|
|
08-05-2018, 10:19 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 1,049
Liked 3,510 Times in 957 Posts
|
|
H4227 Question
Maybe stupid, but is H4227 and IMR4227 the same powder?
|
08-05-2018, 10:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,616
Likes: 1,554
Liked 8,605 Times in 3,452 Posts
|
|
According to Hodgdon, the distributor for both, they are now identical and come from the same manufacturer. Previously, when IMR 4227 was distributed by IMR or DuPont, this was not true. This has been several years ago. At that time the H-4227 had a slightly faster burning rate than the DuPont/IMR product.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
Last edited by Alk8944; 08-05-2018 at 10:51 AM.
|
08-05-2018, 11:05 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
|
|
I have used them in the 38 special and 357 Magnum loads and
you do not have to worry about exceeding pressures with this powder.
At best, it gives nice low target fps in these weapons with all the
jacket and lead bullets that I tested.
Do to the slow burn rate, it was not the best powder to use in these
small pistol cases.
They may do better in the 40 cal's but I do not load those and
don't even try the little case, of the 9mm, hint.
|
08-05-2018, 01:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: the free state of Arizona
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 2,402
Liked 1,795 Times in 625 Posts
|
|
They are the same. I shoot a lot it in my 357 Maximums handloads. Very accurate.
It is similar but better than H110/296 in that it downloads without issues.
Prescut
|
08-05-2018, 03:35 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 298
Likes: 210
Liked 237 Times in 120 Posts
|
|
According to the Hodgdon website they no longer produce or distribute H4227 leaving only IMR 4227 as the sole choice. What I did notice tho' is the IMR site shows 4227 in .45 Colt for Ruger, Freedom Arms and T/C only!
I'm sure my 25-15 could handle the hotter loads in small quantity, but why push it.
|
08-05-2018, 03:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Taranaki, New Zealand
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 4,282
Liked 6,015 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
|
H4227 was made by AUstralian Defence Industries (ADI) who also made an identical burning powder but with a coating to reduce temperature for loading .223 for the Australian military marketed at ADI/Mulwex AR2205.
The two powders were interchangeable for reloading data but the coating meant that AR2205 metered differently from powder measures. A little more space was taken up for an H4227 equivalent weight.
Back in the ‘90’s I tried both powders in .38 Special and 44/40. In both cases I preferred the Hodgson powder over the Mulwex powder.
At some time both Mulwex and Hodgson were owned by the same parent company and a question was asked at board level “Why are we making two basically identical powders”?
As a result H4227 was discontinued while AR2208 remained for the military contracts. I cannot find anything definitive to confirm this but I believe that what is now known as H4227 in the US is actually AR2205. H4227 is no longer available down under.
For a few years I replaced H4227 with AR2205 in my reloading, but it was never as accurate for me in my guns, so I switched to Tightgroup.
I have no experience with IMR powders but if they are now referred to as being “the same powders” by the manufacturer then again, I suspect it is AR2205.
__________________
View from down under
|
08-05-2018, 05:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,479
Likes: 236
Liked 28,940 Times in 14,012 Posts
|
|
I have mentioned this before, but 4227 is an excellent propellant for use with cast lead bullets in CF rifle loads. I have used both the IMR and Hodgdon versions, and never saw any significant difference in chrono MV measurements with the same loads. I also have used 4227 in .30 Carbine loads, but even with a nearly full case, the MV is somewhat lower than achievable using 2400 or H110/296 loads.
|
08-05-2018, 09:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: 30min SE Montreal
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 150
Liked 1,540 Times in 841 Posts
|
|
Like Dwalt said;4227 in either IMR or H form(if you happen on an old stash of it since it's not manufactured anymore)you cannot stuff enough of it in a .357 hull to create an overcharge.It is,for handgun calibers,very slow burning.
I used it for .44 Mag when H110,2400 and W296 were hard to come by but now that this is only bad ''souvenirs'',I use it for my ''Ruger and Contender only''loads in .45 Colt(4 5/8 Blackhawk).
I think that being so slow burning,it should make for a very good .460 S&W powder.If the God of $$$ decides to drop some of it on my house,I might report the results of my tests!
|
08-06-2018, 05:56 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 181
Liked 1,654 Times in 639 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qc Pistolero
I think that being so slow burning,it should make for a very good .460 S&W powder.....
|
It does work very well in 460S&W particularly with bullets 300 grains and heavier.
be safe
ruggy
|
08-07-2018, 02:22 AM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
|
|
From what I have read... The IMR formulation of 4227 has been discontinued. The Hodgdon formulation of 4227 has replaced the IMR formulation and is being sold under the IMR label and the H4227 label is now gone.
In any event, both were so close the data was pretty much interchangeable even though the powders were not identical.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|
08-07-2018, 04:49 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 3,090
Liked 4,735 Times in 1,517 Posts
|
|
I used to buy the DuPont made IMR4227 powder back in the 80s.
It came in a heavy duty metal can with screw lid.
I started reloading 44 magnum with a Lee Loader. 4227 was the specified powder for 240-250 grain bullets using the 1.6cc scoop that came with the tool. It was a great load! Not too hot, but still quite powerful. I even loved the distinct scent of that powder.
Anyhow, the bulk and burn rate were very reassuring when loading in 44 or 357.
Not a very helpful post for the OP. Sorry!
Jim
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-07-2018, 08:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 185
Liked 3,297 Times in 1,523 Posts
|
|
When it comes to magnum powders ? IMR 4227 is by far the easiest powder on the gun itself , less forcing cone erosion . I give up a bit in velocity but all things considered , it's the magnum powder I reach for 99% of the time . I use the CCI " full magnum " primers only for a more complete burn . Regards, Paul
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-16-2018, 02:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 4,198
Liked 998 Times in 536 Posts
|
|
I use it in 38/44 loads with the Lyman 358429 . 12.5grs , WSPM primer , Starline +P 38 cases gives me an honest 1150fps from a 6 1/2" pre 23 Outdoorsman . I also used to use SR4756 , now discontinued for same type loads & the old standby 2400 . 4227 won't give top velocities , is easier on forcing cones & give great accuracy . Not to mention it used to cost less than the others .
|
08-17-2018, 01:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Liked 753 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
I was using H110 for 500 S&W and it worked great most of the time with maximum loads. But I would get squibs every now and then with anything less than that. Bad news when you get a bullet stuck in the barrel with that one. Using 4227 now and it is working great.
|
08-19-2018, 09:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: N/O Tampa Bay
Posts: 439
Likes: 280
Liked 1,272 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
I have 4 sealed 1lb Metal Cans of Dupont IMR 4227. I have been hesitant to load with it because I know that it is not the same as the Current Powder sold by Hodgdon. So if it's a little slower than the new 4227, I guess it is safe to load it using modern data.
Last edited by nipperdog; 08-19-2018 at 09:14 AM.
|
08-19-2018, 09:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: N/O Tampa Bay
Posts: 439
Likes: 280
Liked 1,272 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Raby
I was using H110 for 500 S&W and it worked great most of the time with maximum loads. But I would get squibs every now and then with anything less than that. Bad news when you get a bullet stuck in the barrel with that one. Using 4227 now and it is working great.
|
I used H110 Previosly in my 500, and am currently using it in my 460. The trick with H110/W296 is a Good Tight Crimp to get Complete Ignition. I still carry a Wooden Dowel, and a Small Hammer in my Range Bag.
|
08-19-2018, 11:26 AM
|
Vendor
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 53,433
Liked 13,435 Times in 4,240 Posts
|
|
I am using H4227 in .44Mag with great success for Met. Sil. My load is 18 gr. powder with 300 gr. Hornady XTP bullets, firm crimp and Fed. LP Mag. primer. The recoil is mild, I've shot 120 rounds in one day with no problems at all. I'm getting 1050 fps muzzle velocity, and 900 fps at 200 meters according to my ballistic chart. Takes down rams every time. Also, 5 to 6 inch groups at 200 m. out of an 8-3/8 629.
A long time ago I ran out of H4227 and had a metal can of IMR 4227 so used that. All the sight settings were still spot on at 4 distances, so there has to be very little difference in the 2 powders.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-19-2018, 10:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,479
Likes: 236
Liked 28,940 Times in 14,012 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nipperdog
I have 4 sealed 1lb Metal Cans of Dupont IMR 4227. I have been hesitant to load with it because I know that it is not the same as the Current Powder sold by Hodgdon. So if it's a little slower than the new 4227, I guess it is safe to load it using modern data.
|
I wouldn't give it a second thought. Any difference in IMR 4227 vs. H4227 is insignificant.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-31-2018, 12:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 804
Likes: 86
Liked 482 Times in 300 Posts
|
|
Quote:
eddietruett asked:
"...is H4227 and IMR4227 the same powder?"
|
No.
At some point following the consolidation of powder manufacturing in just a few hands, H4227 and IMR-4227 became essentially identical powders, but I have canisters of IMR-4227 powders made in the 1970's, 1980's, 1990's, 2000's and 2010's.
Which one(s) is(are) identical H-4227?
Unless you know, from the manufacturer, by lot number, which powders are, in fact, identical, I would use the reloading data specific each one.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|