Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Antiques
o

Notices

S&W Antiques S&W Lever Action Pistols, Tip-Up Revolvers, ALL Top-Break Revolvers, and ALL Single Shots


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2012, 09:30 AM
shep854's Avatar
shep854 shep854 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 578
Likes: 358
Liked 273 Times in 156 Posts
Default S&W Compared to Colt

In looking at a photo of the "Schofield" revolvers compared to SAAs, I noticed that the S&W seems to sit much lower in the hand than the Colts.

Does this affect the "shootability", particularly muzzle flip?

At some point I want a "Western" revolver, and the Smith is attractive, not only for its uniqueness, but also the ease of reloading and possible reduced flip.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2012, 10:13 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,916
Likes: 3,028
Liked 14,263 Times in 5,435 Posts
Default

As much as it pains me to state this, the Colt SAA has long been considered as the most shootable revolver ever made, both in terms of balance and overall pointability.

Having said that, I own reproductions of both Colt SAA and S&W Schofield, both in 45LC. I enjoy shooting the Schofield best, mostly because it is quick to reload and it is the only one at the range. Accuracy is pretty much a wash, with both performing well.

If shooting Black Powder, the Colt normally will shoot more rounds before the residue stops the cylinder advance and the Colt is easier to clean, but I still like the "different" look of the Schofield better. I just wish someone would make a reproduction American.

Last edited by glowe; 01-02-2012 at 11:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2012, 10:19 AM
shep854's Avatar
shep854 shep854 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 578
Likes: 358
Liked 273 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Thanks; I've shot neither. That needs correcting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2012, 10:22 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,916
Likes: 3,028
Liked 14,263 Times in 5,435 Posts
Default

. . . oh I probably should add that you can buy two Uberti Colt SAAs for the price of one Schofield.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2012, 11:04 AM
shep854's Avatar
shep854 shep854 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 578
Likes: 358
Liked 273 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe View Post
. . . oh I probably should add that you can buy two Uberti Colt SAAs for the price of one Schofield.
Good point, but like you said, the Schofield is different, in a good way! This being a Smith & Wesson site, one could say one Schofield is worth two Ubertis!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2012, 06:10 PM
McShooty McShooty is offline
Member
S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 348
Likes: 71
Liked 405 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Hmmmmm...A Schofield in the hand is worth two Ubertis in the bush?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2012, 08:06 AM
twaits's Avatar
twaits twaits is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windham, Maine
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 47
Liked 620 Times in 142 Posts
Default

I used to have a short barreled Uberti Schofield and I liked It quite a bit. Overall I liked it better than the SAA in look and feel. I think the lines are more elegant. They look great cocked (when they are the repro that actually has the firing pin on the hammer)
I sold mine because I only invest in the old stuff now. And it eventually drove me nuts that the hammer was serrated and not knurled...and that it was in .45 Colt and not .45 S&W
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-2012, 08:46 AM
BearBio BearBio is offline
Member
S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 4,913
Likes: 3,226
Liked 6,813 Times in 2,543 Posts
Default

I shoot both, same caliber and pretty much same barrel length, as well as Rugers and Ubertis. All are pretty much a wash. (Unless using heavy loads but then those get shot only in the Rugers). The Schofield is neat looking, though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:29 AM
Driftwood Johnson Driftwood Johnson is offline
SWCA Member
S&W Compared to Colt  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Liked 968 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Howdy


I have agree with glowe. Although I love Smiths, there is no single action revolver that points as well as a Colt SAA. Period.

As far as ease of shooting is concerned, the distance to the hammer spur on a Schofield is a bit longer than with a Colt. This means you have to stretch your thumb out a bit longer to reach the hammer to cock the gun.

As far as muzzle flip, unlike a Russian or a New Model #3, the Schofield grip is rounded, very similar to a Colt. The 'knuckle' on the grip of a Russian model or New Model #3 helps prevent the muzzle from rising in recoil. Here is a link to a page that shows the various types of #3 Smiths and how they are all a bit different.

Smith and Wesson Model Three revolver information

The design of the Colt SAA grip goes back to the Model 1851 Navy Colt. It is designed to roll in the hand under recoil. Pretty much the same with a Schofield. When held tightly these grips will transfer all of the energy of recoil to the hand, and it can get uncomfortable. If allowed to roll in the hand, some of the energy of recoil gets slowed down as the gun rolls, and recoil becomes more manageable. If shooting the same cartridge loaded to the same specs, both of these guns will roll pretty much the same with pretty much the same amount of muzzle flip.

Muzzle flip is not necessarily a bad thing. One can use it to facilitate cocking the hammer for the next shot, particularly if the stretch to the hammer is a long one, or if the shooter has short thumbs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2012, 10:36 AM
shep854's Avatar
shep854 shep854 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 578
Likes: 358
Liked 273 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone. I'm reading and heeding--and still wanting a Schofield!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-04-2012, 11:59 AM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt S&W Compared to Colt  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
Default

I have never been able to shoot a SAA style of revolver well, as the natural "roll" of the recoil with the grip shape prevents me from getting a consistent grip, and prevents me from geting decent accuracy. But I guess when the accuracy goal was "angle of man" at 20 feet it wasn't too important. The S&W Hand ejector grip shape provides just the consistency needed to shoot well.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cartridge, colt, ejector, hand ejector, russian, s&w, saa, schofield, serrated, smith and wesson, uberti

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DA/SA on SW 915 compared to M&P9 vboy36 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 22 06-06-2016 08:01 AM
You just THINK you had a bad day, compared to this guy! tom turner The Lounge 7 07-30-2014 08:40 PM
Value of Colt Compared to S&W? alde Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 6 06-26-2013 07:34 PM
S&W Triple Lock Compared to Colt New Service rhmc24 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 31 01-09-2012 11:29 AM
M&P 45C compared to G36 ToddS112 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 2 02-13-2009 08:19 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)