Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2017, 11:48 AM
perryhd's Avatar
perryhd perryhd is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: AL
Posts: 586
Likes: 2,970
Liked 1,359 Times in 375 Posts
Default Question for precision loaders

I have been reloading for over forty years but I'm new to precision rifle reloading. I'm working on loads for 223 with Sierra 69 GR HPBT. When I seat the bullets a few thousandths off the rifling the bullet only contacts about half the case neck. Is this normal? Is this enough to hold the bullet straight when feeding from a mag or will I need to load them one at a time? Thanks in advance for any and all opinions.
Dan
__________________
Old Age Ain't For Sissies
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2017, 12:12 PM
29aholic 29aholic is offline
Banned
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
Default

Well for starters, Matchkings are not particularly jump sensitive so having them close to the lands may not be necessary.


What I would do is an OCW test with what ever powder you are going to use and start with the published COAL for your combo. Once you find a node that works well then do the same basic thing with cartridges of different COAL's until you find the next node.
You have to have the OCW first or you're just beating your head against a wall.


OCW=Optimum Cartridge Weight
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 01-28-2017, 12:22 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,639
Likes: 242
Liked 29,153 Times in 14,095 Posts
Default

Given bullet weight and balance uniformity, bullet jump to the rifling is the most important determinant of grouping performance, and of course jump vs. COAL depends largely upon the nose profile. About all you can do is start out with what is generally considered to be a good load for that cartridge, and by experimentation find what the best-grouping COAL is for that specific bullet and load, regardless of case neck engagement.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-28-2017, 12:34 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
Default

My precision loads are for a Shilen Barreled AR-15 in 223 Wylde, so I load everything to an overall length of 2.250 inches and don't worry about getting the bullet that smidgen short of the rifling. For one thing the 223 Wylde chamber features a longer lead intended to allow the use of 77 and 80 grain bullets. At this point I haven't even purchased any of these heavy weight bullets, my precision loads use a 68 grain Hornady BTHP or the Sierra 69 grain bullet you are using. Mainly I use the Hornady bullet because they cost less and are easier to find locally.

Now for the results of using a round that is well short of the rifling. BTW, both the Hornady and Sierra bullets produce the same level of accuracy. On my better days I have managed to shoot consecutive 3 shot groups at 100 yards under 0.30 inch at 100 yards with the average group size being 0.285 inches. To be honest I suspect a better shooter could get down to 1/4 inch or less but for an old fart under 3/10 moa is just fine. Unfortunately I do have good days and poor ones and the poor days do seem to outnumber the good ones. On a poor day I'll shoot between 1/2 and 5/8 moa. I'll also note that 5 shot group performance isn't quite as good and the stringing I've observed seem to indicate the barrel strings vertically as it warms up.

Conclusion to me is that fussiness about getting the bullet an exact distance from the rifling is a complete waste of time for most shooters. While it may improve accuracy by a fraction of an inch, 99.5% of us just aren't good enough to ever observe the improvement.

Note, at this point I've tested IMR 4064, Varget, and CFE223. My very best results have been with Varget with the CFE223 a very close second. As for the 4064, rather so so in 223 but very good in 308. I will also note with the Nolser 60 grain Ballistic Tip the CFE223 is a complete failure, I tried every weight between max and min at 1/10 grain increments and could not get one single group under 2 inches at 100 yards. With Varget and the Nosler bullet the average group runs about 0.45 inch. Really do wish the CFE would work with the Nosler bullet because it meters well enough to just "throw and go" where Varget requires hand adjusting every charge thrown. I will also note that Copper Fouling Eliminator actually does make it much easier to get a barrel 100% copper free.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 01-28-2017, 12:47 PM
jim46ok jim46ok is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Idaho
Posts: 415
Likes: 34
Liked 156 Times in 103 Posts
Default

There is an old "rule of thumb" that seating depth should not be less than the diameter of the bullet. Depending on your desired COAL and OCW, it can be a balancing act, quite elusive. My 204 is that way. Especially with a 32gr pill. Sometimes OCW does not give optimum accuracy. Good luck chasing the perfect load!
__________________
CERAKOTE Svcs.
Class 01 FFL
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 01-28-2017, 12:48 PM
jim46ok jim46ok is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Idaho
Posts: 415
Likes: 34
Liked 156 Times in 103 Posts
Default

There is an old "rule of thumb" that seating depth should not be less than the diameter of the bullet. Depending on your desired COAL and OCW, it can be a balancing act, quite elusive. My 204 is that way. Especially with a 32gr pill. Sometimes OCW does not give optimum accuracy. Some bullets perform better with more "jump." Good luck chasing the perfect load!
__________________
CERAKOTE Svcs.
Class 01 FFL
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 01-28-2017, 01:58 PM
perryhd's Avatar
perryhd perryhd is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: AL
Posts: 586
Likes: 2,970
Liked 1,359 Times in 375 Posts
Default Another question

Can anyone recommend a good book with the what to and how to for precision reloading?
__________________
Old Age Ain't For Sissies
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2017, 09:46 AM
perryhd's Avatar
perryhd perryhd is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: AL
Posts: 586
Likes: 2,970
Liked 1,359 Times in 375 Posts
Default Thanks

Thanks to all for replies.
__________________
Old Age Ain't For Sissies
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-29-2017, 10:53 AM
mtgianni mtgianni is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,738
Likes: 10,517
Liked 6,034 Times in 2,972 Posts
Default



The Mcpherson classic.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 01-29-2017, 12:34 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Imo, you need more bullet bearing in the case neck. Many will say a full caliber is a minimum. Usually easy to attain that. It helps align the bullet in the case neck & keep it there during feeding. In a ss rifle, you might get away with less, but feeding from any mag, i want more bullet bearing in the case neck.
Btw, the mythical 0.010" off the lands is just that. Every bullet will have a sweet spot. I start at 0.01" off if possible, then work it up or back. In most AR, some internal mags, you arent getting that close the rifling without single feeding.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO

Last edited by fredj338; 01-29-2017 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 01-29-2017, 01:54 PM
Twoboxer's Avatar
Twoboxer Twoboxer is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 340
Liked 736 Times in 398 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perryhd View Post
. . . When I seat the bullets a few thousandths off the rifling the bullet only contacts about half the case neck. Is this normal? Is this enough to hold the bullet straight when feeding from a mag or will I need to load them one at a time?. . .
Are cartridges long enough to approach the lands actually short enough to fit in your mag?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 01-29-2017, 09:44 PM
perryhd's Avatar
perryhd perryhd is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: AL
Posts: 586
Likes: 2,970
Liked 1,359 Times in 375 Posts
Default

mtgianni
Thanks I have one on order.

Twoboxer
Yes i have about .050 in. to spare in the mag.

Thanks again to all for your help.
__________________
Old Age Ain't For Sissies
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-01-2017, 05:58 PM
29aholic 29aholic is offline
Banned
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
Default

Another book that is somewhat dated, but still has good info in it is Warren Page's "The Accurate Rifle"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 02-01-2017, 06:09 PM
apollo99 apollo99 is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 103
Liked 1,475 Times in 601 Posts
Default

I find in precision rifle shooting, that while not having excessive bullet jump is desirable, I find case volume and case preparation, and powder charge weight and type of powder used for a particular rifle bullet combination, far outweigh the depth of bullet seating to some degree. I get .25" out of my .308 and .30" out of my .223 @100 yards. I guess for me charge weight and bullet choice and a lot of experimenting with the combinations till I get it right seems to work out pretty good.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 02-01-2017, 06:43 PM
jimbo728's Avatar
jimbo728 jimbo728 is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 8,671
Liked 3,497 Times in 1,342 Posts
Default

I load .223 with 69gr Sierra Match Kings also.
Before loading that load I had very good groups with Black Hills reman and factory 69gr SMK`s.
When experimenting with Hodgon OAL data and using the OAL of the Black Hills loading I got better groups using the Black hills OAL which was the longer of the two.
2.245" is the average Black Hills OAL
2.235" is from Hodgdon Data
I shoot the loads in an Axis XP 2 and a Sport 1 1/8 5R.
Both shoot MOA or better.
YMMV
Jim

Last edited by jimbo728; 02-01-2017 at 06:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 02-03-2017, 10:48 AM
perryhd's Avatar
perryhd perryhd is offline
Member
Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders Question for precision loaders  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: AL
Posts: 586
Likes: 2,970
Liked 1,359 Times in 375 Posts
Default

In my rifle the 68 gr match king touches the lands at 2.410" I loaded some test rounds at 2.400 witch is not deep enough but I wanted to see what they would do. They did fit in the mag but they did not feed well at all. I shot five different loads a 100 yards and to my surprise they all shot sub moa with the smallest being .486". Four of five in that group was .206". With my old eyes and body that may be as good as I can do. My next load I'm seating the base of the bullet down to the base of the case neck witch is 2.340 OAL and see how that works out. Thanks again to all for your input.
__________________
Old Age Ain't For Sissies
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTS - HS Precision Rem. 700 SA stock/Seekins Precision bottom metal Sailor29 Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 7 09-16-2016 09:59 PM
Question for you hand-loaders trooplewis Reloading 21 03-26-2014 02:28 AM
Question on Ponsness Warren loaders RussellD Reloading 2 07-01-2013 05:14 PM
noob question for auto loaders S&Wfan3 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 11 01-12-2013 09:57 PM
Unique loaders, question adagna Reloading 18 09-10-2009 08:31 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)