Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Antiques
o

Notices

S&W Antiques S&W Lever Action Pistols, Tip-Up Revolvers, ALL Top-Break Revolvers, and ALL Single Shots


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2021, 04:04 PM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default 2 in. SA .38

Does anyone have a 2nd model Single-action .38 with a factory 2 inch barrel? (Not chopped down.)

Just curious if they are out there &/or how many are out there.

Books
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2 in SA 38 2nd.jpg (51.2 KB, 185 views)
File Type: jpg 2 in SA 38 2nd closeup.jpg (50.3 KB, 160 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 02-21-2021, 04:20 PM
cgt4570's Avatar
cgt4570 cgt4570 is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 1,620
Liked 3,176 Times in 932 Posts
Default

The book lists 3-1/4" as the shortest barrel for the .38 SA Second Model, but anything is possible.
Odds are high that the barrel is from a later .38 DA or .38 Safety (or swapped by the factory, even). Is there a star in front of the SN on the bottom of the grip frame to indicate a factory re-work?
The SN on the barrel is very tiny and stamped between the 'ears' inside the barrel latch.
Lift the latch and look on the flat inside with a magnifying glass.
It should match the butt SN.
If it's blank or different, then it didn't ship that way.
Now if it matches, that one is definitely worth investing in a factory letter.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292

Last edited by cgt4570; 02-21-2021 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 02-21-2021, 06:02 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,916
Likes: 3,028
Liked 14,263 Times in 5,435 Posts
Default

Could you provide a closeup picture of the patent dates or copy them in a post? Curious what the September date is? The presence of a side patent date stamp indicates that it should be a factory 2" barrel, but from what model is the question? As noted above, make sure you look for a serial number on the very rear of the top rib between the ears where the latch pivots upward.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515

Last edited by glowe; 02-21-2021 at 06:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2021, 07:23 PM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default

All of the numbers match. Even the barrel.

Can't get any closer. Dates match what is normally on the top.

No star that indicates a factory re-work but the letter says:

* shipped July of 1884 to M.W. Robinson (surprise, surprise.)
* 4 inch barrel, nickle, black hard rubber grips.
now the fun:
* "The 2-inch barrel was added after they became available in the late 1890s."

Based on my observation, it is clearly a factory barrel.
The last line of the letter 'implies' that it is a factory re-barrel, but doesn't actually say it.

Does anyone out there is Smith & Wesson collector land have one?

Books

Last edited by Books; 02-21-2021 at 09:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 02-21-2021, 07:41 PM
gmborkovic gmborkovic is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,644
Likes: 469
Liked 5,697 Times in 3,186 Posts
Default

Mr. Books, aint sold yet, but wanna be. Neat snub.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-21-2021, 07:53 PM
applefish applefish is offline
Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 34
Likes: 10
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Default

The 32 S&W lemon squeezers had a 2" bicycle gun variation where they stamped the barrel similarly, so it there was definitely a market for snub-nosed top breaks back in the 1890's. On those guns, they also stamped the barrel markings on the side of the barrel instead of the normal location on top of the barrel rib.

Quote:
* "The 2-inch barrel was added after they became available in the late 1890s."
The standard catalog also lists that bicycle guns were available for the .38 Safety Hammerless 5th Model (1907-1940).
So 2" barrels were made for 38 S&W, but were they interchangeable with the baby russians?

What's most puzzling is how the serial number on the barrel matches, if the letter shows it was originally shipped out with a 4" barrel.

Last edited by applefish; 02-21-2021 at 07:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-21-2021, 10:04 PM
BMur BMur is offline
Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 1,780
Liked 4,511 Times in 1,658 Posts
Default Patent dates

It’s a great looking short barrel but I guess you have to ask yourself if Smith & Wesson would install a barrel on a much earlier Single Action frame with patent dates that refer to later double action improvements? That’s a tough one to get around.

Murph
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2021, 10:09 PM
mrcvs mrcvs is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 3,219
Liked 6,869 Times in 1,863 Posts
Default

Well, if the 2" barrel became available in the late 1890's, and your firearm shipped in 1884, then it cannot be original to the gun. I believe Smith & Wesson becan stamping rework dates on the frame during the first decade of the 20th Century. I want to say the earliest guns with such dates that have been identified have the two digit year of 09, meaning 1909, but it might have been a few years earlier than that. Which means that your barrel was installed before restamping of dates became commonplace or, if later, the frame escaped restamping.

Can you provide good photographs of the barrel serial number so we can determine if the numbers appear to be factory in origin?

You might want to contact the SWHF to see if they have information on when this might have been done. I have a revolver with the star on it but no date, for some unknown reason, and they still provided me with a multitude of information on the work done on the firearm, this being in the autumn of 1929.

However, without any documentation to prove any of this, it makes it difficult to assign a value to this, other than to someone who might find it to be "neat" and pays a price that reflects outside later modifications.

Last edited by mrcvs; 02-21-2021 at 10:11 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 02-21-2021, 10:09 PM
cgt4570's Avatar
cgt4570 cgt4570 is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 1,620
Liked 3,176 Times in 932 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by applefish View Post
So 2" barrels were made for 38 S&W, but were they interchangeable with the baby russians?

What's most puzzling is how the serial number on the barrel matches, if the letter shows it was originally shipped out with a 4" barrel.
That's a .38 SA Second Model, NOT a Baby Russian. The 1st Model 'Baby Russians' have an extended under lug and used a different extractor mechanism.

I agree with above comments that it's definitely a factory 2" barrel. I have a .38 'lemon squeezer' with factory pearls with the same barrel.

Since it has a matching barrel SN, then it must have been installed by the factory. My best guess is that it was sent back for the snub barrel, but somehow failed to get a star or date stamp.

I have a cut down near twin, though. I got it cheap due to a barrel bulge past 2". I cut it down and installed a front sight with silver solder in a slot I cut. Yes, it's cut into the pat. info, but it's still a neat little pocket gun.

I'd check with the SW Historical Foundation to see if they might have service records or communications for it.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 02-21-2021, 11:16 PM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default

The Historical Foundation 'History Letters' only cover the years 1920-1966.

So I'm out of luck there.

I appreciate the feed-back I'm getting here. I really hoped someone would have a similar specimen.

Books
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-21-2021, 11:37 PM
mmaher94087 mmaher94087 is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 4
Liked 2,494 Times in 1,296 Posts
Default

books, it's not a known variation and I'll admit that I'm skeptical, but the matching serial numbers makes it one in a million. But, as said, I'm a non-believer and until some documentation is provided, I can only speculate that someone was incredibility lucky enough to find matching serials between two .38 caliber DA/SA models. I hope that I'm proven wrong.
__________________
Mike Maher #283
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-22-2021, 10:08 AM
first-model first-model is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1,002
Liked 2,322 Times in 774 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaher94087 View Post
books, it's not a known variation and I'll admit that I'm skeptical, but the matching serial numbers makes it one in a million.
I agree Mike ... it's not a known variant ... but the factory did all sorts of wonky things back in the day, and I suspect there are a lot of "one off" guns out there. Could have been as simple as something cobbled together with some left over parts. Given that these were frugal Yankees, they would have happily sold anything that they could push out the door.

I think the chances of having found two guns with the same serial numbers—and then deciding to cobble them together into some sort of mutant—is right around zero.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-22-2021, 10:38 AM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default

You all have got me thinking. So...

To find the same SN on a different pistol and install it on a SA 2nd model would require finding SN 84XXX.

SN 84XXX would be a 2nd model DA made from 1880-1884. No 2in barrels.

or

a 3rd model Safety Hammerless. Two inch barrels are very rare (about 12) and the latch system would not be compatible.

So....I conclude that the 2nd model SA .38, serial number 84XXX left the factory in 1883 as a 4 inch barrel and was returned sometime in the 1890s and a 2 inch barrel was installed.

Comments please.

Books
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 02-22-2021, 10:54 AM
first-model first-model is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1,002
Liked 2,322 Times in 774 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Books View Post
So....I conclude that the 2nd model SA .38, serial number 84XXX left the factory in 1883 as a 4 inch barrel and was returned sometime in the 1890s and a 2 inch barrel was installed.
Off the top of my head it seems like the most logical explanation—which, given the limited historical documentation on this gun, may be the closest you'll ever get.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-22-2021, 12:06 PM
mmaher94087 mmaher94087 is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 4
Liked 2,494 Times in 1,296 Posts
Default

Agree. Also, the roll marks appear to be those used on the 1st Model .32 Safety Hammerless. The address is stopped after 'Mass' which truncates the second line at 'Oc' (October) and the dingbat (Maltese Cross) is missing on the right end of the address. Interesting revolver.
__________________
Mike Maher #283
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-01-2021, 03:08 PM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default

The markings of the side of the barrel are:

Smith & Wesson Springfield Mass
20 77. Dec 187[?]. May 11 80. Sept 11 83. Oc

Which appears to be the same as the top of the barrel markings on a 1st model .32 Safety Hammerless - if you erase the last (right) 5/8s of an inch.

I have tried to get a closer look at the markings.

Books
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2nd SA ultra close.jpg (42.7 KB, 39 views)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-01-2021, 04:15 PM
BMur BMur is offline
Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 1,780
Liked 4,511 Times in 1,658 Posts
Default Modified Barrel address

Hi Books,
I sent you a pm....

I'm convinced it's real. I'm convinced the gun was sent to the factory some time in the late 1880's to early 1890's and a special order short barrel was added....

Smith & Wesson began special orders or to be more accurate, altered production, in about 1887 when they started including longer barrel length options. That's documented. Prior to that time they actually printed in their catalogs they did not manufacture special features or altered production. Only those features offered. A very strict standard.

All of that changed in the 1887 timeframe....In fact a lot of historical changes took place in that same year....Very important year for Smith & Wesson. Reloading kits changed to the improved kit that included insulated wood handles on the molds to keep up with industry standards...Totally different from the earlier kits....The bullet designs took a radical change from outside lubricated to inside lubricated and the company now suddenly offered very long barrel lengths "AND" included a Target variation of the New Model 3! That's a lot of change for one year!

This abbreviated barrel address not only dates to the correct period but makes perfect sense for a special order 2" barrel. How exactly does one fake that barrel address? The stamp is a focus on relevant patents only and is very unique.

This is a 38 cal barrel also. It's not a 32cal. Just because it doesn't have a star next to the serial number isn't proof that it didn't go back for a short barrel....When exactly did they start using the "Star" signifier? as a procedure or denoting a rework? I'd say confidently that it wasn't until much later.

It's too bad this work was not recorded for some reason but it does not in the least bit surprise me. It could also have been done between 1887-1890 and could represent a very early special order when procedures were in their infancy.

I have a 2" short barrel 38 Colt lightning that has factory features that do not make sense. The wrong front sight, that was discontinued 5 years prior from standard production. A shortened etched panel that was suspect at the auction I attended....but "it lettered"....Without that letter, nobody was believing it was real...In fact, the factory letter was not listed as part of the auction....I bid on it because I believed it was real...It was just too well done to be fake in my view at that time when I actually looked at it at the preview.

It wasn't until I went to pick up the gun that the 1972 factory letter suddenly showed up....I was beside myself with relief and couldn't wipe the smile off my face...



Murph

Last edited by BMur; 03-01-2021 at 04:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 03-01-2021, 07:57 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
Default

This is how the .32 Bicycle gun was marked.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 03-01-2021, 08:49 PM
mmaher94087 mmaher94087 is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 4
Liked 2,494 Times in 1,296 Posts
Default

Books, looks legit for a factory re-barrel to the two inch. The barrel markings are the same as used on the right side of the 2", .32 Safety Hammerless. Are there any date marks on the left frame under the stocks? Very neat revolver.
__________________
Mike Maher #283
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-02-2021, 01:47 AM
BMur BMur is offline
Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 1,780
Liked 4,511 Times in 1,658 Posts
Default Special order

I'd be willing to bet that this short barrel was part of a small order of guns for a special purpose. When you compare this to my 2" Colt lightning....Colt offered a 2 1/2" barrel length at that time...Just like Smith & Wesson offered a 3 1/4" barrel. Why bother ordering a barrel length that's only 1/2" less or in your case 1 1/4" less? My factory letter proves it was one of 5 ordered and shipping in January of 1888 to a major distributor in New York. So, with a special order often there was a special purpose for, in this case , the shorter barrel length. It wasn't just personal preference.

There are others out there.

Several years ago I also saw a 2 1/2" barrel double action 2nd model 38. I remember it had that side barrel address also but it's been too long now. I can't remember the details but I remember believing it was real. I bid on it but was too low. One of those regret moments in collecting that you never forget?

When you think about what it would have cost to replace the revolver as compared to sending it back to Smith & Wesson for a re-barrel? I think the re-barrel would have been a more viable option.



Murph

Last edited by BMur; 03-02-2021 at 02:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-02-2021, 03:37 PM
Dosgatos Dosgatos is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 916
Likes: 175
Liked 633 Times in 152 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaher94087 View Post
Books, looks legit for a factory re-barrel to the two inch. The barrel markings are the same as used on the right side of the 2", .32 Safety Hammerless.
Things are never quite always the same when it comes to S&W. Here's my .32 Bicycle Gun with the markings on the LEFT side of the barrel.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bicycle 5.jpg (109.4 KB, 15 views)
__________________
Peter #2091
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-02-2021, 04:44 PM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default

And for what it's worth:

A lettered (1923) 2 inch 5th model .38 Safety Hammerless; with no patent markings at all.

Books
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2in5thND.jpg (60.4 KB, 9 views)

Last edited by Books; 03-02-2021 at 04:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-02-2021, 04:47 PM
Books Books is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 213
Likes: 203
Liked 323 Times in 105 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaher94087 View Post
Books, looks legit for a factory re-barrel to the two inch. The barrel markings are the same as used on the right side of the 2", .32 Safety Hammerless. Are there any date marks on the left frame under the stocks? Very neat revolver.
There are no markings on the frame under the stocks at all.


Books
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-02-2021, 06:03 PM
first-model first-model is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1,002
Liked 2,322 Times in 774 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Books View Post
There are no markings on the frame under the stocks at all.
I'm voting for a factory re-barrel done after-the-fact. The service records may or may not exist in the S&WHF records that haven't yet been digitized ... but I simply don't see someone else cobbling together a barrel with roll marks like that.

In any event, it's a nice looking piece.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-02-2021, 09:16 PM
mmaher94087 mmaher94087 is offline
SWCA Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 4
Liked 2,494 Times in 1,296 Posts
Default

OK, I choked badly. The roll marks are on the LEFT side of the barrel on the 1st Model, .32 Safety Hammerless. Anyone that's been around me knows I have troubles with right and left and this was no different. Anyone need directions to the store???
__________________
Mike Maher #283
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-02-2021, 09:33 PM
BMur BMur is offline
Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 1,780
Liked 4,511 Times in 1,658 Posts
Default Major Distributor?

Actually,
There is one other possibility. It's also very possible that this person walked into a Major Distributor in Say New York and asked them to put a 2" barrel on it for them. Major Distributors had a huge stock pile of parts for all guns available. they would purchase parts directly from the factory.

The Distributor could have placed the Order for the barrel only with Smith & Wesson some time after 1887 when they were more willing to meet special orders. That would also fit since there is no record of the work done. Perhaps that is what Mr. Jinks was trying to say in the letter.

However, that doesn't answer the question regarding the "matching serial number"....so.... I guess we go back to the question regarding the die stamps on the barrel serial number.....Do they match the die stamps on the rest of the gun? If they do then it's definitely factory....If they don't then it's likely and early Distributor in house job.


Murph

Last edited by BMur; 03-02-2021 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-03-2021, 05:15 PM
BMur BMur is offline
Member
2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38 2 in. SA .38  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 1,780
Liked 4,511 Times in 1,658 Posts
Default Major Distributor Part II

If we look through period catalogs?

As an example these photos taken from The Schoverling, Daily & Gales Major Distributor catalog CIRCA 1892

You can clearly see that they maintained a complete stock of parts for many guns of that period. There are several more pages of shotguns, rifles, and pistols of all makes and models.

Notice they also stocked the rare 8” & 10” barrels available for all 32 and 38 cal SA & DA top breaks as well as the scarce 4” barrel for the DA 44’s. So anything is possible from the Major Distributor in New York at that time frame.

They most definitely had qualified on site gunsmiths that could have easily made any alterations requested by a client. From my research they also had indoor ranges For a potential client to actually test fire firearms prior to purchasing.

I would imagine that the parts would have had NO serial number. So, did the Distributor number the part to match? I have no idea.

Murph
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)