Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2009, 01:06 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

I know that "rule of thumb" is not a exact way to go about things, but is there a general percentage to lower the amount of powder when comparing a lead bullet to a jacketed of the same weight?
Lead usually requires less powder, yes?
So if there is no load data for a lead bullet do you just use the start load of a jacketed of the same weight?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2009, 03:22 PM
cmort666's Avatar
cmort666 cmort666 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OCD1:
I know that "rule of thumb" is not a exact way to go about things, but is there a general percentage to lower the amount of powder when comparing a lead bullet to a jacketed of the same weight?
Lead usually requires less powder, yes?
So if there is no load data for a lead bullet do you just use the start load of a jacketed of the same weight?
Starting loads tend to be VERY mild. You won't have overpressure, but be careful of squibs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-14-2009, 04:34 PM
Cary Cary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OCD1:
I know that "rule of thumb" is not a exact way to go about things, but is there a general percentage to lower the amount of powder when comparing a lead bullet to a jacketed of the same weight?
Lead usually requires less powder, yes?
So if there is no load data for a lead bullet do you just use the start load of a jacketed of the same weight?
That is what I have been doing and it seems to work for me. I will usually run some of those first loads over my chronograph to get an indication of where I am at concerning bullet speed. If all looks good I will adjust my powder charge from there.
Cary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-14-2009, 04:49 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

Yes, that sounds logical but unfortunately I do not have a chroo. Maybe next Christmas.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:19 PM
Snapping Twig's Avatar
Snapping Twig Snapping Twig is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 527
Liked 3,814 Times in 1,243 Posts
Default

Using cast bullets .001 over bore size, typically after working up for safety reasons, all else being equal, I use the same powder charge as a jackedted bullet and take the extra velocity (@ 100fps) as an end result with lead.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:18 PM
HAWKEYE10's Avatar
HAWKEYE10 HAWKEYE10 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MURFREESBORO TN.
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 90
Liked 402 Times in 177 Posts
Default

I HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. I LOOK AT THE SAME WEIGHT JACKETED OR A CLOSE WEIGHT CAST. IF LOADING FOR A REVOLVER I LOAD LOW TO MEDIUM,IF LOADING FOR A SEMI AUTO I WILL LOAD 25RDS MEDIUM AND TEST FIRE.I WILL CONTINUE UNTIL I GET THE SLIDE TO CYCLE. I DON'T LOAD TO MAX. AND NEVER NEVER OVER MAX. IN MY OPINION THESE COMPANY SHOULD PUT OUT LOAD DATA BUT THEY DON'T.
DON
__________________
"Don't worry be happy"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:42 PM
Steve C Steve C is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Generally I've found a 20% reduction of a jacketed load gives a good start point for a lead bullet of the same weight and a load at 10% reduction or the start load for a jacketed bullet usually achieves the same velocity with lead as the jacketed bullets maximum velocity.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:58 PM
ArgMauser ArgMauser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Greenville, Texas
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

What is your goal: achieving combat effectiveness or achieving target accuracy?

If you are worried about excessive pressure in a high-speed combat load, then you can rest assured that pressure will be less with a lead bullet than with a jacketed bullet over the the same powder charge because the barrel friction is less with a lead bullet than with a jacketed bullet.

If you're working up an accuracy load, use less powder with lead than with jacketed bullets because the softer lead will not hold the rifling as well as the jacketed bullet will at higher velocities.

The above holds for typical velocity ranges, biut be careful at the extremes of low and high velocity. At very low velocity, a jacketed bullet may stick in the barrel (fail to exit), while at very high velocity, a lead bullet may expand when entering the forcing cone--possibly cracking the forcing cone.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:59 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve C:
Generally I've found a 20% reduction of a jacketed load gives a good start point for a lead bullet of the same weight and a load at 10% reduction or the start load for a jacketed bullet usually achieves the same velocity with lead as the jacketed bullets maximum velocity.
Sorry I am a bit lost on that??

I understand the start load of jacketed achieves about the max velocity of jacketed with lead.
Is your 20% reduction of the maximum jacketed value??

I am only looking for mild target loads for 40 sw. So if my load data for 180gr fmj is 4.1. gr start would I use this also for 180 gr lfn.?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-15-2009, 07:44 AM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,795
Likes: 18,509
Liked 22,391 Times in 8,268 Posts
Default

I refer to my "Cast bullet handbook" by Lyman for lead loads. For swagged bullets, I refer to the mfg's data.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-15-2009, 08:56 AM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by H Richard:
I refer to my "Cast bullet handbook" by Lyman for lead loads. For swagged bullets, I refer to the mfg's data.
Do you by chance have data for a a 40SW 180gr cast using HP38 or Win 231??
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-15-2009, 09:05 AM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,160
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,205 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

"Rules of thumb" are generalities that are usually but not always true.

The safe way is to use data from at least one, preferably two, loading manuals.

There are some nasty surprises lurking out there that can damage your gun or you.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-15-2009, 06:11 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OKFC05:
"Rules of thumb" are generalities that are usually but not always true.

The safe way is to use data from at least one, preferably two, loading manuals.

There are some nasty surprises lurking out there that can damage your gun or you.
Very true and I agree, but what does one do when the data for a specific lead bullet can not be found?
This is why I posted a request here.

The "closest" I have is from Lyman for a 175 gr lead bullet.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-15-2009, 06:56 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,160
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,205 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

You REALLY need to convince Mama she needs a chronograph for her birthday........
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-15-2009, 09:44 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OKFC05:
"Rules of thumb" are generalities that are usually but not always true.

The safe way is to use data from at least one, preferably two, loading manuals.

There are some nasty surprises lurking out there that can damage your gun or you.
There in is the problem. There are so many diff. styles & variations of lead bullet, you just aren't going to find printed data. I have found that a sim. bullet profile & wt. bullet in lead, needs a 5%-10% reduction to achieve sim. vel. as a jacketed bullet. It will vary a bit w/ the speed of the powder, but that is how it seems to work for me over my chronograph.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-16-2009, 08:17 AM
bluetopper's Avatar
bluetopper bluetopper is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 623
Liked 998 Times in 414 Posts
Default

Do you by chance have data for a 40SW 180gr cast using HP38 or Win 231??[/QUOTE]

The closest I can come to what you want is with a 175gr cast lead bullet. My Lyman manual shows:
a starting charge of 4.3gr of 231 at 863fps and a max charge of 5.8gr at 977fps.....seated at 1.125" OAL
__________________
Where we go one, we go all
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-16-2009, 12:25 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by parisite:
Do you by chance have data for a 40SW 180gr cast using HP38 or Win 231??
The closest I can come to what you want is with a 175gr cast lead bullet. My Lyman manual shows:
a starting charge of 4.3gr of 231 at 863fps and a max charge of 5.8gr at 977fps.....seated at 1.125" OAL[/QUOTE]

Thanks, I have that manual also and is what I am going with. I'll load some up at 4.3 grs and see how they function.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:53 AM
Steve C Steve C is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OCD1:
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve C:
Generally I've found a 20% reduction of a jacketed load gives a good start point for a lead bullet of the same weight and a load at 10% reduction or the start load for a jacketed bullet usually achieves the same velocity with lead as the jacketed bullets maximum velocity.
What I'm saying is that a start load or 10% reduction off a jacketed load should be considered maximum for lead. Therefore the start load for a lead bullet would be another 10% reduction off that maximum which is a 20% reduction from the jacketed data.

Sorry I am a bit lost on that??

I understand the start load of jacketed achieves about the max velocity of jacketed with lead.
Is your 20% reduction of the maximum jacketed value??

I am only looking for mild target loads for 40 sw. So if my load data for 180gr fmj is 4.1. gr start would I use this also for 180 gr lfn.?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:14 AM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight? Load reduction for lead vs jacketed of the same weight?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,082
Likes: 10,795
Liked 15,509 Times in 6,796 Posts
Default

OK, Thanks.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chronograph


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is lead to jacketed or jacketed to lead bad? PeterK Reloading 18 04-03-2017 08:36 PM
Shooting wheel weight lead instead of pure lead in black powder revolver? canoeguy Reloading 12 04-05-2012 09:19 AM
NOW I WANT IT TO KNOW!!! WHAT DO YOU LOAD FOR 357 MAG. JACKETED OR LEAD BULLETS? Swissman Reloading 46 01-22-2012 09:22 AM
.45 ACP: load data for 185gr lead versus jacketed lmcgust Reloading 10 09-09-2011 04:32 PM
Jacketed vs lead fredzo Ammo 3 03-25-2009 11:46 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)