Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2017, 11:09 PM
Eddietruett Eddietruett is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1,054
Liked 3,520 Times in 961 Posts
Default Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question

Going to be doing some longer range (50-100) yard shooting with 38/357 and wondering if anyone has any experience? I've heard lighter weight bullets pushed hard do better because of less drop and also heard that heavier weight bullets do better because of stability. So far all I have tried is Berrys Plated 158 Target Hp with 7.5gr HS-6 which I'm guessing should give around 1000 fps in a 6" barrel. Would going to a jacketed bullet and pushing the extra 300 or so fps improve accuracy? Not sure what "acceptable" accuracy would be with open sights by most shooter's standards and quite sure my guns are capable of better accuracy than I can give. Going to a jacketed bullet would also double the cost so I can practice a lot more with plated which would be a plus. Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2017, 11:28 PM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is online now
SWCA Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,580
Likes: 3,066
Liked 22,564 Times in 5,845 Posts
Default

A faster projectile will shoot flatter, not necessarily more accurately.

50-100 yards is not long range for a 357 Magnum. In the old days of Metallic Silhouette our shots were at 25, 50, 100 and 200 yards. So we had to know our holdover/under at each distance.

Projectile choice depends on what you are doing? Are we just talking about paper punching? Or are you getting ready for hunting?

If it is the latter, you want to choose a projectile/load that has a similar trajectory as your hunting round.

Traditionally, most plated offerings are not super accurate.

I would probably be loading a 125 grain, non-HP projectile.

In the olden days I would be choosing a JSP like the IMIs pictured below, but today we can select a polymer or powder coated projectile for a lower cost.


The coated projectiles can be pushed at almost any velocity. They do not have velocity limits like plated projectiles. 2000 FPS from a 357 Magnum rifle is not a problem for a coated projectile.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 08-13-2017, 11:54 PM
Eddietruett Eddietruett is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1,054
Liked 3,520 Times in 961 Posts
Default

I'm just punching paper and ringing gongs. I'm not steady enough any more to trust myself hunting with a handgun. Berrys says 1200 fps is max and I don't want to deal with leading. Most of my guns like 158gr much better than the 125gr so that's what I've been trying so far. I was just wandering if pushing either weight bullet a lot faster was going to increase the accuracy any appreciable amount. When you are referring to a coated bullet, I'm assuming you mean like the ones sold by Missouri Bullet, etc? I have not tried any of these as I was under the impression that leading became a problem at higher velocity like the plated. I get really good accuracy from the Berrys Plated Target HP and the HBWC at "normal" distances up to 25 yards so haven't seen a need to try the coated. But if they are normally more accurate than the plated, I'll certainly give some a try.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:07 AM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is online now
US Veteran
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,404
Likes: 3,189
Liked 12,762 Times in 5,688 Posts
Default

When I got my first K frame, 19-5, 357 Magnum, I went to the rifle range.
There was a large steel Pig sitting at the 100 yard marker.

I started with a 158gr lead 38 special and put the iron sights on it.
At the shot, the bullet hit the dirt in front of it, about 20 yards short.
My next try was with a 110gr +P loading, aimed just over its back.......
this round hit in the dirt about ten feet short.

Time to try a little better ammo for that long pistol distance.
I loaded a 125gr JHP and held dead center and squeezed one off.
The slap of the bullet was almost instant. No pause, no hold over, just right there, right now.

Have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:19 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

For 50 to 100 yards target work with a 357 Magnum revolver the 158gr coated bullets will work very well. How do I know? I use them lol...

Like said above, 50-100 yards isn't all that long a distance for the .357 and velocity doesn't mean accuracy. You can use that HS-6 or use 2400, AA#9 or W296 for loading the Missouri Bullets.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:23 AM
S&W SS Revolvers S&W SS Revolvers is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado (unfortunately)
Posts: 379
Likes: 731
Liked 222 Times in 128 Posts
Default

I like the 110 gr. in the ol' 686-3 .357...they are fast and accurate. Picked some up at SG Ammo very reasonable.
__________________
S&W SS Revolvers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:35 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S&W SS Revolvers View Post
I like the 110 gr. in the ol' 686-3 .357...they are fast and accurate. Picked some up at SG Ammo very reasonable.
IMO using a 110gr bullet in the .357 Magnum is a waste of its capability. If you want to use a 110gr bullet you can shoot a 9mm. That's the beauty of the .357 Mag, the ability to shoot 158gr, 170gr and 180gr bullets.

As for velocity, you only need what you need and no more.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 08-14-2017, 01:34 AM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,986
Likes: 41,646
Liked 29,239 Times in 13,823 Posts
Default Round nose..

Round nose would be best or the highest ballistic coefficient you can find. I think I'd try jacketed or hard cast coated if the plated bullets don't work. No reason why they shouldn't.

You MAY get more accuracy by keeping the load subsonic, even though it may have a huge drop. This would tend to say that the heavier bullet will carry at the lower velocities.

One thing about bullet drop due to gravity is that it is predictable.

Some casters make 'match grade' bullets.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2017, 04:14 AM
sw282's Avatar
sw282 sw282 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CSRA
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 869
Liked 1,629 Times in 779 Posts
Default

Hornady 200gr FTX boolits are the current favorite 357s for long range

work...Used to knock down those steel IHMSA Rams @ 200meters in

Big Bore Class.. Fueled by either lilgun or 296 powder..lignited by a

Small rifle magnum primer.. 200gr FTX has a b/c of 300. Velocity 1200fps

from a 10 1/2" Freedom Arms barrel.. However...Surgery is required to

each and every little FTX boolit.. The RedTip MUST be removed.. Boolits

are too long with the tip in.. They remind me of Sierra MatchKings with

Tip removed.. I think published data is used..Don't know how these will

work in a S&W revolver because l don't know FA cyl length.

Ultimate long range load for 357mag uses 250gr .358" Speer rifle boolit

In 38 Special WADCUTTER cases and Winchester 680 powder, SRM primers.

These would fit in the cyls in a Model 27/28 or Colt PYTHON. Wadcutter

cases were used because of their higher internal volume.. Cases were only

good for a couple of firings.. Those PYTHONs and Model 27s had a rough life too..

BTW.. WW680 powder is gone.. Pythons too
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 08-14-2017, 05:11 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,160
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,205 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

FWIW I use 158gr JSP (Speer, BC .164) over 296 as a hunting load in my 8 3/8"bbl scoped 686.
__________________
Science plus Art

Last edited by OKFC05; 08-14-2017 at 05:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 08-14-2017, 08:10 AM
elpac3's Avatar
elpac3 elpac3 is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mpls, Minnesota
Posts: 867
Likes: 87
Liked 967 Times in 398 Posts
Default

Consider using the 170 grain Keith SWC with 12 grains of 2400. I bought mine at Rim Rock. Great shooting bullet.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 08-14-2017, 08:39 AM
nitesite's Avatar
nitesite nitesite is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Morgan County Alabama -
Posts: 440
Likes: 156
Liked 134 Times in 58 Posts
Default

The .45-70 never performed with light bullets when shooting at distance.

Neither should your .357 Magnum handgun.

If it were me I would be in the 160~180 grain range and learn them well.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-14-2017, 09:01 AM
lrrifleman's Avatar
lrrifleman lrrifleman is online now
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 18,973
Liked 4,189 Times in 1,864 Posts
Default

@OP,

Back when I was younger (about 40 years ago) and trying my hand at IHMSA handgun metallic silhouette, I used a S&W Model 27 with an 8 3/8" barrel firing a handload of 296 behind a Speer .358 half jacketed hollow point semi-wadcutter. I had respectable success with this bullet on the rams at 200m (c.220 yards). Unfortunately, that bullet is no longer available.

Personally, if I could find those matches again within less than a day's drive, I would try either a 158gr JHP, or possibly a 150-160gr hardcast gas checked SWC out to 200+ yards.
__________________
Judge control not gun control!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 08-14-2017, 09:06 AM
mtgianni mtgianni is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 10,497
Liked 6,018 Times in 2,964 Posts
Default

I have had decent success with a Blackhawk, 180 gr wfn and a homemade lube. I like softer bullets for this maybe cast 50-50 lead to Wheel Weights. It would be hard to find a commercial caster that uses the same alloy.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-14-2017, 09:18 AM
stykshooter stykshooter is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Roanoke, Va.
Posts: 229
Likes: 12
Liked 431 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Several years ago I did extensive testing with various 686 revolvers, both iron sighted and scoped at 100 yards. The most accurate load that I tested was a 140 grain jacketed hollow point seated over top of a maximum charge of WW 296 powder. Any other load was a very distant second place. I shot some pretty amazing groups at 100 yards with these loads and hands down it has been the most accurate .357 load I have shot out of a dozen different revolvers. It is stout, but accurate. I keep a 6” 686 sighted in for this load at 100 yards just to knock over 8” steel plates at that distance.

In testing the various bullets I was surprised to find that the Remington 140 grain semi jacketed scalloped edge HP was the most accurate bullet in my loads. At the time I could buy those things very cheaply as bulk bullets from several different suppliers. I can remember buying them on sale for about $9.00 a hundred. Sadly, I haven’t seen them for sale in several years and I don’t know that Remington is still producing them. I have had almost as good of results with the 140 grain Hornady XTP that I have been using in that load recently.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 08-14-2017, 10:26 AM
Phish's Avatar
Phish Phish is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Lake shore, Ohio
Posts: 144
Likes: 805
Liked 101 Times in 61 Posts
Default

Nothing short of 158gr or better yet 180gr Hornady xtp are super accurate in my 686+ with burris 2x scope i can easily put them at 2-3" using 2400 powder. Velocity doesnt make an accurate loading.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:27 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is online now
US Veteran
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,404
Likes: 3,189
Liked 12,762 Times in 5,688 Posts
Default

+1 with post 7 & 15;

I had my best accuracy with the lightest bullet being the 140gr XTP.

This larger bullet weight is also easier on the revolver being lower
in the fps and having to use less powder, is a win, win, condition.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:38 PM
Paul105 Paul105 is offline
Member
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 589
Liked 1,841 Times in 604 Posts
Default

If you want to shoot jacketed, zero bullets are the way to go. These are cheaper than plated and competitive with most cast.

Roze Distribution: 38 SPECIAL (.357 DIAMETER)

Missouri Bullet Co offers a good selection of coated .38/357 bullets.
Missouri Bullet Company

RimRock's 170 gr Keiths mention above are also a good option for a cast bullet
.357 Keith SWC-FB 170 gr. per 500

I've had great luck with a 170gr Keith over 11.0gr of A2400. It chronos 1,150 fps in a 5 1/2" Freedom Arms M97. It's easy shooting and accurate. We were hitting an 8 x 14 (Portrait Orientation) steel plate offhand at 95 yds with good regularity while testing those loads.

Can't image much more tha 1,100 + needed or desired for your application.

FWIW,

Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question about .223 bullet weight. HAWKEYE10 Reloading 10 05-07-2013 07:35 AM
Published bullet weight vs. actual bullet weight safearm Reloading 29 03-26-2013 05:45 AM
Ross Long range .500 bullet molds John Ross Reloading 2 04-13-2011 10:55 PM
120 Grain min. bullet weight question Batman3n1 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 1 11-06-2010 08:45 PM
Same weight, different size bullet question. stanws6 Reloading 11 01-14-2009 04:52 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)