|
|
08-25-2016, 04:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Factory Rework
Apologies if this has been done to death, I have a No.3 Target in 32-44 which has in my opinion been refinished.
There is a rework star on the butt, put there after the refinish, the date under the grips is 11/10.
I have known this revolver for some time before I acquired, it so 2010 would be out of place?
There was a thread some time ago that stated the S&W ceased rework on these guns in the 60's (I think) but search as I might, I cant find it.
Any comments?
|
08-25-2016, 04:56 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,840
Likes: 3,258
Liked 7,109 Times in 1,894 Posts
|
|
Yes, a star means it was serviced at the factory, but that could be for anything. It is possible it was sent to the factory in November of 1910 for something other than refinishing and refinished later. It could also be that it was refinished in November of 1910.
Please post photographs.
|
08-25-2016, 05:18 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,349 Times in 5,471 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum. Any replaced exterior part would require a refinish so the gun would look uniform. I also think that the factory might refinish a worn gun that came to them for any reason to impress the customer with the thorough job they do.
Lots of variation in stamping parts occur on the older repairs, but often a replaced part would have a diamond stamp on the part replaced. If a new barrel was installed, many times it would be stamped with a diamond somewhere on the replaced part. Look the gun over for any stamps other than the standard serial numbers rib, etc.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
08-25-2016, 05:34 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,593
Likes: 3,710
Liked 8,948 Times in 3,555 Posts
|
|
Photos would help. Sounds like work done in November of 1910.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
08-25-2016, 10:15 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Inman, SC USA
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 95
Liked 649 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
I have a nickled .32-44 target that was sent back to S&W for a complete refinish and re-work in June of 1956. The only re-work marking are the date stamps on the left side of the frame under the grips, and the numbers are so small that a magnifying glass is needed to read them. It has no re-work stat stamped anywhere, but the barrel is a much earlier serial number than the frame and cylinder.
__________________
Tom
1560
|
08-26-2016, 03:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Factory Rework
First off thank you for your replies and apologies to all, rework date 10.11, had a senior moment.
The reason I am curious, is the type of finish applied to the gun, it is what I would associate with the modern hot blueing process, rather than the Carbona method used by S&W in period.
Finish is 99% plus, tight lock-up, bright bores and all matching numbers.
The rework star has raised edges, the serial number not, and I cannot find any diamond mark.
So did S&W use this method of bluing in 1911?
I have attempted to post photos, but they are not brilliant, the logo for example looks a lot deeper in the flesh.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-26-2016, 09:54 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,796
Likes: 18,511
Liked 22,399 Times in 8,270 Posts
|
|
It is my understanding that S&W will not work on any gun that is not Model Marked, and then only back to about the 70's time frame as they have no parts to fit anything older. It may be even more restricted by now. The thought that S&W refinished that in 2010 just isn't feasible.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
08-26-2016, 12:10 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 922
Liked 9,949 Times in 3,657 Posts
|
|
I am quite certain the original/old bluing process was used in 1910---would go so far as to wager a substantial sum on it.
As an aside, I am also quite certain the <> mark sometimes found on reworked guns was not in use at that time (but no bet on that one). As a related aside, I can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt the use of the <> mark does NOT indicate a replaced part----at least not each and every time. The bottom line is these marks meant something of value to the folks who put them there at the time they put them there. ALL of our not so scientific wild guesses as to what they meant are just that.
Ralph Tremaine
And on the off chance that anybody KNOWS, are (were) barrels removed from frames (of hand ejector revolvers) when refinished by the factory?
Last edited by rct269; 08-26-2016 at 12:14 PM.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|