Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-03-2020, 05:51 PM
mikerjf mikerjf is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 2,232
Liked 2,930 Times in 1,091 Posts
Default 45acp fast loads

Ok, today we got Nevada Ed posting some chrono data, guys talking about 3" 1911's, and recent posts on both using manuals vs online info and people mixing primers. All relevant to something I've been thinking on.

I ran into this article (online) about fast 45acp loads. I'm interested because he claims near-45 Super velocities at *standard* 45acp pressure - not even +P. Who wouldn't like that!

Note that he is talking about data that *used* to be in the manual, but isn't now. It even used to be on the powder label, but isn't now.

45 ACP Fast Loads

A specific question I have - it seems to me (beginner) that this powder is intended for magnum loads, and might be slow-burning? Being a magnum powder, it ignites better with a magnum primer, which he does use.

His results were with a 5" barrel, a typical 45acp length. Being a slower powder and getting so much performance out of 5", would you expect a serious fall-off in performance with the shorter barrel guns?

I haven't found Ramshot Enforcer available anywhere yet, but am eager to try this one out.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2020, 07:26 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
Default

To answer your specific question, Ramshot Enforcer is a slow powder, falling between old faithful 2400 and H110, both more familiar magnum powders to many reloaders. Not having tried Enforcer, I can't comment on how hard it is to ignite, which determines primer choice.
The comment from Western Powders on Enforcer being inefficient in .45 ACP makes sense to me, since .45 ACP is a low-pressure round, and you can get about the same practical performance using a lesser amount of a somewhat faster powder. Using lots of slow powder in a low pressure round usually results in marginal speed increase, with tremendous blast and recoil increases, and often not-so-great accuracy.
Many load .44 magnum, a high pressure round, with 2400 to get great balanced performance without trying for absolute max MV. Trying to get max MV from .45 ACP or .38Spl or similar low pressure cartridges has even less practical rationale.
Putting such loads in short barrels guarantees massive balls of fire, and blast, as the powder finishes burning in the air.

Unless your 1911 is set up for a steady diet of +P, you also risk gun damage. Remember peak pressure is what blows up barrels, but the total force-the integral of the pressure curve all the time the bullet is in the barrel-is what wears out the gun and cracks frame.
__________________
Science plus Art

Last edited by OKFC05; 08-03-2020 at 07:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 08-03-2020, 08:27 PM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 1,787
Liked 5,342 Times in 2,685 Posts
Default

A couple of comments on data that "used to be" in load manuals that are no longer. And "fast loads within pressure limits".

In some cases, data for old reliable powders has been replaced with data for newer powders. If it's new, it's gotta be better (?), besides there's a lot of sources for data on old powders.

In other cases, the data source is using a different firearm or barrel in a universal receiver and the data for that barrel is different from the old data.

Then the adoption of the piezo-electric pressure gauges allowed accurate time/pressure curves that didn't show up on the previous copper crusher (now shown as CUP for copper units of pressure). This resulted in some load data being dialed back because we now were aware of pressure spikes that exceeded SAAMI specs.

As the post just above notes, there's also cases where a given powder may work, but it's not really a good choice if something else is available. Looking at a burn rate chart, it's slightly faster than 296, that doesn't bode well for really short barrels. That doesn't strike me as a reasonable choice for .45 ACP, but hey, it's your money, gun and body.

I'm not aware of the article in post 1, but I have to wonder about how the author established pressures. There are some powders out there now that just might, maybe, generate some velocities above those generally seen at acceptable pressures. However, based upon experience, when you see claims of stupendous velocities at "standard" pressures, there's often at least one misstatement there.

I also have to wonder about why you need to super size the .45?
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 08-03-2020, 09:37 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is online now
US Veteran
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,376
Likes: 3,183
Liked 12,712 Times in 5,669 Posts
Default

Yes a shorter 3" or 3.5" barrel does fall of in FPS from a 5" barrel, but..........

they usually have plenty of energy and knock down power to do a BG in
with the correct ammo........
plus they are pretty darn accurate, to boot !!

Fast is good but a lower recoil load that gets back on target is also a good thing.
I like ONE shot with my .357 MAGNUM.............
but two with a 9mm or .45 ........... will also work.

More popcorn.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 08-03-2020, 11:16 PM
mikerjf mikerjf is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 2,232
Liked 2,930 Times in 1,091 Posts
Default

The author got his pressure data from the powder manufacturer's manual. This was a published load.

Good comments, thank you, trying to learn from this. Like was said, claims of high velocities at lower pressures are suspect, and I was wondering if this was a time where the powder just worked out perfectly for the particular bullet and barrel length. Altho the author did substitute a different bullet and got similar results.

As to why super-size the 45, well, we could just all shoot 22s. <yawn>

Besides, the whole point of handloading is to optimize something - velocity, ME, accuracy, cost, whatever - so any load that seems to offer something-for-nothing, well, you want to take a look at that and learn from it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 08-04-2020, 01:29 AM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

In any caliber, any bbl length, you will always get max vel with slower powders. You will also get more blast & flash but vel will be higher. Get really short bbls & medium burners will get very close to the slow powders with less blast & flash. So just decide how badly you want that extra 40-50fps.
Slower powders build pressures more gently, so sure its possible to get higher vel with lower pressures.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO

Last edited by fredj338; 08-04-2020 at 01:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 08-04-2020, 04:49 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is online now
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,460
Likes: 5,859
Liked 9,269 Times in 3,479 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerjf View Post
The author got his pressure data from the powder manufacturer's manual. This was a published load.
I saw that article a couple months ago & pretty much discounted it for several reasons, one of which is I have no need to use Enforcer in anything else.

I don't have any Western reloading manuals but I've got some older Accurate manuals, which consolidated all of their powders together, & Enforcer is in v5.0 but it's not listed in any 45ACP load. v7.0 is the current manual.

Westerns/Accurate burn rate chart shows Enforce is roughly the same burn rate as Lil' Gun.

I've tried a 185gr JHP & 15.5grs of Alliant 2400, which is slightly faster than Lil' Gun, in some 45 Super loads in my Colt 1911 Mk.IV, set-up for 45 Super, & it performed poorly. The slow burn rate couldn't cycle the action/slide properly, not doubt because of the heavier springs.

You have to wonder why, since the Enforcer label suggested 13.0grs, did he go up to 14.2grs?

FWIW, QuickLoads (& I don't put blind faith in it) calculates 14.2gr/Enforcer with a HDY 230gr FMJ-RN @ 1.245" is just under 32K psi at 1106mv from a 5" bbl. The fill rate was 119%.

.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day

Last edited by BLUEDOT37; 08-04-2020 at 04:51 AM. Reason: .
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 08-04-2020, 08:27 AM
kingrj kingrj is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 112
Likes: 143
Liked 127 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerjf View Post
Ok, today we got Nevada Ed posting some chrono data, guys talking about 3" 1911's, and recent posts on both using manuals vs online info and people mixing primers. All relevant to something I've been thinking on.

I ran into this article (online) about fast 45acp loads. I'm interested because he claims near-45 Super velocities at *standard* 45acp pressure - not even +P. Who wouldn't like that!

Note that he is talking about data that *used* to be in the manual, but isn't now. It even used to be on the powder label, but isn't now.

45 ACP Fast Loads

A specific question I have - it seems to me (beginner) that this powder is intended for magnum loads, and might be slow-burning? Being a magnum powder, it ignites better with a magnum primer, which he does use.

His results were with a 5" barrel, a typical 45acp length. Being a slower powder and getting so much performance out of 5", would you expect a serious fall-off in performance with the shorter barrel guns?

I haven't found Ramshot Enforcer available anywhere yet, but am eager to try this one out.
It never get tired of reading about perpetual motion machines or plug in devices that can cut your power bill in half..or proposed Democrat policies or even super power secret handgun loads that have the same mean pressure of standard loads! All of these "dreams" defy the first law of physics which is "there ain't no free lunch"! If a .45 acp load produces .45 Super velocities in a 5" barrel then it is producing .45 Super pressures....Now if you are using a 15" barrel then you might get close...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 08-04-2020, 08:58 AM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,838
Likes: 7,394
Liked 8,050 Times in 3,652 Posts
Default

Only one way to know for sure.

Load em up ... and as Troy Landry say's "CHOOT 'EM"
Gary
__________________
Certified Cajun
NRA Member
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-04-2020, 09:16 AM
mikerjf mikerjf is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 2,232
Liked 2,930 Times in 1,091 Posts
Default

I'm interested in the company's statement (quoted in the article) - they "felt it was not a very efficient powder for the .45".

What makes an "efficient" powder?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-04-2020, 09:36 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,713
Likes: 19,282
Liked 11,738 Times in 5,351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerjf View Post
I'm interested in the company's statement (quoted in the article) - they "felt it was not a very efficient powder for the .45".

What makes an "efficient" powder?
A powder that gives complete combustion and does not leave unburned granules. I have experienced powders, generally the medium and slow burning rates, that can leave a fair amount of unburned or partially burned granules. An efficient powder will be one that uses the least amount for the desired pressure and velocity and burns completely.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 08-04-2020, 10:08 AM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 1,787
Liked 5,342 Times in 2,685 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerjf View Post
The author got his pressure data from the powder manufacturer's manual. This was a published load.
OK, but those pressures are for that barrel/firearm. Does not mean it will be that pressure/velocity in yours. There's a deplorable tendency to take a set of load data as the one true way. That's not the case and, at the upper end of the data, potentially dangerous. That's why one should have several sources of load data and be very cautious.

Also, as I've grown older, more knowledgeable and more experienced, I've discovered glaring technical errors in both articles and technical information-including books on gunsmithing. Bear in mind the old saying about believe nothing of what you hear/read and little of what you see. This is particularly true of what you may read/see online.

Added edit: I just recalled once receiving an ink-still-wet load data sheet from one of the prominent powder makers. This was back when the 125 gr JHP .357 load was the NEW BIG THING! A buddy had grabbed a box of bullets and I was supposed to cook up some loads. Well, when I looked at the data, the max charge with the powder I had was right up there with the listed max for .44 Magnum with 240 gr JHP. I thought about that, did some math-several times- and decided to drop the loads. Then I think I dropped them again and loaded maybe 6 rounds. The test loads still produced cratered primers and a muzzle flash you could see on a bright sunny day. Very shortly, a new, revised load data sheet appeared.

I kept both load data sheets for decades as examples of the dangers of believing load data to be absolute. Unfortunately, I moved too many times and lost them. Maybe after I'm gone and the kids are cleaning up after me they'll find them and wonder why I saved them.

Last edited by WR Moore; 08-05-2020 at 11:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 08-04-2020, 10:24 AM
zeke zeke is offline
Member
45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 3,315
Liked 3,020 Times in 1,279 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
A powder that gives complete combustion and does not leave unburned granules. I have experienced powders, generally the medium and slow burning rates, that can leave a fair amount of unburned or partially burned granules. An efficient powder will be one that uses the least amount for the desired pressure and velocity and burns completely.
And some un-burned powder/residue can be enough to tie up a tight fitted semi-auto. Tried blue dot in 45 acp couple of times, and while it gave very good accuracy, it tied up a tight fitted 45.

And the recoil impulse may be another consideration, especially when shooting it unsupported in your hands.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 08-04-2020, 02:08 PM
boatbum101 boatbum101 is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 4,198
Liked 998 Times in 536 Posts
Default

I use Enforcer in my 41mag Henry with 210JHP's . Haven't tried it in other calibers yet . I too fail to see it as good in 45acp . Silhouette maybe as IIRC it's same as discontinued WAP . In a full size Gov't Model & a full diet of hot loads I'd consider following as prudent : 23lb MS , small radius FPS , XP FP spring , bowtie cut , 16 - 18lb RS . 5" barrel 900-950fps is doable @ std press . Medium speed like AA#5 , N-340 etc. Speed aint everything in this caliber . Look at the 230 Fed HST gel tests with both std & +P . Granted that's with that bullet , but it's easier to get better placement with less recoil / place followup shots .
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-04-2020, 02:42 PM
Protocall_Design Protocall_Design is offline
Vendor
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 53,438
Liked 13,435 Times in 4,240 Posts
Default

The bottom line is - Pressure = Velocity. More pressure makes the bullet go faster.

Power Factor is - Bullet Weight x Velocity divided by 1000. So a 230 gr. bullet at 800 FPS is a power factor of 184. That is a heavy hitting load with low recoil and low pressure.

A 115 gr. 9mm bullet would have to be doing 1600 FPS for an equal power factor. That would be hotter than 38 Super and very hard recoil. Might blow up your gun.
__________________
protocalldesign.com
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 08-04-2020, 03:37 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,065
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,466 Times in 6,788 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerjf View Post
I'm interested in the company's statement (quoted in the article) - they "felt it was not a very efficient powder for the .45".

What makes an "efficient" powder?



Who wants to use 13 to 14 grains of powder in a 45 ACP load just to get a hundred fps more velocity??
I can use a powder such as LongShot and use 7 grains and get 900 or so FPS
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 08-04-2020, 03:44 PM
mikerjf mikerjf is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 2,232
Liked 2,930 Times in 1,091 Posts
Default

<<Who wants to use 13 to 14 grains of powder in a 45 ACP load just to get a hundred fps more velocity??>>

I guess the correct answer would be "Who knows? Is a bear chasing them?"
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-04-2020, 06:55 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,065
Likes: 10,777
Liked 15,466 Times in 6,788 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerjf View Post
<<Who wants to use 13 to 14 grains of powder in a 45 ACP load just to get a hundred fps more velocity??>>

I guess the correct answer would be "Who knows? Is a bear chasing them?"



"Not an efficient powder"
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-04-2020, 08:27 PM
HKSmith HKSmith is offline
Member
45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 732
Likes: 1,302
Liked 713 Times in 273 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Protocall_Design View Post
The bottom line is - Pressure = Velocity. More pressure makes the bullet go faster.

Power Factor is - Bullet Weight x Velocity divided by 1000. So a 230 gr. bullet at 800 FPS is a power factor of 184. That is a heavy hitting load with low recoil and low pressure.

A 115 gr. 9mm bullet would have to be doing 1600 FPS for an equal power factor. That would be hotter than 38 Super and very hard recoil. Might blow up your gun.
Actually, these 2 loads would have the same recoil energy in the same weight gun. Of course, as you pointed out, there's no safe way to get 1600 ft/sec with a 115 grain bullet in 9 mm, but you might come close in the .357 SIG.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-04-2020, 10:33 PM
Engineer1911's Avatar
Engineer1911 Engineer1911 is online now
US Veteran
45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads 45acp fast loads  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 6,115
Likes: 6,647
Liked 6,156 Times in 2,666 Posts
Default

But is the brass cases and primer pockets 'surgically clean' ?
__________________
S&WHF 366
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.45acp Factory FMJ Loads ; LPP or SPP ? geo57 Ammo 9 04-28-2018 05:01 PM
45acp HAP 185 Grain loads Ohioron Reloading 4 11-14-2013 03:11 AM
mild .357 loads using fast-burning powders? Lou_NC Reloading 23 08-25-2013 06:18 PM
.45acp loads...what do you think? Dmaxboy08 Reloading 3 11-29-2012 07:42 AM
.45acp LRN loads for M25 and 625 Smith357 Reloading 19 06-09-2010 01:29 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)