|
|
02-03-2017, 01:09 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
This one is still one of my favorites......US Military & S&W Collide!
Being a U.S. Military and S&W collector.....this 1st Model US Schofield has always been one of the favorites in my collection......
The ammo is an original and full box of FA Schofield ammo dated 1878 and the 2-hole holster is original and period correct.
I also have the original leather belt, buckle and cartridge pouch around here someplace.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
Last edited by THREEDFLYER; 02-03-2017 at 01:11 AM.
|
The Following 25 Users Like Post:
|
bcowern, bigwheelzip, Breakaway500, Club Gun Fan, Dennis, diggler1833, growr, Hunter Keith, Jebus35745, jleiper, jpage, ki5mc, model17, Model25Man, mrcvs, ol777gunnerz, opoefc, Qball, red9, Shark Bait, shouldazagged, sw44russ, torizus, VNK971, wolffgun |
02-03-2017, 07:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Whiskey Hill Ma.
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 16,218
Liked 9,121 Times in 1,980 Posts
|
|
More photos please... I love S&W Schofields. Nice accessories too!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-03-2017, 10:37 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 4,131
Liked 9,492 Times in 1,464 Posts
|
|
More photos
A while back I also owned a 2nd Model CIVILIAN Schofield, which has the revised latch as you can see in the photo. The 2nd Model is on the left and the change on the latch was designed to give the soldier something better to grasp when opening the action.
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-03-2017, 10:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Whiskey Hill Ma.
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 16,218
Liked 9,121 Times in 1,980 Posts
|
|
Nice bookends. I'm fairly new to the Schofield study..wasn't the first model an iron frame and the second steel? I thought I read that somewhere..recently. Wonderful pair..I would have a hard time splitting them up..
|
02-03-2017, 11:08 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 701
Likes: 919
Liked 1,926 Times in 331 Posts
|
|
Now that is just cool! Congratulations finding all of those accoutrements to go along with the Schofield too. I have begun to do the same with a couple of my older revolvers but it becomes a dangerous game... need a holster...need the ammo...need a knife to go with it. Thank you for sharing!
|
02-03-2017, 11:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,349 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
It is stated in Roy's book that the 1st Model was iron frame. I have also read that the Americans used steel frames, but since the Schofield is a later gun, wouldn't both models have been some type of steel? I wonder if it is just the definitions we are dealing with. Certainly there was some early "steel" out there that were not much better than iron??
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
02-03-2017, 11:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Whiskey Hill Ma.
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 16,218
Liked 9,121 Times in 1,980 Posts
|
|
It could very well be just definitions. Some irons are better suited than steel for some applications,even today. I'd like to own one of each model Schofield some day..
|
02-03-2017, 01:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
|
|
Just another one my wish list. That would be a favorite of mine, too.
|
02-03-2017, 01:38 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 313
Likes: 60
Liked 416 Times in 146 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
It is stated in Roy's book that the 1st Model was iron frame. I have also read that the Americans used steel frames, but since the Schofield is a later gun, wouldn't both models have been some type of steel? I wonder if it is just the definitions we are dealing with. Certainly there was some early "steel" out there that were not much better than iron??
|
It is my understanding that all No. 3 frames except the 2nd model Schofields were made of iron, not steel. This prompted a mechanical change requested by the Russians - a steel firing pin bushing was added to strengthen that area of the frame on all Russian contract revolvers. This change was added into American production between serial numbers 6466 and 6744.
IMG_8454.JPGDSCN0770a.jpg
Early American and 1st Contract Russian
Joe
Last edited by jleiper; 02-03-2017 at 01:45 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-03-2017, 02:46 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
Nice set up, Tom!
Do your cartridges have any markings on them? I have a couple of loose rounds, copper case, internal priming, grooved cannelure just above the rim, look like yours as best as I can see. No markings on any of them.
My First Model was refinished before I got it. S/N 584.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Two favorites
|
cgspapa |
S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present |
1 |
05-30-2014 07:31 PM |
M&P - One of MY Favorites
|
italiansport |
Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols |
0 |
05-07-2014 07:09 AM |
a few of my favorites
|
mjk5757 |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
3 |
01-01-2013 04:17 PM |
Two favorites
|
OIF2 |
S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 |
8 |
05-25-2012 02:16 PM |
Favorites
|
Stinger4me |
The Lounge |
3 |
03-12-2009 02:49 PM |
|