|
|
06-18-2018, 06:07 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
|
|
9mm 5" target loads, how slow ?
I have found that is really hard to get lower fps in the long barrel
with the lighter weight bullets. No problem in the 3.5" C9 but
the 5" is a fps monster.
I have been trying to get the new Berry plated HP down to Sonic speeds
but I am down to the last straw. Just .2-.3 grs of powder left per
the loading manuals with the four powders that are still working
the action and the cases are still clean w/o any soot on them.
I would like to MAYBE get down to 980fps if possible but might have
to settle with this last test if the energy is to low to work the action
with this final test of minimal powder, per my manuals.
Has anyone with a 5" gotten a 124gr JHP down under 1,000fps
in their powders, that worked the action and had good accuracy?
Here is a picture of my last test in search of a Sonic loading.
Later.
|
06-18-2018, 06:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,604
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
|
|
Sorry, it is my experience ( and well know among competitors) that going much below about 130 PF ( about 1050 fps) with a 5" M&P using 124gr plated or jacketed bullets tends to add dispersion. You can make the action work with a 15# recoil spring, but that does not help the accuracy.
On the plus side, the 1050fps load is an easy load to shoot rapidly and well, and makes minor power for IDPA and USPSA.
One thing I see is some loading the .40 M&P to minor power which translates to about 750fps with a 180gr bullet. This requires dropping to a 14 to 15 # recoil spring in 5" .40 M&Ps and Glocks.
This low-energy load is very soft shooting.
__________________
Science plus Art
Last edited by OKFC05; 06-18-2018 at 06:25 PM.
|
06-19-2018, 06:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,707
Likes: 19,260
Liked 11,729 Times in 5,348 Posts
|
|
If sub-sonic is the goal, why not try 147 grain bullets? They were initially designed for sub-sonic 9x19 loads.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-19-2018, 08:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,906
Likes: 41,494
Liked 29,147 Times in 13,778 Posts
|
|
heavy bullet.....
...light charges of Acc no 7 powder. Lower charge until you get what you want or reliability starts to fall off.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
06-19-2018, 10:46 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
It will depend on your gun & recoil spring, but 124gr at 900fps is pretty easily done in say a g34 or 1911. Dropping one spring rate may be needed.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
06-19-2018, 01:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 2,854
Liked 2,765 Times in 1,160 Posts
|
|
I can offer a couple of light 1911 loads I've used for Steel Challenge using a 10# recoil and a 19# main. One jacketed & one coated.
124gr P.Delta JHP, 3.9gr 700x, 1.130, FED100 or WSP, 125PF
124gr ACME coated, 3.7gr Tightgroup, 1.130, FED100, barely made 1000fps or fell just short.
You can try them in your M&P, but I can't say if you may need to spring down.
|
06-19-2018, 01:49 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 2,854
Liked 2,765 Times in 1,160 Posts
|
|
If you want to go much slower I'd agree with previous post that 145-147gr is the way to go.
|
06-19-2018, 01:53 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 8,789
Liked 7,778 Times in 2,375 Posts
|
|
Bayou 130 grain coated over 2.8 grains Bullseye ignited by Federal Magnum SPP.
875 FPS SD 9.01.
My speed steel load. Haven't tried it in a semi-auto, however.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
06-19-2018, 10:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western Phraudsylvania
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 836
Liked 1,237 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
Hers's some of my chrono data; mostly averages of between 20 & 45 trial shots:
Shot from a stock S&W M&P9-Pro (5" bbl):
5.2 Gr AA#5 w/ Eggleston 124 coated RN: Avg.Vel @ 987 fps, SD @ 13 fps
3.5 Gr W-231 w/ Eggleston 115 coated RN: Avg.Vel @ 919 fps, SD @ 19 fps
4.0 Gr W-231 w/ Eggleston 115 coated RN: Avg.Vel @ 1028 fps, SD @ 23 fps
4.5 Gr W-231 w/ Eggleston 115 coated RN: Avg.Vel @ 1145 fps, SD @ 15 fps
Shot from a stock CZ-85 (4" bbl):
5.5 Gr AA#5 w/ Rainier 125 plated RN: Avg.Vel @ 973 fps, SD @ 25 fps
Shot from Springfield 1911-A 9mm (5" bbl):
5.2 Gr AA#5 w/ Berry's 124 plated HBRN: Avg.Vel @ 926 fps, SD @ 26 fps
5.0 Gr AA#5 w/ Bayou 124 coated TCG: Avg.Vel @ 923 fps, SD @ 18 fps
I didn't note any failures to cycle or ejection problems with any of these light loads. -S2
|
06-20-2018, 03:33 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 2,661
Liked 4,324 Times in 1,793 Posts
|
|
4.2gr of Bullseye under a 115-gr plated X-Treme bullet is the lower limit of reliability for my G34 (1911-ish G-Lock). They're subsonic--I haven't chrono'd them, but you can bump up the charge slightly and hear the difference.
|
06-20-2018, 03:34 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 2,661
Liked 4,324 Times in 1,793 Posts
|
|
4.2gr of Bullseye under a 115-gr plated X-Treme bullet is the lower limit of reliability for my G34 (1911-ish G-Lock). They're subsonic--I haven't chrono'd them, but you can bump up the charge slightly and hear the difference. I'd guess the velocity is right around 1050 or so.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|