|
|
02-12-2017, 02:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,636
Likes: 242
Liked 29,147 Times in 14,094 Posts
|
|
BBI's site has been around for quite awhile, and it's great for indicating generally how the MVs of various loads are affected by factors such as barrel length and cylinder-barrel jump. But, especially as regards revolvers, don't automatically assume you will get similar results from YOUR revolver and YOUR loads. It's always better to get a chronograph to see how your loads perform from your revolver than believing anything you see in a reloading manual or on a website.
Last edited by DWalt; 02-12-2017 at 05:05 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-12-2017, 10:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
|
|
DWalt is correct. My 6" Model 28 chronos slower than my 4".
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-12-2017, 01:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,000
Likes: 41,665
Liked 29,250 Times in 13,830 Posts
|
|
That is the kind of information...
...that us reloaders need. People in the powder, components, gun and ammo business seem to think that the less we know, the better. The info on this site should have been available all along, but it's up to individuals to provide it and make it public. Thanks to the people who do that.
It would just be better if the manufacturers weren't so cagey. They have the capability and know how. They should accept that there are a lot of reloaders out there. If they published their data, it would be more from the horse's mouth.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
02-12-2017, 02:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 604
Likes: 21
Liked 660 Times in 284 Posts
|
|
This doesn't get acknowledged enough on the forums. Great Web site! My own chrony work between my Marlin 1894s and my SA revolvers correlates closely. I'm getting muzzle energy on .44 Magnums that rivals some low end 45-70 factory loads.
|
02-12-2017, 05:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,636
Likes: 242
Liked 29,147 Times in 14,094 Posts
|
|
"It would just be better if the manufacturers weren't so cagey. They have the capability and know how. They should accept that there are a lot of reloaders out there. If they published their data, it would be more from the horse's mouth."
I assume you mean the ammo manufacturers, Remington, Winchester, Federal, etc. They use propellants available only to them, not the usual canister powders as sold to reloaders. The ammo manufacturers must test each lot of propellant they buy to develop safe loads with it, as it will differ in its properties from the previous lot. They can't publish reloading data using propellants you can't get.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 PM.