Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2017, 04:40 PM
SquarePizza SquarePizza is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: CNY
Posts: 489
Likes: 62
Liked 520 Times in 210 Posts
Default multi-stage press: OP follow-up

So my original thread blew up in a bad way, so I wanted to make a new post to explain where my head WAS at before I wrote the original post, and where it is NOW.

Where I was:
Originally I didn't want to get into a large expense simply for two calibers, so I turned to the lee progressive. Internet reviews were luke-warm at best, but the trouble with internet reviews is that you never know the experience level of the reviewer. Often times I believe negative reviews reflect operator error.

I originally threw the idea of dillons out the window because you see the huge setups with all the do-dads and the sticker price is well north of $650. Again, for two calibers I wasn't excited to jump on that price tag.

Where I am now:
I turned to these forums because I believe it is a collection of some of the most knowledgeable pistol caliber reloaders out there, so you guys said Lee's can suck and I believe you.

Furthermore, following up on the dillon 550 recommendation, I found that a bare-bones dillon is fairly reasonable at $460 bucks. Since the lee is $200ish, I am only doubling the cost which is a lot less of a jump than I thought I would have to make if I went blue. The hornady progressive is not completely off the list yet either, a gander mtn is going out of business near me and I think they had a few left on the shelves.

I am sorry that my thread turned into a red vs blue press argument, but I would like to sincerely thank those that came into the thread to offer me their experience and suggestions.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 06-16-2017, 03:09 AM
Twoboxer's Avatar
Twoboxer Twoboxer is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 340
Liked 736 Times in 398 Posts
Default

Honestly, you'll be happier with the Dillon 550. The only considerations are it is a manual index, 4-hole press. The manual index is not an issue unless you want at some point to add case and/or bullet feeders. They don't make a lot of sense on a 550, and a bullet feeder requires a station (or "hole").

The Hornady is a 5-hole auto-index press like the 650. It is significantly cheaper than the 650, unless you add case feeders in which case their prices come closer together. The Hornady can require a bit more tuning than the Dillon, but not nearly as much tinkering as that Lee you were considering.

In any case, since you are doing 2 calibers and don't sound like a candidate for case/bullet feeders, the 550 is a great choice.

GLHF and stay safe.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2017, 09:45 AM
revolver_ph's Avatar
revolver_ph revolver_ph is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains, CA
Posts: 309
Likes: 596
Liked 369 Times in 157 Posts
Default

I ran two 550's for many years. The first one started out as a 450 in the 80's. They are good machines. I now run a Hornady LNL.

You could not go wrong with either machine.

If one could take the best features of each that would create a great machine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2017, 02:17 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,800
Likes: 7,843
Liked 25,705 Times in 8,685 Posts
Default

And just a little more will get you the Dillon 650 which is an auto indexing press - which I personally think is a huge upgrade! YMMV.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2017, 02:55 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Just don't buy a Lee progressive to save $200. Avoiding that much frustration, well it is only money.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-16-2017, 04:55 PM
Carrier Carrier is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 375
Likes: 87
Liked 210 Times in 112 Posts
Default

I have used a friends 550 and for me did not like it. I don't like the way it works with manual indexing. Without a case feeder the LNL for me is faster and easier to use.
If you want you can run only one case around at a time or use it as a progressive.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-16-2017, 05:05 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrier View Post
I have used a friends 550 and for me did not like it. I don't like the way it works with manual indexing. Without a case feeder the LNL for me is faster and easier to use.
If you want you can run only one case around at a time or use it as a progressive.
Btw, same for the 550. FWIW, auto indexing isn't really faster, maybe a few rds per hour. I ran my 650 w/o feeder for a couple months. It might have given me 50rds per hour more over my 550. All the speed is in the case feeder, eliminating one hand motion. You index the 550 as you seat a bullet or wait for the press to index & seat a bullet, same speed really.
If one must have auto indexing, then the LNL is slightly easier to run than a 650 as the 650 is designed ground up to sue a case feeder. So a better bet for someone who NEVER wants the case feeder.
Where the 550 works well is the reloader that tinkers with diff calibers & loads. The case stays at stn 2 for removal to manually throw charges or whatever. Just a diff approach. Way too much fan fare over auto indexing IMO.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-16-2017, 05:45 PM
Carrier Carrier is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 375
Likes: 87
Liked 210 Times in 112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
Btw, same for the 550. FWIW, auto indexing isn't really faster, maybe a few rds per hour. I ran my 650 w/o feeder for a couple months. It might have given me 50rds per hour more over my 550. All the speed is in the case feeder, eliminating one hand motion. You index the 550 as you seat a bullet or wait for the press to index & seat a bullet, same speed really.
If one must have auto indexing, then the LNL is slightly easier to run than a 650 as the 650 is designed ground up to sue a case feeder. So a better bet for someone who NEVER wants the case feeder.
Where the 550 works well is the reloader that tinkers with diff calibers & loads. The case stays at stn 2 for removal to manually throw charges or whatever. Just a diff approach. Way too much fan fare over auto indexing IMO.
Yup agree with you but its the manual indexing that I just didn't like. The speed isn't the main issue with me. My freind also has a 650 that he didn't get a case feeder for. He was ready to get rid of it until getting a case feeder now he would never get rid of it.

I bought a case feeder for my LNL and having some issues with it. I still say the LNL is better than the 550 if a case feeder isn't going to be used.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-17-2017, 02:09 AM
DRAINSMITH's Avatar
DRAINSMITH DRAINSMITH is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SOUTH WEST IOWA
Posts: 100
Likes: 82
Liked 85 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrier View Post
Yup agree with you but its the manual indexing that I just didn't like. The speed isn't the main issue with me. My freind also has a 650 that he didn't get a case feeder for. He was ready to get rid of it until getting a case feeder now he would never get rid of it.

I bought a case feeder for my LNL and having some issues with it. I still say the LNL is better than the 550 if a case feeder isn't going to be used.
You say you are having problems with your case feeder. What kind of problems are you having? I have both the old style and the new style, and all four of mine work without a problem. Let me know what problem you are having and I will talk you threw the fix.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-28-2017, 06:33 AM
gojones gojones is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 6
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrier View Post
Yup agree with you but its the manual indexing that I just didn't like. The speed isn't the main issue with me. My freind also has a 650 that he didn't get a case feeder for. He was ready to get rid of it until getting a case feeder now he would never get rid of it.

I bought a case feeder for my LNL and having some issues with it. I still say the LNL is better than the 550 if a case feeder isn't going to be used.
I was not aware that the 650 was offered without a case feeder.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-28-2017, 10:22 AM
MyDads38 MyDads38 is offline
Member
multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up multi-stage press: OP follow-up  
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 1,762
Liked 1,284 Times in 694 Posts
Default

I am going to offer my opinion here. I purchased a Pro 1000 in 9mm last fall, got it on sale for about $139 w/free shipping. I bought it, honestly, to see if there were really that many problems/issues and if I could get it to work as supposed to. Well, I did. Yes, took a little effort to get it set up, but once set, it ran very well as long as I did my part. Even for just a 3 station press, it was pretty consistent with C.O.L. I am now thinking of trying a Dillon Square Deal B, because it is a 4 station and I've come to like seating/crimping in separate operations. I like both presses for the auto indexing. The Lee comes with a case feeder when purchased. My reloading bench and all presses have been in storage, having moved twice since last october. I'm finally setting everything back up in a permanent reloading room.

I have used Lee products since 1980, along with most of the other manufacturers also. I also think at least some of the bad reviews for the Lee progressives are from those who don't take the time to set them up properly from the start. I certainly would like to see Lee come out with a 4 station progressive, to replace the pro 1000.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting into a multi-stage press SquarePizza Reloading 87 07-02-2017 11:51 PM
Single stage press? Thomasino Reloading 66 03-22-2017 10:49 AM
Found:WTB Single stage press Sam McCord WANTED to Buy 1 08-26-2015 12:41 AM
WTB - Lee Single Stage Press, etc. wmk6341 WANTED to Buy 3 06-21-2013 01:17 PM
RCBS Jr3 Single Stage Press - New Re-loader - More Videos to Follow Progress Rollbar Reloading 30 04-04-2013 07:21 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)