Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2018, 04:25 PM
mike campbell mike campbell is offline
Member
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 91
Liked 1,532 Times in 368 Posts
Default Ransom testing a Model 66

**********
__________________
Carry.."hope" isn't a strategy

Last edited by mike campbell; 12-06-2019 at 10:55 PM.
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 07-27-2018, 04:49 PM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
SWCA Member
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
Default

Mike,
When doing your testing did you use all 6 chambers?

Or was every shot in each group shot out of a single chamber?
  #3  
Old 07-27-2018, 05:06 PM
mike campbell mike campbell is offline
Member
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 91
Liked 1,532 Times in 368 Posts
Default

All 6 were used at least once.

There were one-shot flyers in the first few groups. So I marked one chamber with a Sharpie. I loaded the marked chamber plus the next 4. For the next five I skipped the marked chamber. As I noted in the last pic, it was 2 fully loaded cylinders .... no bad chamber.
__________________
Carry.."hope" isn't a strategy
  #4  
Old 07-28-2018, 11:35 AM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 3,190
Liked 12,776 Times in 5,693 Posts
Default

A 125 XTP at 782............................

My lowest was 842 fps before accuracy feel apart but it
was not with the powder you were using.

X-lite loads are fun to shoot but I still feel a lot more comfortable
when my jacketed bullets are going at 945fps out of any of my weapons.

Mighty fine targets for that far away !!
That 66 is a keeper.
  #5  
Old 07-28-2018, 11:52 AM
Bullseye 2620's Avatar
Bullseye 2620 Bullseye 2620 is offline
Member
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tierra del encantamiento
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 6,321
Liked 6,553 Times in 910 Posts
Default

It's great to see someone take the time and spend the energy to determine exactly what their gun/load combination is inherently capable of. A lot of bullseye shooters spend upwards of $2,000 to get a gun capable of shooting sub-2-inch 10-shot groups at 50 yards, and some spend that and still don't get that level of accuracy. For example, Logan and Jess Clark sell their 5-inch bullseye wad gun for around $2,000 and only guarantee 2-1/2 inches at 50 yards.

What a great gun. Thanks for your post.
__________________
Five screws and 3-1/2 inches.
  #6  
Old 07-28-2018, 12:38 PM
oddshooter oddshooter is offline
Member
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: the free state of Arizona
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 2,402
Liked 1,795 Times in 625 Posts
Default

I haven't tried the 4.5gr of vv n310. Pretty slow fps, with good accuracy.

I've used quite a bit of the 5.5gr n340 with 1.5" accuracy @25yds up around 700fps +. Very, very clean shooting.

I love the Vihtavuori. You get what you pay for.

That ransom rest is a great device for getting consistent readings on your groups. But I'm still in love with getting my fingers around that grip. Accurate, lab testing type results are great; but shooting for small groups is a joy.

Here, I love the ransom rest showing the inherent accuracy of that new 66.

Prescut
  #7  
Old 07-28-2018, 01:15 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

God report.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
  #8  
Old 07-28-2018, 04:22 PM
Duckford Duckford is offline
Member
Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66 Ransom testing a Model 66  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 575
Likes: 563
Liked 920 Times in 303 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRidgeBoy View Post
It's great to see someone take the time and spend the energy to determine exactly what their gun/load combination is inherently capable of. A lot of bullseye shooters spend upwards of $2,000 to get a gun capable of shooting sub-2-inch 10-shot groups at 50 yards, and some spend that and still don't get that level of accuracy. For example, Logan and Jess Clark sell their 5-inch bullseye wad gun for around $2,000 and only guarantee 2-1/2 inches at 50 yards.

What a great gun. Thanks for your post.
I remember an article from the Rifleman from way back included in my old NRA Handloading book about testing to maximize the accuracy of the 38 Special 148 grain wadcutter, ordering many different commercial cast bullets, factory swage, and casting their own, using different primers, changing crimps, and using an array of weapons to test each load with several S&W and Colt revolvers and target 1911's.

What surprised me out of the results was that the 2.8 grains Bullseye was the best load, no more, no less, and that some of the poorer wadcutters could average as poor as 6 MOA, or 3 inches at 50 yards. Out of their bench machines many handloads could average 4 MOA out of standard combat revolvers. Most interestingly, the best factory swage bullets could average 3 MOA, and the very best averages at extreme could swing as low as 2.5 MOA, better than some worn out milsurp rifles with poor ammunition. Shooting a 2 inch group at 50 yards out of a machine rest is indeed impressive, but then again if someone says their Ransom and $300 police surplus Model 10 with high end handloads shot 1.5 inch groups, they might just be telling the truth. Sounds like the boys with their $2000 fun guns need better ammunition, it ain't all the gun.

Very good post by OP, this kind of information is very interesting.
  #9  
Old 07-28-2018, 07:33 PM
Troystat Troystat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 792
Liked 679 Times in 437 Posts
Default

Looks like a nice shooting revolver.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ransom ware roarindan FORUM OFFICE 4 04-12-2018 12:10 PM
Model 29-10 testing picture post Bobbysixkiller S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 02-18-2018 06:11 PM
Pay no ransom demands!!!!!!! Biginge The Lounge 8 08-19-2016 10:13 AM
FS:Ransom Rest Jeff423 Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 1 07-01-2015 08:43 PM
Ransom Rest, do you have one? Magload Reloading 7 04-25-2015 04:31 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)