Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading
o

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2009, 10:25 PM
79ipa 79ipa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default screaming snumb loads .38 spec?

I have seen where some people have pushed 158 grain lswc to 1040 in a .38 special. I would rather shoot 125 grainers or even 140 out of a 17/8 or 2 inch snub. My question is could a 125 or 140 be safely pushed to say 1200 or even 1275? On second thought could someone publish a copy of speer number 8 in .38 special for me? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2009, 11:35 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
Default

Perhaps the Hodgdon online data will be of use to you.
Cartridge Loads - Hodgdon Reloading Data Center - data.hodgdon.com

Speer only posts loading updates online.

When you look at published velocities, please realize that barrel length is critical, as is type of barrel. Also some "estimated" data is optimistic.

Having a chronograph is very educational, especially when testing loads in various barrel lengths with different types of powder. I mostly use HP38/231 in .38 Special, although there are several medium-speed powders that work. It is not very rewarding to try to use very slow powders in .38 Special to achieve high velocites.

One problem with .38 Special is that the SAAMI pressure limits for +P is only 20K PSI, and if you want to load .357 pressures and achieve .357 velocities, it is best to use a .357. Slow powders like Win 296 can be loaded in a .357. While I find shooting a max velocity .357 out of a 3" barrel unpleasant, there is no denying it gets the bullet moving fast.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2009, 12:05 AM
Treeman Treeman is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 392
Likes: 5
Liked 60 Times in 44 Posts
Default

1200fps from a snub at SAAMI pressures isn't really doable. There are some old data loads that came in around 1100 fps with 125s in a snub.Were they safe? Thousands got shot without blowing up the users guns but you are wandering alone in the desert witth such loads nowadays. With current data 125s are lucky to reach 1000fps from a snub.......but they are plenty scary to be on the receiving end of at 900fps.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2009, 12:43 AM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 10,447
Liked 6,092 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

Treeman's right. One could be said to be having a bad day to be on the receiving end of a 125 grain .38 Special slug traveling at 900 feet per second.

Good hits are golden and bad hits are unfortunate. Don't get too wound up with expansion as the panacea for effective handgun self defense.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2009, 12:53 AM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Not 1200fps out of a snub, but I could see 1000fps running +p w/a slower powder like Longhsot from a snub.
125 GR. HDY XTP Hodgdon Longshot .357" 1.455" 7.0 1228 18,300 PSI
There is even a bit of wiggle room w/ LS too. I have some, & a snub, maybe I'll run some tests.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO

Last edited by fredj338; 08-18-2009 at 12:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:41 AM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Lightbulb You asked, now you are responsible for your actions!

Having knowledge is not the same as having wisdom. Wisdom is the proper application of knowledge.

Here is some knowledge you asked for, don't misuse it or you will prove your lack of wisdom!





Now, with all of this talk of fast bullets out of short barrels going on on the forum in the last few days, it would seem there is an epidemic of folks trying to get themselves blown up.

There are some loads I will not use in an alloy snubbie while they would be quite acceptable in a steel revolver.

If you want to push bullets to levels of days gone by with current data, you may want to look to Vita Vohri(sp) powders and load to their European data. It would seem that they have a higher regard for the durability of their firearms than SAAMI has for ours, even though they are the same firearms!

http://www.lapua.com/fileadmin/user_...oguide2009.pdf

Some of their data for a 158gr LSWC with N340 shows over 1100fps from a 6 1/2" barrel. Might be something to check out!
I know that their older data goes even above that!
Imagine, 158gr LSWC going over 1000fps, in 38spl, unheard of!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2009, 01:20 PM
canoe on the yukon canoe on the yukon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 79ipa View Post
I have seen where some people have pushed 158 grain lswc to 1040 in a .38 special. I would rather shoot 125 grainers or even 140 out of a 17/8 or 2 inch snub. My question is could a 125 or 140 be safely pushed to say 1200 or even 1275? On second thought could someone publish a copy of speer number 8 in .38 special for me? Thanks!

In the early 70s,I used(after working up to)loads from the Speer #8 manual in a number of J frame Smiths.These were all steel frame.I never used them in an aluminum frame gun.

It was more relevant then.Except for a model from an obscure smaller company(security arms,I think),there were no small frame 357 mag snubbies,except for some after market jobs which were questionable.

Unlike many on the forum,I have never felt well armed with a 38 special (I don't want to get into a pointless debate about that).The reason a packed a J frame 38 was because I considered it to be a passable compromise.

That was then and this is now.With several 357 snubbies on the market,there seems to be no great logic behind straining the 38 with loads which still won't equal the 357 magnum.If one chooses to load the 357 below it's capability,that's their decision.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2009, 01:44 PM
TiroFijo TiroFijo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Asuncion, Paraguay
Posts: 76
Likes: 59
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Skip, from the 2006 Vihtavuori manual:

"All of this reloading information has been provided by Nammo Lapua Oy. The data given here were obtained in laboratory conditions following strictly the CIP (Commission International Permanente) June 13, 1990 and November 9, 1993 rules. The listed maximum loads have been determined according to the respective CIP/SAAMI maximum pressure specification, whichever is lower.
These test methods have been deemed to be safe throughout the world. Pressure is measured at the case mouth or from inside the case according to the CIP."

Lab data is one thing, looking at primers and guessing is another
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:21 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Cool ???????????????????????????

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiroFijo View Post
Lab data is one thing, looking at primers and guessing is another
I guess I am too dense to catch what you are meaning. I hope we don't have to go through all that "Speer had pressure testing equipment for the #8" stuff again! Why don't we leave that lay.

In every manual that has been produced for reloading data, there is a section in it on pressure. Detecting the signs for the average reloader is usually spelled out in that section. Do you know what the NEW, #49 Lyman says in it? Sure the same thing that the #48 and #47 and ....... I hope you get my drift. It says, look at the primers and watch for sticky extraction BECAUSE most reloaders don't have pressure equipment!

My inference was simply this: Some folks like to stay in the current data. They also want to have loads that run at maximum velocity. To put both of those things together it would seem that Vita Vhori has the data to do that.

That is the only point I was trying to make with the above post, period.

Now, I must say for myself, it would seem that powders in the same burn rate area of N340 should be able to give you the same kind of performance, give or take a little. That is for me though, not for everyone else.

I'm not going to ask you to believe me with a comparison between two powders. Here is a burn rate chart, one I had nothing to do with, that shows burn rates by company compared to those of another company.

Notice all the powders on the same line with N340 from Vita, please!
GS CUSTOM BULLETS - Burn Rate Chart
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:29 PM
38-44HD45 38-44HD45 is offline
Absent Comrade
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, TX, US
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 2
Liked 49 Times in 30 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by smith crazy View Post
Notice all the powders on the same line with N340 from Vita, please!
GS CUSTOM BULLETS - Burn Rate Chart
Like, for instance, SR-4756?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:50 PM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Excellent link and site Skip!
BTW: Good to be reading you John! (38/44)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:58 PM
Skip Sackett Skip Sackett is offline
Banned
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hoosier Land!
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 587
Liked 576 Times in 307 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by 38-44HD45 View Post
Like, for instance, SR-4756?
You must be a lawyer, can't get anything by you!


Yeah, like SR4756!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:06 PM
canoe on the yukon canoe on the yukon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Skip,

This is not to start an argument.It's a legitimate observation.I noticed in the chart that Longshot is on the same line as 2400.As you know,data is very different between these two.

When all things are considered,one is excellent for heavy shotshell loads and the other for heavy handgun loads.Whenever the two are used in the same cartridge,charge weight,velocity are quite different.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:32 PM
38-44HD45 38-44HD45 is offline
Absent Comrade
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, TX, US
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 2
Liked 49 Times in 30 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canoe on the yukon View Post
Skip,

This is not to start an argument.It's a legitimate observation.I noticed in the chart that Longshot is on the same line as 2400.As you know,data is very different between these two.

When all things are considered,one is excellent for heavy shotshell loads and the other for heavy handgun loads.Whenever the two are used in the same cartridge,charge weight,velocity are quite different.
Good observation and comment. The chart that Skip linked to is a good comparative chart, but there are others that rank powders much more specifically. This one, for instance: Powder Burn Rates

Neither chart accounts for differences in burning/pressure curves or characteristics between powders of near-identical burn rates. For instance, I've loaded lots and lots of ammo with both N-340 and SR-4756 (more with 4756). I've found 340 to be much more brittle and less forgiving than 4756, in every caliber in which I've loaded both, even though it's only slightly faster on the chart.

And thanks, Spot! Good to be read!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:49 PM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default

And that's another one being saved as well 38/44!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-18-2009, 09:38 PM
oldRoger oldRoger is offline
US Veteran
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Citrus County, Florida
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 21
Liked 218 Times in 110 Posts
Default

I like the GSC chart, it is similar to that published by VV which is my mainstay. The consecutively numbered charts always leave a question in my mind since I don’t know what the chart maker does when he has three essentially identical powders. Alphabetize??

A comment, my favorite powders today are the VV powders which I think for my uses have a wonderful range. However, when you consider VV 3N37 and N350, I think you appreciate the problem we face, the question of which is faster seems to be answered: It all depends.
__________________
Ipsis Rebus Dictantitbus
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-19-2009, 01:15 AM
Treeman Treeman is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 392
Likes: 5
Liked 60 Times in 44 Posts
Default

ADI's powder equivalency chart is imformative.....ADI's Smokeless Powders Handloaders Guide
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-19-2009, 04:27 AM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Uhhh! Uhhh! as Officer Toody used to say on "Car 54 Where are You?" another KEEPER!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:59 AM
David Sinko David Sinko is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Liked 375 Times in 217 Posts
Default

To answer the original question, I have been getting 1230 FPS with 122 gr. cast bullets in my 2" 9mm Model 940. If I can safely do this with the 9mm, the .38 Special will at the very least equal that performance with lower pressure or even be able to exceed it. But I am no fan of 125 gr. bullets in the .38 Special and I have never tried it.

There are very good reasons for pursuing heavy handloads in the .38 Special. A steel frame .38 Special like a Model 36 or 60 is the optimum package for a small frame, five shot revolver. Any .357 "snub" will be bigger and harder to conceal and has never caught my interest as a hideout gun. The steel J Frame revolver is much tougher than most people will give it credit. You can easily and safely exceed 1000 FPS in such a revolver with 158 gr. cast bullets. I can do it with jacketed bullets in my Ruger but have not yet tried it with my Model 60. There is plenty of discussion about heavy charges of SR4756 and 158 gr. cast bullets and my experiences at the chrono indicate that the velocity figures given are attainable. Whether you feel the pressure levels are safe is something you can debate all day long.

All said and done, I prefer my 9mm 940 shooting 147 gr. Gold Dots at 1070 FPS. I prefer the moonclipped 9mm cartridges over the slight ballistic advantage of the .38 Special.

Dave Sinko
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-23-2009, 12:39 AM
Sourdough Sourdough is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I was told, many years ago, the maximum pressures listed for just about every cartridge would decline as the weapons which chamber it grow older and possibly deteriorate as a result. As old as the .38 SPL is, does it make any sense that a "Max" pressure listed in the books could be quite safe for a modern, even J Frame, revolver? I have wondered about that for years!
__________________
-30-
Fred
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-23-2009, 11:12 AM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,236
Likes: 9,331
Liked 8,820 Times in 2,555 Posts
Default

Quote:
I was told, many years ago, the maximum pressures listed for just about every cartridge would decline as the weapons which chamber it grow older and possibly deteriorate as a result. As old as the .38 SPL is, does it make any sense that a "Max" pressure listed in the books could be quite safe for a modern, even J Frame, revolver? I have wondered about that for years!
So, you were told that (cared-for) steel noticeably deteriorates with age over time periods measured by humans' lifespans? I think you need to talk to a metallurgist, amigo, to dispel that nonsense (which is what it is).

I know where you're coming from, though, Sourdough: I can't begin to tell you all the horsehockey that folks have told me over the years. When the people wrap themselves in the mantle of an expert, it's hard for a person outside the field to know what's what and to realize when the "expert" is full of it. (Don't get me started on "experts" and the topic of "one-shot stops," for instance! ) Anyhow, I sincerely urge you to talk to someone who knows about metal - that's nonsense that you were told.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-23-2009, 12:30 PM
Jerry in SC Jerry in SC is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Upstate
Posts: 465
Likes: 150
Liked 93 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Since most of us don't have access to pressure testing equipment, I remain skeptical that exceeding loading manual velocities by a significant margin is safe with powders available to handloaders.

John Barsness (formerly of Rifle and Handloader) wrote an article some time back on pressure testing. He tested loads using a major ammunition company's test lab equipment and technician. There were some loads that exhibited no classic pressure signs in his rifles, that were far exceeding maximum pressure recommendations.

His advice, and it makes sense to me, is that maximum pressure corresponds closely with maximum velocities in the loading manuals.

Keep in mind that every firearm is an example of one.

Last edited by Jerry in SC; 08-25-2009 at 08:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-23-2009, 05:25 PM
grendelbane grendelbane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sourdough View Post
I was told, many years ago, the maximum pressures listed for just about every cartridge would decline as the weapons which chamber it grow older and possibly deteriorate as a result. As old as the .38 SPL is, does it make any sense that a "Max" pressure listed in the books could be quite safe for a modern, even J Frame, revolver? I have wondered about that for years!
Strange that 9x19mm cartridges haven't dropped pressure drastically over the years, even though they are about the same age as the .38 Special.

I guess I am lucky, my reduced recoil tolerance keeps me out of trouble with lightweight revolvers.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-24-2009, 10:44 AM
Treeman Treeman is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 392
Likes: 5
Liked 60 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Grendelbane, Ironically 9x19 started out in this country downloaded from the standards of its country of origin. Lugers were almost universally reliable with German military ammunition but had funtioning problems with US commercial ball.-Our makers dropped product average pressures for a safety factor and created substandard ammo for P08s. Of course 9mmx19 remains a "high pressure" pistol cartridge. I suspect that 9mm+P is simply loaded to the original pressures.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:43 PM
Sourdough Sourdough is offline
Member
screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec? screaming snumb loads .38 spec?  
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
So, you were told that (cared-for) steel noticeably deteriorates with age over time periods measured by humans' lifespans? I think you need to talk to a metallurgist, amigo, to dispel that nonsense (which is what it is).

No, I think it had more to do with the fact corrosive primers and poor care caused lots of good weapons to deteriorate. Although, if you've been around the Forum awhile you've maybe read some of the discussions about the improvements in metallurgy which have come about in the last half century, let alone going back to the early years of the smokeless powder era. Some of the steel used back in the early 20th century seems hardly stronger than second hand Hershey Bar wrappers!

Whichever; when folks are putting their company's name on reloading data they tend to err on the side of safety. The first time I was warned to reduce pressure in old revolvers came in answer to a letter I wrote back in the '60s to the Lyman folks asking whether it would be OK to duplicate 9mm data in .38 S&W carts being used only in modern revolvers chambered for that cartridge.

The question was prompted by the fact the gun shop in town had a few nearly new S&W revolvers (as well as a lot of old, rusty ones) chambered for .38 S&W for sale for less than similar used .38 SPL revolvers. I thought maybe I could buy a nice gun in an unpopular chambering and save a few bucks.

I think the letter was passed around among the reloading department staff from the way the response was worded. Wish now I had kept it but I was a teenager and never thought to hang on to a negative response letter.

I was told not to proceed. They "could not" give approval for such a plan because of the unknown factors including how carefully I would prepare the ammunition, the condition of the firearm in which I would fire it, and the possibility someone might load an old weak revolver with my ammunition with disastrous results. The fellow said maximum loads are normally reduced in older cartridges due to there being old guns around which were no longer safe to shoot the original loads, and by no means should one increase their power. But he did say it sounded like an interesting idea!
__________________
-30-
Fred

Last edited by Sourdough; 08-25-2009 at 09:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
340, 357 magnum, 38spl, 940, cartridge, chronograph, commercial, j frame, military, model 60, ruger, sig arms, snubnose

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would like when my M&P .38 spec. was made and if it is safe to shoot target loads. snuffy51 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 20 09-09-2015 09:33 PM
Range report - 148 grain, .38 spec loads elpac3 Reloading 22 10-30-2014 03:12 PM
8in BBL 38 spec loads jhde69 Reloading 6 03-16-2013 06:54 PM
Hvy. bullet .38 Spec. loads? WyoStillhunter Reloading 21 04-03-2011 09:09 AM
Someone is screaming in the woods! USAF385 The Lounge 18 05-05-2010 02:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)