum since both have a max pressure of 35,000 PSI.
Just a note, higher velocities do not translate into a superior cartridge. Higher velocity is just higher velocity.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Last edited by ArchAngelCD; 01-11-2017 at 06:23 AM.
|
01-12-2017, 12:50 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Tonto Rim
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 13,546
Liked 2,512 Times in 932 Posts
|
|
Arch, I was not trying to do a "fair comparison". I was just testing some ammo I had on hand in revolvers of similar barrel length and sharing the results here. Yes, I understand that the .357 is ballistically superior to the 9MM. You might find though, that in ~2" barrels, the .357 with 125 grain bullets, is not not as ballistically superior to the 9MM with a similar weight bullet as some might assume. And any superiority the 357 may display is, as you say, "just higher velocity".
__________________
NRA Life, COTEP 640
Last edited by Rock185; 01-12-2017 at 12:52 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-12-2017, 09:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 949
Liked 826 Times in 488 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock185
Arch, I was not trying to do a "fair comparison". I was just testing some ammo I had on hand in revolvers of similar barrel length and sharing the results here. Yes, I understand that the .357 is ballistically superior to the 9MM. You might find though, that in ~2" barrels, the .357 with 125 grain bullets, is not not as ballistically superior to the 9MM with a similar weight bullet as some might assume. And any superiority the 357 may display is, as you say, "just higher velocity".
|
Groo here
The thing to remember is No auto round can match a revolver
round in construction/ size/depth of the hollow point.
The auto bullet MUST be made strong enough to feed from the mag/slid
up the feed ramp/and slam into the top of the chamber without deformation.
Where as a revolver round needs to only to make it out the barrel and to the target.
Look at the old REM SJHP bullet, It has a LOT of lead uncovered.
This allows faster deformation then most any auto bullet.
And for most part, a faster deformation will do more damage.AKA
alarger hole for the distance traveled.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-13-2017, 01:32 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Tonto Rim
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 13,546
Liked 2,512 Times in 932 Posts
|
|
Groo, I appreciate yours and Arch's comments. I was not attempting to prove any type ammunition is superior, just testing velocities of some ammo on hand that had been mentioned in this thread, Nyclad. I decided to chronograph a couple of other loads while at the range. I understand that some old tec. ammunition did have large hollow points, and/or considerable exposed lead. I used a fair amount of it myself. Fortunately though, modern ammunition for semi-automatic calibers has evolved and been shown to expand effectively without the need of exposed lead SJHP designs such as the old Remington loads. I would be comfortable carrying a revolver with SJHP type ammunition, or modern ammunition in a semi-auto, even if there was no exposed lead. For instance, something like the Federal HST ammunition for semi-auto calibers. Again, not trying to prove anything or sway anyone's opinion, just sharing results.....ymmv
__________________
NRA Life, COTEP 640
Last edited by Rock185; 01-13-2017 at 01:33 AM.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|