Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Antiques

Notices

S&W Antiques S&W Lever Action Pistols, Tip-Up Revolvers, ALL Top-Break Revolvers, and ALL Single Shots


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2016, 05:46 PM
RevolverScout RevolverScout is offline
Member
smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question  
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question

I am looking into purchasing a smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) in 38S&W.

Is there a limit to bullet weight/powder load for this revolver?

I hand load for my Webley Mark 4 with the correct, 38/200 British military round with Hi-Skor 700x, could this gun accept that cartridge?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2016, 06:10 PM
Jim Watson Jim Watson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 40
Liked 1,394 Times in 772 Posts
Default

I would load for the Smith with the proper .38 S&W 146 grain bullet.

One of the old writers, Henry Stebbins or Elmer Keith, maybe, recounted blowing the latch right off a topbreak with .38 S&W Super Police with that 200 grain bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-22-2016, 07:36 AM
RevolverScout RevolverScout is offline
Member
smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question  
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Just looked-up the differing powder loads for the 38s&w from my Lyman book.

Hi-Skor 700x produces the following:

150gr bullet = 2.1gr-2.4 grs of powder, 677-734 fps, 9,100-12,500 C.U.P.

195gr bullet = 1.4gr-1.6gr Powder, 482-544 fps, 7,900-12,200 fps.

Besides the recoil, shouldn't the heavier bullet be less straining on the gun due to the lower pressure? (This is for a 4th model, btw)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-22-2016, 08:56 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is online now
US Veteran

smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,966
Likes: 3,047
Liked 14,349 Times in 5,471 Posts
Default

Outside of the style of top latch in the 1st Model, I can find little difference in overall design or materials between the Antique and "Modern" 32 or 38 Safety revolvers. The theory that on January 1, 1899 all revolvers were changed to accept the new smokless powders is false. Nothing changed and both will work fine with standard loadings of 38 S&W.

For all of the 38 S&W history, the standard bullet was 146g LRN. I pick reloading recipes that keeps the velocities at around 550 - 650 fps. As a benchmark, I have chronographed original black powder 38 S&W and they average 740 fps. Standard factory loads from Winchester, Remington, etc. run between 600 - 700 fps. Unfortunately, there are some heavy 38 S&W loads on the market from Buffalo Bore and I would not shoot them in any top-break, so be careful in your purchases.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2016, 02:29 PM
RevolverScout RevolverScout is offline
Member
smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question  
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

So it is the recoil from the 200 gr bullet which will potentially damage the latch?
(Since the velocity and pressure are both lower than the lighter bullets)

Does anyone have direct links or sources to anyone who has tested this?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2016, 02:45 PM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
STCM(SW) STCM(SW) is offline
US Veteran
smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question smith & wesson safety hammerless (New Departure) Caliber Question  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,596 Times in 3,227 Posts
Default

I load the 38 S&W with a 160 gr bullet with Trail Boss in my top break S&W.
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.32 Safety Hammerless, New Departure, 1st Model rayj101 S&W Antiques 21 01-24-2021 01:28 PM
Safety Hammerless vs. New Departure.... gmborkovic S&W Antiques 11 03-27-2016 09:44 PM
Help with New Departure Safety Hammerless .32 bostrander98 S&W Antiques 1 10-29-2014 01:35 PM
1888 Smith Wesson 32 Hammerless Departure steven sarasky S&W Antiques 2 01-18-2011 09:43 PM
S&W Safety Hammerless, New Departure, 1st Model rayj101 S&W Antiques 5 01-12-2008 11:55 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)