Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2009, 05:17 AM
model 49 rick model 49 rick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA
Posts: 42
Likes: 5
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I am loading 26.0 gr of 748 behind a 55 gr. boat tail bullet in .223. Good load in my AR.

My Hornady 2006 manual indicates a max load of 27.0 gr of 748 for a 63 grain boat tail bullet, so I felt comfortable charging the same 26.0 gr of 748 behind my 62 grain boat tail bullets.

When I did it, the powder crushed down a bit, and there is no loose space in the casing. Is it too heavy a load?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-25-2009, 05:17 AM
model 49 rick model 49 rick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA
Posts: 42
Likes: 5
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I am loading 26.0 gr of 748 behind a 55 gr. boat tail bullet in .223. Good load in my AR.

My Hornady 2006 manual indicates a max load of 27.0 gr of 748 for a 63 grain boat tail bullet, so I felt comfortable charging the same 26.0 gr of 748 behind my 62 grain boat tail bullets.

When I did it, the powder crushed down a bit, and there is no loose space in the casing. Is it too heavy a load?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2009, 06:09 AM
VAdoublegunner's Avatar
VAdoublegunner VAdoublegunner is offline
Member
Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 10
Liked 78 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Does the manual indicate this is a "compressed load"? If so, that's not unusual, particularly since it doesn't seem too compressed.

MORE IMPORTANTLY -- is this military or commercial brass you are handloading? Military brass is generally thicker, therefore has less internal volume. Loading manuals usually make reference to this. Loads should be reduced slightly. However, if max is 27.0 your charge is about a 5% reduction. Make sure OAL is correct for your bullet; too much seating depth will increase pressures too by reducing internal volume.
__________________
" I said, good DAY! "
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2009, 09:52 AM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,653
Likes: 1,820
Liked 5,407 Times in 2,727 Posts
Default

I'm a bit concerned about your comment about compressed loads. I typically use 25.5 gr 748 behind a 69 gr Sierra Match King. In military brass, the powder generally comes up about to the shoulder.

If the 62 gr bullet has a penetrator core, making it longer, you are well advised to drop your initial load and work upward. You may experience higher than expected pressures due to the bullet construction. Can you pick a bullet up with a magnet?

BTW, the military brass is thicker issue is highly questionable with the .223. Still, when working up loads, start low and work up. Do the same when you change components also.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2009, 10:29 AM
model 49 rick model 49 rick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA
Posts: 42
Likes: 5
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Thank You Gentlemen,

I too was a little concerned. It is military brass. 26.0 gr comes up almost to the top of the part that tapers into the case neck. The bullets are the SS109 bullets, and they are significantly longer. I haven't tried a magnet, that would be interesting to know.

I will knock the ones I loaded back out, and reduce the load to 25.5 grams I think. I check OAL on every cartridge. I try to hit 2.630" - 2.640". The manual says nothing about compressed loads on the pages for .223, maybe it's a general note that is somewhere else?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:07 PM
Beans Beans is offline
Member
Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Southern Az Territory, Border County
Posts: 494
Likes: 16
Liked 50 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
I will knock the ones I loaded back out, and reduce the load to 25.5 grams I think
Are you loading GRAINS or GRAMS ????????????????
__________________
Semper FI
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:40 PM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,653
Likes: 1,820
Liked 5,407 Times in 2,727 Posts
Default

I doubt that 25 grams of powder will fit in the case. IIRC, a 10 gram bullet is over 100 grains. Still, have you ever checked your scale with check weights? They're cheaper than a rifle and/or eye.

Rick, I'd back off to 24 grains, load 5 and run them over a chronograph to see what you've got. If you have access to new, unfired brass, try loading in those. Mike the case web diameter just ahead of the extractor groove before and after firing. Expansion of the web more than 0.0005 inches is cause for serious concern.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2009, 03:54 PM
VAdoublegunner's Avatar
VAdoublegunner VAdoublegunner is offline
Member
Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up Want to make sure my rifle doesn't blow up  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 10
Liked 78 Times in 51 Posts
Default

You'd be hard pressed to get 25 grams into an empty 20 ga case!! That would be roughly 1/16 of an entire pound of powder. There are 28.35 grams per ounce. There are approximately 7000 grains per pound.

W748 powder filling the case to the shoulder/neck line sounds about right for military brass, but I agree with backing off a half grain, although if OAL is OK and the weight is correct as 26.0 it shouldn't be a problem normally, except perhaps for SS109 steel core, then backing off is advised.
__________________
" I said, good DAY! "
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2009, 04:10 PM
jjones33 jjones33 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You are going to hear one of Ted's cardinal rule. If you have a question about a load's safety then STOP. I don't know what your load should be and wouldn't advise. It could very well be safe. Call Winchester Powder and ask them. Check a couple more manuals. If you feel like you need to close your eyes when you pull the trigger behind a load then there is a problem.

Just make sure, that's all. Guns are not cheap and hands and eyes are not replacable.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:23 AM
model 49 rick model 49 rick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA
Posts: 42
Likes: 5
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Whoops! Grains - definitely grains. I tried the magnet. It picked the bullet right up. The manual calls 24.0 grains the starting load. I have always felt like I wasted my time when I test the starting load. My practice is always to split the difference between the maximum & starting loads, and then to try something a little more, but still less than the maximum. I use an auto charging column for loading powder, and I have the charging sleeves for 25.0 & 25.5 grains. I'll try 15 of each and go to the range on Saturday. If they aren't too bad, I might even keep a few of the 26.0 grain loads and try them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
223, 640, cartridge, chronograph, commercial, extractor, hornady, military, sig arms, winchester


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
doesn't make sense erreertt Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 6 12-29-2013 11:26 PM
Why doesn't SW make a 9 ? S&W357 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 12 03-21-2013 02:08 PM
S&W doesn't make a .22 revolver like this... AirCommando Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 16 01-27-2013 03:30 PM
Smith doesn't make 'em like they used to... PALADIN85020 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 18 05-14-2010 12:35 PM
S&W doesn't make their own barrels? Malysh S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 9 03-01-2010 09:58 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)