|
|
05-14-2009, 01:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
I know that "rule of thumb" is not a exact way to go about things, but is there a general percentage to lower the amount of powder when comparing a lead bullet to a jacketed of the same weight?
Lead usually requires less powder, yes?
So if there is no load data for a lead bullet do you just use the start load of a jacketed of the same weight?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-14-2009, 03:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OCD1:
I know that "rule of thumb" is not a exact way to go about things, but is there a general percentage to lower the amount of powder when comparing a lead bullet to a jacketed of the same weight?
Lead usually requires less powder, yes?
So if there is no load data for a lead bullet do you just use the start load of a jacketed of the same weight?
|
Starting loads tend to be VERY mild. You won't have overpressure, but be careful of squibs.
|
05-14-2009, 04:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OCD1:
I know that "rule of thumb" is not a exact way to go about things, but is there a general percentage to lower the amount of powder when comparing a lead bullet to a jacketed of the same weight?
Lead usually requires less powder, yes?
So if there is no load data for a lead bullet do you just use the start load of a jacketed of the same weight?
|
That is what I have been doing and it seems to work for me. I will usually run some of those first loads over my chronograph to get an indication of where I am at concerning bullet speed. If all looks good I will adjust my powder charge from there.
Cary
|
05-14-2009, 04:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
Yes, that sounds logical but unfortunately I do not have a chroo. Maybe next Christmas.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-14-2009, 06:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 527
Liked 3,814 Times in 1,243 Posts
|
|
Using cast bullets .001 over bore size, typically after working up for safety reasons, all else being equal, I use the same powder charge as a jackedted bullet and take the extra velocity (@ 100fps) as an end result with lead.
|
05-14-2009, 08:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MURFREESBORO TN.
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 90
Liked 402 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
I HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. I LOOK AT THE SAME WEIGHT JACKETED OR A CLOSE WEIGHT CAST. IF LOADING FOR A REVOLVER I LOAD LOW TO MEDIUM,IF LOADING FOR A SEMI AUTO I WILL LOAD 25RDS MEDIUM AND TEST FIRE.I WILL CONTINUE UNTIL I GET THE SLIDE TO CYCLE. I DON'T LOAD TO MAX. AND NEVER NEVER OVER MAX. IN MY OPINION THESE COMPANY SHOULD PUT OUT LOAD DATA BUT THEY DON'T.
DON
__________________
"Don't worry be happy"
|
05-14-2009, 08:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Generally I've found a 20% reduction of a jacketed load gives a good start point for a lead bullet of the same weight and a load at 10% reduction or the start load for a jacketed bullet usually achieves the same velocity with lead as the jacketed bullets maximum velocity.
|
05-14-2009, 08:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Greenville, Texas
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
What is your goal: achieving combat effectiveness or achieving target accuracy?
If you are worried about excessive pressure in a high-speed combat load, then you can rest assured that pressure will be less with a lead bullet than with a jacketed bullet over the the same powder charge because the barrel friction is less with a lead bullet than with a jacketed bullet.
If you're working up an accuracy load, use less powder with lead than with jacketed bullets because the softer lead will not hold the rifling as well as the jacketed bullet will at higher velocities.
The above holds for typical velocity ranges, biut be careful at the extremes of low and high velocity. At very low velocity, a jacketed bullet may stick in the barrel (fail to exit), while at very high velocity, a lead bullet may expand when entering the forcing cone--possibly cracking the forcing cone.
|
05-14-2009, 08:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve C:
Generally I've found a 20% reduction of a jacketed load gives a good start point for a lead bullet of the same weight and a load at 10% reduction or the start load for a jacketed bullet usually achieves the same velocity with lead as the jacketed bullets maximum velocity.
|
Sorry I am a bit lost on that??
I understand the start load of jacketed achieves about the max velocity of jacketed with lead.
Is your 20% reduction of the maximum jacketed value??
I am only looking for mild target loads for 40 sw. So if my load data for 180gr fmj is 4.1. gr start would I use this also for 180 gr lfn.?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-15-2009, 07:44 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,801
Likes: 18,533
Liked 22,417 Times in 8,275 Posts
|
|
I refer to my "Cast bullet handbook" by Lyman for lead loads. For swagged bullets, I refer to the mfg's data.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
05-15-2009, 08:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by H Richard:
I refer to my "Cast bullet handbook" by Lyman for lead loads. For swagged bullets, I refer to the mfg's data.
|
Do you by chance have data for a a 40SW 180gr cast using HP38 or Win 231??
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-15-2009, 09:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,209 Times in 2,174 Posts
|
|
"Rules of thumb" are generalities that are usually but not always true.
The safe way is to use data from at least one, preferably two, loading manuals.
There are some nasty surprises lurking out there that can damage your gun or you.
__________________
Science plus Art
|
05-15-2009, 06:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OKFC05:
"Rules of thumb" are generalities that are usually but not always true.
The safe way is to use data from at least one, preferably two, loading manuals.
There are some nasty surprises lurking out there that can damage your gun or you.
|
Very true and I agree, but what does one do when the data for a specific lead bullet can not be found?
This is why I posted a request here.
The "closest" I have is from Lyman for a 175 gr lead bullet.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-15-2009, 06:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,209 Times in 2,174 Posts
|
|
You REALLY need to convince Mama she needs a chronograph for her birthday........
__________________
Science plus Art
|
05-15-2009, 09:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OKFC05:
"Rules of thumb" are generalities that are usually but not always true.
The safe way is to use data from at least one, preferably two, loading manuals.
There are some nasty surprises lurking out there that can damage your gun or you.
|
There in is the problem. There are so many diff. styles & variations of lead bullet, you just aren't going to find printed data. I have found that a sim. bullet profile & wt. bullet in lead, needs a 5%-10% reduction to achieve sim. vel. as a jacketed bullet. It will vary a bit w/ the speed of the powder, but that is how it seems to work for me over my chronograph.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
|
05-16-2009, 08:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 623
Liked 1,000 Times in 414 Posts
|
|
Do you by chance have data for a 40SW 180gr cast using HP38 or Win 231??[/QUOTE]
The closest I can come to what you want is with a 175gr cast lead bullet. My Lyman manual shows:
a starting charge of 4.3gr of 231 at 863fps and a max charge of 5.8gr at 977fps.....seated at 1.125" OAL
__________________
Where we go one, we go all
|
05-16-2009, 12:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by parisite:
Do you by chance have data for a 40SW 180gr cast using HP38 or Win 231??
|
The closest I can come to what you want is with a 175gr cast lead bullet. My Lyman manual shows:
a starting charge of 4.3gr of 231 at 863fps and a max charge of 5.8gr at 977fps.....seated at 1.125" OAL[/QUOTE]
Thanks, I have that manual also and is what I am going with. I'll load some up at 4.3 grs and see how they function.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
05-18-2009, 01:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OCD1:
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve C:
Generally I've found a 20% reduction of a jacketed load gives a good start point for a lead bullet of the same weight and a load at 10% reduction or the start load for a jacketed bullet usually achieves the same velocity with lead as the jacketed bullets maximum velocity.
|
What I'm saying is that a start load or 10% reduction off a jacketed load should be considered maximum for lead. Therefore the start load for a lead bullet would be another 10% reduction off that maximum which is a 20% reduction from the jacketed data.
Sorry I am a bit lost on that??
I understand the start load of jacketed achieves about the max velocity of jacketed with lead.
Is your 20% reduction of the maximum jacketed value??
I am only looking for mild target loads for 40 sw. So if my load data for 180gr fmj is 4.1. gr start would I use this also for 180 gr lfn.?
|
|
05-18-2009, 07:14 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,085
Likes: 10,798
Liked 15,512 Times in 6,798 Posts
|
|
OK, Thanks.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|