Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2017, 09:27 AM
Mr_Flintstone's Avatar
Mr_Flintstone Mr_Flintstone is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 125
Likes: 68
Liked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Default Bullet weight question

I bought some .358 .38 special lead round nose that was advertised as 90 gr bullets, but they were actually 93 gr bullets. Would this cause any problems with pressure using 90 gr load data? The maximum 90 gr load data pressures run about 11,000 PSI. I don't think that the extra 3 grains would be significant, but did like to hear from some of you before loading.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2017, 09:46 AM
ageingstudent's Avatar
ageingstudent ageingstudent is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 593
Likes: 741
Liked 413 Times in 220 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Flintstone View Post
I bought some .358 .38 special lead round nose that was advertised as 90 gr bullets, but they were actually 93 gr bullets. Would this cause any problems with pressure using 90 gr load data? The maximum 90 gr load data pressures run about 11,000 PSI. I don't think that the extra 3 grains would be significant, but did like to hear from some of you before loading.
Not unusual with cast bullets. Just use your starting charge from your selected load data and work the load up looking for anything amiss like usual.
__________________
Trucks and guns.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 09-30-2017, 10:15 AM
Mr_Flintstone's Avatar
Mr_Flintstone Mr_Flintstone is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 125
Likes: 68
Liked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Thanks. The only reason I'm using these is for powder puff loads, so low-medium is probably all I'll load anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2017, 10:46 AM
ontargetagain ontargetagain is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 921
Likes: 862
Liked 597 Times in 332 Posts
Default

Just as a safety it might be good to check your scale for accuracy just in case.
They may be 90gr without the lube. Clean one up and check out the weight
Karl
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 09-30-2017, 12:08 PM
Mr_Flintstone's Avatar
Mr_Flintstone Mr_Flintstone is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 125
Likes: 68
Liked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ontargetagain View Post
Just as a safety it might be good to check your scale for accuracy just in case.
They may be 90gr without the lube. Clean one up and check out the weight
Karl
No need. They were marked on the pack Meister .358 93 gr LRN.

Only thing now is the C.O.L. Hodgdon lists the overall length of 90 gr LRNFP as 1.325". These are round nose. I seated the bullet all the way to where the nose starts to curve and used a Lee factory crimp die. The overall length was 1.380". I don't think the extra 0.055" would mean much going from flat point to round nose.

Anyway I made some up with 4.0 gr AutoComp, and they felt like shooting a .22 magnum.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2017, 12:28 PM
mikld's Avatar
mikld mikld is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. Orygun
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 1,962
Liked 1,827 Times in 987 Posts
Default

Nope, no problem (90 gr is kinda light for a 38 Special though, do they have a crimp groove?). As with any new component, start with the starting loads and work up if necessary...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2017, 12:56 PM
Mr_Flintstone's Avatar
Mr_Flintstone Mr_Flintstone is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 125
Likes: 68
Liked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikld View Post
Nope, no problem (90 gr is kinda light for a 38 Special though, do they have a crimp groove?). As with any new component, start with the starting loads and work up if necessary...
No crimp groove. I'm still trying to figure the Lee factory crimp die out though. I followed the directions that came with the die, and I can't tell that they've crimped at all.

Directions say tighten die until it touches the shell holder, insert round with seated bullet, tighten adjuster screw until it touches, lower round, and tighten 1/2 turn for light crimp and 1 turn for heavy crimp. When I do this, I can't see any difference between no crimp, light crimp, and heavy crimp.

Update: I think I'm going to stay away from AutoComp for minimum loads. I had very inconsistent results. Some rounds felt like heavier loads. Some felt like 22 shorts. There was no pattern, and they didn't get progressively worse. It seemed that the first shot was always the lightest though. Ironically, the ones that felt like 22 shorts blew the primers back to where the cylinder wouldn't rotate. The heavier feeling loads didn't do this. Also, if I held the gun muzzle up before I started shooting, I never got the "squib feeling" shots. If I held it muzzle down, the majority were the very light ones. Either way, there was no consistency to the rounds even though I double checked all of my charges, and measured each round after seating.

Last edited by Mr_Flintstone; 09-30-2017 at 01:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2017, 02:36 PM
ageingstudent's Avatar
ageingstudent ageingstudent is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 593
Likes: 741
Liked 413 Times in 220 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Flintstone View Post
No crimp groove. I'm still trying to figure the Lee factory crimp die out though. I followed the directions that came with the die, and I can't tell that they've crimped at all.

Directions say tighten die until it touches the shell holder, insert round with seated bullet, tighten adjuster screw until it touches, lower round, and tighten 1/2 turn for light crimp and 1 turn for heavy crimp. When I do this, I can't see any difference between no crimp, light crimp, and heavy crimp.

Update: I think I'm going to stay away from AutoComp for minimum loads. I had very inconsistent results. Some rounds felt like heavier loads. Some felt like 22 shorts. There was no pattern, and they didn't get progressively worse. It seemed that the first shot was always the lightest though. Ironically, the ones that felt like 22 shorts blew the primers back to where the cylinder wouldn't rotate. The heavier feeling loads didn't do this. Also, if I held the gun muzzle up before I started shooting, I never got the "squib feeling" shots. If I held it muzzle down, the majority were the very light ones. Either way, there was no consistency to the rounds even though I double checked all of my charges, and measured each round after seating.
You may be having issues getting that fine slow-er powder to ignite and burn consistently under that light for caliber bullet.
__________________
Trucks and guns.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2017, 07:59 PM
Wise_A Wise_A is offline
Banned
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 2,661
Liked 4,324 Times in 1,793 Posts
Default

Autocomp is a horrendously slow powder, and 90/93 grains is a horrendously light bullet for .38 Spl. You're simply not going to get decent results.

To start with, I would be looking at Bullseye, N310, Red Dot, 700X, maybe Clays, and maybe Titegroup. Really no slower than that.

The other thing I would do is consider switching to at least a 120-grain bullet. You can easily load .38 Spl for $4 a box with even a 158-grain bullet, and recoil is almost negligible at that weight.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-01-2017, 03:03 AM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

Heavier bullets use less powder that lighter ones. It is perfectly safe to load those 93gr bullets with 90gr data.

Are you sure those bullets are meant for the .38 Special considering there is no crimp groove? Possibly 9mm or 380 Auto?

I would be using W231 in this application.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437

Last edited by ArchAngelCD; 10-01-2017 at 03:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-01-2017, 06:57 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,836
Liked 25,615 Times in 8,661 Posts
Default

Don't be surprised if the bullets hit very low!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-01-2017, 07:41 AM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,838
Likes: 7,394
Liked 8,050 Times in 3,652 Posts
Default

Short answer ...No.
Light target loads....Bullseye, Red Dot, 700X, AA#2, Titegroup, these types have a faster burn rate suited to low pressure low velocity loads.
AutoComp is going to suck rocks.
Bullets with no cannelure or crimpgroove can be taper crimped , I use a 9 mm luger taper crimp die with these bullets on 38/357 , works well.

Tip- 148 grain lead wadcutter over 2.7 grains Bullseye...it magic in a 38 special....SWEET !
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-01-2017, 08:45 AM
Mr_Flintstone's Avatar
Mr_Flintstone Mr_Flintstone is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 125
Likes: 68
Liked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Default

I think I'll make some more of these today, but I'm going to make some changes. First, no more AutoComp. I'm going to use either Titegroup or Trail Boss (I don't have any Bullseye). They are both pretty fast burning, and I'm leaning toward Trail Boss because it will fill the case better; although Titegroup will give me another 100 fps. Next, I'm going to get a good magnifying glass to examine my crimps. As I get older, I can't see things like bullet crimps as good. I may even use my bullet seater die for a light crimp. I can see those a little better. I'm also going to go up to near max load data, which is still just around 11,000 psi. Hopefully I'll get a better batch of rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-01-2017, 09:09 AM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,838
Likes: 7,394
Liked 8,050 Times in 3,652 Posts
Default

Titegroup ..excellent . I've no experience with Trail Boss but should be fine also.
38 special dies usually come with a roll crimp in the seater die.
Light crimp , or case may bulge with smooth sided bullets. Seating and crimping in separate steps will help also .
Good luck, load safe,
Gary
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 10-01-2017, 07:06 PM
Mr_Flintstone's Avatar
Mr_Flintstone Mr_Flintstone is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 125
Likes: 68
Liked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Default

I made some with a medium Trail Boss charge, and a light roll crimp with the seater die. They worked perfectly. Hodgdon should take that AutoComp minimum charge out, or at least add a disclaimer that it should be used in a longer barrel.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 10-01-2017, 07:37 PM
Wise_A Wise_A is offline
Banned
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 2,661
Liked 4,324 Times in 1,793 Posts
Default

The problem is that a bullet that light doesn't present enough resistance to the powder to reach a good pressure. That doesn't mean it's impossible, or that it will squib (although it's far more likely to do so), it just means it won't burn well consistently. When that happens, you get extreme position sensitivity, inconsistent velocities, etc.

There are a lot of powder/bullet combinations that can probably be made to work well-enough in a lab setting, but which aren't good matches in the real world. I think they should still be left in--somebody, somewhere, is going to insist on using a poorly-matched powder/bullet combination, so at least they'll be doing it with data.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 10-01-2017, 11:22 PM
ageingstudent's Avatar
ageingstudent ageingstudent is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 593
Likes: 741
Liked 413 Times in 220 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Flintstone View Post
I made some with a medium Trail Boss charge, and a light roll crimp with the seater die. They worked perfectly. Hodgdon should take that AutoComp minimum charge out, or at least add a disclaimer that it should be used in a longer barrel.
It's why we work up a load that's unfamiliar and pay attention to how it's acting and ask others to share their experience. You learned a lot about erratic performance using slow powder in that application. Slow powders need that extra couple microseconds provided by the heavier bullet to get up to pressure consistently. I did something similar myself some years ago.
__________________
Trucks and guns.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-02-2017, 12:54 PM
mikld's Avatar
mikld mikld is offline
Member
Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question Bullet weight question  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. Orygun
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 1,962
Liked 1,827 Times in 987 Posts
Default

I looked up that bullet in my Lyman 50th and it seems to be a 380 design but can be used in 9mm and 38. Personally, I wouldn't try that bullet in 38 Special as the lightest bullet I've found to be consistent, accurate and light shooting is the Lee 125 RBFP..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long Range .357 Bullet Weight Question Eddietruett Reloading 17 08-14-2017 12:38 PM
A question about .223 bullet weight. HAWKEYE10 Reloading 10 05-07-2013 07:35 AM
Published bullet weight vs. actual bullet weight safearm Reloading 29 03-26-2013 05:45 AM
120 Grain min. bullet weight question Batman3n1 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 1 11-06-2010 08:45 PM
Same weight, different size bullet question. stanws6 Reloading 11 01-14-2009 04:52 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)