Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan the Butcher
Question: Aren't the Thunderhead bullets a bore riding full wadcutter design!
If that is the case, keeping the Driving Band section of the bullet at a minimum length to stabilize the bullet I would think 400 to 435 would be perfect!
Ivan
|
Yes the TH designs in the purist sense are bore riders on the front band but I have some other options that I could offer in a large Meplat design bullet.
For example I could do a SWC type design with the nose diameter at .452 or .476 diameter with full diameter rear bands instead of going to a bore rider at .492 on the front shank of the bullet.
I could also offer a rnfp design that runs on the .45 caliber range with a full diameter drive band.
All of these designs will be grooveless coated only bullets.
So far the feed back here and from one customer is something in the 400-450 range.
I know there was someone that made a 700 gr mold up in Alaska which I thought a bit insane but what else is new in this business?
Other info that would help would be length of crimp area to nose would be of some help . I only have the original SAMMI specs on the cartridge to go by for OAL.
All input and help is greatly appreciated.
I am aware of penetration issues with large meplat bullets in some applications. For example the .500 Linebaugh did not show a much of an improvement in penetration over the .475 Linebaugh despite the increased weight of the .500. Which is why I am thinking more along the lines of a .476 front end for this bullet.