|
|
01-10-2010, 07:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sonoma/Marin Counties, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Gun show find, lots of pics
__________________
~ S&WCA No.2159 ~
|
01-10-2010, 11:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 201
Likes: 17
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
SWEET !!!!!!
__________________
millbilly
|
01-10-2010, 11:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 1,279
Liked 3,344 Times in 570 Posts
|
|
What a gun that is. Sorry I know very little about these.
|
01-11-2010, 12:13 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,701 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
Now that I have seen this, I think I want one.
I believe your identification is correct: New Model No. 3 Target model in .32-44 caliber, a special target cartridge designed at the behest of C.I. Paine and introduced in this model in 1887. According to Roy Jinks' History of Smith & Wesson, this model was terminated with serial number 4333, so your gun is one of the last ones made. If I am reading the book correctly, the factory was still selling this gun from available stock as late as 1910.
If I owned this gun, I would letter it. It is a beauty. I take it the holster came with it? Are there any markings on the leather that would help identify the manufacturer?
__________________
David Wilson
Last edited by DCWilson; 01-11-2010 at 12:15 AM.
Reason: Fix Paine's name
|
01-11-2010, 12:55 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,701 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
Paine bead sight
And note that the front sight is a Paine bead sight. If the .32-44 and .38-44 versions of this gun came into being at Paine's urging, I wouldn't be surprised to find that the standard sight on those calibers was the one Paine developed. (But of course other front blades were available and could be ordered.)
__________________
David Wilson
|
01-11-2010, 01:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windham, Maine
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 47
Liked 621 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Great gun! Love the serial number too.
|
01-11-2010, 01:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sonoma/Marin Counties, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Any idea as to it's value?
__________________
~ S&WCA No.2159 ~
|
01-11-2010, 09:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sonoma/Marin Counties, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
To clarify, my Dad has not purchased this gun yet. He asked me to post the images he took to this forum to get you guys's opinion of what I thought the gun was and to see what would be a reasonable price for the gun. The seller hasn't set a price and want's my Dad to make an offer. My Dad doesn't want to insult him with a lowball and he doesn't want to overpay massively either. Any advice on what a reasonable offer would be is greatly apprecaited.
PS. The gun was shipped in 1905 according to RJ.
__________________
~ S&WCA No.2159 ~
|
01-11-2010, 09:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 2,515
Liked 1,682 Times in 703 Posts
|
|
I know you want to know value & I honestly have no idea. If your Dad purchases the gun, the worn patina is a feature of it's history as an antique & you don't want to clean it off. I don't know how it would respond to wax sealer, so I'll leave that to others. I'd just rub down everything with a soft patch & gun oil to leave a film.
Russ
|
01-11-2010, 10:00 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,701 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
I think value is going to be subject to the supply and demand picture. There weren't many of this model made (and probably fewer in this caliber), but if there are more guns than there are collectors of NM3's in .32-44, the price will stay low.
I would offer $300, maybe $350, to get the ball rolling. If the seller wants over $500, I would thank him for his time and walk away. But that's just me. Others may value it either more or less highly than I do.
__________________
David Wilson
|
01-11-2010, 10:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 2,515
Liked 1,682 Times in 703 Posts
|
|
It's a beauty. Clearly out of my league. I PM'ed some search results. Hope this helps,
Russ
|
01-11-2010, 11:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sonoma/Marin Counties, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Thanks guys, I'll pass the info along. I keep trying to get Dad to sign up on the forums and I may have convinced him tonight. So maybe in a few days he'll be able to tell you about the gun himself.
__________________
~ S&WCA No.2159 ~
|
01-12-2010, 01:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 132
Likes: 17
Liked 134 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Man, for $500 I'd but that right now. I think that's a very desirable pistol in a pretty rare caliber.
I'd honestly value it higher that that.
|
01-12-2010, 08:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 368
Liked 1,171 Times in 373 Posts
|
|
I know nothing about these and some very wise people have alrady given their opinions here but the standard catalog has these valued a lot higher than what's been mentioned. Exc $5000, Fine $2000, VG $1100, Good $750 and doesn't this fall in there somewhere? And doesn't get rated with a little less leniency because of it's age? And the catalog lists some guns with serial numbers in the 5000's as being shipped in 1879 so this could be older than that. And it also mentioned 9 new model number 3's being shipped to Ira Paine as he was mentioned earlier in this thread.
I agree that I would make this one mine for $500 easily, but I am not always very smart with my money.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|