I purchased some LSWC bullets, 200 gr, and tried loading some for my 1911. This is my first attempt at non-jacketed bullets. I used the Speer reloading manual and the recommended OAL is 1.185". When I seat the bullet to this length the rim of the bullet is below the rim of the brass leaving an edge. The bullets will not load consistently, about every third one hangs up and crinkles the brass on the leading edge. My brain says to leave the bullets longer to eliminate the rim, but not sure what the results will be. The bullets that cycled and fired were very accurate, so I believe I'm onto something good here.
http://smith-wessonforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3509&stc=1&d=1251072611
The three on the left are unfired, the three on the right show where the brass jammed.
Thanks for any advice or opinions.
Terry
Terry,
In loading LSWC's I have found that the base to shoulder dimension is the relavant issue. Your 200 gr. SWC has a profile similar to the old Star 185 gr. LSWCHP for which a 0.935" base to shoulder length provided excellent functioning. That being said if you have a barrel which has not been relived for SWC's you will not obtain reliable functioning.
Tony
I just checked the LSWC I have, using an over-all length of 1.250 results in a base to shoulder length of .930". I've loaded about 700 at that OAL, and fired around 250 rounds. A couple of FTF, but overall happy with the rounds, and they're very accurate. When I load next time I'll leave them a snicker longer.
Thanks for the input.
+1 on post #38;
The SWC design needs to fit the mag. and feed up the ramp.
A lot more problems than the old RN Ball ammo, in working right.
As for measurements on bullet cylinder (body) stick out, from the case,
you can use the height of a Dime for starters.
A lot of Pistols need the correct OAL and FPS to work.
I gave up trying them in my 9mm but the RN coated worked well.
Just that the WC makes a nice hole in targets that can be seen
and scored easier.