Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Antiques
o

Notices

S&W Antiques S&W Lever Action Pistols, Tip-Up Revolvers, ALL Top-Break Revolvers, and ALL Single Shots


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:06 PM
short short is offline
Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Olympic Peninsula
Posts: 57
Likes: 24
Liked 75 Times in 23 Posts
Default British conversion of Safety Hammerless

Thought those of you who appreciate Lemon Squeezers might find this entertaining. It's a 4th Model 38 that was shipped to C. Osborn, Birmingham, England, in 1907. It has two sets of proofs, apparently when it arrived, and then after it was converted by A.G. Parker to 22 rimfire. I later got a personal letter from his daughter who verified the time frame.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1121.jpg (137.9 KB, 97 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1120.jpg (103.6 KB, 99 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1123.jpg (90.8 KB, 111 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:40 PM
shouldazagged shouldazagged is offline
Absent Comrade
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,386 Times in 11,801 Posts
Default

Very cool indeed.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2017, 01:26 AM
cblcar cblcar is offline
Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 42
Likes: 216
Liked 50 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Thank you for sharing the photos of your Lemon Squeezer. Does it shoot .22 Long Rifle ? Can you tell what hammer modifications were done to allow for rim fire ? Does it eject the emptys normally when the action is opened ? Do you know if this was a common conversion at this time period ? A very interesting gun.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-05-2017, 11:59 AM
short short is offline
Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Olympic Peninsula
Posts: 57
Likes: 24
Liked 75 Times in 23 Posts
Default

I've had it about 20 years; fired a cylinder full at that time. 22 LR, standard velocity. Worked merrily. A new firing pin bushing was fabricated and installed, overlapping the original one. If you look carefully, you can see the extra cross/retaining pin below the original. Can't tell you how common or uncommon it might have been. Always seemed to me that converting the smaller 32 model would be more logical. This particular model came back to the US via Canada. I'm guessing after WWII.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2017, 04:24 PM
short short is offline
Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Olympic Peninsula
Posts: 57
Likes: 24
Liked 75 Times in 23 Posts
Default Yes, it shoots.

If this is a duplicate message, pardon me. Still learning the buttons.
While not marked other than "22 Caliber " I did fire standard velocity LRs in it 20 years ago. If I shoot it again, it will be with CB caps. I often wondered why a 32 model wouldn't have made more sense, but I think the cylinder might have been too short.
New firing pin bushing in location for rimfire overlaps the original. It was a lot of work.
Returned to the US via Canada.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-05-2017, 05:58 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
Absent Comrade
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

Did the daughter confirm the conversion was to circumvent the English gun confiscation laws regarding any .38 cal handgun ? Ed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-05-2017, 09:00 PM
short short is offline
Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Olympic Peninsula
Posts: 57
Likes: 24
Liked 75 Times in 23 Posts
Default British Lemon Squeezer

I'm not sure where my replies are going, but I'll keep at it. I'm also not sure what sort of British confiscation efforts might have been in effect in 1907; I just figured there must have been a demand, real or imagined, for a sturdy, pocket size 22 revolver. Apparently Mr. Parker was doing quite a bit of lining work. Miss Emily Parker was in her nineties when she took the time to respond to my inquiries. She also advised that the Blitz took care of all their records.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 09-05-2017, 09:33 PM
JSR III's Avatar
JSR III JSR III is offline
SWCA Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,575
Likes: 3,695
Liked 8,924 Times in 3,545 Posts
Default

It may just be the photo or my monitor but the photo of the rear face of the cylinder appears to show hammer strikes on the center most portion of the charge hole. A photo showing the hammer face might be interesting.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-05-2017, 11:27 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
Absent Comrade
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,536
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

If the 2nd set of proofs (Birmingham?) was for the conversion, what time period does the 2nd set reflect ? Is it before when A.G.Parker became part of Parker & Hale? Ed.

Last edited by opoefc; 09-06-2017 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:30 PM
short short is offline
Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Olympic Peninsula
Posts: 57
Likes: 24
Liked 75 Times in 23 Posts
Default

You are correct JSR. The poor thing has been around a long time, and, I suspect, played with by children and/or adults. The firing pin was broken when I first obtained it, so I had the opportunity to examine the conversion. Hopefully you can see from the photo how the new fp bushing overlaps the original.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1129.jpg (72.8 KB, 42 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1128.jpg (105.4 KB, 39 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 09-08-2017, 01:38 PM
THREEDFLYER's Avatar
THREEDFLYER THREEDFLYER is offline
SWCA Member
British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless British conversion of Safety Hammerless  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 4,065
Liked 9,396 Times in 1,441 Posts
Default

That is a very interesting piece indeed, thank you for sharing!!
And excellent background in those last photos......I am envious!
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.38 Safety Hammerless brazosdave S&W Antiques 15 04-17-2017 10:37 AM
S&W Safety Hammerless 5th? Bull8721 S&W Antiques 3 02-05-2017 11:39 AM
Another .32 Safety Hammerless hsr S&W Antiques 6 09-29-2014 08:18 AM
32 Safety Hammerless cipher1300 S&W Antiques 6 08-26-2014 08:23 PM
Safety of the Safety Hammerless design Dragon88 S&W Antiques 0 07-08-2012 11:06 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)