|
|
05-17-2017, 02:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Shooting 52-2
Hey all,
Not sure if this is the right forum, but thought I would start here for this.
Today I took out my 52-2. I have only had for a few years, and have fired a handful of times. As I am slowly getting better with different firearms and reloading, I noticed an issue today that I thought was odd, and wanted to get peoples input.
For anyone who doesn't know, a Model 52-X is a target pistol that is very similar to a 1911, however it only fires .38 special Wadcutters.
Anyhow, the issue I noticed, was an awful lot of muzzle flip/recoil. What I thought was interesting, I was firing what I believe should be relatively light loads. The rounds were 148gr. Wadcutter and the boxes were marked 2.7gr. Bullseye. I did not reload these rounds, they were reloaded by a relative many years ago. I am just trying to run through some of the old reloads. I just thought for a relatively heavy firearm, with these loads, it should be pretty relaxed. Maybe its the 52-2, maybe its the loads?
Interested in thoughts.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-17-2017, 03:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 921
Likes: 862
Liked 597 Times in 332 Posts
|
|
First of all you have a gun I have great interest in owning someday soon, so I am a bit (a lot) envious
I would set aside the 'hand loaded rounds' and perhaps pull one apart and weigh a load and if you have any Bullseye on hand compare the power in looks. I am not thinking that a 2.7 load of Bullseye should give much recoil at all but I have not shot one of these guns yet.
Karl
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-17-2017, 03:56 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 583
Liked 274 Times in 182 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontargetagain
First of all you have a gun I have great interest in owning someday soon, so I am a bit (a lot) envious
I would set aside the 'hand loaded rounds' and perhaps pull one apart and weigh a load and if you have any Bullseye on hand compare the power in looks. I am not thinking that a 2.7 load of Bullseye should give much recoil at all but I have not shot one of these guns yet.
Karl
|
GREAT IDEA!!!
__________________
Good shooting.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-17-2017, 04:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 93
Liked 27 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
The loads you have been given (2,7BE and 148 HBWC) are the only loads that should be used. Those and the 52 are inseparable for good shooting. If you find the recoil excessive then get used to it. You might want a set of fitted Herrett grips to feel more comfortable.....could help. You're fortunate to have the finest target .38 pistol that has been made and now discontinued because it was too expensive to produce,
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-17-2017, 05:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
|
|
The gun is actually based on the M 39 and not really "like" a 1911 other than single action and has a bushing.
Anyway, the loads you state are the correct loads if indeed the powder is actually the weight indicated.
Here are some links:
Smith & Wesson’s Model 52 .38 MasterGuns Magazine.com | Guns Magazine.com
Model 52 loads
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-17-2017, 06:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 3,749
Liked 3,780 Times in 1,388 Posts
|
|
I would be very cautious of anyones, relatives included reloads. If I didn't make them, I wont shoot them. Buy factory, or make your own. Shelve those and start fresh.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-17-2017, 07:39 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,795
Likes: 18,509
Liked 22,391 Times in 8,268 Posts
|
|
As a former owner and shooter of a 52-2 I will attest that the 2.7 Gr Blsye load is the "standard" loading. It is not an overly heavy handgun, and there is a slight muzzle flip with it, but a firm grip controls it. The fastest it needs to be shot is 5 rounds in 10 seconds (normal bullseye Rapid Fire), so a little muzzle flip is very easy to control.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
05-17-2017, 07:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 450
Likes: 22
Liked 270 Times in 126 Posts
|
|
2.7g Bullseye is my standard load with a 148g HBWC for my 52-2. The muzzle flip is very slight, and easily controlled with a good grip. I would be suspect shooting someone else's reloads. If you can break one down and measure the load, and look to see if it is Bullseye.
|
05-18-2017, 02:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. Orygun
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 1,963
Liked 1,827 Times in 987 Posts
|
|
I'm in the "if I didn't make 'em, I don't shoot 'em" camp when it comes to reloads. As suggested above, put the reloads on the shelf, buy a few factory rounds, shoot a few to get the "feel" of the gun, then start reloading with known good components and load data...
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-18-2017, 03:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 4
Liked 8,919 Times in 4,135 Posts
|
|
In my gun, 2.5 grs. Bullseye is slightly more accurate than a heavier charge. This is probably minimum and I wouldn't load any lighter. I use a H&G #50 WC sized to .3575" (.358" die).
Recoil feels differently to everyone, but I never thought the 52 had much. The only handguns I have that kick less are probably .22s.
|
05-18-2017, 03:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 4,198
Liked 999 Times in 536 Posts
|
|
Many good loads . Best for your's will be found by careful testing . 148 HBWC , best are Remington or Zero . Seat flush with a slight crimp . Std SP primers . I vastly prefer 3.1 W231 or 2.7 WST to Bullseye . Barrel weight will help with muzzle light feeling & allows a steadier hold .
|
05-18-2017, 04:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 804
Likes: 86
Liked 482 Times in 300 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Kornax wrote:
...the boxes were marked 2.7gr. Bullseye. I did not reload these rounds,...
|
I would suggest you pull the bullet from a few of these rounds and weigh the powder. My guess is that the charge may be a little different from that indicated.
I'm largely in the "if I didn't load it, I don't shoot it" camp. You just don't know what the person who loaded the rounds did or did not do. There have been people on this very forum who have said that they think reloading data is intentionally reduced for liability reasons, so it's okay to exceed published maximums by at least 10% - maybe even more. Would you really want to shoot that guy's reloads?
I have a good friend that I learned to reload with when we were teenagers. We developed our technique - including written reloading procedures and a checksheet that accompanies each batch - together. So, if the checksheet was with it, I'd shoot a box of his handloads and vice versa, but no one else.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-18-2017, 05:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
I appreciate everyone's comments/suggestions.
The reloads I do trust. They were reloaded by my father in law and grandfather before they passed. They were competition shooters for many years. I will definitely take a load apart to see how it weighs.
I did not mean to make it seem the 52 is uncontrollable, just noted that it was more than I expected out of this. I have other 38's that shoot just fine.
Thanks again!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-18-2017, 09:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: 30min SE Montreal
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 150
Liked 1,540 Times in 841 Posts
|
|
I used to own one 52 no dash.Sold it.Another mistake that's being put in the ''getting more experienced with age and mistakes''drawer.
2.7 Bullseye is the recommended load for HBWC.If cast solid base,2.5 is more like it.
I'd also pull the bullet on one and try to ID the components just to be on the safe side.
Qc
|
05-18-2017, 09:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 228
Liked 2,397 Times in 1,081 Posts
|
|
Might also try a fresh recoil spring.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-18-2017, 11:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
Liked 218 Times in 141 Posts
|
|
Did it come with the frame weight? Some folks always shot with the frame weight attached.
1) Buy a box of factory ammo and try it.
2) Never trust someone else's reloads
3) If firing L-HBWCs, be sure velocity is under 800 fps. Above that, and I get consistent separation of the skirt from the rest of the bullet and either get two holes in the target for each shot or I have a barrel obstruction left in the barrel. L-HBWCs are by far the most accurate, but you MUST keep velocity down.
4) If/when you decide to reload, I'll let you know the tricks I found to equal factory ammo for accuracy.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-19-2017, 10:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noylj
Did it come with the frame weight? Some folks always shot with the frame weight attached.
1) Buy a box of factory ammo and try it.
2) Never trust someone else's reloads
3) If firing L-HBWCs, be sure velocity is under 800 fps. Above that, and I get consistent separation of the skirt from the rest of the bullet and either get two holes in the target for each shot or I have a barrel obstruction left in the barrel. L-HBWCs are by far the most accurate, but you MUST keep velocity down.
4) If/when you decide to reload, I'll let you know the tricks I found to equal factory ammo for accuracy.
|
My only choice for this Model is wadcutter. It is all it will fire.
I won't fire it all that much unless i potentially get into competition shooting. I was more or less just interested to hear others experiences.
Again, I appreciate all the comments and suggestions.
|
05-19-2017, 01:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 4,198
Liked 999 Times in 536 Posts
|
|
Most factory 38 special 148 HBWC ammo runs 700 to 800fps . Good advise not to exceed 800 . Swaged will give best accuracy within the above velocity envelope . Stay away from plated as accuracy will suck & you have to bump powder charges so you won't stick one in the barrel . I watched a fella blow the extractor out of a 52-2 with 3.5 Bullseye & Berrys plated HBWC . Gun was designed to shoot mid range HBWC loads in the 8 - 10,000 psi range . Exceeding that limit will stress & batter / wear gun . Can offset this to a degree by changing main & recoil springs , but why take a chance . Parts are expensive & getting harder to find .
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-19-2017, 02:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,131 Times in 3,678 Posts
|
|
It's the reloads!
I shoot a lot of 2.7 Bullseye / wadcutter loads and it is a classic light recoiling target load. I would pull a bullet and weigh the charge...I would bet money it's not 2.7 grains.
Don't risk damaging your fine target pistol...shoot them out of a 357 magnum if you must .
Gary
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-20-2017, 01:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. Orygun
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 1,963
Liked 1,827 Times in 987 Posts
|
|
Or perhaps shoot them in a good +P rated revolver? I'm pretty sure the Mod. 52 isn't delicate, but I'd hate to mess one up with "bad" reloads...
|
05-21-2017, 03:43 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
Liked 218 Times in 141 Posts
|
|
The M52 is made for "mid range" wadcutter only ammo.
It is NOT made for standard .38 Spl loads and will bulge a case before normal pressures are even reached. It has what is called "an unsupported chamber."
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-21-2017, 07:30 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 6,125
Likes: 6,652
Liked 6,168 Times in 2,672 Posts
|
|
In my M52-2, Remington factory 148 grain wadcutters ejected empty cases between 6' and 8' from my right hand shooting one-handed. My cast bullet reloads ejected fired brass 2' to 4' from my hand, and the accuracy was as good as factory ammo.
__________________
S&WHF 366
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-21-2017, 09:13 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Battery Oaks Range, S.C.
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 5,663
Liked 3,574 Times in 1,163 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kornax
I appreciate everyone's comments/suggestions.
The reloads I do trust. They were reloaded by my father in law and grandfather before they passed. They were competition shooters for many years. I will definitely take a load apart to see how it weighs.
I did not mean to make it seem the 52 is uncontrollable, just noted that it was more than I expected out of this. I have other 38's that shoot just fine.
Thanks again!
|
Curious....what other 38 autos do you own? If you are talking about revolvers, that's not a good comparison.
|
05-22-2017, 08:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee's Landing Billy
Curious....what other 38 autos do you own? If you are talking about revolvers, that's not a good comparison.
|
No other 38 semi autos. Only a 14-3, and the 52-2.
Really, I had hoped more comments about what I experienced. Again, its not uncontrollable, and it shoots quite accurately as it should. I just personally didn't think it would have as much muzzle flip/recoil as it did out of a 38. No big deal, was just wondering what others might have thought.
I own other semi-autos. Shield 9mm, 459, Colt Govt Model 70, etc etc.
The 52-2 is a sweet shooter, don't get me wrong. I just thought it was more active in the hand than I had expected. I almost wonder if its not the fact that the loads are too much, but that the loads are weak in general, and don't do enough to offset the action of the slide.
Again, appreciate the comments from everyone. I will continue to enjoy it!
|
05-22-2017, 10:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birdsboro Pa.
Posts: 444
Likes: 182
Liked 199 Times in 92 Posts
|
|
Look at the high barrel line on the Model 52. Its going to want to jump, just by its design. Shoot it a lot, and it will feel fine.
Modern pistols, like the Pardini HP have a low barrel line that pushes back more than flips.
Still, the 52 is capable of high scores due to its accuracy. Years back I shot a 52 well, but used to practice it a lot.
|
05-22-2017, 10:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 86
Likes: 25
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Rule No.1 = Never, ever shoot someone else's handload!
There are way too many people who have no idea what they're doing and even really experienced shooter/handloader makes mistake every once in awhile. Start with fresh components and make your own as precise as you could.
Remember. You only have one set of eyes and hands.
|
05-22-2017, 11:56 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
|
The Colt Mark I,II and III National Match was another Semi Auto made to shoot 38spl 148gr HBWC ammo.
I liked this pistol for Center Fire matches better than my two Model 52-2 because of the grip design
EDIT: there was also a parkerized 45 conversion chambered in 38spl 148gr HBWC only done buy/for the military shooting teams and sold for a very short time to civilian shooters at Camp Perry in the mid 60s.
I didn't own one but my good friend,Stake Out Unit member,Distinguished Pistol shooter Bill Allard did have one and wouldn't part with it no matter what I offered.
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
Last edited by StakeOut; 05-22-2017 at 12:16 PM.
|
05-22-2017, 01:16 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,401
Likes: 3,189
Liked 12,760 Times in 5,686 Posts
|
|
If you reload.......
You might see if Bullseye at a lighter load at just 2.5grs will work the action.
A second choice is 3.1grs of W231 if you have this powder........
that with a 4" barrel should be around 788fps, pew Winchester data.
|
05-22-2017, 09:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 3,749
Liked 3,780 Times in 1,388 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StakeOut
The Colt Mark I,II and III National Match was another Semi Auto made to shoot 38spl 148gr HBWC ammo.
I liked this pistol for Center Fire matches better than my two Model 52-2 because of the grip design
EDIT: there was also a parkerized 45 conversion chambered in 38spl 148gr HBWC only done buy/for the military shooting teams and sold for a very short time to civilian shooters at Camp Perry in the mid 60s.
I didn't own one but my good friend,Stake Out Unit member,Distinguished Pistol shooter Bill Allard did have one and wouldn't part with it no matter what I offered.
|
Not to be nit picky, but the Colt .38 special wadcutter pistol was never called the MKI, II, or III by Colt. Colt named it the "Gold Cup National Match" chambered in .38 Special Mid Range. In actual fact there was never a "MK I" but collectors/shooters refer the MK I to the original barrel offered in the pistol. Colt added "MK II", "MK III" to the revised barrel designs that they installed in this pistol and collectors/shooters continued calling the pistol MK II, MKIII. Just sayin, no offence intended.
Last edited by 824tsv; 05-23-2017 at 08:03 AM.
Reason: Added info + Spelling
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-22-2017, 10:18 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW of Austin Texas
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 1,351
Liked 4,938 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 824tsv
Not to be nit picky, but the Colt .38 special wadcutter pistol was never called the MKI, II, or III by Colt. Colt named it the "Gold Cup National Match .38 Mid Range". The MKI, II, III are what shooters/collectors refer to the versions of barrels that Colt installed in these pistols. Just sayin, no offence intended.
|
Nit Picky = yes,I agree
Well I'm a shooter so It's OK then.It's how I and many other shooters referred to them.
I done like to use Gold Cup for this fine pistol because there's another called Gold Cup in a different caliber that's not so fine.
__________________
NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUN
|
05-23-2017, 07:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 3,749
Liked 3,780 Times in 1,388 Posts
|
|
I'm even nit picky to my own post as I've revised it...
"I done like to use Gold Cup for this fine pistol because there's another called Gold Cup in a different caliber that's not so fine."
Both Gold Cup National Match pistols were catalogued together.
O.P. Sorry for the thread drift.
Last edited by 824tsv; 05-23-2017 at 08:00 AM.
Reason: Added info
|
05-23-2017, 08:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 824tsv
O.P. Sorry for the thread drift.
|
Its all good. Conversations are meant for just that.
To be honest, the post went a little sideways from the get go.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-23-2017, 09:05 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 33
Likes: 281
Liked 267 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
One other thought as to the perceived muzzle flip, just consider that when you fire the Model 14 you feel the immediate recoil impulse to the bullet leaving the barrel and that's it, nothing else happens.
With the Model 52-2 the bullet moves, the slide unlocks, cycles open, hits the end of its travel, moves forward, picks up a round and locks into battery. A lot of commotion causing the muzzle to waggle that you don't get in a revolver. Perhaps what you are experiencing is the action cycling rather than the recoil.
With a light Mid-range load the action cycling might almost be more obvious than the recoil impulse. Just a suggestion as I've not shot a Model 52 myself.
As an aside, I'd go with most advice here and not use someone else's reloads unless I really knew the loader and had broken down some rounds to confirm their make up and also put them over a chronograph.
__________________
Mario B.
SWCA 3249, SWHF 157
|
05-23-2017, 09:28 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAB93
One other thought as to the perceived muzzle flip, just consider that when you fire the Model 14 you feel the immediate recoil impulse to the bullet leaving the barrel and that's it, nothing else happens.
With the Model 52-2 the bullet moves, the slide unlocks, cycles open, hits the end of its travel, moves forward, picks up a round and locks into battery. A lot of commotion causing the muzzle to waggle that you don't get in a revolver. Perhaps what you are experiencing is the action cycling rather than the recoil.
With a light Mid-range load the action cycling might almost be more obvious than the recoil impulse. Just a suggestion as I've not shot a Model 52 myself.
As an aside, I'd go with most advice here and not use someone else's reloads unless I really knew the loader and had broken down some rounds to confirm their make up and also put them over a chronograph.
|
This is exactly what I thought is happening. The motion/cycling is really what I am noticing. All other semi autos I wont have a more powerful round with higher pressures that I expect eats up or otherwise counters the recoil I am feeling. I mentioned something similar on this post the other day.
As for the reloads, I do trust them. But have taken the advice and took one apart. They weigh as marked.
|
05-23-2017, 09:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 410
Liked 2,125 Times in 811 Posts
|
|
I had a 52-1 that I recently passed on to my son. When I shot it the load I used was also 2.7 grains of Bullseye. I believe I increased the load slightly to eliminate jams and stovepipes. I never really noticed any excess recoil and thoroughly enjoyed shooting that gun. As stated before, it's one of the best target guns ever made and could compete with any custom gun. The trigger on mine was outstanding.
Although 2.7 grains of BE is most common, that's not to say other powders also work well. With the recent powder shortage, I switched to another, found the right load and never had a problem.
Everyone I've allowed to shoot the gun, including my son, have all ended up with a big smile. I usually get a big "ME LIKEY"!
I'm 72 now and remember drooling over the gun back when it originally was produced. I believe the original price was $650 but not quite sure of that. It was priced above what I could afford so never bought one. Later in the mid 80's I found mine at a local gun shop. It was pristine and in the original box. I offered $400 for it and my offer was accepted. I've cherished it ever since and now my son is using it. I hope he can pass it on as well.
|
05-29-2017, 09:01 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 850
Likes: 293
Liked 1,678 Times in 280 Posts
|
|
From my limited experience with my 52-2, ejected brass from a proper load falls in a nice pile practically right next to my feet.
If brass were ejecting differently I would suspect a possible hot load. Not saying this is a hard and fast rule but it could be an indication.
Kevin
|
06-02-2017, 11:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 111
Likes: 33
Liked 77 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Both National Match Mid-Range and the 52 are among the finest target guns ever made.
Be aware that many 52 parts are near impossible to find. Especially the bushing.
Take good care of your gun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|