|
|
12-21-2021, 01:05 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Alabama
Posts: 679
Likes: 5,769
Liked 2,986 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
Model 91 6" Barrel - Gun Show Find
Traded into this Model 91 that I know very little about. SN# 3829. I've done some searching on the forum, read several detailed posts, but would like to know more about this single-shot 22 caliber jewel.
The frame and latch serial numbers match but no numbers on barrel. The front sight is unusual and I'm guessing modified.
Looking forward to comments.
Thank you!
Ray
|
The Following 15 Users Like Post:
|
Boulder350, desi2358, iby, kryten67, lihpster, mikeruns, Moo Moo, mrcvs, nicky4968, ol777gunnerz, Protocall_Design, SS336, tt66, Vidd, Wiregrassguy |
12-21-2021, 01:07 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Alabama
Posts: 679
Likes: 5,769
Liked 2,986 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
More pictures
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 01:17 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,025
Likes: 8,999
Liked 48,771 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
Do you know where to look for the barrel number?
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 01:25 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,025
Likes: 8,999
Liked 48,771 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
Also-
the front sight is an ivory bead that was fairly common back in the day. Is it marked Lyman?
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 01:28 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,431 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
It appears to me to be a Second Model Single Shot. No recoil shield and grooved on the side of the receiver. It was made between 1905 -1909 and s/n range of 1 to 4617. It was available in 10" and on special order 8" and 6".
Yours appears to be in very nice condition, and the 6" barrel might have a little premium over the standard 10" barrel. They were available in a "Olympic Chamber", (where you had to press the round into the chamber the last couple 1/10ths of an inch. It was thought to improve accuracy.)
The SCSW4 shows a value of 400 good to 2500 as new. These prices are several years old and I haven't seen any sales lately to see what the current value might be.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 01:37 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Alabama
Posts: 679
Likes: 5,769
Liked 2,986 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
Also-
the front sight is an ivory bead that was fairly common back in the day. Is it marked Lyman?
|
Here are a couple more pictures. I don't see barrel serial number unless I'm looking in wrong place. Also, I didn't see the Lyman sight stamp until you mentioned it and I blew up picture to see it.
Thanks so much!
Ray
Last edited by SFIDEC; 12-21-2021 at 01:41 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 04:39 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,025
Likes: 8,999
Liked 48,771 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
The number should be here-
Higher numbers are often broken up with some on one side and the rest on the other.
It appears that barrel is not numbered.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 06:39 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,075
Likes: 924
Liked 9,972 Times in 3,665 Posts
|
|
My 2nd Model Single Shots sold in the last two years as follows (Gun Broker Auction), condition was comparable to that show here.
10"-------$800
8"--------$1200
6"--------$1750
Ralph Tremaine
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 06:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 14,562
Liked 4,663 Times in 1,200 Posts
|
|
That is very cool. I have never even seen one in the flesh. Not in the pedestrian places I hang out.
Maybe I need to get out more. 😳
How rare are they?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-21-2021, 07:58 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Alabama
Posts: 679
Likes: 5,769
Liked 2,986 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rct269
My 2nd Model Single Shots sold in the last two years as follows (Gun Broker Auction), condition was comparable to that show here.
10"-------$800
8"--------$1200
6"--------$1750
Ralph Tremaine
|
Mercy---That is amazing!
Thanks so much for sharing.
Think I'll run down to McDonalds at get a milk shake.
Make that a double.
Ray
|
12-21-2021, 09:00 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,075
Likes: 924
Liked 9,972 Times in 3,665 Posts
|
|
It's unlikely getting out more is going to be much help. Staying home and reading some books, on the other hand, is very likely to hep immeasurably. The books are Smith & Wesson 1857-1945. It was written by "Neal & Jinks"------both of whom may be considered as having been there and done that. Another one is History of Smith & Wesson----written by the same Jinks as noted above. Another one is Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson-----a more current publication----heavier too.
Now, here's some commentary you're not going to find in any of them. It comes from me----messing around. Someone mentioned the grooves on the side of the receiver. I used to think they were there to break up what would otherwise be a fairly large open space----pure aesthetics----same goes for the grooves on the sides of the 3rd Model. Then there's the treatment of the bottom of the barrel lug on the 3rd Model. It's the same barrel forging as for the 1st and 2nd models, but it needs to needs to be ground flat to fit in the Perfected frame (as modified for single shot use), but it's ground to be a whole lot more than flat. It's ground flat---then chamfered on the entire perimeter, and then treated to an oval depression in the center. I've come to call that "fancy flat". Now I don't know that much about running a milling machine, but it figures it costs more to grind something to fancy flat, than just plain flat. So why'd they do that? What were they trying to accomplish by spending the extra time---and money?
I decided they did it to lose some weight----in certain places. Same goes for the grooves on the side of the receiver. Does that make any sense? We'll see. I hung three 10" single shots (1st, 2nd, 3rd) by the trigger guards on a dowel rod resting on the backs of two chairs. The angle of the dangle (the balance) of all three guns was virtually identical----very likely would've been identical if not for the 1st Model speciman. (It had been shipped to Germany to begin with, and came back with different sights (both front and rear---heavier), and a different mainspring (shorter/lighter). All of this quest for identical balance didn't happen by accident.
The bottom line with these pistols is they won a lot of matches---attracted a lot of attention to Smith & Wesson, and S&W did everything they could to keep it coming.
Ralph Tremaine
Last edited by rct269; 12-21-2021 at 09:03 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-22-2021, 08:52 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 769
Likes: 4,261
Liked 1,570 Times in 415 Posts
|
|
info
It would be interesting to get a factory letter on the pistol. The barrel not being serial numbered will drop the value a bit, but could be recovered if letters as a 6 inch. Either way, a nice find.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|